THE CHALLENGES OF NOWCASTING CONVECTION OVER THE OCEAN Huaqing Cai, Cathy Kessinger, Nancy Rehak, Daniel Megenhardt and Matthias Steiner National Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Random Forest Predrag Radenković 3237/10
5 th International Conference of Mesoscale Meteor. And Typhoons, Boulder, CO 31 October 2006 National Scale Probabilistic Storm Forecasting for Aviation.
Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
ENHANCEMENTS OF THE NCAR AUTO-NOWCAST SYSTEM BY USING ASAP AND NRL SATELLITE PRODUCTS Huaqing Cai, Rita Roberts, Cindy Mueller and Tom Saxen National Center.
Louisville, KY August 4, 2009 Flash Flood Frank Pereira NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Hydrometeorological Prediction Center.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Radiance Assimilation Activities at SPoRT Will McCarty SPoRT SAC Wednesday June 13,
A short term rainfall prediction algorithm Nazario D. Ramirez and Joan Manuel Castro University of Puerto Rico NOAA Collaborator: Robert J. Kuligowski.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 AIRS Products for the National Weather Service Brad Zavodsky SPoRT Science Advisory.
5/22/201563rd Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference, March 2-5, 2009, St. Petersburg, FL Experiments of Hurricane Initialization with Airborne Doppler.
PROVIDING DISTRIBUTED FORECASTS OF PRECIPITATION USING A STATISTICAL NOWCAST SCHEME Neil I. Fox and Chris K. Wikle University of Missouri- Columbia.
FAA Tactical Weather Forecasting In The
DATA USED ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES  Vigorous testing of HN and RDT will be carried out for NYCMA  Improvement to the models will be carried out to suite the.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
1 Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback Judy E. Ghirardelli National.
Data Integration: Assessing the Value and Significance of New Observations and Products John Williams, NCAR Haig Iskenderian, MIT LL NASA Applied Sciences.
The Evaluation of a Passive Microwave-Based Satellite Rainfall Estimation Algorithm with an IR-Based Algorithm at Short time Scales Robert Joyce RS Information.
The Hydro-Estimator and Hydro-Nowcaster: Satellite- Based Flash Flood Forecasting Tools Robert J. Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS Center for SaTellite Applications.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Wind Predictions: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and Ray Zehr NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
RADAR STORM MOTION ESTIMATION AND BEYOND: A SPECTRAL ALGORITHM AND RADAR OBSERVATION BASED DYNAMIC MODEL Gang Xu* and V. Chandrasekar Colorado State University.
Toward a 4D Cube of the Atmosphere via Data Assimilation Kelvin Droegemeier University of Oklahoma 13 August 2009.
“High resolution ensemble analysis: linking correlations and spread to physical processes ” S. Dey, R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini Mesoscale group.
STEPS: An empirical treatment of forecast uncertainty Alan Seed BMRC Weather Forecasting Group.
The NWS/NCAR “Forecaster Over the Loop” Fort Worth Operational Demonstration Human Enhancement of a Thunderstorm Nowcasting System Eric Nelson, Rita Roberts,
IMPROVING VERY-SHORT-TERM STORM PREDICTIONS BY ASSIMILATING RADAR AND SATELLITE DATA INTO A MESOSCALE NWP MODEL Allen Zhao 1, John Cook 1, Qin Xu 2, and.
An Improved Wind Probability Program: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO Stan Kidder,
NASA Applied Sciences Weather Program Review Boulder, CO – November 18-19, 2008 Oceanic Convection Diagnosis and Nowcasting Cathy Kessinger, Huaqing Cai,
NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Convective Weather Group NCAR/RAL.
Oceanic Weather and Volcanic Ash Cathy Kessinger NCAR/RAL Weather in the Cockpit Workshop Boulder, CO 8-10 August 2006 Augustine, 12 Jan 2006 M.L.Coombs,
Validation of HWRF forecasts with satellite observations Project team Tom Greenwald and James Davies CIMSS/UW Tomislava Vukicevic and Kathryn Sellwood.
Validation of US Navy Polar Ice Prediction (PIPS) Model using Cryosat Data Kim Partington 1, Towanda Street 2, Mike Van Woert 2, Ruth Preller 3 and Pam.
1 National Severe Storms Laboratory & University of Oklahoma Nowcasting.
T he Man-In-The-Loop (MITL) Nowcast Demonstration: Forecaster Input into a Thunderstorm Nowcasting System R. Roberts, T. Saxen, C. Mueller, E. Nelson,
Jon Trueblood (Dordt College) Timothy Sliwinski (FSU) Dr. Amy McGovern David John Gagne (OU) Dr. John Williams Dr. Jennifer Abernethy (NCAR) Image Courtesy:
1 Results from Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program 2008 Yucheng SongIMSG/EMC/NCEP Zoltan TothEMC/NCEP/NWS Sharan MajumdarUniv. of Miami Mark ShirleyNCO/NCEP/NWS.
1 Results from Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program 2007 Yucheng SongIMSG/EMC/NCEP Zoltan TothEMC/NCEP/NWS Sharan MajumdarUniv. of Miami Mark ShirleyNCO/NCEP/NWS.
Nowcasting Trends Past and Future By Jim Wilson NCAR 8 Feb 2011 Geneva Switzerland.
A Global Tropical Cyclone Formation Probability Product Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Daniel Brown, NHC 64.
Atlantic Simplified Track Model Verification 4-year Sample ( ) OFCL shown for comparison Forecast Skill Mean Absolute Error.
Convective Storm Forecasting 1-6 Hours Prior to Initiation Dan Lindsey and Louie Grasso NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/RAMMB and CIRA, Fort Collins, CO John Mecikalski,
Observed & Simulated Profiles of Cloud Occurrence by Atmospheric State A Comparison of Observed Profiles of Cloud Occurrence with Multiscale Modeling Framework.
NOAA-MDL Seminar 7 May 2008 Bob Rabin NOAA/National Severe Storms Lab Norman. OK CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Challenges in Remote Sensing to.
Typhoon Forecasting and QPF Technique Development in CWB Kuo-Chen Lu Central Weather Bureau.
Preliminary results from assimilation of GPS radio occultation data in WRF using an ensemble filter H. Liu, J. Anderson, B. Kuo, C. Snyder, A. Caya IMAGe.
Recent and Planned Updates to the NCAR Auto-Nowcast (ANC) System Thomas Saxen, Rita Roberts, Huaqing Cai, Eric Nelson, Dan Breed National Center for Atmospheric.
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
1 Aviation Forecasting – Works in Progress NCVF – Ceiling & Visibility CoSPA – Storm Prediction A Joint Effort Among: MIT Lincoln Laboratory NCAR – National.
Trials of a 1km Version of the Unified Model for Short Range Forecasting of Convective Events Humphrey Lean, Susan Ballard, Peter Clark, Mark Dixon, Zhihong.
COMPARISONS OF NOWCASTING TECHNIQUES FOR OCEANIC CONVECTION Huaqing Cai, Cathy Kessinger, Nancy Rehak, Daniel Megenhardt and Matthias Steiner National.
Nowcasting Convective Storms for Aviation in NCAR/RAL Convective Weather Group Cai Huaqing National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO, USA.
National Convective Weather Forecast (NCWF) Collaborators: C. Mueller, J. Pinto, D. Ahijevych, D. Megenhardt, N. Rehak Stan Trier, NCAR
Overview of CIRA and NESDIS Global TC Services Presented by John Knaff NOAA/NESDIS Regional and Mesoscale Meteorology Branch Fort Collins, CO USA For The.
New developments in the Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG) product
Nowcasting Convection Fusing 0-6 hour observation- and model-based probability forecasts WWRP Symposium on Nowcasting and Very Short Range Forecasting.
Briefing to FAA and Airline Industry Representatives 8 April 2010 Global/Oceanic Convection Diagnosis and Nowcasting Cathy Kessinger, Huaqing Cai, Matthias.
SIGMA: Diagnosis and Nowcasting of In-flight Icing – Improving Aircrew Awareness Through FLYSAFE Christine Le Bot Agathe Drouin Christian Pagé.
11 Short-Range QPF for Flash Flood Prediction and Small Basin Forecasts Prediction Forecasts David Kitzmiller, Yu Zhang, Wanru Wu, Shaorong Wu, Feng Ding.
NOAA, May 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA Activities toward Transitioning Mature R&D Missions to an Operational Status.
Roger A. Stocker 1 Jason E. Nachamkin 2 An overview of operational FNMOC mesoscale cloud forecast support 1 FNMOC: Fleet Numerical Meteorology & Oceanography.
ASAP Convective Weather Research at NCAR Matthias Steiner and Huaqing Cai Rita Roberts, John Williams, David Ahijevych, Sue Dettling and David Johnson.
2. WRF model configuration and initial conditions  Three sets of initial and lateral boundary conditions for Katrina are used, including the output from.
Investigations of Using TAMDAR Soundings in the NCAR Auto-Nowcaster H. Cai, C. Mueller, E. Nelson, and N. Rehak NCAR/RAL.
60 min Nowcasts 60 min Verification Cold Front Regime
NCAR Research on Thunderstorm Analysis & Nowcasting
Huaqing Cai, Jim Wilson, James Pinto, Dave Albo and Cindy Mueller
New developments in the Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG) product
A Real-Time Learning Technique to Predict Cloud-To-Ground Lightning
Studies of convectively induced turbulence
Aiding Severe Weather Forecasting
Presentation transcript:

THE CHALLENGES OF NOWCASTING CONVECTION OVER THE OCEAN Huaqing Cai, Cathy Kessinger, Nancy Rehak, Daniel Megenhardt and Matthias Steiner National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO, USA Joint 2010 CWB weather Analysis and Forecasting and COAA 5 th International Ocean-Atmosphere Conference June, 2010 Central Weather Bureau, Taipei ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study is supported by NASA ROSES and NASA ASAP program and in collaboration with NRL and MIT LL

Air France 447 (0145 UTC 1 June 2009) The wide-area view provided by real-time experimental Global Convection/Turbulence uplinks may have improved pilot situational awareness (approx.) Last verbal contact, 0133 UTC (approx.) Last ACARS message, 0214 UTC (approx.) Last verbal contact, 0133 UTC (approx.) Last ACARS message, 0214 UTC Longwave IR (0145 UTC) Cloud Top Height (0145 UTC) Convection Diagnosis Oceanic (CDO) 0145 UTC + + Motivation: Air France 447

“Wx Ahead” Uplink Message valid 0130 UTC 1 June 2009 /EXP CLOUD TOP FI AF447/AN NXXXAF 01 Jun '/' Cloud tops 30,000 to 40,000 ft//////CCC///// 'C' Cloud tops above 40,000 ft///////////CC///// *4.0N,30.0W///////// *////////C////////// //*//CC///CCC///////// ///*CCCC/C/CC////////// ////*CCCCCCC//C///////// ///CC*CCCCC///CC//////// ///CCC*CCCCC///////////// //CCCCC*CCCC////////////// //CCCCCCC*CCC////////////// /CCCCCCCCC*CCC///// / //CCCCCCCCCC*CC///// // /// //CCCCCCCCCCC*C///////// ////// /////CCCCCCCCCC*C// // // ////// //////CCCCCCCC//*/ // / ////// CC//////CCCCCCC//* ///////// CCC////////////// * ///////// /C//////////// *1.3N,31.4W //// /////// */ *// / /*/// // /*/// / /*// * // * /// * // // * //// * ///// * ////// * ///// /// * /// Pos Rpt / // * / 0133 // X 1.4S,32.8W // Valid for // / z // Pilot feedback at url: deleted] Graphical view (EFB concept) Text-based view for ACARS printer 30-39Kft >40Kft /=30-39Kft C=>40Kft

Oceanic Diagnosis and Nowcasting System Convective Diagnosis Oceanic (CDO) identifies convective cells CDO Interest CDO Binary Product Convective Nowcasting Oceanic (CNO-Titan) makes 1-hr and 2-hr nowcasts of storm location using an object tracker (Titan) CNO- Titan Nowcast CNO-Gridded produces gridded nowcasts that will more closely resemble storm structures CNO- Gridded Nowcast CNO-RF Random Forest Nowcast CNO-RF utilizes environmental and model-based inputs to better predict storm initiation and decay [Cai et al. (2009)] CTopCClassGCD With Growth/Decay Without Growth/Decay

CNO Based on TITAN (Dixon and Wiener, 1993) TITAN for Radar Data An Example of 1 Hr CNO-TITAN *1 hr nowcast of CDO valid at 1315 UTC on August 19, 2007 using TITAN technique is shown on the right; red lines on the right represent CDO = 2.5 verification. *Advantages of TITAN: computationally efficient; capability of addressing growth/decay. *Disadvantages of TITAN: polygons can only roughly represent storm shapes; tends to over- forecasting

CNO Based on Modified TITAN---- Gridded Forecast An Example of 1 Hr CNO-Gridded Forecast TITAN Motion Vectors at t 0 Gridded 0 hr TITAN Motion Vectors Temporal & Spatial Smoothing min Motion Vectors min Forecasts by Advecting Original Satellite Data at t 0 Gridded 1 hr TITAN Motion Vectors Gridded 2 hr TITAN Motion Vectors Merged with GFS Winds Closest in Time Temporal & Spatial Smoothing Temporal & Spatial Smoothing min Motion Vectors min Motion Vectors min Forecasts by Advecting 60 min Nowcasts min Forecasts by Advecting 120 min Nowcasts Merged with GFS Winds Closest in Time 1-3 Hr CNO-Gridded Forecast Flow Chart *Advantages of CNO-Gridded: realistic looking storms; low bias. *Disadvantages of CNO-Gridded: could be computationally expensive; no explicit growth/decay capability

CNO Based on Random Forest Statistical Analysis and Data Fusion The random forest technique produces an ensemble of decision trees from labeled training instances –during training, RF generates estimates of predictor importance –RF trees “vote” on classification of new data points, comprising a nonlinear empirical model that provides both deterministic predictions and probabilistic information Vote: 1 => 40 votes for “0”, 60 votes for “1”; consensus category “1” Data pt. Tree 1 Vote: 0 Data pt. Tree 2 Vote: 0 Data pt. Tree 3 Vote: 1 Data pt. Tree 4 Vote: 0 Data pt. Tree 100 … *Slide courtesy of John Williams and Dave Ahijevych

An Example of CNO- RF Forecast Compared with CNO- TITAN ( 1 hr) *1 hr forecasts valid at 1315 UTC on August 19, 2007 for both techniques; Red lines represent CDO = 2.5 verification *Advantages of random forest technique: more realistic looking storms; taking into account of storm environment to address storm growth/decay. *As a relatively new, novel technique for nowcasting, its potential needs to be fully explored CNO Hurricane Dean A B C D A B C D CNO-RF CNO-TITAN

Statistical Evaluation of the Three Nowcasting Techniques CSIBIAS 5 days of data from Aug 19-23, 2007 over the Gulf of Mexico domain are used to calculate the statistics with a grid size of ~ 5 km and CDO threshold of 2.5 All three techniques show skill over persistence RF and gridded forecast perform best at 1 hr lead time TITAN is the best at 2-3 hr lead time Gridded forecast is the best for 4-6 hr lead time

Relative Skill Comparisons of Three Nowcasting Techniques versus Persistence Gridded and RF nowcasts ~10 % better than persistence at 1 hr lead time TITAN is the best for 2 and 3 hr lead time (~20-30% improvement) Gridded nowcasts the best for 4,5 and 6 hr lead time (~ 15-25% improvement) Overall, gridded technique seems to be the best performer

Examples of 1 hr Gridded Forecast over the Gulf of Mexico Domain * White lines are CDO=2.5 verification, satellite data available every 30 min A B C D Issue time: 1215 UTC 2009/09/05 Valid time: 1315 UTC 2009/09/05 1 HR

Examples of 3 hr Gridded Forecast over the Gulf of Mexico Domain *White lines are CDO=2.5 verification, satellite data available every 30 min A B C D Issue time: 1215 UTC 2009/09/05 Valid time: 1515 UTC 2009/09/05 3 HR

Examples of 6 hr Gridded Forecast over the Gulf of Mexico Domain *White lines are CDO=2.5 verification, satellite data available every 30 min A B C D Issue time: 1215 UTC 2009/09/05 Valid time: 1815 UTC 2009/09/05 6 HR

Examples of 3 hr CDO Forecasts Based on CNO- Gridded Technique in the West Pacific Domain *White lines are CDO=1.5 verification; Cloud class is not used in CDO *Satellite data are available every 3 hrs A B C D Issue time: 2100 UTC 2009/12/28 Valid time: 0000 UTC 2009/12/29 3 HR

Examples of 3 hr CDO Forecasts Based on CNO- Gridded Technique in the West Pacific Domain *White lines are CDO=1.5 verification; Cloud class is not used in CDO *Satellite data are available every 3 hrs A B C D Issue time: 0000 UTC 2009/12/29 Valid time: 0300 UTC 2009/12/29 3 HR

Examples of 3 hr CDO Forecasts Based on CNO- Gridded Technique in the West Pacific Domain *White lines are CDO=1.5 verification; Cloud class is not used in CDO *Satellite data are available every 3 hrs A B C D Issue time: 0300 UTC 2009/12/29 Valid time: 0600 UTC 2009/12/29 3 HR

Summary Statistics of CNO-Gridded Forecasts 30 days of data from Sep 1-30, 2009 over the Gulf of Mexico domain are used to calculate the statistics with a grid size of ~ 5 km and CDO threshold of 2.5 The results showed here could serve as benchmark performance of extrapolation-based nowcasting techniques for oceanic convection Similar verification for model forecasts need to be done so that a comparison of convective forecasting skills between model and extrapolation can be obtained The black squares are statistics from Aug 19-22, 2007 What are the GFS model scores for oceanic convection???

Summary and Future Work The challenges of nowcasting convection over the ocean at the current stage are caused by the lack of 1) high spatial and temporal resolution data; 2) the best way to identify convection over the ocean; and 3) the best way to blend observation-based extrapolating nowcasts with model-based convective forecasts. The nowcasting products need to be uplinked to transoceanic aircraft for situational awareness. Three nowcasting techniques (CNO-TITAN, CNO-Gridded and CNO- Random Forest) for oceanic convection forecasting in the 1-6 hr time frame are implemented, tested and compared in the Gulf of Mexico domain Based on the overall performance statistics, CNO-Gridded forecasts for 1-8 hr are implemented in the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific domain in the realtime Oceanic Diagnosis and Nowcasting System. The summary statistical performance of CNO-Gridded extrapolating technique could serve as benchmark for future blending work of GFS model and extrapolating for oceanic convection in 1-8 hr time frame.

Thanks for Your Attention! Questions and Comments?