Using the LEP (Leadership Environment Preferences) Assessment to Validate Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development Laura Sensenig Gwendolyn.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Decision Making as Applied to Selection of College Majors Joan V. Miller Instructional Support Facilitator Central Bucks School District M. Ed. Candidate.

Advertisements

3 rd Annual Ivy Tech Community College Adjunct Faculty Conference Behind Every Voice There is a Story: Understanding the Learning Potential of all Students.

NATHAN WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA KARA FRESK, M.Ed. UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Beyond the Buzzword: Understanding and Using Student Development Theory.

Is College Success Associated With High School Performance? Elizabeth Fisk, Dr. Kathryn Hamilton (Advisor), University of Wisconsin - Stout Introduction.

Student Development Theory Importance, history and utility.

Classroom Management in a Concept Based Curriculum Jill Peltzer, PhD, RN, APRN-CNS.

Using the LEP (Leadership Environment Preferences) Assessment to Validate Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development Laura Sensenig Gwendolyn.

Research Study The career maturity of college freshmen as impacted by career counseling received in grades K-12: A reflective study.

Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.

Critical Thinking in Information Literacy Program Gabrielle Wong May 2010.

WASHBURNWASHBURN Friends of Mabee Library October 28, 2004 Standardized Assessment of Information Literacy Skills Presented by Judy Druse Martha Imparato.

Rationale for the Historical Understanding Measure: NPDEP Impact Study of FHAO.

C R E S S T / U C L A Improving the Validity of Measures by Focusing on Learning Eva L. Baker CRESST National Conference: Research Goes to School Los Angeles,

Student Development in the First College Year Chris Verhaeghe Center for the First-Year Experience.

Student Writing in Geoscience Courses

Five Key WAC Best Practices for Instructors across the Disciplines Presented by Deborah Schlacks, WAC Coordinator WAC Brown Bag October 8, 2012.

Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.

“Knowledge” Do Now: As a teacher, what does this statement make think about or feel: “He Who Can Does He Who cannot Teaches” George Bernard Shaw.

MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.

Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Cognitive Development A Look at How Students Think.

Models of Epistemological Development in Adults

Student Development Theory

Student Development Theory. Agenda History Chickering’s Psychosocial Theory of Student Development Perry’s Cognitive Theory of Student Development Theory.

Developing a Teaching Portfolio

Critical Thinking: The Who, What, How, & Why Department of Psychology Professional Development Workshops January 15, 2004.

PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.

University of Arkansas Faculty Senate Task Force on Grades Preliminary Report April 19, 2005.

William Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development

Cognitive Development, College Students, & Information Literacy Meghan Sitar Instruction and Outreach Librarian University of Texas Libraries

Go Find Yourself Fostering Growth in the Bully and Bullied Texas A&M University: Waylon Hastings, Brooke Wilson, Colby Seay, & Jesse Hernandez.

A Theoretical Perspective Wildcard Project Cori Hall February 25, 2004 The Educational Journey of a Woman in Computer Science.

Background Method Discussion References Acknowledgments Results  RateMyProfessors.com (RMP.com) launched in 1999 as an avenue for students to offer public.

Issue: Affirmative Action Group Names TITLE SLIDE.

FOSTERING LEADERSHIP IN STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES: THE DI/LI THEORY Presented By: Tory Atkins, Brittany Vytal, and Megan Purcell.

1 The Multicultural Climate at MSU- Mankato William E. Sedlacek University of Maryland

So What Matters in the Development of Leadership Capacity? More Findings from the Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership * International Leadership Association.

The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.

Instructors’ General Perceptions on Students’ Self-Awareness Frances Feng-Mei Choi HUNGKUANG UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH.

Chapter 2: Theoretical Context. Perry’s scheme of adult development Stage 1: Dualism: there are right and wrong answers, the authority is the source of.

Advancing Assessment of Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning Donna L. Sundre Amy D. Thelk Center for Assessment and Research Studies (CARS) James Madison.

Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development

Annotated Bibliography English 12 Writing. What is it?  An annotated bibliography is just a works cited page in which each citation is followed by a.

Carol Hurney, James Madison University Jenny Knight, University of Colorado – Boulder Janet Branchaw, University of Wisconsin – Madison Alix Darden, University.

Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years

Lia Vella Colorado School of Mines June 28, 2015

Crash character analysis Cameron Thayer Dave Levasseur, Bethany M. Pratt and Margo Steiner EDU 773 Professor Leila V. Moore.

Patrice Ludwig, James Madison University Carol Hurney, James Madison University Janet Branchaw, University of Wisconsin – Madison Kristina Obom, Johns.

Student Development Theory Presented by Deborah Crowley EDU – Dr. Nayor.

What is Literacy (And Why Should I Care)?  Literacy is commonly defined as the ability to read and write, or knowledge in a specific field.  Literacy.

Assessing Student Engagement in the Classroom Rick D. Axelson, PhD Assistant Professor, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine Arend Flick, PhD.

Strategies to Check Student Learning in the Classroom Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs)

C OLLEGIATE L EARNING A SSESSMENT Dr. Pedro Reyes, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs January 2014.

Using the LEP (Leadership Environment Preferences) Assessment to Validate Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development Laura Sensenig Gwendolyn.

How Do Students React to Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations?

“Excuse Me Sir, Here’s Your Change”

COMM 250 Agenda - Week 14 Housekeeping C3 – Due Today

Samantha Palombizio, M. S

My Sister’s Keeper: The Need for Persistence and Retention Mentoring Programs for Underrepresented Undergraduate Black Women Dr. Tasha Davis, Governors.

Designing Professional Development for Elementary School Teachers

NSSE Results for Faculty

The Accessibility and Utilization Frequency of Academic Services for Student Military Veterans Presented by: Jessie Boswell, Sandra Garcia, Xavier Simon-Perry,

Applying CIQ in your classroom. Assignment 5 Digital Project Marcelo Cabral.

Allison Ambrose, PhD Illinois State University

Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016

Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017

Table 1. Conceptual Framework Learning Outcomes

Table 3. Standardized Factor Loadings of EFA

Project (Problem) Based Learning

Presentation transcript:

Using the LEP (Leadership Environment Preferences) Assessment to Validate Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development Laura Sensenig Gwendolyn Williams Michael Montgomery April 20, 2009

Nine Positions 1)Basic Duality 2)Dualism (Multiplicity Pre-Legitimate) 3)Early Multiplicity (Multiplicity Subordinate) 4)Late Multiplicity (a. Multiplicity Coordinate b. Relativism Subordinate) 5)Contextual Relativism 6)Commitment Foreseen 7)Initial Commitments 8)Orientation in Implications of Commitment 9)Developing Commitments (Perry, 1981 as cited in Rapaport, 1982)

Four Frames Dualism- (Moore: Position 2) Multiplicity- (Moore: Position 3) Relativism- (Moore: Position 4) Commitment in Relativism- (Moore: Position 5) (King, 2006)

(Thoma, 1993) Transitioning

Hypothesis / Predictions Freshmen : learning methodologies reflect more basic and co-dependent structures of cognitive thinking such as dualism and early multiplicity. (Positions 2-3) Seniors : learning preferences reflect more mature cognitive positions such as late multiplicity and/or relativism. (Positions 3-4)

An objective, recognition-task instrument developed by William S. Moore, Center for the Study of Intellectual Development (1987). Initially designed and validated based upon the qualitative research done on Perry ’ s intellectual and ethical development model (1981) According to the preliminary longitudinal studies (Moore, 1989), there is a predicted upward trend in cognitive performance from the freshmen year to the senior year. The LEP addresses five domains which include course content, the roles of instructors and peers, classroom atmosphere and activities, and course evaluation. Learning Environment Preferences (LEP)

Students  CLASS: 8 Freshmen, 8 Seniors  GENDER: 7 Male, 9 Female  RACE: 7 White 3 Asian (Indian/S.Asian, Vietnamese) 2 Hispanic/Mexican-American 1 each: African-American, biracial, international (Malay), N/A  MAJOR: 4 HOD (two combined with Comm. Studies / English) 3 PolySci (one combined with Econ) 3 Psychology, each combined with Spanish/Geology/English 1 each: English, Bio, Chem, MCB, ChemEng, Pre-nursing

Results (Scored by William S. Moore, CSID)

Transitioning (Thoma, 1993) Senior Freshman

Conclusions Freshmen: fell within 2nd/3rd position Seniors: fell near the 4th position No one scored above 4th position (Perry) Frosh vs. Senior: “significant difference”-- therefore Perry’s theory *is* generalizable

Limitations SurveyMonkey, vs. “in person” administration? Also, length of test - ~30 minutes? Fatigue? “Race/ethnicity” - typed into box, not pre-filled (e.g., “biracial”, Vietnamese, Malay)… Non-longitudinal.. Also, limited sample - size, and Vandy-only Complicated scoring/relation to questions Confusing questions? Open to interpretation? Only top three learning preferences considered-- not the questions themselves-- when scored LEP - quantifying a qualitative method (based off essay prompts)… can the info from the latter, be translated via the former?

Questions / Future Research MID versus LEP: Would the former have been better (essay prompts, “leaning” to/from stages) Choice of major - does high/low consensus matter? What about gender (seniors, frosh)? Race/Ethnicity? Sample size… Vandy vs. large university? Commuter? LAC? Other institutions…

References Chickering, A., Reisser, L. (1993). Education and Identity, (Second Edition). San-Francisco, Jossey- Bass. Evans, N, J., Forney, D. S., Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student Development in College: Theory Research and Practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. King, Patricia. (2006). “William Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development.” New Directions for Student Services Vol. 1978, Issue 4, pp Moore, William S. (1989). The Learning Environment Preferences: Exploring the Construct Validity of an Objective Measure of the Perry Scheme of Intellectual Development. Journal of College Student Development. v30 n6 pp Perry, William, G. (1999). Forms of Ethical and Intellectual Development in the College Years: A Scheme. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. Perry, William, G. ( 2005). Different Worlds in the Same Classroom: Students’ Evolution in Their Vision of Knowledge and Their Expectations of Teachers in ASHE Reader on College Student Development Theory, eds, Wilson, M., Wolf-Wendel, L. Pearson Custom Publishing, pp Perry, William, G. Jr. (2005). Sharing in the Cost of Growth in ASHE Reader on College Student Development Theory, eds, Wilson, M., Wolf-Wendel, L. Pearson Custom Publishing, pp Rapaport, William. (1982). “Unsolvable Problems and Philosophical Progress.” American Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 19, pp Thoma, George, A. (1993). “The Perry Framework and Tactics for Teaching Critical Thinking in Economics.” Journal of Economic Education Spring: