Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Kim M. The Science of Climate Change.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Kim M. The Science of Climate Change."— Presentation transcript:

1 Kim M. Cobb kcobb@eas.gatech.edu @coralsncaves The Science of Climate Change

2 greenhouse gases in the atmosphere trap heat at the Earth’s surface and prevent it from escaping. 1 2 3 4 These gases include: Carbon dioxide CO 2 Methane CH 4 Nitrous oxide N 2 O Chlorofluorocarbons Water vapor H 2 O (this is the most important one, by far!) without greenhouse gases average temp of Earth would be -18ºC instead of 15ºC

3 greenhouse gases trap heat because they absorb radiation in the infrared range, according to specific bond geometries and vibrational modes (ex CO 2 below)

4

5 https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/

6 The “Keeling Curve” (1957-now)

7 the last 1,700yrs

8 the last 800,000yrs

9 The ‘instrumental’ record of climate shows a ~1ºC warming over the last century Source: Hadley Center UK Met Office Jones et al., 1999

10 http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/monitoring/climate/surface-temperature

11 CO 2 range = 200 to 280ppm Temperature range = 5ºC 80 ppm A paleo perspective: glacial-interglacial cycles 5ºC

12 But why hasn’t a +120ppm change in CO 2 resulted in a 5+°C warming?

13 Why do 99.999% of climate scientists believe that CO 2 is warming the planet? 1.Theory predicts that increasing atmospheric CO 2 should warm the planet. 2.Geologic evidence links CO 2 and temperature in the past. 3.The warming is unprecedented in the most recent centuries (dwarfs natural variability). 4.Climate models show that rising CO 2 is necessary to simulate 20 th century temperature trends (solar and volcanic minor players).

14 Ice core climate and CO 2 records tiny gas bubbles in the ice trap ancient air samples

15 Atmospheric CO 2 and temperature over the past 650 thousand years CO 2 and temperature are closely linked on geologic timescales #2

16 To understand how climate has changed in the past, we need to use records of climate preserved in ice cores, ancient tree rings, coral bands, and other “paleoclimatic” sources: key is to CALIBRATE to temperature records

17 The “Hockey Stick” Key Points: error bars increase as you go back in time natural variability accounts for <0.5ºC over the last millennium late 20 th century temperature trend is unprecedented #3

18 The “hockey stick” has been reproduced many times IPCC WG1, 2007

19 You need CO 2

20 Consequences of Global Warming (IPCC SPM-AR4) 1)Reduced uptake of CO2 by land and ocean in warmer climate 2)Rising sea levels (0.3 to 0.6m by 2100)…. at a minimum 3)Ocean pH will decrease by 0.14 to 0.35 (already down 0.1) 4)Snow cover will decrease, permafrost melt, sea ice melt 5)Extreme events (temperature and precipitation) will become more frequent 6)Tropical cyclones will become more intense 7)Storm tracks will move poleward 8)Rainfall will increase in the high latitudes, decrease in the subtropics 9)Meridional overturning of Atlantic ocean will decrease

21 Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change

22 -formed in 1988 by World Meteorological Organization and the United National Environmental Program IPCC’s job: “...to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation. IPCC reports should be neutral with respect to policy, although they may need to deal objectively with scientific, technical and socio- economic factors relevant to the application of particular policies.” Assessment reports in: 1990, 1995, 2001, 2007, and 2013

23

24 831 lead authors 10,000+ comments

25 IPCC pros? IPCC cons?

26 The uncertain CO 2 future Range of CO2 emissions scenarios: Strict international agreements  CO2 at 650ppm by 2100 Mid-ground  850ppm by 2100 Business as usual  1370ppm by 2100 Caldeira and Wickett, 2005

27

28 The uncertain climate future COLORS= different CO 2 paths grey bars= different model responses to different CO 2 concentrations Take-homes: Lower limit: 1°C by 2100 Upper limit: 6.5°C by 2100

29 Projected temperature change: global view Take-homes: -poles warm more -land warms more -ocean warming patchy and complex uneven warming will shift rainfall patterns

30 Diffenbaugh et al, 2005 US http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/nacc/se-mega-region.htm Regional models use global model output, run at high-resolution (5km) grid Length of heat waves increase (# days/event) Peak temperatures increase

31 white = models disagree color = models mostly agree stippled = models agree Projecting precipitation is VERY uncertain business, yet extremely critical to human impacts. Projected precipitation change: global view

32 Projected precipitation change: regional view change in yearly average precipitation # heavy rain days # dry days Diffenbaugh et al, 2005 mm/daydays/yr

33 IPCC says increase in hurricane intensity “likely” (66%)

34 Feely et al, 2012 Increasing CO 2 decreases ocean pH -already measureable as -0.1 pH unit in 30yrs -will continue as atmospheric CO 2 increases -effect on marine calcifiers (corals) uncertain, but adds risk (ex = pteropod exposed to low pH) Orr et al, 2005

35 IPCC AR5, 2013

36 CERTAIN UNCERTAIN Warming of 1-6°C by 2100. Sea levels will rise by 6 to 30 inches by 2100. Oceans will continue to acidify. Precipitation patterns will change. More irregular precipitation. Extreme events will increase, hurricanes more intense. Prospect of abrupt climate change.

37 We have already committed to centuries of climate change

38 Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change

39 -formed in 1988 by World Meteorological Organization and the United National Environmental Program IPCC’s job: “...to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation. IPCC reports should be neutral with respect to policy, although they may need to deal objectively with scientific, technical and socio- economic factors relevant to the application of particular policies.” Assessment reports in: 1990, 1995, 2001, 2007, and 2013

40

41 831 lead authors 10,000+ comments

42 IPCC pros? IPCC cons?


Download ppt "Kim M. The Science of Climate Change."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google