© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Tejas LEE 2010-2014 Grouping: Converting Results into Effective Instruction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The School District of Philadelphia
Advertisements

Steps to Developing an Entry Part Two Module V NJ APA Teacher Training – Module V 1.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Using the PMER &PMBR Overview of Progress Monitoring and the assessments available 1
Advancing Excellence in America’s Nursing Homes A Review of 2 Clinical Tools: Pressure Ulcer and Restraints.
© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Tejas LEE Analyzing Spelling Results 1.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
Tejas LEE Using the Guía de actividades de intervención 1.
Administering the DRA2 /EDL2
1 Using the TPRI Kindergarten.
Developmental Reading Assessment Thompson School District Fall 2012
Intermediate DRA Training
1 To hear narration, please click the avatar in the box above.
Data Analysis Protocol Identify – Strengths – Weaknesses – Trends – Outliers Focus on 3 – Strengths – Weaknesses.
Chapter 10: Spreadsheets Section IV: Using Problem Solving Tools to Enhance Learning.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Atlantic Canada Mathematics Assessment Resource Entry - 3 Introduction to the Resource CAMET (Council of Atlantic Ministers of Education & Training )
©2001 Chariot Software Group Using MicroGrade Classroom Management Software.
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
1 Using the TPRI Second Grade.
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Grade 1.
DAILY MATH SKILLS DMS OBJECTIVES Determine the purpose of DMS Plan for implementation of DMS at our school Understand how DMS will look in the classroom.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
1 Using the TPRI First Grade.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten, Grade 1, and Grade3.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Kindergarten To Third Grade
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Developing the Plan. Tier III Developing the Intervention Plan Developing the Intervention Plan.
Strategies for School-wide Achievement
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
Comprehensive Curriculum Now that I have it, what do I do with it? July 2005.
Spring Literacy Training Kindergarten Spring 2014.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
1 Scoring Provincial Large-Scale Assessments María Elena Oliveri, University of British Columbia Britta Gundersen-Bryden, British Columbia Ministry of.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
District Response to Instruction and Intervention Reflection and Planning.
DRA DEVELOPMENTAL READING ASSESSMENT DeEtte Wick Victoria.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION How can my PSAT score help me prepare for my future?
White Pages Team Grey Pages Facilitator Team & Facilitator Guide for School-wide Reading Leadership Team Meetings Elementary.
Overview of DRA2 (Developmental Reading Assessment) Middle School Presentation Cathy Rosso Stephanie Williams May 2012.
Academic Seminar – Week 6 Lesson Plans & Formative Assessment Graphs.
Beginning of the Year Update
Middle of the Year Update
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Writing and Submitting Student Learning Objectives
Developmental Reading Assessment 2 (K-3)
Session 1, Whole-class Assessments
Grouping Students for Differentiated Instruction
Session 4, Grading Practices
Training Valid for Puzzle Piece Edition
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
Welcome to the Linguistic Instructional Alignment Guide Training
Video 3: Scoring Policies and
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Developmental Reading Assessment
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Developmental Reading Assessment
Curriculum Night 8th Grade Mathematics
Curriculum Night 8th Grade Mathematics
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
P ! A L S Interpreting Student Data to
Presentation transcript:

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Tejas LEE Grouping: Converting Results into Effective Instruction

COPYRIGHT NOTIFICATION The materials in this presentation and in your binder are to be used only for the Trainer of Trainers to facilitate presentation training. The materials in this presentation are copyrighted by the University of Houston and Texas Education Agency and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written consent of the University of Houston and the Texas Education Agency. Furthermore, you may not alter the training materials or the presentation of the materials in any manner. You may not sell or use the materials in any other capacity.

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Module Contents Why Group Students? Class Summary Sheet Features Automated Class Summary Sheets Grouping for Individualized Instruction The Tejas LEE Grouping Charts The Tejas LEE Grouping Mats 3

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Tejas LEE Website 4

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Tejas LEE Grouping Mats 5

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Why Group Students? The Tejas LEE is intended to drive classroom instruction. Grouping allows you to focus your instruction on those skills that each student or group of students need in order to read successfully. Grouping allows you to make efficient use of instructional time. 6

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Class Summary Sheet 7

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Class Summary Sheet 8

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency NI Number and Percentage To calculate the Percentage of students NI: Number of students NI. Total of students in your class x 100 9

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Reading Comprehension Information 10

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Features of the Automated Class Summary Sheet 11

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency BOY View 12

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency MOY View 13

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Additional Features 14

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Printable View 15

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Additional Features 16

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Branching Features 17

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Graphing Features Number of Students NI 18

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Graphing Features 19

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Grouping: Converting Results into Effective Instruction General Ability Grouping Skill Specific Grouping 20

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency General Ability Grouping 21

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency The sections outlined below will assist you in grouping students using the Tejas LEE data.  Prepare the Tejas LEE data for grouping.  Follow the guidelines for differentiated instructional grouping.  Plan Instruction based on needs. Using Tejas LEE Data to Group Students 22

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Sample Class Summary Sheet 23

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency 1. Determine which skills should be taught whole group versus small group. Recommendations: Large Group: 67% or more NI Small Group: 66% or less Guidelines for differentiated instructional grouping 24

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Sample Class Summary Sheet 25

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency 26

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Sample Class Summary Sheet 27

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Sample Class Summary Sheet 28

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Tejas LEE Grouping Chart 29

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency 2. Group student names into the High and Low categories for each skill (do not fill in the Final or Enfoque de instrucción columns). Using the Resumen de la clase, identify students who score as High or Low on each skill. Place their names into the appropriate box. All other names should be placed in the Middle group (this group will eventually be broken into Middle High and Middle Low). Guidelines for differentiated instructional grouping 30

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency The Low Group 31

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency The High Group 32

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency The Middle Group 33

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Sample Class Summary Sheet 34

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency 35

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Helpful Hints When making grouping decisions, look at the raw (numerical) score as well as the performance level. It is often helpful to record the student accuracy score and the actual fluency score to assist with grouping and instruction. 36

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Your Turn Complete the Grouping Chart, all the way across up to and including the Fluency column. DO NOT yet complete the Comprehension, Final, or Instructional Focus columns. 37

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Sample Class Summary Sheet 38

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Grouping for Comprehension 39

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Final BOY Skill Grouping 40

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Enfoque de instrucción 3. Identify students who consistently fall into the Low group across skills. These students’ names should be placed in the Final column for the Low group. Define the instructional needs for this group and write them in the Enfoque de instrucción column. Guidelines for differentiated instructional grouping 41

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Enfoque de instrucción 4. Identify students who consistently fall into the High group across skills. These students’ names should be placed in the Final column for the High group. Define the instructional needs for this group and write these in the Enfoque de instrucción column. Guidelines for differentiated instructional grouping 42

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Enfoque de instrucción 5. Begin to separate students in the Middle group by those who fall into the Middle group across most skills and the Low group on some; and those who fall into the Middle group across most skills and the High group on some skills. These two groups most likely will be the base for your Middle Low and Middle High groups. List the names of these students in the Middle Low or Middle High Final columns. Determine the instructional needs of the Middle Low and Middle High groups and write them in the Enfoque de instrucción column. Guidelines for differentiated instructional grouping 43

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency 6. Some students will not follow the specific patterns discussed above and at this step, you might have some students who have yet to be placed into a Final group. To place these students, examine the instructional focus of your groups and place students into the group their skill levels are most closely aligned with and where the instructional focus will be most beneficial to the student. Guidelines for differentiated instructional grouping 44

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency 7. Once all of students have been placed into Final groups, re-examine your grouping and instructional goals to ensure all student needs are being addressed. You may need to regroup a few students at this stage. Guidelines for differentiated instructional grouping 45

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Final BOY Ability Grouping 46

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Group Activity 47

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Final BOY Ability Grouping Low Middle Low Middle High 48

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency The sections outlined below will assist you in grouping students using the Tejas LEE data.  Prepare the Tejas LEE data for grouping.  Follow the guidelines for differentiated instructional grouping.  Plan Instruction based on needs. Using Tejas LEE Data to Group Students 49

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Skill Specific Grouping 50

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Grouping Mats K-3 51

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Purpose The Tejas LEE Grouping Mats allow teachers to quickly identify appropriate activities for their small group or whole class intervention for every skill assessed on the Tejas LEE. Grouping Mats have room to list students needing help on each skill and allow teachers to check off the activities they use with their students. Tejas LEE Grouping Mats 52

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Kindergarten 53

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency First Grade 54

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Second Grade 55

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Third Grade 56

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Features of the Grouping Mats 57

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Features of the Grouping Mats 58

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Features of the Grouping Mats 59

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Features of the Grouping Mats 60

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Using the Grouping Mats Step 1: Prepare the data on your class summary sheet. 61

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Step 2: Focus on a specific skill 62

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Step 3: Enter all NI student names under the appropriate column. Luis Omar Eddie Fernando Josue Luis Adán Eduardo Omar Camila Eddie Josue Graciela Fernando 63

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Step 4: Pick one or more activities. 64

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Step 5: Go to the Intervention Activities Guide. 65

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Implement Step 6: Implement 66

© 2010 University of Houston and Texas Education Agency Questions & Answers If you have any further questions: contact the Tejas LEE team at check for an answer online at 67