3 Months Viva OUTLINE What is CLIC and PACMAN projects - Why PACMAN - what is the PACMAN challenge? What is project 3.1 of PACMAN PhD Thesis - Thesis subject.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Complexity Metrics for Design & Manufacturability Analysis

Advertisements

Simona Bettoni and Remo Maccaferri, CERN Wiggler modeling Double-helix like option.

CIEMAT technological contributions to linear colliders Fernando ToralGandía, 3/12/2005.

Silvia Zorzetti. PACMAN CLICScientific ProjectThe Team PACMAN (Particle Accelerator Components Metrology and Alignment to the Nanometer Scale) Ph.D. training.

Metrology and pre-alignment of the components of CLIC in the PACMAN project S. W. Kamugasa, V. Vlachakis CLIC Workshop January 2015 CERN, Geneva,

Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.

H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.

Workshop TS May 2008 GENERAL CLIC ALIGNMENT Progresses and strategy. Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, TS/SU/MTI.

Robert Ruland Intra Girder Assembly and Alignment - October 20, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 Intra.

A Laser Based Alignment System for the CLIC project

PACMAN Workshop OUTLINE Introduction ESR 3.1 Challenges - Stability budget and Precision Mechanical Design - Precision Assembly of MBQ and BPM - System.

DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.

Goal: Understand the stages in design process and the role of computer aided design. Objectives: After this chapter, you should understand the following.

Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Iordan Doytchinov ESR3.1, WP3 1.

1 M. Modena for the CLIC MDI magnet study Team (A. Aloev, P. Thonet, E. Solodko, A. Vorozhtsov) CLIC MDI Meeting,16 January 2015.

High-Accuracy, Repeatable Wrist Interface

Gek 16/6/041 ITRP Comments on Question 19 GEK 9/06/04 19) For the X-band (warm) technology, detail the status of the tests of the full rf delivery system.

H. MAINAUD DURAND PACMAN WP1 OUTLINE Tasks & role of associated partner Plans for training.

 The Task  The Approach  The Evaluation  The Analysis  The Model  Conclusions  Project Management.

1m 3 SDHCAL Mechanic Structure M.C Fouz 8/10/2010 The 1m 3 prototype Mechanical Structure is financed by: Spanish HEP National Program by the project FPA

10/2007 M.Taborelli, TS-MME Structure Manufacturing, Achievements and Challenges M.Taborelli -Technology -Shape accuracy -Surface quality -Assembly accuracy.

STATUS of the final PACMAN bench integration PACMAN meeting 11/06/2015 Hélène Mainaud Durand.

What is CERN? International laboratory with strongest “microscope” in the world answering questions about: School laboratory microscope CERN’s “microscope”

Introduction to Design Engineer Analysis

ESR 3.1 Introduction Iordan Doytchinov

Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.

ABSTRACT The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is currently under development at CERN as a potential multi-TeV e + e – collider. The manufacturing and assembly.

Medical Device R&D / manufacturing in Mexico for worldwide markets Summary of Technical Capabilities ZIPTEK MEXICO SA DE CV.

Status of training program N. Catalán Lasheras

November : PACMAN Kick-off Meeting Introduction to Work Package 3: “Precision mechanics and stabilization” Michele Modena - CERN.

Specimens are measured in microns (µm)! 1 millimeter = 1000 microns (micro meters) If this caterpillar is 20mm long, how many microns is it? (20mm)(1000)

CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.

WP5. Training N. Catalán Lasheras. Outline Introduction Existing vs. new training General training for all ESRs Training by work package Secondments in.

CERN adb Chamber Support Structure Installation MUON SYSTEM INTEGRATION MEETING - Status of Production of support panels - Things to be settled.

AGENDA: 1) SDO Procurement ACTIONS has noted at last meeting (10 June): ALEXANDER: magnetic forces during assembly to be computed. In case, we could assemble.

CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.

CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.

Solomon William KAMUGASA

Fiducialisation and initial alignment of components for CLIC Mateusz Sosin on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC Workshop 2015.

2 nd Supervisory Board Package 3.1 Summary OUTLINE University Secondment PACMAN alignment bench 25/09/2015 by Iordan Doytchinov.

Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department 22 nd January 2015 C. Garion2 Beam Line Interconnection: snapshot of present design principles.

PACMAN Error Inventory OUTLINE The PACMAN task The Inventory of contributors The Evaluation Method Critical Areas Outcome 08/10/2015 by Iordan Doytchinov.

SUM ESR ESR ESR ESR ESR ESR ESR ESR (TBC)

Presentation 7/05/2015 Giordana Severino ESR2.2, WP2 CERN Supervisors Marco Buzio Academic supervisor Prof. Pasquale Arpaia.

Application Development in Engineering Optimization with Matlab and External Solvers Aalto University School of Engineering.

Introduction to the PACMAN project A study on Particle Accelerator Components’ Metrology and Alignment to the Nanometre scale OUTLINE Scientific goals.

CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.

MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.

Pre-alignment of quadrupoles 1 CLIC stabilization day, STARTSLIDE PRE-ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN BEAM QUADRUPOLES Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.

H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.

Physics Requirements Sensitivity to Manufacturing Imperfections Strategy  where to map field  measure deviation from ideal model  fit to error tables.

CLIC08 Workshop, CERN October 2008 PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDY STATUS AND MODEL FOR THE BEAM DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS TS/SU/MTI Thomas TOUZE Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.

PACMAN : technical objectives Hélène Mainaud Durand.

CLIC survey and alignment studies 1 CTC meeting, 13 th January 2009 STARTSLIDE CLIC Survey and alignment studies Jean-Pierre QUESNEL, Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.

Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.

H. MAINAUD DURAND PACMAN training network A study on Particle Accelerator Components’ Metrology and Alignment to the Nanometre scale OUTLINE Scientific.

David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.

on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team

PACMAN impact on future module design

Recent developments on micro-triangulation

Stages for the SSW translation system for PACMAN

Ddd 4-Slides Challenge Silvia Zorzetti.

WP1 Metrology & Alignment

Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.

TBL quadrupole mover prototype development

SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.

HIE-LINAC status report

TESA UPC / UPD Gauge block comparator

Undulator Alignment Plan

M. Modena, CLIC Stabilization Day # 10, 14 September 2010

Presentation transcript:

3 Months Viva OUTLINE What is CLIC and PACMAN projects - Why PACMAN - what is the PACMAN challenge? What is project 3.1 of PACMAN PhD Thesis - Thesis subject - Hypothesis Resources for Thesis Timeline Cranfield 16/09/2014 by Iordan Doytchinov

CLIC and why PACMAN Project mm diameter 48.3km straight line assembly of 2 linac’s “particle guns” shooting at each other ~10nm diameter equivalent

What is the PACMAN challenge 3

PACMAN ESR 3.1 sub-project “If you grasp the principles – myths fall & Ideas take-off” David Lentink (TUDELFT) TED Conference Amsterdam (“ برج خليفة ‎, "Khalifa Tower“) – Dubai 2010 Babylon tower by Tobias Verhaecht (1561 – 1631) One off prototype example: Dominique Loiseau - the Rose de Temps clock Extremely costly on time & money High number production (thousands): ‘Swatch’ mass production of Swiss made high quality wrist watches

5000 of them! How is this can be done at industrial not prototype scale? shape accuracy of +/-10 microns meters for critical surfaces for up to 2 meters length Shape Assembly accuracy of +/- 20,microns for up to 2 meters 2000km +/-1 cm Comparison to earth size topology of form specification Iordan D. at PACMAN: PhD Thesis subject

Before, Now 6  Current practical work assembly with jig tooling (fit key concept):  Use of kinematic tool to set location/align components (horizontal VS vertical assembly – investigating effect of gravity) --> Geometric CMM + Magnetic measurement + GD&T analysis (KOTEM software) to be performed Is tooling giving better results than kinematic assembly alone? What about tooling + kinematic assembly?  Done (best so far) kinematic assembly using central pin: approx. ±150 μm obtained  Selected a better assembly method (quadrants positioned by axial pins): approx. ±10 μm

Hypothesis: 7 “Developing a Tool and Technique/methodology for the optimal uncertainties minimisation to increase accuracy and precision/repeatability for precise electro- mechanical assemblies in economically viable environment” How can unperfected components to be put together to produce a high precision assembly with relevant electromagnetic quality? With relative industrial ease? Manufac turing Design Hard/expensive to optimise Measurement + evaluation  Methodology + Jig + Software Assembly stage + jig/tooling Magnetic measurement

Resources required 8  Knowledge: -System Integration, conceptual design. ‘make it good first time’ -Precision systems design -Materials selection for precision and manufacturability -In-built uncertainties due to manufacturability methods processes -Uncertainty bill due to metrology measurement -Assembly methods induced uncertainties -Final function verification induced uncertainties  Software Tools: -CATIA -ANSYS -MATLAB -KOTEM, Sigmetrix  Hardware and facilities: -Quadrupoles existing prototypes + future one to be manufactured -Final PACMAN test bench -CERN and DMP metrology and manufacturing departments -Final PACMAN test bench  Technical support: -Cranfield (Supervisors) -CERN specialists (M.Modena, Stefano Sgobba, Bertrand Niqueverst and other) -External Specialist (L.Charvier (now at Piaget watches) K. Doytchinov (KOTEM) and others

Time plan (see Gantt Chart) 9  Before 9 month VIVA:  After 9 month VIVA:  Thesis finalisation: