AAC&U VALUE Project: Minnesota Collaborative Demonstration Year 2 (2015-16) Demonstration Year 3 (2016-17) 1.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Aligning VALUE Rubrics to Institutional Purposes: Sharing Practical Approaches that Promote Consistent Scoring and Program Improvement Linda Siefert

Advertisements

Aligning and Integrating General Education and the Majors at a Large Public Research University Anthony Ciccone William Keith Jeffrey Merrick University.

Our Institutions CSB/SJU Two schools, one academic program Liberal Arts, Residential, Catholic, Benedictine 3,900+ undergraduates 300+ FTE faculty Distribution.

Outcomes Assessment. Many academic institutions measure the success of service- learning based on participation, number of hours, or estimated monies.

An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections

Multi-State Collaborative to Advance Learning Outcome Assessment Pilot Project and PCC.

AMY DOLING, CORYANNE HARRIGAN, AND STEVEN J. GRIFFITH SIMPSON COLLEGE, INDIANOLA, IOWA Widening the Circle: Creating Momentum for Curricular and Structural.

Pilot Study Introduction and Overview 1.  Julie Carnahan Senior Associate - SHEEO MSC Project Director  Terrel Rhodes Vice President.

Multi-State Collaborative 1.  Susan Albertine Vice President, Office of Diversity, Equity, and Student Success, AAC&U Faculty Engagement Subgroup, MSC.

Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.

NSE Assessment (Session 2): The Final Story Project

ENGAGING STUDENTS: HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES By Mark Stoner and Vanessa Arnaud.

The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.

S TEPS FOR S CORING W ORK Florida State University March 18-19, 2015 VALUE R UBRIC C ALIBRATION E VENT.

Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.

Student Success as a University-wide Commitment Faculty Presentation August 25, 2011.

PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.

The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.

NSE Assessment (Session 1): The Academic Plan Assignment for MEP

Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.

Maps, Rubrics and Templates A Primer on Their Uses for Assessment in Student Affairs.

Frequently asked questions about development, interpretation and use of rubrics on campuses 1.

Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.

AAC&U/ Minnesota Collaborative Pilot (MCP) Project: Artifacts and Assessment Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 1.

Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.

California State University East Bay

Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.

Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.

Palomar College General Education/Institutional Learning Outcomes Overview Fall, 2015.

Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.

MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.

Goal Assessment Team Orientation February 18, 2009.

NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.

NSE Assessment Overview: Your Role in Outcomes-Based Assessment What Will We Learn About Our Students?

Competency Assessment Advisory Team (CAAT) QUANTITATIVE REASONING DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS REP – ROB NICHOLS 1.

VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.

Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.

SD WriteToLearn Assessment Pilot TIE Conference April 20, 2010.

An Assessment For Learning. A rubric is a scoring tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” and clearly defines gradations of.

Faculty Driven Assessment Karla Guilford Shipp Tidewater Community College Virginia Beach, VA.

Program Assessment: What Difference Does it Make? Ross Miller, AAC&U.

Assessment at City Tech April 17, 2015 Living Lab Associate Seminar Susan Nilsen-Kupsch RDH MPA.

Multi-State Collaborative. What is it? Oregon University System (OUS) partnership with 9 states, Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U),

AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.

Taking Institutional Level Assessment to the Course Level Journey – Challenges – Discoveries Mesa Community College DIVING INTO DEEPER LEARNING.

Using AAC&U’s Learning Tools to Address Core Revision Terrel L. Rhodes Vice President Association of American Colleges and Universities Texas Coordinating.

Orientation Meeting Humanities Distribution- Cycle B Fall 2012.

Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.

Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.

C OLLEGIATE L EARNING A SSESSMENT Dr. Pedro Reyes, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs January 2014.

A Paradigm Shift in the Assessment of Learning Outcomes Tara Rose Director of University Assessment University of Kentucky Jeanne Mullaney.

Adding Flame to Kindling: Transforming Campus Culture

CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.

Beyond the “A” Word Assessment that Empowers Faculty to

Dr. Ruth Newberry February 16, 2015

Institutional Student Learning Outcome Assessment Report Fall 2015 Assessment Cycle

ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP

Engaging Faculty in Institutional Assessment - A Panel Discussion

2017 Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Student Learning

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment

Continuing to Advance the Culture of Assessment in Massachusetts

The Pain and Promise of CRITICAL CORE Implementation

Purposeful Pathways: Designing Relevant and Transparent HIPs

Aqua Training Webinar for Refinement Year Participants

AY College-Wide Learning Outcomes Results

AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment

Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research

AP World History and AP Capstone Seminar and Research

Assessment Spring 2016.

General Studies ePortfolio Pilot

Presentation transcript:

AAC&U VALUE Project: Minnesota Collaborative Demonstration Year 2 ( ) Demonstration Year 3 ( ) 1

Overview  Describe project goals  Explain requirements for participation in year 2 & 3  Discuss the tentative plan for local flexibility  Explain the benefits to SMSU faculty and campus 2

Minnesota Collaborative: 10 institutions  SMSU  St. Cloud State  U of M – Morris  Minneapolis Comm. & Tech. College  Inver Hills Comm. College  Augsburg  Gustavus  Hamline  St. Olaf  St Scholastica 3

Project Goals  Focus assessment of student learning on samples of students’ authentic work  Establish reliability and validity of using VALUE rubrics  Relationship between assignment and rubric scores  Relationship between assessment and other measures of student learning 4

SMSU’s Participation:  Six Outcomes at 3 student credit levels (25%, 50%, 75%)  Critical Thinking  Written Communication  Quantitative Literacy  Intercultural Knowledge & Competence  Civic Engagement  Ethical Reasoning  Demographic Data  Faculty-Reported Assignment Difficulty 5

Tentative Plan: Collection of Artifacts Year 2: Spring Written Communication 2. Critical Thinking 3. Civic Engagement Year 3: Fall Quantitative Literacy 2. Ethical Reasoning 3. Intercultural Knowledge & Competence 6

Assignment Parameters  Written student work  no multiple choice exams, videos, or multimedia  Does NOT have to be final project for course  Length:  3 pages minimum: Written Communication and Critical Thinking  No minimum for others  Individual assignment  No team projects 7

OPPORTUNITY!! Be a VALUE Project SCORER  Score ~100 artifacts in one outcome  Scoring: June1-July 19, 2016  $750 stipend from AAC&U  Must Attend Training  March 31-April 2  Kansas City  travel/lodging/meals are covered  Names are due: Dec 18 8

Project Timeline November-December  project briefings with CIA, LEC, Civic Engagement, IRB  Recruit faculty volunteers  Put out call for scorers (due Dec 18) March-May 1  Collection of student artifacts Mar 31-April 2: Scorer training May 1: ALL ARTIFACTS DUE May 1-15: Upload artifacts June 1-July 29: Scoring for Year 2 9

Benefits…  Gather data in 5 of 7 LEP outcomes  Enhance program assessments  Faculty ownership in assessment  Improving assessment tools  Conversations at local level  Assist in meeting HLC concerns  Building our culture of assessment 10