Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update City of Forks June, 2011 Rebekah Gentry Olympic Natural Resources Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restore Lawyer Creek Habitat: Targeting Steelhead and Chinook Salmon.
Advertisements

Protect and restore Deer Creek watershed Protect and Restore Deer Creek Watershed Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries/Watershed BPA Project #28044.
Project Introduction Consists of 9,040 acres of deeded land and 52,000+ acres of state and federal lands. Encompasses 16.6 miles of the South Fork and.
Protect and Restore Little Salmon River Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries/Watershed Program By Chad Fealko.
Acquire South Fork Asotin Creek Property A proposal from the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.
Toppenish Creek Watershed ( ) Yakama Nation Division of Natural Resources.
Restoration of Columbia River Floodplain Functions to Steigerwald Lake
WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council 2007 SRFB & PSAR Grants Project Subcommittee Report & Recommendations July 19, 2007.
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Master Program Update: Process Overview City of Benton City August 30,
Salmon Anchor Habitat and State Forests Presented by Bob Van Dyk and Tom Miewald to the Oregon Board of Forestry September 3, 2008.
2010 Squak Valley Park Restoration Project City of Issaquah.
NMFS BiOp on FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) DeeAnn Kirkpatrick January 22, 2009.
Island County SMP Shoreline Residential Development Workshop December 5, 2011.
Project Slide Show. This 1893 photograph is of the Prather pump in the Shasta River Canyon about five miles upstream of the mouth of the river. Large.
Watershed Update, Kahler, ECF, 6/26/2014. The Kahler Challenge.
Nisqually Watershed Flying for Fish Habitat Tours 2010.
Drainage District #7 Pump Station Retrofits for Safe Fish Passage Ryan Bartelheimer, P.E. Snohomish Conservation District.
Green- Duwamish River Watershed
Dylan Castle Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
County & Regional Context State Parks & Urban Open Space Federal and National Parks - city to wildland social issues of St. Edward park.
Shoreline Master Program Update First Review of Preliminary Draft Shoreline Master Program City of Wenatchee April 15,
Shoreline Master Program Update First Review of Preliminary Draft Shoreline Master Program [Entity] [Month Day, 2009] 1.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Thomas R. Payne & Associates Update on Flood Storage Fish Study Presented by Paul Schlenger, Bob Montgomery, Jim Shannon June 15, 2011.
Atlin/Taku Land Use Planning Forestry Chapter Presentation to Multiparty Workshop #4 June 19, 2009.
Suggested Guidelines for Geomorphic aspects of Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Restoration proposals G. Mathias Kondolf.
Elk Creek Wood Replacement Phase Two Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, 2009 Katie Halvorson.
Montana Forest Stewardship “Empowerment of Forest Owners through Personal Involvement”
Bellevue Planning Commission November 4, Conservation of Lake Sammamish Kokanee An Update on Current Science A Briefing for the City of Bellevue.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Pataha Creek, 10% of Flow, RM 0.1 (L): 67degrees Tucannon River, 90% of Flow, RM 11 (R): 70 degrees.
FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY UPDATES City Council Workshop July 7, 2008.
San Pedro Creek: A Longitudinal Profile Study Andrew Georgeades Anne Jurek Mary Snow.
City of Bellingham Habitat Restoration Master Plan TAG Meeting December 5, 2012 ESA | VEDA Environmental | Northwest Ecological Services.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
Importance of the Lower Wenatchee River in Salmon Recovery* The Lower Wenatchee is a critical migration corridor for all ESA listed species Of the total.
Linking freshwater habitat to salmonid productivity Watershed Program 1 1. NW Fisheries Science Center 2725 Montlake Blvd. East, Seattle, WA
Coos Watershed Association Watershed Restoration Projects.
Flathead River to Lake Initiative Conservation and restoration through a diverse collaborative effort Part I – How it began Part II – Conservation Successes.
Additional Primary Headwater Habitat Stream Parameters.
Ocean Springs. Hazard Mitigation Plan Comprehensive Plan Zoning Floodplain Management Building Codes Land Acquisition Front Beach Master Plan Tree and.
Population - 44,301 18% - Aged 65+ Household Median Income- $29,530 Jan.-March 2004 unemployment 14 % Demographics.
Dungeness Watershed Action Plan Olympic National Forest.
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N The.
Nason Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Development, and road building have affected riparian (streamside) habitat, large woody debris and gravel recruitment.
Lake Roosevelt Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvement Project No Jason McLellan Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation January.
Hangman Creek Fisheries Enhancement BPA Project & Hangman Restoration Project: Wildlife BPA Project
SONOMA CREEK AND SEDIMENT: KNOWING WHAT WE DON’T KNOW MAY 2011.
City of Grover Beach, San Luis Obispo County 1 Grover Beach.
Janes Creek and McDaniel Slough Past, Present, and Future.
 Beginning in the late 1980’s significant loss of forest cover and channelization in the area of Block 72, lead to increased total and peak flows being.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
Side Channel and Off Channel Habitat Restoration Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Side Channel Restoration Dylan Castle.
Tillman Creek Acquisition
Parks and Recreation Commission
Fish Passage Barriers & Salmon Recovery
North Fork Teanaway Large Wood Trapping Implementation
When should you fix a stream????
Thorp Mill Ditch Assessment ( )
Sucker Creek Design Draft
Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids
Micanopy Cultural Center
Leveraging Funding from Other Sources: a Programmatic Approach
FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY UPDATES
When should you fix a stream????
Presentation transcript:

Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update City of Forks June, 2011 Rebekah Gentry Olympic Natural Resources Center

Introduction ► Progress to date ► Today: Review proposed changes relevant to Forks ► We want your input  Corrections to ICR information  Views regarding potential changes  Website access to ICR, Preliminary Elements Reports, & maps

Input Needed ► Focus on Certain Reaches  Bogachiel (Mainstem, Mill Creek) ► Presentation includes all new mainstem breaks although most outside FUGA  Calawah/Sitkum (Mainstem in UGA, Elk 10) ► Presentation includes ELK 20 & Sitkum changes although outside FUGA

Bogachiel System ► Gentle grades, wide meanders, wide floodplain, active channel migration ► 86.2% Closed canopy; 10.1% other vegetation; 3.6% non-forest ► FUGA portion ~1 mile; rural light residential in places, but most lands zoned in timberlands ► Problems: High temperatures, poor LWD, channel incision ► Healthy salmon stocks, good public access

Bogachiel Reaches: Changes to Consider ► Mainstem ► MILL

BOGACHIEL 10: Proposed New Reach ► Active channel migration and erosion zone ► Key spawning habitat ► Riparian cover:  83.6% closed canopy  13.8% other veg  2.7% non-forest ► Current: rural ► Proposed: conservancy

BOGACHIEL 20: Proposed New Reach ► Light residential & forestry ► Riparian cover:  85.9% Closed canopy  10.3% other veg  3.9% non-forest ► Current: rural ► Retain Rural

BOGACHIEL 30: Proposed New Reach ► Current: rural ► Proposed: conservancy ► FUGA segment part of new reach ► Active channel migration and wide floodplain ► Forestry, light residential in UGA

 Does “Conservancy” designation in UGA make sense?  Growth directed in UGA  Consider a new category— ”Scenic Residential” for east shoreline?

BOGACHIEL 30: Proposed New Reach– Upstream portion Meander hazard FEMA Flood zone

BOGACHIEL 30: Proposed New Reach– Upstream portion ► Residential on side of meander & flood zone ► Forestlands on other

BOGACHIEL 40: Proposed New Reach ► Light residential & forestry ► Riparian cover:  92.5% closed canopy  4.2% other veg  3.3% non-forest ► Current: Rural ► Retain Rural

Meander hazard FEMA Flood zone BOGACHIEL 40: Proposed New Reach (Closeup on next slide)

Meander hazard FEMA Flood zone BOGACHIEL 40: Proposed New Reach (Closeup on next slide)

► Residential on west shoreline – meander & flood zone ► Residential & forestlands on east shoreline – larger meander & flood zone

MILL Creek ► Wide floodplain ► Potential wetlands ► 91.8% closed canopy; 8.2% non-forest ► Coho, fall chinook, chum winter steelhead spawning ► Private lands throughout ► 2 segments in Forks UGA: [~0 -- RM.1] & [~RM ] ► Zoning: URL & RW5 -- Low density residential ► Land use outside FUGA: commercial timber ► Proposed: New category– use & protection-- “scenic residential”

Calawah/Sitkum

Calawah/Sitkum ► Most of system flows through ONF lands no longer intensively logged ► 1 mile flows through FUGA: currently rural designation for most ► Salmon runs are healthy ► Elk Creek, Sitkum, & North Fork sub-basins studied by WSC ► Key spawning and rearing habitat ► Riparian: 83.4% closed canopy; 15.2% other natural vegetation, and 4.5% non-forest

Calawah/Sitkum Key Reaches ► CALAWAH 20– Oxbow area inside FUGA focus ► ELK 10 – Boundary change & Conservancy proposed ► ELK 20 – Boundary change & Natural Designation Proposed ► Sitkum, NF Sitkum, Rainbow & Lost– Natural Designation proposed

CALAWAH 20 ► Oxbow-- wide floodplain, meander zone ► Rural designation ► Landowner questions data, provides study ► No change, but protection if needed

ELK 10 & 20– closeups next slides

ELK 10 Closeup CA ► Landslide and FEMA flood zone ► Current- Rural ► WSC proposal– Conservancy  Based on recent studies of value to coho & trout ► Move upstream boundary to UGA boundary ► Locals oppose & question data ► New designation category?  “Scenic residential?”

ELK 20 ► FEMA flood zone ► Owned by Land Trust ► WSC proposed- Break change & natural designation ► Based recent studies of value to coho & trout ► Move upstream boundary to UGA boundary ► No opposition voiced by locals

ELK 10 & 20 Zoning

Sitkum, NF Sitkum, Rainbow & Lost ► Riparian:  92.7% closed canopy;  7.1% other natural vegetation, and  0.1% non-forest ► Federal ownership ► Much of landscape in old growth– late successional reserve status ► WSC proposed Natural designation ► No local opposition voiced ► May offset some loosening of restrictions