1 Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology Karen Cator Director, Office of Education Technology U.S. Department of Education 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustaining Course Redesign on Your Campus Marguerite Weber.
Advertisements

National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Approaches To E-Learning: Developing An E-Learning Strategy Brian Kelly UKOLN University.
The Status of the Teaching Profession 2009 Copyright All rights reserved. The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Research conducted by.
EDIT 654 OL MIDTERM Spring semester 2012 Professor K. TSAMASIROS 1SUHAILAH BOOKER.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Teacher Practices for Student Success Cathy Cavanaugh University of Florida College of Education
1 Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology Karen Cator Director, Office of Education Technology U.S. Department of Education 1.
The Effects of the National Technology Plan on Aldine ISD William Danes EDLD 5362 Section 8026.
Yvan Rooseleer – BiASC – MAY 2013
MoHealthWINs MoHealthWINs Open Learning Initiative Co-Development Project October 31, 2013.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
Braiding Initiatives Steve Goodman, Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Initiative (MiBLSi) April 16, :00PM – 3:30PM
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Policy for Transforming Teaching & Learning through ICTs in South Africa Seugnet Blignaut Seugnet Blignaut
Assisting Struggling Readers and Writers: Using Evidence-Based Resources to Support Adult Learners Michigan Conference 2014 Kathy Houghton-- LINCS.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN TECHNOLOGY: PREPARING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS FOR A DIGITAL AGE BY VIRGINIA E. GARLAND AND CHESTER TADEJA Chapter 1: Technology.
Cougar Ridge Site Council April 22, What is our focus for classroom technology? District End Statement 4 Throughout life, students will understand.
Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.
Lynda Hoffpauir EDLD 5362 – ET $ Technology Expenditure Per Pupil 3 Student(s) for every computer 1 Teacher(s) for every computer.
21 st Century Curriculum for 21 st Century Schools The value of applied learning Tom Bentley Director, Applied Learning, ANZSOG.
MoHealthWINs MoHealthWINs Open Learning Initiative Co-Development Project October 31, 2013.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Adelina Rucker EDLD 5362 Lamar University Pearland I.S.D. Technology Plan 2011.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Technology Update Barrington School Committee December 15, 2011.
Ensuring America’s Future Productivity: Trends for Education Policy Trends for Education Policy Susan Sclafani Chartwell Education Group.
Technology Counts Making Connections Around the World Prepared By: Ellen Driscoll, Coordinator of Educational Technology & Instructional Media.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Eric W. Waldo U.S. Department of Education Deputy Chief of Staff July 2012 U.S. Department of Education Policy Overview.
Digital Learning Resources (e-Content) Development Process Senthil Kumar 14th November 2011.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
CCISD TECHNOLOGY PLAN by Patti Shields Cohort 10 EDLD 5362 Information Systems Management.
Marion H. Martinez, Ed.D. Associate Commissioner for Teaching, Learning and Instructional Leadership August 25,
How eNet4S can benefit your project? eNet4S Software Solution Business Team Chief Technology Officer July 11, 2006.
Technology Use Plan Presented by: Bob Santi. Rationale A technology plan is a current guideline for the appropriate and effective use of technology a.
D ENTON ISD T ECHNOLOGY P LAN Presented by Agustin Quezada Lamar University May, 2011.
Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) Professional Development Clusters 2010–2012.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
School in Front of Challenges of Knowledge Society, Again and Again Liisa Ilomäki Department of Psychology University of Helsinki EDEN conference.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. April 5, 2010 Maple Avenue Campus.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
1 Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology Karen Cator Director, Office of Education Technology U.S. Department of Education 1.
Technology Plan for E-Rate Year 2013 Liberty Hill ISD Presented by Bonnie Reichert EDLD 5362 Informational Systems Management Plan for Success.
Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Information Systems Management EDLD 5362 Week 5 Assignment By Jason Mansfield L
NCCE 2009 Administrator/IT Summit Strategy Session: Leadership.
Power Point Segment 3 Inserted Following Segs 1-2.
*All presentation sources used in this Power Point presentation are used in accordance with the Multimedia Fair Use Guidelines and are not for copying.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT. The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled.
Technology’s Role In Curriculum and Assessment Michael Fischer EDU 640.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
Sustaining Technology Enhanced Learning Large-scale multidisciplinary Research The STELLAR Network of Excellence A European FP7 project Marie Joubert.
Company LOGO ATP Connected Learning in an Open World ‘‘Developing new ideas and escaping from the old ones’ - A collaborative E learn course development.
PRESENTED BY DIANE DUGAS, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM JON LAMBERT, DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY GRANBY THREE YEAR TECHNOLOGY PLAN.
NC Digital Learning Competencies School Administrators and Classroom Teachers ****** Partnering for Education Impact April 19, 2016.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Session 3 Web 2.0 Tools: SymbalooEdu and Other Sites to Support Personalization and Differentiated Learning Opportunities Stephanie Dulmage, 2014.
1 Research Question: What did SDCOE do and what role did we play to have team-oriented classrooms, with students collaborating across disciplines, to solve.
December 5, 2016 c&I Board committee
How Shall we prepare teachers for deeper community partnerships?
Our changing world… The 25% of the population in China, with the highest IQ’s, is greater than the total population of North America. If you took every.
Information Technology (IT)
Presentation transcript:

1 Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology Karen Cator Director, Office of Education Technology U.S. Department of Education 1

2 ContextProcessContent

33 Context Why?

4 Social Interactions for LearningDigital ContentMobility – 24/7 AccessPrint to Online

5 “By 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.” – President Barack Obama

66 Process How?

7 How the plan was developed 12 federal policymakers 15 experts on Technical Working Group 17 events and focus groups 50 chief technology officers 24 industry leaders 48 school administrators 123 college instructors 235 classroom teachers 153 technology providers 572 reports, examples, and statements contributed to the web site 22,876 users of public Web site

88 Content What?

9 Productivity Infrastructure LearningAssessmentTeaching

10 Productivity Infrastructure LearningAssessmentTeaching R&D – Grand Challenges

11 21st century expertise How people learn Personalized learning Universal Design for Learning Informal + Formal 11 Learning

12 All learners will have engaging and empowering learning experiences both in and outside of school that prepare them to be active, creative, knowledgeable, and ethical participants in our globally networked society. Goal 1.0: Learning

13 Measure what matters Embedded assessments Real time feedback Persistent learning record Universal Design Continuous improvement Assessment

14 Our education system at all levels will leverage the power of technology to measure what matters and use assessment data for continuous improvement. Goal 2.0: Assessment

15 Highly “effective” Connected Online Informal + Formal Inspired Teaching

16 Professional educators will be supported individually and in teams by technology that connects them to data, content, resources, expertise, and learning experiences that can empower and inspire them to provide more effective teaching for all learners. Goal 3.0: Teaching

17 24/7 - Community wide Broadband Access Points Supported Equitable Infrastructure

18 All students and educators will have access to a comprehensive infrastructure for learning when and where they need it. Goal 4.0: Infrastructure

19 Cost efficiency Financial systems Process redesign Interoperability standards Productivity

20 Online Instruction – Statistics Traditional vs hybrid instruction models Carnegie Mellon, Open Learning Initiative, Lovett et al.

21 Our education system at all levels will redesign processes and structures to take advantage of the power of technology to improve learning outcomes while making more efficient use of time, money, and staff. Goal 5.0: Productivity

22 Research and Development

23 What needs to be invented?

24 Grand Challenges 1.0 Design and validate an integrated system that provides real-time access to learning experiences tuned to the levels of difficulty and assistance that optimize learning for all learners, and that incorporates self-improving features that enable it to become increasingly effective through interaction with learners.

25 Grand Challenges 2.0 Design and validate an integrated system for designing and implementing valid, reliable, and cost-effective assessments of complex aspects of 21st century expertise and competencies across academic disciplines.

26 Grand Challenges 3.0 Design and validate an integrated approach for capturing, aggregating, mining, and sharing content, student learning, and financial data cost- effectively for multiple purposes across many learning platforms and data systems in near real time.

27 Grand Challenges 4.0 Identify and validate design principles for efficient and effective online learning systems and combined online and offline learning systems that produce content expertise and competencies equal to or better than those produced by the best conventional instruction in half the time at half the cost.

28 Open Government

29

30 Q&A