`VI-III RoR Meeting San Diego, CA November 1, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Business Architecture?. Overview Agility matters today more than yesterday Previous methods for managing change were designed for the needs of.
Advertisements

Common Humanity & Shared Guardianship of Planet
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
State of New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services Division of Personnel Workforce Development Strategic Plan.
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
Growth Generation Leaders
Starting an Innovation Process Life of any business is finite. For companies to endure, the drive for efficiency must be combined with excellence in.
MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Strategic Management & Strategic Competitiveness
Chapter 6 The Process of Interaction Design Presented by: Kinnis Gosha, Michael McGill, Jamey White, and Chiao Huang.
Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.
The Manager as Leader 3.1 The Importance of Leadership
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Arturo Luna. Jose Mendoza. Jerry Cuellar. Vanessa Garcia.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
Marketing & Sales Roundtable Marketing ’ s Role in Driving the Customer Focus into the Planning Process November 2002.
AIMS & OBJECTIVES AIM: To allow delegates an opportunity to practise Teamwork in a practical way using a series of outdoor activities OBJECTIVE: To develop.
Cultural Competence “Whenever people of different races come together in groups, leaders can assume that race is an issue, but not necessarily a problem.”
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Nature and Scope of Marketing Research
General Considerations for Implementation
Corporate Mission and Values Lecture 4. Robinson College of Business Mission--The J. Mack Robinson College of Business is committed to excellence in the.
1 By The End of The Workshop, Participants Will Be Able To:  Describe the PDQ methodology  Know when and how PDQ can be used to strengthen quality and.
What should a Housy graduate be able to do? December 4, 2014 J. Martinez.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
June 2002USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service1 Critical Meeting Elements: Preparation to Minimize Conflict.
Quality Management.  Quality management is becoming increasingly important to the leadership and management of all organisations. I  t is necessary.
Marketing and Sales Roundtable Marketing ’ s Role in Driving the Customer Focus into the Planning Process November 2002.
Specific Types of Knowledge Part II Organizing Ideas pg. 315 Skills and Processes pg. 324.
Chapter 7: A Summary of Tools Focus: This chapter outlines all the customer-driven project management tools and techniques and provides recommendations.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
STRATEGIC CAPABILITY By: Vedika Saraf Swagata Giri Yukti Agarwal Vikram Pesswani Vivek Sood Srishti Seth Sumalya.
MYP Pre-authorisation Report April 12-13, 2010 Recommendations Summary Professional Development Day May 17 th 2010.
Chapter 14: Using the Scalable Decision Process on Large Projects The process outlined is meant to be scaleable. Individual steps can be removed, changed,
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-1 Organizational Theory, Design, and Change Sixth Edition Gareth R. Jones Chapter.
The Employee Partnership Partners in Transition 22 nd Annual Telecommunication Conference and Trade Exhibition June 2006, Punta Cana The Employee.
Chapter 3 Strategic Human Resource Management. Chapter 3: HR’s Strategic Challenges  Strategic plan A company's plan for how it will match its internal.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
Regional Training Sessions The Arts, Grades 9-12 Day One John Phillips Education Officer, The Arts Ontario Ministry of Education November, 2009.
Our Community: THINGS ARE JUST NOT THE SAME!. UNIT SUMMARY: Children are often under the impression that the way things are in their world is the way.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
 People with goals succeed because they know where they are going. ~ Earl Nightingale.
Context Evaluation knowing the setting Context Evaluation knowing the setting.
Board Feedback Results Board Meeting Dallas April 2007 Board Feedback Results Governance Committee Report Presented at Los Angeles July 2007.
Chapter 8: Participant-Oriented Evaluation Approaches
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
+ Dynita Padgett EDUC 534/SUMMER 2009 LEADERSHIP PROJECT.
Strategic Direction Janice Melnychuk Russ Dahms If you don’t know where you are going Any path will get you there.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
1 Training for the real world: Collaborative learning & Employability Skills Vivienne Scott.
Team Exercise. 5/29/2007SE Survival Exercise2 SURVIVAL!
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
Assessing Organizational Culture: Moving Towards Organizational Change and Renewal.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-1 Organizational Theory, Design, and Change Sixth Edition Gareth R. Jones Chapter.
Outdoor Logistics.  Outdoor Logistics  Real purpose  Specific plans  Avoids comfort  Determines consequence  Personal confidence  Solves problems.
W R I T I N G M A T T E R S A workshop of the Hoosier Writing Project a site of the National Writing Project at IUPUI Herb Budden, Co-director.
Teaching Children About Food Safety Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators.
Tier 6: Knowledge Competencies for Options Counselors The detailed knowledge areas required for work in a specific occupation. Competencies from the “Core.
The Market – Class Discussion –Review of Daly and Cobb: Characteristics of the Market Questions –Limitations of Market Economics –Modifying or Reforming.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
©2013 Global Insights Consulting, LLC Neethling Brain Instrument™ NBI™ Thinking Preferences and Decision Making Neethling Brain Instrument™ NBI™ Thinking.
Before We Begin… Visit:
Organization and Knowledge Management
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
Vision Facilitation Template
Strategic Leadership.
Presentation transcript:

`VI-III RoR Meeting San Diego, CA November 1, 2003

This IRI meeting What does your company think innovation is? Who is responsible for innovation? What are your company’s innovation goals? How innovative is your company? What is the process you use to innovate?

VI-I Defined innovation Interviewed innovative and non-innovative companies Developed a Value Innovation Process model Developed the Value IQ Tool The Incredible Human Histogram

From RoR 99-7 Value Creation Value Innovation Technology Innovation Key Academic Experts: Hamel, Prahalad, Kim, Mauborgne, Markides, Matheson, Quinn, and Christianson RoR revised model

Value Innovation Process Hamel’s 10 Rules Environment The two drivers The Process Culture Value Innovation Value Creation

VI-II Value IQ Tool 1. Reviewed and revised 2. Validated and refined CIMS, Linda Aiman-Smith Air Products, 462 respondents questions ROBUST DECISIONS INCENTIVES IMPLEMENTING IN THE FACE OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY Instructions: For each Principle, read each question or statement and review the two descriptors provided (for the conventional and value innovation organizations). Rate your company using these descriptors on a seven point scale (-3. –2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3). If the descriptor for the conventional organization describes your company then insert a –3 in the score column. When you have completed scoring for the 50 questions/statements, transcribe the results into the summary table above. At the outset we will not be able to identity where your company sits relative to a population of companies; however, we expect over time to build a database so that we will be able to in the future. OPEN CULTURE Conventional Organization (-3) Value Innovation Organization (+3) Score A. How empowered are people to question the value of activities? People are discouraged from questioning the value of a task. They fear or have experienced unresponsiveness or backlash. Inquiring into how the task creates value is a legitimate way to question. Activities not adding value are modified or stopped. B. How many alternatives are considered in decision-making? How are perspectives integrated into decisions? Limited options are evaluated simultaneously. Projects progress sequentially. Preferred alternative often dominated by politics. Few perspectives are represented. Additional ideas are discounted and rarely listened to. People are expected to explore alternative strategies and plans. Detailed plans are developed only for the selected strategy. Different perspectives are incorporated and diversity of thought is encouraged. The organization has developed a listening culture. C. How open is the organization to opportunities beyond the current business model? The focus is on the improvement of the core business. Non-core businesses are divested. Unusual opportunities are approached with a “How can we…?”, rather than a “This won’t work” attitude. Organization is flexible enough to try, and fail often and honorably. The company encourages revolutionaries. D. How easy is it to get information? People must work hard to get information. They feel out of the loop on critical issues. Information is used as a source of personal power, or, is kept in business “silos”. People obtain information readily. There are few secrets and channels of information flow are abundant. People are encouraged and trusted to seek and use information appropriately. E. How is knowledge managed? There is no formal approach. Informal practices exist leading to errant assumptions or misinformation. There are numerous communities of practice and formal tools to retrieve, sort and convey information.

VI-III Co-Chairs David Roberts, Air Products Dick Lee, Emeritus, Co-chair VI-I Team Members Jim Scinta, Co-chair VI-II Nina Goodrich, Co-chair, VI-II Tom Dillon, Co-chair, VI-I Barbara Bachman, Tom Basalno, Michael Pickett, Debra Steich and others ROBUST DECISIONS INCENTIVES IMPLEMENTING IN THE FACE OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY Instructions: For each Principle, read each question or statement and review the two descriptors provided (for the conventional and value innovation organizations). Rate your company using these descriptors on a seven point scale (-3. –2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3). If the descriptor for the conventional organization describes your company then insert a –3 in the score column. When you have completed scoring for the 50 questions/statements, transcribe the results into the summary table above. At the outset we will not be able to identity where your company sits relative to a population of companies; however, we expect over time to build a database so that we will be able to in the future. OPEN CULTURE Conventional Organization (-3) Value Innovation Organization (+3) Score A. How empowered are people to question the value of activities? People are discouraged from questioning the value of a task. They fear or have experienced unresponsiveness or backlash. Inquiring into how the task creates value is a legitimate way to question. Activities not adding value are modified or stopped. B. How many alternatives are considered in decision-making? How are perspectives integrated into decisions? Limited options are evaluated simultaneously. Projects progress sequentially. Preferred alternative often dominated by politics. Few perspectives are represented. Additional ideas are discounted and rarely listened to. People are expected to explore alternative strategies and plans. Detailed plans are developed only for the selected strategy. Different perspectives are incorporated and diversity of thought is encouraged. The organization has developed a listening culture. C. How open is the organization to opportunities beyond the current business model? The focus is on the improvement of the core business. Non-core businesses are divested. Unusual opportunities are approached with a “How can we…?”, rather than a “This won’t work” attitude. Organization is flexible enough to try, and fail often and honorably. The company encourages revolutionaries. D. How easy is it to get information? People must work hard to get information. They feel out of the loop on critical issues. Information is used as a source of personal power, or, is kept in business “silos”. People obtain information readily. There are few secrets and channels of information flow are abundant. People are encouraged and trusted to seek and use information appropriately. E. How is knowledge managed? There is no formal approach. Informal practices exist leading to errant assumptions or misinformation. There are numerous communities of practice and formal tools to retrieve, sort and convey information.

VI-III Objectives Define “Front-End” and establish central database – Anonymity? Internal and external benchmarking - IRI RoR and other member companies By industry? By functional area? Benchmark “innovative” companies Walmart Southwest airlines mTV Virgin Best Buy ROBUST DECISIONS INCENTIVES IMPLEMENTING IN THE FACE OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY Instructions: For each Principle, read each question or statement and review the two descriptors provided (for the conventional and value innovation organizations). Rate your company using these descriptors on a seven point scale (-3. –2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3). If the descriptor for the conventional organization describes your company then insert a –3 in the score column. When you have completed scoring for the 50 questions/statements, transcribe the results into the summary table above. At the outset we will not be able to identity where your company sits relative to a population of companies; however, we expect over time to build a database so that we will be able to in the future. OPEN CULTURE Conventional Organization (-3) Value Innovation Organization (+3) Score A. How empowered are people to question the value of activities? People are discouraged from questioning the value of a task. They fear or have experienced unresponsiveness or backlash. Inquiring into how the task creates value is a legitimate way to question. Activities not adding value are modified or stopped. B. How many alternatives are considered in decision-making? How are perspectives integrated into decisions? Limited options are evaluated simultaneously. Projects progress sequentially. Preferred alternative often dominated by politics. Few perspectives are represented. Additional ideas are discounted and rarely listened to. People are expected to explore alternative strategies and plans. Detailed plans are developed only for the selected strategy. Different perspectives are incorporated and diversity of thought is encouraged. The organization has developed a listening culture. C. How open is the organization to opportunities beyond the current business model? The focus is on the improvement of the core business. Non-core businesses are divested. Unusual opportunities are approached with a “How can we…?”, rather than a “This won’t work” attitude. Organization is flexible enough to try, and fail often and honorably. The company encourages revolutionaries. D. How easy is it to get information? People must work hard to get information. They feel out of the loop on critical issues. Information is used as a source of personal power, or, is kept in business “silos”. People obtain information readily. There are few secrets and channels of information flow are abundant. People are encouraged and trusted to seek and use information appropriately. E. How is knowledge managed? There is no formal approach. Informal practices exist leading to errant assumptions or misinformation. There are numerous communities of practice and formal tools to retrieve, sort and convey information.

VI-III Deliverables: Is this an indicator? Is it a leading or lagging? companies can benchmark against: Prior performance All other companies Other companies in their industry Recognized “Innovative” companies Results reported annually ROBUST DECISIONS INCENTIVES IMPLEMENTING IN THE FACE OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY Instructions: For each Principle, read each question or statement and review the two descriptors provided (for the conventional and value innovation organizations). Rate your company using these descriptors on a seven point scale (-3. –2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3). If the descriptor for the conventional organization describes your company then insert a –3 in the score column. When you have completed scoring for the 50 questions/statements, transcribe the results into the summary table above. At the outset we will not be able to identity where your company sits relative to a population of companies; however, we expect over time to build a database so that we will be able to in the future. OPEN CULTURE Conventional Organization (-3) Value Innovation Organization (+3) Score A. How empowered are people to question the value of activities? People are discouraged from questioning the value of a task. They fear or have experienced unresponsiveness or backlash. Inquiring into how the task creates value is a legitimate way to question. Activities not adding value are modified or stopped. B. How many alternatives are considered in decision-making? How are perspectives integrated into decisions? Limited options are evaluated simultaneously. Projects progress sequentially. Preferred alternative often dominated by politics. Few perspectives are represented. Additional ideas are discounted and rarely listened to. People are expected to explore alternative strategies and plans. Detailed plans are developed only for the selected strategy. Different perspectives are incorporated and diversity of thought is encouraged. The organization has developed a listening culture. C. How open is the organization to opportunities beyond the current business model? The focus is on the improvement of the core business. Non-core businesses are divested. Unusual opportunities are approached with a “How can we…?”, rather than a “This won’t work” attitude. Organization is flexible enough to try, and fail often and honorably. The company encourages revolutionaries. D. How easy is it to get information? People must work hard to get information. They feel out of the loop on critical issues. Information is used as a source of personal power, or, is kept in business “silos”. People obtain information readily. There are few secrets and channels of information flow are abundant. People are encouraged and trusted to seek and use information appropriately. E. How is knowledge managed? There is no formal approach. Informal practices exist leading to errant assumptions or misinformation. There are numerous communities of practice and formal tools to retrieve, sort and convey information.