HL-LHC 11 T Dipole for DS Collimation 8 th to10 th December, 2014 D. Duarte Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, T. Sahner, H. Prin, R. Wawrowski, F. Savary,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19th – 20th of September 2007Cryogenic Expert Meeting at GSI, Jan Patrick Meier1/11 Cryogenic Experts Meeting at GSI, 2007 The SIS 100 Cryogenic Jumper.
Advertisements

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
ColUSM #51 30 th January, 2015 D. Duarte Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, T. Sahner, H. Prin, R. Wawrowski, Q. Deliege, V. Baglin, F. Savary.
A. Perin, CERN, TE-CRG, 26 May Review of the cryogenic by-pass for the LHC DS collimators 26 May 2011 Modifications to the DFBs, DSLC and cryogenic.
4m Undulator Design Concepts Amanda J Brummitt CCLRC RAL On behalf of the HeLiCal Collaboration.
F. Savary on behalf of the WP11 team Input from V. Baglin, D. Ramos.
1 Integration of collimators in the dispersion suppressors Status of 11 T cryo- assembly integration Dec 17, 2013
1 Presented at ColUSM by D. Ramos on behalf of the Cold Collimator Feasibility Study Working Group Longitudinal.
ZQNA Electrostatic Quadrupoles for ELENA Transfer Lines 1.Conceptual design 2.Performance 3.Engineering details 4.Interfaces 5.Production planning D. Barna,
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
Fcal upgrade for sLHC: Cryogenics modifications – TE-CRG/ C.Fabre 1 ATLAS FCal Upgrade for sLHC: Modifications to the Calorimeter Cryogenic.
Status of vacuum & interconnections of the CLIC main linac modules C. Garion TE/VSC TBMWG, 9 th November 2009.
Possible HTS wire implementation Amalia Ballarino Care HHH Working Meeting LHC beam-beam effects and beam-beam interaction CERN, 28 th August 2008.
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
H. Prin, F. Savary, D. Duarte Ramos, L. Grand- Clement, C. Mucher, A. Temporal.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
SCU Layout Concept - Minimal Segmentation Joel Fuerst (ANL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting Dec. 16, 2014.
FP 420 Connection Cryostat Design and Integration Keith Potter, Jaak Lippmaa, Guido Ryckwaert, Benoit Florin, Thierry Renaglia, Thierry Colombet, Shrikant.
1 Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting Update on the Q1 to D1 cryostat Jan 28, 2014  Outline  Cryostat cross section options  Elliptical interconnect.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
12th HL-LHC Parameter and Layout Committee meeting.
C. Garion Presentation Outline  Overview of the inner triplet interconnections  Q1/Q2, Q2/Q3 interconnections  General view  Working conditions  Compensation.
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
Plan for test station Marta Bajko For the Technical Review of FReSCa2 June 2015 Saclay Paris.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
Cryostat & LHC Tunnel Slava Yakovlev on behalf of the FNAL team: Nikolay Solyak, Tom Peterson, Ivan Gonin, and Timergali Khabibouline The 6 th LHC-CC webex.
Updated Design of TCLD whit reduced jaw length Collimation Upgrade Specification meeting L. GENTINI.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department 22 nd January 2015 C. Garion2 Beam Line Interconnection: snapshot of present design principles.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Mike Struik / LHC-CRI INSTRUMENTATION FEEDTHROUGH SYSTEM FOR LHC MACHINE ARC QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS. 123rd LHC Vacuum Design Meeting 19 April 1999.
Quadrupoles and orbit correctors bus bars routing along the inner triplet string MQXF Workshop at CERN– February the 3 rd 2016 H. Prin With acknowledgements.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
LHC Beampipes Ray Veness / AT-VAC FP XII 08Beam Vacuum- R.Veness.
ColUSM #63 18 th September, 2015 D. Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, H. Prin, Q. Deliege, A. Bastard, J. Hrivnak.
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
Development of Cryo-Module Test Stand (CMTS) for Fermi Lab (R.L.Suthar, Head,CDM, BARC) Cryo-Module Test stand (CMTS) is a very sophisticated equipment.
QXF magnet integration Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
Inner Triplet Review 1 H. Prin AT/MEL Activities on the triplets at CERN Reception and Acceptance Triplet String Assembly in Building 181 Handling and.
Prototype Cryomodule FDR Ken Premo 21 – 22 January 2015 High Power Coupler Design.
1 Status of the 11T cryo-assembly design and integration Presented at ColUSM #34, February 21, 2014
Two-beam module layout
Cryostats for superconducting magnets
D. Ramos, H. Prin, M. Moretti, C. Eymin, A. Temporal, V. Parma, S
Cold mass design, assembly plans and QA/QC at CERN
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
Roadmap for triplet cryostats
Status of triplet cryostat and magnet support scheme
Internal review of IR2 LEP cryostats (WP11/WP5) Close out session
Update on He3 Services design since the ORNL meeting
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
Cryostat procurement, status and plan, QA/QC
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Cryo-assembly design D. Ramos, V. Parma, C. Mucher, H. Prin, M. Souchet, J. Hrivnak, M. Moretti, L. Mora, F. Savary, L. Gentini Review of the 11T Dipoles.
Status of cryostat integration and conceptual design
Consequences of warming-up a sector above 80 K
List of changes and improvements for the next generation CLIC module
Functional specification for the consolidated LHC dipole diode insulation system and consolidation strategy C. Scheuerlein on behalf of the LHC dipole.
The 11T cryo-assembly: summary of design and integration aspects
Design of Distribution Feedbox at LHC P7
WP3 Meeting – December the 10th 2015 H. Prin
Cryostats Some ideas for the new Q1 to Q3 Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
Magnetic shielding and thermal shielding
Status of QQXF cryostat
Presentation transcript:

HL-LHC 11 T Dipole for DS Collimation 8 th to10 th December, 2014 D. Duarte Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, T. Sahner, H. Prin, R. Wawrowski, F. Savary, V. Baglin

Click here to add footer 2 Outline Main integration requirements Conceptual design: Layout, main features, interfaces Cryostat main components and assembly sequence Collimator design Beam vacuum equipment and collimator length Current leads for the trim circuit Work in progress Conclusion

Click here to add footer 3 Main integration requirements Compatibility with installation and transport constraints: not larger than existing cryostat (ø1055) Create a room temperature vacuum sector in the LHC continuous cryostat Cold to warm transitions (CWT) Sector valve after each CWT for vacuum separation during magnet cooldown or collimator bakeout. RF- shielded gate valves and bellows for impedance reasons DN35 ports on the cold sectors to send an RF emitter ball through the full arc after warm up and before cooldown Compatibility with existing cryogenic and electrical systems, ensuring their continuity Prevent loss of alignment during evacuation with independent supports for collimator and cryostat Minimise changes to other magnets: keep interconnects standard if possible Collimator Vacuum enclosure Magnet 1.8K Heat exchanger Beam vacuum Lines E, C’, K RF emitter Bus bars

Click here to add footer 4 Solution: MB replacement unit Same mm length between interconnect planes as an LHC MB Connection cryostat between two 11 T magnets to integrate the collimator LHC MB replaced by 3 cryostats + collimator, all independently supported and aligned: Same interfaces at the extremities: no changes to nearby magnets, standard interconnection procedures & tooling

Click here to add footer 5 Connection cryostat for collimator integration Collimator support jacks Cryostat support jacks Cold mass enlarged to Ø750 on the collimator side Constant LHC arc outer flange diameter: Ø1055 Flexible interconnects for alignment independency and thermal contraction Interconnects usestandard componentsand tooling despite thenew compact layout

Click here to add footer 6 Interfaces driving the design QRL side K2 M2 V2 W Y M1 M3 E C’ V1 K1 X N

Click here to add footer 7 Cross section of the connection cryostat and collimator Dedicated collimator design. One collimator design fits both beam lines M2 W Y M1 M3 E C’ X N Collimator supported directly on the concrete slab Larger cold mass extremity to open up space for the collimator

Click here to add footer 8 Cryostat support layout Magnet’s fixed points near the centre: for small contractions at the intermediate interconnects and minimum change wrt replaced MB Distance between jacks shared with DS magnets Q11, Q10, Q8: 3705 mm Gives nearly ideal cold foot distance for minimum cold mass deformation: 3430 mm (estimated less than 0.1 mm sag even with a 10 mm thick shell) W-sleeve on the downstream interconnect cannot be fully open but still acceptable for interconnecting work

Click here to add footer 9 Magnet cryostats 1- Pre-assembly of bottom tray, E-line, support posts, C’-line 2- Cold mass and N-line subassembly placed on bottom tray 3- MLI and thermal shield 4- Insertion into vacuum vessel; finishing of instrumentation feedthroughs and current leads Finished units are not interchangeable but many shared components, including the vacuum vessel. Follows all LHC cryostat design principles.

Click here to add footer 10 Connection cryostat 1- Pre-assembly of transfer lines comprising piping, busbars, supports thermal shield and MLI (supports to be designed) 2- Insertion of transfer lines into vacuum vessel 3 - Alingment of tranfer lines and welding of cold to warm transitions 4 - Welding of thermal shield front plates and thermalizations Simple vacuum vessel design. Precision machining of interfaces after welding.

Click here to add footer 11 Collimator Integrated expansion joint with RF bridge for alingnment and installation clearance ‘Quick’ CF flange for removal and connection of collimator Based on TCLD design from 2010 New design of actuation system in order to comply with integration constraints Pre-aligned support stand Collimator can be exchanged without re-alignment BPM buttons

Click here to add footer 12 Beam vacuum and collimator length Option B: Second beam line at 1.9 K Beamscreen on second line imposes a minimum interconnect length Collimator length: 650 mm jaw (1130 flange to flange) Option A: Second beam line at room temperature (bakeable) Sector valve on second beam line cannot be facing the collimator bellows as initially thought Collimator length: 600 mm jaw (1080 flange to flange) Active jaw length in tungsten Total collimator length (active+480 mm) Decision and validation to be done with full scale mockups

Click here to add footer 13 Current leads for the trim circuit 2x 300 A conduction cooled leads Only one location is possible Integration and design to be started Gas cooled leads not possible both for lack of space and cryogenics Conduction cooled leads: about 3.6 W/kA to 1.9 K (c.f. A. Ballarino) Local solution: applicable everywhere in the LHC RT copper cables  towards power converter Similar to a Dipole Corrector Feedthrough in the SSS (EDMS )

Click here to add footer 14 Work in progress Mechanical and thermal calculations Magnetic field induced by main busbars Material selection Detailed design of components (pipe routing, welding configurations, bellows, supports, etc.) Connection to cold test bench Handling and transport interfaces Assembly breakdown structure, quality control requirements and procurement strategy

Click here to add footer 15 Conclusion Integration has been the main challenge since the beginning of the project. The present concept of cryostat maximises the length available for the collimator and room temperature vacuum equipment. The integration of the current leads for the trim circuit are the next challenge. We are confident that it can be done, but this may no longer allow a single vacuum vessel design for both magnets. The magnet cryostats follow the LHC design basics. One configuration designed to fit all possible locations in the LHC (with local trim). No changes required to nearby magnets. Interconnecting work done in the tunnel takes advantage of existing procedures thanks to many LHC standard components and tooling.

Click here to add footer 17 Heat loads Additional heat loads to 1.9 K with respect to replaced MB cryostat One additional magnet support post: 49 mW Connection cryostat supports: ~100 mW Cold to warm transitions: Option warm second beam line (4 CWT): ~8 W Option cold second beam line (2 CWT): ~4 W Current leads 2x300 A: 2.2 W

Click here to add footer 18 The first 11 T cryo-assembly concept Independently cryostated and handled cold masses, linked through two short transfer lines Transfer lines with expansion joints mechanically decouple cryostats A and B Splice and piping interconnect in the tunnel, all other work prior to installation Can use the existing TCLD collimator design with modified the supports Collimator Lines M, E, N, K, C’ Reinforced jacks to widstand vacuum forces 11 T cold mass A11 T cold mass B Line X Independently supported collimator Busbar splice and interconnect done in the tunnel Flexible S-shaped busbar stabiliser Busbar lyra

Click here to add footer 19 3D Integration

Click here to add footer 20 Before the 11 T magnet development: QTC (2010) Main drawback: extensive machine layout changes to create space 4.0 m m interc. = 4.5 m installation length

Click here to add footer 21 Could the QTC cryostat concept be “extended”? Can only be finished after cryostating Dealing with welding distortions is a major issue Distortions amplified with length Adjustment of cold supports posts is required Complicated assembly procedure Longitudinal butt-welds Cover closure w/ fillet welds New approach needed