1. CBPR Conceptual Logic Model: Source
Evaluation/Reflection Focus Group Guide Slides: Community Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model
April, 2012
CBPR Conceptual Logic Model: Source
Adapted from: Wallerstein , Oetzel, Duran, Tafoya, Belone, Rae, “What Predicts Outcomes in CBPR,” in CBPR for Health From Process to Outcomes, Minkler & Wallerstein (eds). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2008); and Wallerstein & Duran, CBPR contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity, Am. J. Public Health; S1, 2010: 100, S40-S46.

2. System & Capacity Changes:
Outcomes
Policies/Practices
Sustained Interventions
Changes in Power Relations
Cultural Renewal
Social Justice
System & Capacity Changes:
Improved Health
& Disparities:
Slide 1: Complete CBPR Conceptual Model
Contexts
Socio-Economic, Cultural,
Geography & Environment
University
CBO’s
Community
Members
Structural
Dynamics
Individual
Relational
Group Dynamics
Equitable Partnerships
Intervention/
Research Design
Fits with Community
Explanatory Models
Attends to
Translation/Implementation
Appropriate Research
Design
National & Local
Policies/Trends/Governance
Historic Collaboration:
Trust & Mistrust
Community Capacity
& Readiness
University Capacity
& Readiness
Health Issue Importance

3. Equitable Partnerships
Slide 2: CBPR Minimal Research Model
Structural
Dynamics
Individual
Relational
Group Dynamics
Equitable Partnerships
Contexts
Intervention/
Research Design
Outcomes

4. Contexts Socio-Economic, Cultural, Geography & Environment
Slide 3: Contexts
Contexts
Socio-Economic, Cultural,
Geography & Environment
National & Local
Policies/Trends/Governance
Historic Collaboration:
Trust & Mistrust
Community Capacity
& Readiness
University Capacity
& Readiness
Health Issue Importance

5. Equitable Partnerships
Slide 4: Group Dynamics
University
CBO’s
Community
Members
Structural
Dynamics
Individual
Relational
Group Dynamics
Equitable Partnerships

6. Translation/Implementation
Slide 5: Intervention/Research
Intervention/
Research Design
Fits with Community
Explanatory Models
Attends to
Translation/Implementation
Appropriate Research
Design

7. System & Capacity Changes:
Outcomes
Policies/Practices
Sustained Interventions
Changes in Power Relations
Cultural Renewal
Social Justice
System & Capacity Changes:
Improved Health
& Disparities:
Slide 6: Outcomes

8. CBPR Conceptual Logic Model
Adapted from: Wallerstein , Oetzel, Duran, Tafoya, Belone, Rae, “What Predicts Outcomes in CBPR,” in CBPR for Health From Process to Outcomes, Minkler & Wallerstein (eds). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2008); and Wallerstein & Duran, CBPR contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity, Am. J. Public Health; S1, 2010: 100, S40-S46.
Contexts
Socio-Economic, Cultural,
Geography & Environment
National & Local
Policies/Trends/Governance
Historic Collaboration:
Trust & Mistrust
Community Capacity
& Readiness
University Capacity
Health Issue Importance
Outcomes
Group Dynamics &
Equitable Partnerships
Intervention
& Research
System & Capacity Changes
Community
Fits Local /Cultural Beliefs,
Norms & Practices
Structural
Dynamics
Agencies
Policies/Practices
Sustained Interventions
Changes in Power Relations
Cultural Renewal
Relational
Dynamics
Reflects Reciprocal Learning
Individual
Dynamics
Appropriate
Research Design
CBO’s
Improved Health
University
Disparities
Social Justice
Contexts
Group Dynamics
Intervention
Outcomes
Structural Dynamics:
Diversity
Complexity
Formal Agreements
Real power/resource sharing
Alignment with CBPR principles
Length of time in partnership
Relational Dynamics:
Safety
Dialogue, listening & mutual learning
Leadership & stewardship
Influence & power dynamics
Flexibility
Self & collective reflection
Participatory decision-making & negotiation
Integration of local beliefs to group process
Task roles & communication
CBPR System & Capacity Changes:
Changes in policies /practices
-In universities & communities
Culturally-based & sustainable
interventions
Changes in power relations
Empowerment:
-Community voices heard
-Capacities of advisory councils
-Critical thinking
Cultural revitalization & renewal
Health Outcomes:
Transformed social /econ conditions
Reduced health disparities
Intervention adapted or created within local culture
Intervention informed by local settings & organizations
Shared learning between academic & community knowledge
Research & evaluation design reflects partnership input
Bidirectional translation, implementation & dissemination
Social-economic, cultural, geographic, political-historical, environmental factors
Policies/Trends: National/local governance & political climate
Historic degree of collaboration & trust between university & community
Community: capacity, readiness & experience
University: capacity, readiness & reputation
Perceived severity of health issues
Individual Dynamics:
Core values
Motivations for participating
Personal relationships
Cultural identities/humility
Bridge people on research team
Individual beliefs, spirituality & meaning
Community reputation of PI