Online DQ Segments and Triggers John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GWDAW 16/12/2004 Inspiral analysis of the Virgo commissioning run 4 Leone B. Bosi VIRGO coalescing binaries group on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration.
Advertisements

S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session Baton Rouge, March 21, 2007.
Peter Chochula, January 31, 2006  Motivation for this meeting: Get together experts from different fields See what do we know See what is missing See.
Reconstruction and Analysis on Demand: A Success Story Christopher D. Jones Cornell University, USA.
CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)
Firmware implementation of Integer Array Sorter Characterization presentation Dec, 2010 Elad Barzilay Uri Natanzon Supervisor: Moshe Porian.
CSC DQA and Commissioning Summary  We are responsible for the online and offline DQA for the CSC system, a US ATLAS responsibility  We are ready for.
Level 2 Status and Outlook Ali Hanks Run 7 DAQ Fest Oct. 18, 2006.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M DMT Monitors: Beyond the FOM John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LLO August 18, 2006.
CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)
Database Backup and Recovery
Backup and Recovery Part 1.
LIGO-G E ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Argonne, May 10, 2004.
Online Chinese Character Handwriting Recognition for Linux
D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1 Status of Data Quality in Virgo D. Verkindt, LAPP-CNRS on behalf of the Virgo DQ team (M. Bizouard, L. Bosi, S. Chatterji,
May 14, 2001E. Gallas/Trigger Database1 Status of the Trigger Database Elizabeth Gallas, Rich Wellner, Vicky White Fermilab - Computing Division See my.
Emlyn Corrin, DPNC, University of Geneva EUDAQ Status of the EUDET JRA1 DAQ software Emlyn Corrin, University of Geneva 1.
LSC Segment Database Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
GDS Software Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session Cambridge, July 25, 2007 LIGO-G Z.
HPS Online Software Discussion Jeremy McCormick, SLAC Status and Plans.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization NeedsK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Needs Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
We have developed a GUI-based user interface for Chandra data processing automation, data quality evaluation, and control of the system. This system, known.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Kay Kasemir ORNL/SNS Oct EPICS Meeting, PAL, Korea Control System Studio Training.
THE EVENT DISPLAY TOOL Shantanu Desai Penn. State University Scimon Camp, Livingston, LA August 18, 2006.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Kay Kasemir ORNL/SNS Jan Control System Studio Training - Archive System Setup.
Marcelo R.N. Mendes. What is FINCoS? A Java-based set of tools for data generation, load submission, and performance measurement of event processing systems;
Databases E. Leonardi, P. Valente. Conditions DB Conditions=Dynamic parameters non-event time-varying Conditions database (CondDB) General definition:
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen Gateway (Redux) PSI - GFA Controls IT Alain Bertrand Renata Krempaska, Hubert Lutz, Matteo Provenzano, Dirk Zimoch.
A Brief Documentation.  Provides basic information about connection, server, and client.
Analysis of nonstationarity in LIGO S5 data using the NoiseFloorMon output A proposal for a seismic Data Quality flag. R. Stone for the LSC The Center.
Offline report – 7TeV data taking period (Mar.30 – Apr.6) ALICE SRC April 6, 2010.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
G R LSC UL 13 Aug 011 Detector Characterization; Triggers, code infrastructure; Followup Analysis for the UL groups Nelson Christensen, Szabi.
Andrei Gheata, Mihaela Gheata, Andreas Morsch ALICE offline week, 5-9 July 2010.
LSC glitch group report Shourov K. Chatterji for the LSC glitch group LSC/Virgo meeting 2007 October 24 Hannover, Germany LIGO-G Z.
PlaneMon: Airplane Detection Monitor Evan Goetz & Keith Riles (University of Michigan) DCC: G Z.
Jan 12, 2009LIGO-G Z1 DMT and NDS2 John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Ligo PAC, Caltech, Jan 12, 2009.
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
Nov 1, 2002D0 DB Taking Stock1 Trigger Database Status and Plans Elizabeth Gallas – FNAL CD (with recent help from Jeremy Simmons, John Weigand, and Adam.
Oracle Applications 11i Concepts II Brian Hitchcock OCP 11i DBA -- OCP 10g DBA Sun Microsystems Brian Hitchcock.
GEO Online Detector Characterization System R. Balasubramanian Cardiff University LSC March 2003 LIGO-G Z.
Prompt Calibration Loop 11 February Overview Prompt calibration loop in SCT –Provides ATLAS with conditions data used for the bulk reconstruction.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Data Quality Segments Repository K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Data Quality Segments Repository Keith Riles (University.
S5 Data Quality John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech. Contents ● Segment Database ● Automatically generated segments ● Other segments ● Segment summary.
LIGO-G Z SenseMonitor Updates for S3 Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
LSC Meeting, 10 Nov 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)1 Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests Evan Ochsner and Peter Shawhan (U. of Chicago) (LIGO / Caltech)
LIGO-G050197LSC Collab. Mtg, LHO, August 16,20051 S4 Data Quality & S5 Preview John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M DMT Monitor Verification with Simulated Data John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G E Data Simulation for the DMT John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
Event Management. EMU Graham Heyes April Overview Background Requirements Solution Status.
Marcelo R.N. Mendes. What is FINCoS? A Java-based set of tools for data generation, load submission, and performance measurement of event processing systems;
3/21/2007 LIGO-G Z S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session MIT, July 25, 2007.
ACES User Interface Workshop #1 Prototype Inspection 22. November 2011.
1 InspiralMon Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G E S2/S3 Data Quality Flagging John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
S5 Data Quality John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Hanover, October 25, 2007.
THIS MORNING (Start an) informal discussion to -Clearly identify all open issues, categorize them and build an action plan -Possibly identify (new) contributing.
Online Software Status
Jordi Burguet-Castell for the Calibration Team
Tracking parameter optimization
ورود اطلاعات بصورت غيربرخط
John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech
Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests
Presentation transcript:

Online DQ Segments and Triggers John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech

DMT Overview

DQ Segment Handling Monitors send raw segments {pid, name, version, start, stop, active} to trigger manager. Trigger manager (TrigMgr)‏ »Collects segments from all monitors »Writes data to 1-32 output streams‏ »Current configuration one stream –S6segments, 16s xml files, ~32s latency (end-time). –Written as xml to /dmt/triggers/DQ_Segment

DQ Segment Handling User access »Segment written aynchronously to database »Xml file access utilities (Syracuse segment pkg)‏ Archival »Coalesce files (Syracuse)‏ »Archive coalesced files.

On-line Segment Generation Segments generated by extant on-line monitors »SegGener: Generic condition evaluation. »LightMon: Monitor arm light dips »PlaneMon: acoustic airplane detection‏ »SenseMonitor: inspiral range variation »PSLmon: glitch, RMS based segments »blrms_monitor:‏ Excess noise at low-f, trains

Current On-line Segment Types

Status h(t) generation »Bugs in stability, flag generation found and fixed by Joirdi, in gds (dol )‏ »running since 2/7/2008 Segment generation »Segments stored and inserted in Segment DB since 3/10/2009. »~1% not inserted in database immediately – reinserted off-line. KleineWelle trigger generation »Running – triggers lists written to /dmt »Occasional failures (source unknown: resource leak?)‏