Uniform limit value for air quality: Bring down PM2.5 everywhere below a AQ limit value Gap closure concept: Reduce PM2.5 levels everywhere by same.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution: First ideas for scenarios Matti Vainio Clean Air for Europe programme Working Group on Target Setting and Policy Assessment.
Advertisements

Purpose: Integrated assessment of options to control air pollution in Europe Model the full chain from sources to impacts Multi-effects: acidification,
A first set of optimized scenarios from RAINS: Exploring the range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions for 2020 M.
Three policy scenarios for CAFE Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Chris Heyes, Zbigniew Klimont, Wolfgang Schöpp, Fabian Wagner.
Exploratory CAFE scenarios for further improvements of European air quality in Europe M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes,
Approaches for Cost-effective Reductions of Population Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter in Europe M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas,
State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,
Markus Amann The RAINS model: Modelling of health impacts of PM and ozone.
Options for Setting Environmental Interim Targets for Health for CAFE Summary of presentations to the CAFE Working Group on Target Setting and Policy Advice.
Benefits Analysis and CBA in the EC4MACS Project Mike Holland, EMRC Gwyn Jones, AEA Energy and Environment Anil Markandya, Metroeconomica.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: The approach. Cost-effectiveness needs integration Economic/energy development (projections) State of emission controls,
Sensitivity analyses for the CAFE policy scenarios Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Chris Heyes, Zbigniew Klimont, Wolfgang Schöpp, Fabian Wagner.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: Health impacts of PM.
The use of the BelEUROS model for policy support at LNE TEMIS-workshop 8/9 October 2007 on behalf of: Mirka Van der Elst Flemish Ministry of the Environment,
Methodology and applications of the RAINS air pollution integrated assessment model Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
The potential for further reductions of PM emissions in Europe M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Application of air quality strategies of Western Europe for modeling of the transboundary air pollution impact on the Russian Federation with the GAINS.
EIONET Clean Air for Europe programme The Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution Directive on ambient air quality and cleaner air.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Modelling the spatial distribution.
EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON AIR AND CLIMATE CHANGE N:\adm\arkiv\overhead\stl \etc-acc\geneve.ppt 1 Air Quality in Europe 1999 Steinar Larssen, Kevin J. Barrett,
10th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Management and Assessment, Vilnius, October 2005 Air pollution at street level in European cities Nicolas Moussiopoulos,
European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.
European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.
SOURCE APPORTIONMENT of PARTICULATE MATTER Imperial College 23 rd April 2010 APRIL:Air Pollution Research in London.
Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.
Reinhard Mechler, Markus Amann, Wolfgang Schöpp International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis A methodology to estimate changes in statistical life.
Baseline projections of European air quality up to 2020 M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, K. Kupiainen, W. Winiwarter,
Mitigating BC Kristin Rypdal and Terje Berntsen Based on paper in prep. by Rypdal, Rive, Berntsen and Klimont All results preliminary.
Cost-effective measures to achieve further improvements of air quality in Europe ( focus on key measures in the EECCA and Balkan countries) Based on presentation.
IIASA M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress in developing the baseline scenario for CAFE.
Current knowledge and possible systematic biases Linkages with greenhouse gas policy Fabian Wagner M. Amann, C. Berglund, J. Cofala, L. Höglund, Z. Klimont,
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.
Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,
NIAM meeting, March 2009 Jan Aben. 2 NIAM, March 2009, Jan Aben Selected topics  Dutch baseline compared to Current Policy  CC policy and.
GAINS emission projections for the EU Clean Air Policy Package Work in Zbigniew Klimont Task Force on.
Environment 1 The current work on Air Quality Indicators Best needed “ Population exposure” vs. Best available “Population weighted concentrations” Ute.
Attaining urban air quality objectives- links to transboundary air pollution Helen ApSimon, Tim Oxley and Marios Valiantis UK Centre for Integrated Assessment.
Baseline emission projections and scope for further reductions in Europe up to 2020 Results from the CAFE analysis M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala,
Working Group on Effects, 29th Session, September 2010 Task Force on Health: Results: PM Michal Krzyzanowski TFH Chair WHO/Europe, European Centre.
Scenarios for the Negotiations on the Revision of the Gothenburg Protocol with contributions from Imrich Bertok, Jens Borken-Kleefeld, Janusz Cofala, Chris.
The three CAFE policy scenarios Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Chris Heyes, Zbigniew Klimont, Wolfgang Schöpp, Fabian Wagner.
11 September 2015 On the role of measurements and modelling in Dutch air quality policies Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
Scope for further emission reductions: The range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala,
Baseline and MTFR scenarios EECCA and Balkan countries Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
Control by existing protocols and current work under the Convention Richard Ballaman Chairman of WGSR Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape.
The GAINS optimization approach – Basic background information Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) IIASA workshop.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS Tim Oxley & Helen ApSimon UK National Focal Centre for Integrated Assessment Imperial College London.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
Particulates: Where is the current policy emphasis in the EU CAFE Programme? A contribution to the panel discussion “Nanoparticles from road vehicle exhaust:
Final Meeting of the CAPACT project, 4-6 July 2007, Almaty, Kazakhstan M. Krzyzanowski and Kubanychbek Monolbaev WHO Regional Office for Europe EECCA participation.
‘Air Monitoring and Protection Strategies in EECCA’ UNECE/WGEMA Workshop, Geneva, 11 June 2007 Dr Hans-Guido Mücke for the WHO European Centre for Environment.
The CAMS Policy products
Progress on modelling emission scenarios
Scenarios (1) Round 1 - (December 2006) Baselines
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Updating the Baseline and Maximum Control scenarios State of play of the.
Three policy scenarios for CAFE
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z
Markus Amann, CIAM Status of the RAINS model development for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol.
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
CAFE CBA Paul Watkiss and Steve Pye, AEA Technology Environment
Environmental objectives and target setting
Steve Pye / Mike Holland NEC-PI Working Group, 19th June 2007
Environmental targets for the NEC analysis
PM observations in Europe a review of AirBase information
Contributions to total changes in emissions of ozone precursors
An Overview of Europe’s Air Quality and Air Pollutant Emissions
Presentation transcript:

Uniform limit value for air quality: Bring down PM2.5 everywhere below a AQ limit value Gap closure concept: Reduce PM2.5 levels everywhere by same percentage Maximize total health benefits in Europe for a given European budget constraint, disregarding the location of the benefit Three concepts for target setting for PM health effects

Option 1: Uniform limit value on air quality EMEP/RAINS quantify: –Primary anthropogenic PM –Secondary inorganic aerosols (including water) EMEP/RAINS miss: –Mineral and Sea-salt from natural sources –Primary organic matter from natural sources –Secondary organic aerosols from natural and anthropogenic sources RAINS + City-Delta address urban background, but not hot spots in street canyons Thus, model can only explain part of observed PM

Uniform limit value on air quality Ambition levels explored Bring annual mean PM2.5 in urban background below –19 / 17 / 16.5 / 16 / 15.5 / 15 μg/m 3 This level includes the fraction modelled by RAINS + assumption on mineral (1/2/3 μg/m 3 ) It does not include unknown contributions of primary natural organic matter + secondary organic aerosols To relate this value to potential hot-spot AQ limit value, add ~ 5 μg/m 3 ? No targets for harbor cities considered for this round of analysis (mistake in dispersion calculations)

Costs of the limit value scenarios [billion €/year]

Option 2: Gap closure Reduce modelled PM2.5 everywhere by the same percentage For these round of calculations: –Explore the range between the impacts from CLE and MTFR including Euro-V/VI 25% / 40% / 50% / 60% / 70% / 75% reductions analyzed With and without Euro-V/VI

Effect indicator MTFR from EU25 excluding EURO5/6 Baseline 2020 (Current legislation) MTFR from EU25 MTFR from EU-25 + shipping MTFR from Europe + shipping No-effect level (critical load/level) Zero exposure Base year exposure (2000/1990) Gap concept used for NEC NEC 2010 Definition of “gap closure” used NEC 2010 ceilings and NEC 2020 ceilings Range of exploratory ambition levels 100% 0% 50%

Costs of the “gap closure” scenarios [billion €/yr]

Option 3: Maximize total European health benefits for a given budget Dual optimization problem: Instead of –Minimize total European costs for achieving place-specific environmental targets: optimize for: –Maximize total European health benefits (i.e., gains in life expectancy) for a given budget. No consideration of the place/country where the improvement occurs. Maximal cost-effectiveness, equity needs to be explored Illustrative analysis with pseudo-life expectancy data (calculations include population younger than 30 years) No difference of whether Euro-V/VI is taken or not, but a final analysis should include Euro-V/VI (with cost data) in the optimization

Emission control costs vs. years of life lost Illustrative calculations [billion €/yr]

Cost-effectiveness of the target setting approaches Emission control costs [billion €/yr] vs. YOLL