To Connect to Wireless Network Boot up with wifi enabled, no encryption Open browser, go to or

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOE Global Modeling Strategic Goals Anjuli Bamzai Program Manager Climate Change Prediction Program DOE/OBER/Climate Change Res Div
Advertisements

CMIP5: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Status of Candidate Processes (Part 1) OptionPhaseOrderDateComments FV core00Fall 2007CAM 3.5 Dilute parcel01Fall 2007CAM 3.5 Convection02Fall 2007CAM.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U.S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY Global Climate Modeling Research John Drake Computational Climate Dynamics Group Computer.
Geophysical Modelling: Climate Modelling How advection, diffusion, choice of grids, timesteps etc are defined in state of the art models.
Climate Initiatives and Opportunities J. J. Hack (NCCS)
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
4. Models of the climate system. Earth’s Climate System Sun IceOceanLand Sub-surface Earth Atmosphere Climate model components.
The NASA Modeling, Analysis and Prediction (MAP) Modeling Environment Don Anderson NASA HQ Sience Mission Directorate Earth-Sun Division Manager, Modeling,
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
WRF-VIC: The Flux Coupling Approach L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory BioEarth Project Kickoff Meeting April 11-12, 2011 Pullman, WA.
Observational Needs for Testing Global Model Parameterizations Andrew Gettelman, NCAR Thanks to: J. Kiehl, W. Collins, P. Rasch.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
6-month Plan: May-Oct 2013 RASM 5 th Workshop Seattle 04/13 red == high priority tasks.
Report on March Crystal City Workshop to Identify Grand Challenges in Climate Change Science By its cochair- Robert Dickinson For the 5 Sept
Identifying Grand Challenges in Climate Change Research: Guiding DOE’s Strategic Planning: Report on the DOE/BERAC workshop March Crystal City For.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
Marine organic matter in sea spray Nd vs. SO4, binned into low-OM, intermediate OM, and high-OM groups Adding marine organic matter as a source into ACME.
Tracer Transport in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM): Using three numerical formulations for atmospheric dynamics Summary of a paper submitted for.
CSEG Update Mariana Vertenstein CCSM Software Engineering Group Mariana Vertenstein CCSM Software Engineering Group.
GEOS-Chem Chemical Transport Model: Current Status and Future Plans Daniel J. Jacob, GEOS-Chem Model Scientist Harvard University.
CAM 4 Update Phil Rasch The plan – What is happening over the next 2.5 days – Review of progress over last year – What remains to be done before CAM4 –
Land Surface Processes in Global Climate Models (1)
CESM/ESMF Progress Report Mariana Vertenstein NCAR Earth System Laboratory CESM Software Engineering Group (CSEG) NCAR is sponsored by the National Science.
Earth System Modeling Framework Status Cecelia DeLuca NOAA Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado, Boulder.
Regional Models in CCSM CCSM/POP/ROMS: Regional Nesting and Coupling Jon Wolfe (CSEG) Mariana Vertenstein (CSEG) Don Stark (ESMF)
Status of the Sea Ice Model Testing of CICE4.0 in the coupled model context is underway Includes numerous SE improvements, improved ridging formulation,
Presented by Global Coupled Climate and Carbon Cycle Modeling Forrest M. Hoffman Computational Earth Sciences Group Computer Science and Mathematics Division.
CCSM Atmospheric Model Working Group Summary J. J. Hack, D. A Randall AMWG Co-Chairs CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001 CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001.
Morrison/Gettelman/GhanAMWG January 2007 Two-moment Stratiform Cloud Microphysics & Cloud-aerosol Interactions in CAM H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR),
AMWG Breakout, CCSM Workshop June 25, 2002 Overview of CAM status and simulations Bill Collins and Dave Randall National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Core Theme 5: Technological Advancements for Improved near- realtime data transmission and Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Data Assimilation WP 5.2 Development.
Chemistry-Climate Working Group Meeting (March 22-24, 2006) Background –SSC expectations and the next IPCC (Bill Collins) Summarize where we are now Discuss.
The evolution of climate modeling Kevin Hennessy on behalf of CSIRO & the Bureau of Meteorology Tuesday 30 th September 2003 Canberra Short course & Climate.
CCSM Performance, Successes and Challenges Tony Craig NCAR RIST Meeting March 12-14, 2002 Boulder, Colorado, USA.
© Crown copyright Met Office Uncertainties in the Development of Climate Scenarios Climate Data Analysis for Crop Modelling workshop Kasetsart University,
Implementation Plan for CCSM 4 CCSM 4 needs to be ready by the end of 2008 for AR5 in early 2013.
Presented by LCF Climate Science Computational End Station James B. White III (Trey) Scientific Computing National Center for Computational Sciences Oak.
Update on the 2-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in CAM Hugh Morrison and Andrew Gettelman National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM Atmospheric.
March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison and S. Walters Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
Do we / why do we want to develop an ASM? Climate working group for WRF – workshop on model developments for climate studies with WRF (summary of.
Representing Effects of Complex Terrain on Mountain Meteorology and Hydrology Steve Ghan, Ruby Leung, Teklu Tesfa, PNNL Steve Goldhaber, NCAR.
Mirin – AMWG 2006 – Slide 1 Coupled Finite-Volume Simulations at One-Degree Resolution Art Mirin and Govindasamy Bala Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
March 9, 2004CCSM AMWG Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison S. Walters and the WACCM group Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
White paper: Atmospheric Chemistry impacts on the land biosphere Phillip Cameron-Smith and Natalie Mahowald Processes: 1.[AC-direct] Ozone Damage (a strong.
Status of CAM, March 2004 Phil Rasch. Differences between CAM2 and CAM3 (standard physics version) Separate liquid and ice phases Advection, sedimentation.
SciDAC CCSM Consortium: Software Engineering Update Patrick Worley Oak Ridge National Laboratory (On behalf of all the consorts) Software Engineering Working.
Overview of the CCSM CCSM Software Engineering Group June
Ronald J Stouffer October 2015
Project Management Approach
Chemistry-climate interactions in CCSM
GMAO Seasonal Forecast
The Met Office aqua-planet runs using pre-HadGAM1
Community Earth System Model (CESM) for CMIP6
Update on CAM and the AMWG. Recent activities and near-term priorities. by the AMWG.
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
Joint GEOS-Chem and NCAR Modeling Workshop:
WRF-GC: on-line two-way coupling of WRF and GEOS-Chem
Mariana Vertenstein CCSM Software Engineering Group NCAR
Implementation Plan for CCSM 4
Recent CCSM development simulations: Towards CCSM4
Progress of Interactions Among CCSM and Other Modeling Efforts
J.T. Kiehl National Center for Atmospheric Research
CAM 4 Update Phil Rasch The plan Agenda and minor changes
A brief introduction to NEMS
Presentation transcript:

To Connect to Wireless Network Boot up with wifi enabled, no encryption Open browser, go to or Usernameamwg2007 Passwordamwg2007 Leave heartbeat window open!

Opening thoughts on AMWG meeting Phil Rasch Overview of Meeting –Day 1: CAM development; PBL & Shallow Convection, Aerosols, Microphysics Deep Convection; Exploring CAM3 behavior –Day 2: Exploring CAM3 behavior CAM3/CCSM3 in relationship to other Climate Models –Day 3 Morning: Insights into Dynamical formulations Data assimilation SciDAC Next Steps

What is missing from the agenda WACCM Chemistry Cloud fraction, subgrid variability, cloud overlap, independent column approximations Gravity Wave Drag Flow dependent horizontal diffusion (e.g. Smagorinsky) Microphysics within vigorous convection Radiation Extra-terrestrial CAM New grids/numerical techniques for CAM –HOMME –Conservative remapping See for developments in these areas (contact Andrew Gettelman for passwords if you need one)

What is happening in other components of CCSM Software engineering efforts relevant to the development of CCSM –Subversion repository maturing –Sequential CCSM development (significant refactoring of CAM as first stage. No re-griding yet) –Removed dependencies within CAM assuming rectangular lat/lon grids (opens path for cubed sphere and triangular grids) –Coupling Frameworks: We plan to exploit two frameworks Much of the development has been done using MCT Nearing complete ESMF capability. Stage 1 effectively complete. Stage 2 begins. –Unification of FV core with NASA GEOS-5 modeling effort –Fixed OMEGA (pressure velocity) in CAM –Much improved regression testing procedures for CAM, constantly evolving, exercise new functionality –Database of experiments and control simulations (currently most relevant for CCSM rather than CAM) –Tropospheric MOZART/Chem, WACCM, UW Physics, Emanuel convection, Offline CAM & CGD aerosols on development trunk as options –Massively parallel issues [I/O, dynamical core, memory (particularly lookup tables in chemistry)]

What is happening in other components of CCSM part II Exploratory –Regional Cloud Resolving Model (NRCM, WRF run in a channel driven by either analyses or CCSM) The path forward –New land model (revisions to hydrology) –Chemistry [w/aerosols (simple and more complex)] –More Biogeochemistry (Carbon, Nitrogen cycles) C 4 MIP -> C-LAMP (compare CASA, CN, IBIS w/in SciDAC) –Substantially revised ocean model (POP-2 code, vertical resolution, horizontal viscosity, GM modifications, new advection) –New Sea Ice Model (CSIM -> CICE4, ridging, albedo, meltponds) Feb 27-28

Interim model (CCSM3.5) Will combine all model component improvements available as of about 1 March, 2007 Goal to allow exploration of Carbon Cycle early in the evolution of CCSM4 (spinups of as much as a thousand years are necessary to equilibrate biogeochemical models) Strategy is starting to evolve to produce controls for the CC experiments –Balance CCSM at TOA at 1870 conditions –Run model forward in time with transient forcing, look at present day simulation to make sure it looks like today’s planet earth. –Iterate until physical system acceptable –Start BGC simulations with CCSM 3.5 Improvements continue within components at least until early 2008 (phase II) In 2008 we put models together again and start phase III “ test, finalize, and thoroughly understand the CCSM4 that includes the new physical components, the final carbon cycle component, aerosol indirect effects, and the new land ice component. Includes obtaining the very long spinups required for the biogeochemistry and land ice components, and determining the final parameter settings for the CCSM, such as the sea ice albedos, etc. “ Goal is to have a model we have some confidence in by early 2009.

Questions for AMWG Are we missing a discussion of important things that should be considered for CAM itself (e.g. resolution issues) Can we leverage our current efforts to move faster in improving CAM? What metrics should we be focussing upon? Do we want a “social outing” this evening? –Pub (bottom of hill) –Tandoori Grill (bottom of hill) –The “Med” (downtown) Open Discussion / Questions?