1 Charm Review Update on charm mixing Charm semileptonic decay –Analysis of D  K*  –Analysis of D s  Charm 3 body hadronic decay –Isobar model versus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Excited Charm and K0sK0s Resonance Production at ZEUS V. Aushev For the ZEUS Collaboration XXXIX International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics ''Gold.
The FOCUS Collaboration Univ. of California-Davis, CBPF-Rio de Janeiro, CINVESTAV-Mexico City, Univ. Colorado-Boulder, FERMILAB, Univ. of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign,
Sharpening the Physics case for Charm at SuperB D. Asner, G. Batignani, I. Bigi, F. Martinez-Vidal, N. Neri, A. Oyanguren, A. Palano, G. Simi Charm AWG.
Branching Ratios of B c Meson Decaying to Vector and Axial-Vector Mesons Rohit Dhir Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. Dated:21-Sept-2012.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
S-Waves & the extraction of  s Sheldon Stone FPCP 2010, Torino, Italy, May 2010.
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
Marina Artuso 1 Beyond the Standard Model: the clue from charm Marina Artuso, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K-
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Evidence for Narrow D s  0 and D s   0 states Jianchun Wang 05/09/03 Directly involved: Dave Cinabro Selina Li Sheldon Stone Jon Urheim Jianchun Wang.
Recent Charm Results From CLEO Searches for D 0 -D 0 mixing D 0 -> K 0 s  +  - D 0 ->K *+ l - Conclusions Alex Smith University of Minnesota.
XLIId RENCONTRES DE MORIOND ELECTROWEAK INTERACTIONS AND UNIFIED THEORIES CLEO-c Results Basit Athar March , 2007 University of Florida CLEO Collaboration.
1 Charm Decays at Threshold Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University.
Charmonium Decays in CLEO Tomasz Skwarnicki Syracuse University I will concentrate on the recent results. Separate talk covering Y(4260).
1 Charm (meson) Semileptonic Decays Jim Wiss University of Illinois (Urbana) Representing FOCUS Outline Interference in D +  K  FOCUS New D +  K 
7/4/08 Flavour physics at CLEO-c - Jim Libby 1 Jim Libby (University of Oxford) On behalf of the CLEO-c collaboration  Introduction to CLEO-c  Measurements.
B decays to charm hadrons at Belle M.-C. Chang Fu Jen Catholic University (On behalf of Belle Collaboration) European Physical Society HEP2007 International.
Semileptonic Charm Decays Will E. Johns (for the FOCUS Collaboration) Vanderbilt University, BEACH 2004, July 1.
Discovery of D sJ (2463) + (part II) JC Wang CLEO Meeting 06/20/03 Authors Dave Cinabro Selina Li Sheldon Stone Jon Urheim Jianchun Wang Committees Roy.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
1 BEACH 2006 July 5, 2006 Content I: Why We Study Charm Semileptonic Decays. II: Recent Analyses on Semileptonic BF, from BES and CLEO-c. III: Form Factors.
1 Doris Y. Kim, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Content Part I: Theories of Charm Semileptonic decays Part II: q 2 dependence in Pseudo- scalar.
1 BESIII-Cleo-c workshop J. Wiss Fully leptonic and semileptonic decay CLEO-c and BESIII Joint workshop on charm, QCD and tau physics Jan , 2004.
D 0 D 0 bar Mixing and CP Violation at BESIII Kanglin He June 2006, Beijing.
Amplitude Analysis of the D 0        Dalitz Plot G. Mancinelli, B.T. Meadows, K. Mishra, M.D. Sokoloff University of Cincinnati BaBar Coll. Meeting,
Dalitz Plot Analysis of D Decays Luigi Moroni INFN-Milano.
1 Charm Results from FOCUS Kihyeon Cho Kyungpook National University Daegu, Korea (On behalf of FOCUS Collaborations) Flavor Physics CP Violation 2004.
Sandra Malvezzi I.N.F.N. Milano Recent Results from FOCUS QCD 2005 Conversano June 2005.
Charmed Meson Spectroscopy Robert K. Kutschke Fermilab HQL04 June 4, 2004.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
25/9/2007 LHCb UK meeting 1 ADS determination of γ with B→(Kπ) D K, B→(hh) D K and B→(K3π) D K Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
cc spectroscopy at elle S.L.Olsen Hawaii QWG 2004 Worksop IHEP Beijing _.
New Observations on Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Yanping HUANG For BESIII Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) ICHEP2010, Paris,
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Observation in BaBar of a narrow resonance in the D + s  0 system at 2317 MeV Roger Barlow Manchester University For the B A B AR Collaboration.
Andrzej Bożek (IFJ PAN, Kraków) B hadron decays to open charm production in B-factories BEACH B hadron decays to open charm at B-factories A.Bożek.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
1 Charm Semileptonic Decay The importance of charm SL decay Pseudoscalar l decay Vector l decay –Analysis of D  K*  –The V/PS enigma :  (D+  K*  /
New hadrons BaBar Maurizio Lo Vetere University of Genova & INFN Representing the Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International Conference.
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
Scalar and pseudoscalar mesons at BESII Xiaoyan SHEN (Representing BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China Charm06, June 5-7, 2006,
Sandra Malvezzi - Charm Meson Results in Focus 1 Sandra Malvezzi I.N.F.N. Milano Meson Lifetimes, Decays, Mixing and CPV in FOCUS.
Φ→Ψ, BINP, Novosibirsk.2011P. Pakhlov Phys. Lett. B702, 139 (2011) Charged charmonium-like states as rescattering effects in B  D sJ D (*) P. Pakhlov.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
F. Martínez-Vidal IFIC – Universitat de València-CSIC (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration)  from B ±  D (*)0 [K S     ]K (*)±  in BaBar Outline.
Andrzej Bożek (IFJ PAN, Kraków) B hadron decays to open charm production in B-factories BEACH B hadron decays to open charm production in B-factories.
Marina Artuso WG1 CKM Status and future perspectives on V cs and V cd Marina Artuso Syracuse University.
B s Mixing Parameters and the Search for CP Violation at CDF/D0 H. Eugene Fisk Fermilab 14th Lomonosov Conference Moscow State University August ,
Nita Sinha The Institute of Mathematical Sciences Chennai.
Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Haolai TIAN (On behalf of the BESIII Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 23rd Rencontre de Blois.
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
Introduction to the Heavy Flavor session XLIst Rencontres de Moriond March QCD and Hadronic interactions at high energy Andrey Golutvin ITEP/CERN.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
CLEO-c Workshop 1 Data Assumptions Tagging Rare decays D mixing CP violation Off The Wall Beyond SM Physics at a CLEO Charm Factory (some food for thought)
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
V.Tisserand, LAPP-Annecy (IN 2 P 3 /France), on behalf of the B A B AR collaboration. Aachen (Germany), July 17 th -23 rd Charmed B hadrons with.
D. Bettoni - The Panda experiment 1 Charmonium Spectroscopy The charmonium system has often been called the positronium of QCD. Non relativistic potential.
Present status of Charm Measurements
Observation of the DsJ(2463)Dspo & Confirmation of the DsJ(2317)Dspo
Recent results on light hadron spectroscopy at BES
Study of New Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII
DsJ* ‘s & charmed strange baryons at Belle
University of Minnesota on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration
B. El-Bennich, A. Furman, R. Kamiński, L. Leśniak, B. Loiseau
Understanding DsJ*(2317) and DsJ(2460)
New Spectroscopy with Charm quarks at B factories.
Presentation transcript:

1 Charm Review Update on charm mixing Charm semileptonic decay –Analysis of D  K*  –Analysis of D s  Charm 3 body hadronic decay –Isobar model versus K- matrix –Dalitz analysis as probes of new physics Excited charm spectroscopy –cu and cd results from Belle and Focus –cs results from Babar/Cleo/Belle/ Focus The future of charm physics –B-Factories / Cleo-c / Bes III Jim Wiss Univ of Illinois APS meeting May 2, 2004 Apologies for all the important and fascinating results that I had to skip Featuring results from

2 charm mixing circa 2000   2 sigma hints of mixing at few percent level!  (K  ) =  1.34 ps  (KK) =  5.5 ps CP lifetime comparisons Time evolution of wrong-sign D* decay

3 Mixing circa 2003 Things have come a long way since those heady days... It will be interesting to see if mixing does occur at the percent level.

4 D  vector  decays H 0 (q 2 ), H + (q 2 ), H - (q 2 ) are helicity-basis form factors computable by LQCD... right-handed  + left-handed  + Two amplitude sums over W polarization using D-matrices Helicity FF are combinations of vector and axial FF Two numbers parameterize the decay

5 Interference in D +  K*  Yield 31,254 Data MC K*  interferes with S- wave K  and creates a forward-backward asymmetry in the K* decay angle with a mass variation due to the varying BW phase (2002) F-B asymmetry The S-wave amplitude is about 7% of the K* BW with a 45 o relative phase Focus “ K* ” signal The same relative phase as LASS matches model -15% F-B asymmetry!

6 K*  form factors acoplanarity Results are getting very precise and more calculations are needed.

7 D s  form factors Theoretically the Ds  l form factor should be within 10% of D  K*l The rV values were consistent but r2 for Ds  l was  2  higher than D  K*l circa 1999 But the (2004) FOCUS measurement has consistent r2 values as well!

8 Dalitz plots “...consistent with a phase space Dalitz distribution.” The first charm Dalitz analysis – MK1 (1977) D +  K  E791 (2002) CLEO (2001) Same state but higher statistics Lots of structure!

9 What do you learn from Dalitz plots? Bands indicate resonance contributions For spinless parents, the number of nodes in the band give you the resonance spin Look at the  band Interference pattern gives relative phases and amplitudes Look at the D+ K* band pattern of asymmetry Isobar model: Add up BW ’ s with angular factors broad states Nearly all charm analyses use the isobar model:

10 Why study charm Dalitz plots? A valuable source of phase shifts in entangling  in B ±  K ± (K*K) D (discussed in talk of Paras Naik) Probes of charm decay mechanism Role of direct annihilation in D s decay     Unique mixing probes Time dependent Dalitz fit such as D  K s  (David Asner) Sensitive to sign of x New probes of charm CP violation

11 Although used frequently, the isobar model has problems... Add two BW ala Isobar model Add two K matrices Adding BW violates unitarity Adding K matrices respects unitarity When broad resonances overlap you just can ’ t add Breit- Wigners and respect QM! Add BW Add K The Unitarity circle A real pole in K gives a BW The K and T descriptions are equivalent for a single pole but what happens when several poles contribute??

12 FOCUS D   +  +  - analysis Observe: f 0 (980) f 2 (1270) f 0 (1500) Yield D s + = 1475  50 S/N D s + = 3.41 Several broad and overlapping resonances contribute Can they fit it using K- matrix based on fits to other data?? Yield D + = 1527  51 S/N D + = 3.64

13 “K-matrix analysis of the 00++-wave in the mass region below 1900 MeV’’ V.V Anisovich and A.V.Sarantsev Eur.Phys.J.A16 (2003) 229 44 An impressive amount of data is well described in terms of 5 poles

14 K-matrix picture The Focus amplitude was written as a sum F term models S-wave using five virtual states  ’  An isobar BW sum represents higher spin resonances A coherent non –resonant piece is included known from scattering data (A&S) describes coupling of resonances to D (fit for couplings) vector and tensor contributions

15 First K matrix fits to charm Dalitz plots Low mass High mass decay channel phase (deg) fit fractions (%) Reasonable fits with no retuning of the A&S K-matrix and no need to invoke new resonances (such as  (400)) and no NR term decay channel phase (deg) fit fractions (%) s-wave dominates

16 L=1 charm mesons One of few “ good ” applications of HQET to charm L SQSQ SqSq Q spin decouples leaving leaving j = L  S q as a “ good ” Q-num (L=1)  (S q =1/2)  j=3/2 and 1/2 Splitting might look like this Adding S Q =1/2 The S Q acts as a perturbation and creates additional splitting Of course alternative splitting patterns are possible... The axial states might switch

17 Pion transitions to D and D* Well established Belle/Focus Belle

18 Analysis of mass D  spectra D0D0 D+D+ A very bad fit with just D 2 * (2460) + D 1 (2420) and feed-downs cl=28% Fit improves dramatically with inclusion of a broad S-wave state

19 Belle measured the spin 1 states as well 1 node 2 nodes!

20 L=1 cu and cd results Would be great to resolve this Broad widths Narrow widths

21 So on to L=1 cs states. Naively expects the same spectroscopy and same pattern of decays to D and D* pion  kaon K K Two narrow states were seen in DK and D*K transitions. Presumably the j q =3/2 spin 1 and spin 2 states. You then expect to see two broad states which were expected to lie above the kaon threshold and decay via s-wave Are two broad states there??? Ask the experts?

22 New excited Ds states A new state D sJ * (2317) was observed by BaBar but with a very small width (  < 7 MeV) This was confirmed by CLEO and a new state was discovered D sJ (2463) again with a very small width These could be the j q =1/2 states but are unexpectedly low in mass. Decays to D s violate strong symmetries These states would be narrow if they lie below D K threshold and must decay into D s

23 What are the D sJ * (2317) and D sJ (2463)? States consistent with J P = 0 + & 1 + given pattern of observed and absent decay modes. They could be the j=1/2 cs, But why the low mass? DK molecule? (Barnes/Close/Lipkin) 4 quark state j=1/2 (1 +, 0 + ) states are chiral partners to the ( ) or (Ds* Ds) (Bardeen/Eichten/Hill) Bardeen/Eichten/Hill predict a Goldberger-Trieman-like splitting for 1  and 0  states which works for Ds 1 ’ Ds 0 * But:   430 MeV for cu and cd based on Belle measurements

24 Some preliminary cs results from Focus Another D sJ * (2317) confirmation! 31±7

25 Back to the Future: Charm threshold “yellow book” 1 fb -1 MC U = E miss - P miss Closing the neutrino in D  e events using energy momentum balance CP violation Both D’s decay into even CP states Exploiting quantum coherence Cleo-c and Bes III: Run at  (3770) with high luminosity and a modern detector mixing Both D’s decay into the same final state  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  Extremely clean events! U = E miss - P miss preliminary data (60 pb -1 ) Pavlunin APS Talk The future of charm is very bright!

26 My Notes Belle/Focus? Feed downs Cleo98? S and D wave required by parity

27 Semileptonic decay as tests of LQCD Apart from form factors, these decays can be computed using perturbation theory The form factors incorporate hadronic complications and can be calculated with non-perturbative Lattice QCD

28 CP violation in the kspi+pi- Dalitz plot ? 2579 D02720 D0 Nov 2003

29 If are not mass eigenstates. Mass eigenstates are (assuming CP conservation), Probes of D mixing Processes which allow mixing appear in H 12 and H 21. The time evolution of flavour eigenstates is given by the Schrödinger equation Mass and width differences are parametrized by between D 1 and D 2 are given by D0D0 K+-K+- DCSD CAD An alternative probe is to directly compare the lifetime of CP eigenstates or mixed eigenstates.

30 New cu cd L=1 spectroscopy Mass D 2 *0 D 2 *+ “D 0 1/2 ”“D + 1/2 ” Focus03 PDG03 BELLE ±1.1 ± ± ± 2.1 ± ±1.5 ± ±4 2407±21± ± 17 ± ±14 ±35 Width Focus03 PDG03 BELLE ±5.3 ±2.9 23±5 45.6± 4.4 ± ±6.5 ± ±55 ±59 276±21 ± ±24 ±34 Results roughly agree (1.8  ) between BELLE hep-ex/ FOCUS hep-ex/ ± Focus Kalashnikova 02 Di Pierro (2001) Ebert et al Isgur (1998) Godfrey and Kokoski (1991) Godfrey & Isgur (1985) Eichten et al. (1980) Barbieri + (76) De Rujula + (76) -D

31 Belle measured the spin 1 states as well M D 1  D 1 M D 1 ’  D 1 ’ Belle (03) ± 1.5 ± ± 2.7 ± ± 6 ±25 384± 91 ±74 Cleo (99) 2461 ± ± 110 WA ± ± 4 1 node 2 nodes!