Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal on Ancillary Service Deliverability Requirements QMWG January 6, 2012.
Advertisements

1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 7, 2006.
NPRR 209 Presentation Adrian Pieniazek – NRG Texas Technical Advisory Committee May 6, 2010.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
NSRS deployment April John Adams ROS – May 12, 2005.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 4, 2009.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
1 Compliance Update May Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance Performance further declined in March  March performance comparison.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Demand Side Working Group Chairman Slides June 27, 2008 Mary Anne Brelinsky Vice President 1.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
1 Project Update and Summary of Project Priority List (PPL) Activity to Date May 15, 2014.
1 WMS Report TO TAC January In Brief Two Working Group Reports Two Working Group Reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports One PRR.
September 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Outstanding Issues & Action Items 1.Obligations to Honor Ancillary Services Commitments 2.Variable ERCOT Bias 3.Sign reversals of the Regulation Signal.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Outage Scheduler Transition Plan Kenneth Ragsdale NATF.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2010.
Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) TITLE: Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin March.
1 Texas Regional Entity Report November Performance Highlights  ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for September –
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
Report to TAC July In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG DSWG DSWG MCWG MCWG MWG MWG QMWG QMWG VCWG VCWG Task Forces Task.
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 Introduction to ERCOT Modeling Process Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors May 16, 2007.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April In Brief Two Working Group reports Two Working Group reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports BENA presentation.
14 Minute Ramp Period Testing Workshop June 30, 2009.
PRR 705 ERCOT Emergency Interruptible Load Service PRS January 22, 2007.
WMS Update Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Frequency Control Task Force Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
© CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. THE OFFERING DESCRIBED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS SOLD AND CONTRACTED BY CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC., A SUBSIDIARY.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
December 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 3, 2009.
Analysis for the Determination of X, Y, and Z for Compliance Monitoring NATF.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Transitional Qualification Approach to Qualifications for the Nodal Market August 16, 2007.
PRR 525 Update Prepared by ERCOT Compliance December 2005.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Load Participation in Nodal Training Session Update DSWG December 7, 2007.
1 Compliance Update April Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance Performance further declined in March  March performance comparison.
Page 1 of 21 Texas Regional Entity ROS Presentation June 11, 2009 T EXAS RE ROS P RESENTATION J UNE 2009.
Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee July 1, 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Ancillary Service Qualification Self-Certification approach ROS Discussion March 16,
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
1 Project Update and Summary of Project Priority List (PPL) Activity to Date June 11, 2014.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors July 15, 2008.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
February 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott March 3, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Compliance Report to ERCOT BOD December 2006
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Compliance Report to ERCOT TAC February 2007
Presentation transcript:

Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America

1 Antitrust Admonition

2 Demand Side Working Group Agenda

DSWG Goals

4 Suspension of Dynamic Scheduling During EEA

5 Update: Performance Protocol Revision to

6 Performance Protocol Revision to ERCOT Actions for Non-Compliance ERCOT may revoke any or all Ancillary Service qualifications of any QSE providing an Ancillary Service (s) for continued failure to comply with required performance standards. ERCOT may revoke the Ancillary Service qualification of any LaaR for failure to comply with the required performance standards. Specifically, if a LaaR that is providing RRS fails to respond with at least ninety-five-percent (95%) of its scheduled capacity within ten (10) minutes of an ERCOT Dispatch Instruction, that response shall be considered a failure. Two (2) LaaR performance failures within any rolling one (1) year period shall result in disqualification of that LaaR. After six (6) months of disqualification, the LaaR may reapply for qualification provided it submits a corrective action plan to ERCOT that identifies actions taken to correct performance deficiencies and the disqualified LaaR successfully passes a new actual deployment qualification test as specified in Section , General Capacity Testing Requirements. Failure to deliver energy resulting from a valid Dispatch Instruction is cause for ERCOT, at ERCOT’s option, to withhold payment for any Ancillary Services purchased and not delivered. TRE will make information relative to each QSE’s performance as well as ERCOT’s performance, available to Market Participants on a monthly basis, subject to the provisions of Section 1.3.1, Restrictions on Protected Information.

7 LaaR Zonal Market versus Nodal Market ProvisionZonal MarketNodal Market Provisional Qualification Allowed for 90 days. (6.10.1)Allowed for 90 days. ( (4)) Revocation of Provisional Qualification Provisional qualification as described herein may be revoked by ERCOT at any time for any non-compliance with provisional qualification requirements. (6.10.1) Provisional qualification as described herein may be revoked by ERCOT at any time for any non-compliance with provisional qualification requirements. ( (5)) Qual. TestActual load shed test required (PRR 714)Actual load shed test required ( (12)) Net Dependable Capability Testing NoneGeneral capacity testing must be used to verify a Resource’s Net Dependable Capability. Net Dependable Capability is the maximum sustained capability of a Resource as demonstrated by performance testing. Each QSE for the Load Resources that it represents may not provide ERCOT a Maximum Power Consumption (MPC) greater than that Resource’s Net Dependable Capability without a text description indicating the reason for the increase. Qualification tests allow the Resource and QSE to demonstrate the minimum capabilities necessary to deploy an Ancillary Service. ( (2)) Unannounced Testing by ERCOT Unannounced load shed test conducted by ERCOT if not deployed or successfully tested in previous 365 days None Performance monitoring/ evaluation Portfolio-based. If a QSE portfolio deploys % of its obligation within 10 minutes, all LaaRs that deployed successfully are deemed to have passed (thus, not subject to annual test for 365 days). LaaRs within the portfolio that did not deploy are not credited with a successful deployment (thus, still subject to annual testing). If a QSE portfolio does not achieve its % deployment within 10 minutes, all LaaRs that failed to deploy are considered to have failed the deployment (a strike, and still subject to annual test). LaaRs within the portfolio that did deploy their obligation within 10 minutes are considered to have deployed successfully (thus, not subject to annual test for 365 days). Resource-specific.

8 LaaR Zonal Market versus Nodal Market (cont.) ProvisionZonal MarketNodal Market Penalty for non- performance (QSE) ERCOT may revoke any or all Ancillary Service qualifications of any QSE providing an Ancillary Service (s) for continued failure to comply with required performance standards. ( ) ERCOT may require a Market Participant to develop and implement a corrective action plan to address its failure to meet performance criteria in this Section. The Market Participant must deliver a copy of this plan to ERCOT and must report to ERCOT periodically on the status of the implementation of the corrective action plan. (8.4(1)) Continued qualification as a QSE is contingent upon compliance with all applicable requirements in these Protocols. ERCOT may suspend a QSE’s rights as a Market Participant when ERCOT reasonably determines that it is an appropriate remedy for the Entity’s failure to satisfy any applicable requirement. (16.2.1(6)) Penalty for non- performance (LaaR/LR) ERCOT may revoke the Ancillary Service qualification of any LaaR for failure to comply with the required performance standards. Specifically, if a LaaR that is providing Responsive Reserve Service fails to respond with at least 95% of its scheduled capacity within ten (10) minutes of an ERCOT Dispatch Instruction, that response shall be considered a failure. Two LaaR performance failures within any rolling one-year period shall result in disqualification of that LaaR. After six (6) months of disqualification, the LaaR may reapply for qualification provided it submits a corrective action plan to ERCOT that identifies actions taken to correct performance deficiencies and the disqualified LaaR successfully passes a new actual deployment qualification test as specified in Section , General Capacity Testing Requirements. ( ) ERCOT may revoke any or all Ancillary Service qualifications of any Generation Resource or Load Resource for continued material non- performance in providing Ancillary Service capacity or energy. (8.4(2)) POTENTIAL AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE SUBGROUP:  Produce recommendation to DSWG on whether to sponsor PRR and NPRR, or NPRR only.  Consider implications of proration on resource-specific RRS offers.  Add unannounced testing provisions for Load Resources.  Provide more detailed definition of a performance failure.  Determine appropriate penalties for LR performance failures.  Determine appropriate penalties for QSE performance failures.

9 Next Meeting and Schedule for 2010 DSWG Scheduled Meetings and Meeting Details: April 09, 2010 May 07, 2010 June 04, 2010 July 16, 2010 August 13, 2010 September 10, 2010 October 08, 2010 November 05, 2010 December 03, 2010