Update on the interpretation of spacecraft potential during active control Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria MSSL, October 26 th, 2006 acknowledging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
Advertisements

A Short Introduction to Curve Fitting and Regression by Brad Morantz
How Many Samples are Enough? Theoretical Determination of the Critical Sampling Density for a Greek Clay Quarry. by K. Modis and S. Stavrou, Nat. Tech.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
General Approach of Haemostasis Prothrombin Time (Continue) Lecture 5:
Class 5: Thurs., Sep. 23 Example of using regression to make predictions and understand the likely errors in the predictions: salaries of teachers and.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 4 – Multiple Regression.
Simple Regression correlation vs. prediction research prediction and relationship strength interpreting regression formulas –quantitative vs. binary predictor.
Chapter 5 Continuous Random Variables and Probability Distributions
Business Statistics - QBM117 Statistical inference for regression.
Relationships Among Variables
F. Cheung, A. Samarian, W. Tsang, B. James School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Chemometrics Method comparison
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Satellite Tracking Example of SNC and DMC ASEN.
IB Physics Topic 1 Measurement and Uncertainties
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
Error Analysis, Statistics, Graphing and Excel Necessary skills for Chem V01BL.
Simple Linear Regression One reason for assessing correlation is to identify a variable that could be used to predict another variable If that is your.
Optimum Sampling Density for the Prediction of AMD in an Underground Sulphide Mine" by K. Modis, National Technical University of Athens and K. Komnitsas,
Applied Quantitative Analysis and Practices LECTURE#11 By Dr. Osman Sadiq Paracha.
Cluster photoemission Aug 24, 2011.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Week 7 Logistic Regression I.
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
PERFORMANCE MODELS. Understand use of performance models Identify common modeling approaches Understand methods for evaluating reliability Describe requirements.
Real Gas Relationships
Slide 1 Satellite Drag Modeling using Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) Piyush M. Mehta and Craig A. McLaughlin The University of Kansas Acknowledgement:
Model Selection and Validation. Model-Building Process 1. Data collection and preparation 2. Reduction of explanatory or predictor variables (for exploratory.
Linear correlation and linear regression + summary of tests Dr. Omar Al Jadaan Assistant Professor – Computer Science & Mathematics.
BUILDING THE REGRESSION MODEL Data preparation Variable reduction Model Selection Model validation Procedures for variable reduction 1 Building the Regression.
MODIS Collection 6 MCST Proposed Changes to L1B. Page 2 Introduction MODIS Collection History –Collection 5 – Feb present –Collection 4 – Jan.
CLIC CTF3: Phase Feed Forward Comparing the effect of the phase feed forward system on beam phase stability with various theoretical predictions. CLIC.
Aerospace Engineering Laboratory I  Basics for Physical Quantities and Measurement  Physical Quantity  Measured Quantity VS Derived Quantity.
Correlation – Recap Correlation provides an estimate of how well change in ‘ x ’ causes change in ‘ y ’. The relationship has a magnitude (the r value)
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
Advanced Residual Analysis Techniques for Model Selection A.Murari 1, D.Mazon 2, J.Vega 3, P.Gaudio 4, M.Gelfusa 4, A.Grognu 5, I.Lupelli 4, M.Odstrcil.
- 1 - Calibration with discrepancy Major references –Calibration lecture is not in the book. –Kennedy, Marc C., and Anthony O'Hagan. "Bayesian calibration.
Statistics Presentation Ch En 475 Unit Operations.
Electric field, electric potential, and ‘density’ measurements at quasi-perpendicular collisionless shocks: Cluster/EFW measurements Stuart D. Bale, Ryan.
Error Analysis, Statistics, Graphing and Excel Necessary skills for Chem V01BL.
PLASMA DENSITIES FROM SPACECRAFT POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS CALIBRATED BY THE ASPOC, EDI, CIS, PEACE AND WHISPER EXPERIMENTS ON CLUSTER Arne Pedersen and Bjørn.
Submillimeter absorption spectroscopy in semiconductor manufacturing plasmas and comparison to theoretical models Yaser H. Helal, Christopher F. Neese,
Cluster Active Archive 1 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Jonathan Kissi-Ameyaw Cluster Active Archive ESTEC.
9 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March /17 CAA Graphics: Pre-generated/On-demand Panels and Cross-Calibration.
Analytic modelling of Rosetta spacecraft potential measurements based on SPIS simulations Master thesis by: Christian Hånberg Swedish Institute of Space.
Reconstructing the spacecraft potential of Cluster when in active control and other issues Maria Andriopoulou Klaus Torkar Rumi Nakamura Space Research.
14 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 5th – 7th October 2011, York, UK PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics.
Cluster Active Archive Science User Working Group (CAASUWG) - update Matt Taylor on behalf of CAASUWG.
Detection of photoeletrons from the EFW probes A Fazakerley et al.
Status of CIS Calibration Work Iannis Dandouras and the CIS Team presented by: Harri Laakso 3 rd CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting MSSL, October 2006.
Investigation of a discrepancy between magnetic field magnitudes determined by the FGM and EDI instruments Jonny Gloag, Edita Georgescu, Elizabeth Lucek,
Mullard Space Science Laboratory CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting ESTEC 16 th May 2006 H. Khan, A. D. Lahiff, A.N. Fazakerley, I. Rozum, R. J Wilson MSSL-UCL.
Possible long-term trend in the relationship between the ASPOC ion current and spacecraft potential measurements Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria and.
Altitude vs Atmpospere vs temp Purpose statement: I am going to investigate the relationship between Mean pressure and Tempurature (degrees C)
10 th CAA Cross-calibration meeting, 2nd – 4th November 2009, Paris N. Doss, A. Fazakerley, B. Mihaljčić and I. Rozum UCL Department of Space and Climate.
Chapter 7. Classification and Prediction
CAA Implementation Review ESTEC, 31 May - 1 June 2005
Statistical Data Analysis - Lecture /04/03
Sections Review.
ASPOC Presentation for the CAA Operations Review-1 Klaus Torkar and Harald Jeszenszky IWF/OAW Graz ESTEC, May 2006.
Regression Analysis Part D Model Building
Solar Wind Core Electrons
Understanding Standards Event Higher Statistics Award
Statistics Presentation
Statistical Methods For Engineers
CHAPTER 29: Multiple Regression*
12 Inferential Analysis.
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
Adequacy of Linear Regression Models
Effects and magnitudes of some specific errors
Adequacy of Linear Regression Models
Presentation transcript:

Update on the interpretation of spacecraft potential during active control Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria MSSL, October 26 th, 2006 acknowledging support from P.-A. Lindqvist, P.M.E. Décréau, I. Dandouras, A.N. Fazakerley, H. Kahn, H. Laakso, H. Jeszenszky, and the ASPOC, CIS, EFW, PEACE, and WHISPER Teams

Objective and Concept  Derive a method that allows to reconstruct the uncontrolled spacecraft potential (V sc ) from the residual, small variations of the controlled potential when ASPOC is turned on  Note: the estimation of density from V sc is another story. The method presented here shall only allow to use the usual formulas for density estimation from the spacecraft potential irrespective of the state of ASPOC  Find a representation V free =f(V ASPOC-ON ) which is robust against variations of plasma temperature, variations of the photoemission, and changes of the EFW bias current  The correction method ideally fulfils the following conditions:  small number of coefficients, ideally linear fitting  transformation is physically meaningful  Test the accuracy of the method for all conditions

Status  Initial presentation at CAA Calibration Meeting in March, 2006, and at COSPAR  Promising first results  A both reliable and practical conversion method is still to be found  Studies of various methods are ongoing  Accuracy and limitations of the finally chosen method need to be addressed

Change of spacecraft potential due to the ion beam (ASPOC)  Is the controlled spacecraft potential (C4) still usable as a proxy for density, and under which conditions ? ASPOC ON ASPOC OFF data show spacecraft-to-probe potential, spin-average

Simulation of spacecraft potential free- floating controlled  The potential controlled by a constant ion beam:  approaches a constant value at low n, independent of plasma  follows the uncontrolled potential at high density.  Curves shown are valid for 10 µA ion current on Cluster.

Spacecraft potential vs. density relation Spacecraft potential [V] Density [cm -3 ]  The variation of the potential following approximately was illustrated by Ishisaka et al. (2005) for Geotail. Overlay: previous model for ASPOC ON and OFF at 10, 100, and 1000 eV

Estimation of free floating potential from the controlled potential  The relation between controlled and uncontrolled potential is almost independent of electron temp. T e.  The correction term, f, for the potential V uncontrolled = V controlled + f(V controlled ) may be approximated over a wide range of spacecraft potentials by a simple exponential function.  Relation is still non- linear near V max (low density)  Results are less accurate in the steep part of the curve (near V max ).

C1 and C3,  Original potential data; distance C1-C3  100 km  C1: free floating potential, C3: 12 µA ion beam

C1 and C3,  Linear correlation C1 - C3

C1 and C3,  Potential of C3 reconstructed by exponential fit  C1: ASPOC off, C3: 12 µA ion beam ?

C1, C4,  C1: ASPOC OFF, C3: 12.5 µA C4: 10 µA  Potential of C4 reconstructed using coefficients from fit during this period original reconstructed  Time shift C1-C4 due to 600 km distance

Correlation of potentials when ASPOC ion beam is turned on  Instead of inter-spacecraft comparison, this method compares potential of one s/c over beam current changes  Plots shows all 0-12 µA transitions on Cluster 3 in 2001  Exponential correction is applicable even at high potentials

Discussion  Reconstruction of the free floating potential is possible, using a simple expression.  The coefficients c 1, c 2 vary with conditions.  c 1 varies mainly with the known ASPOC beam current  Would other representations provide better fits? Conditionc2c2 Range of controlled potential Theoretical model V C3, summary of V C4, summary of V C3, V C3, V

C1 and C3,  Cubic fit C1 - C3

C1 and C3,  Potential of C3 reconstructed by cubic fit  C1: ASPOC off, C3: 12 µA ion beam ( )

C1 and C3,  Fit (V free -V ASPOC ) as a function of (V max -V ASPOC )

C1 and C3,  Potential of C3 reconstructed by fit to V max -V ASPOC  C1: ASPOC off, C3: 12 µA ion beam ? ( )

C1 and C3,  Linear relation forced to match at min. and max. potential

C1 and C3,  Potential of C3 reconstructed by linear relation enforced  C1: ASPOC off, C3: 12 µA ion beam between o o o ( )

Summary  The reconstruction of the free floating potential of a potential-controlled spacecraft is possible, using simple expressions  The errors are reasonably small, but there is not yet one single representation that gives optimum results in all conditions  Manual calibration may be needed for best results  Future work will aim at establishing appropriate correction terms for all periods with controlled spacecraft potential