August 2013 1. Agenda  Purpose of Evaluation  Senate Bill 10-191 Impact  CDE Licensure Employees  Question and Answer (Q&A) 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speech-Language Pathology Assistants in Texas Schools
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Performance Appraisal Systems
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Unclassified Performance Management Process For Unclassified Administrative and Professional (Non-Teaching) Employees Summer 2011.
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Educational Support Professional Evaluation Orientation August,
RAPID CITY AREA SCHOOLS AUGUST 7, 2012 Denver ProComp Plan Summary.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Professional Development and Appraisal System
 Performance Management, Performance Evaluation, and Correcting Problems  March 10, 2011.
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Human Resources Information Reemployment Process Licensure Advancement Successes Teacher Evaluation Updates Staffing Strategies Retirement Sessions.
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
Educator Effectiveness: Connecting Coursework to Career Success / End of Year Self-Assessment May 15, 2014.
Planning Time & Florida’s K-12 Comprehensive Reading Program Contractual Provisions.
What does Educator Effectiveness (aka SB 191) mean for us?
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Oct. 17, 2011 Mark Cramer HRMS Team Lead Cheryl Brooks HRMS Business Analyst PANC Conference HRMS Update.
BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric.  Overview  State Legislation  District Policy  Key Components and Rating Percentiles  Outline the Evaluation Process,
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Teacher Evaluation Patrick Burk, Ph.D. Graduate School of Education Educational Leadership.
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL TRAINING  A group intended to represent the broad school community and those persons closest to the students who will.
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
Evaluation: Implications for your Professional Future Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT
Creating a Climate of Professionalism Fenton Avenue Charter School Evaluation Process.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Chapter 8.2 Managing Human Resources. Human Resources Planning & Job Analysis  Classifying employees  Determining job requirements.
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
1 CDE Licensed Employees Performance Evaluation Orientation August 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Job Analysis, Design, and Redesign.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Provisional Teachers First Year Comprehensive Provisional Teachers Second Year Comprehensive Provisional Teachers Third Year.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
FRYSC Advisory Councils Partners in Progress
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Cincinnati Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System.
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
Greater Essex County District School Board Regulation: School Councils Reference NO: R-AD-03 Principal Chris Mills.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 20, 2015 Complete Plan posted on District Website
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
Classified Evaluations Presented to Leadership State Center Class XIV September 25, 2015 Samerah Campbell Director of Human Resources.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
 “Excellence in Rural Health Care”.  Many transitions of Programs, Services, Functions and Activities to a Tribe under Self- Governance include existing.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
S , F.S., Requirements for Employee Compensation and Salary Schedules Florida Department of Education May 23,
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Low-Performing Schools Evaluation Requirements
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Presentation transcript:

August

Agenda  Purpose of Evaluation  Senate Bill Impact  CDE Licensure Employees  Question and Answer (Q&A) 2

 Serves as a basis for the improvement of performance.  Enhance the implementation of programs.  Serve as the measurement of satisfactory performance.  Evaluate the level of performance based on the effectiveness of personnel.  Prove a basis for making decisions in the areas of hiring, compensation, promotion, assignment, professional development, earning and retaining-non probationary status, dismissal, and non-renewal of contracts. 3

 All teachers will receive formal annual evaluations beginning Specialized Service Professionals  The State Council has appointed work groups with experts from each field to evaluate how the evaluation standards that apply to traditional classroom teachers apply to these other categories of licensed professionals.  We believe we will have a new method of evaluating them for School Year

 Helps improve performance practices, capabilities, and results.  Facilitates communication and sharing of best practices information among all employees.  Serves as a working tool for understanding and improving performance. 5

 SSpecific  MMeasurable  AAttainable  RResearch-based  TTimelines 6

First Quarter  Orientation (within first 3 weeks of beginning of school)  Probationary CDE Licensed Educators * First observation by the end of first quarter (30 minutes minimum with written documentation) * Conference within 10 days of observation 7

Second Quarter  Second observation -30 minutes minimum -Written documentation  Conference within 10 days of observation. 8

Non-Probationary (Four plus full years)  Orientation (first three weeks of school).  Formal Evaluation for all teachers.  Transition Teachers are not evaluated.  One Formal Observation (30 minutes) during the School Year.  Conference within 10 days of observation. 9

 Notice of Deficiencies within ten working days of conference.  Remediation Plan written within ten working days.  Employees have the right to request a second evaluator when placed on a Remediation Plan.  CSEA may attend meetings with the evaluatee.  Employees have the right to submit a rebuttal to the evaluation. 10

 Input from evaluatee and evaluator(s)  Face to Face Conference  Strengths-specific  Weaknesses-specific  Commendations  Dates-specific 11

Human Resources Karey Dion Danniella

13