Procurement Sensitive Medicare’s 2009 ePrescribing Program Daniel Green, MD, FACOG Medical Officer, Quality Measurement Health Assessment Group Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Orthopaedic Specific Open Door Forum Tuesday, May 19, 2009.
Advertisements

E-prescribing gives providers an important tool to safely and efficiently manage patients' medications. Compared to paper or fax prescriptions, e-prescribing.
HIPAA Administrative Simplification Final Rule for Transactions Code Sets Stanley Nachimson
CHAPTER © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
1 Avoiding the Medicare e-Prescribing “Adjustment” (penalty)
Physician Quality Reporting System & the Electronic Prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program 2011 Overview December 9,
Workflow Redesign for Behavioral Health Providers
JOHN W BARCH, MHA SR. DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL OPERATIONS JANET M RIVERA MANAGER, PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS OFFICE BRIANNE E PORCHE, BBA SUPERVISOR OF.
MO PC May 2011 This material was prepared by Primaris, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Missouri, under contract with the Centers.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Data Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting March 18, 2015.
1 CMS ePrescribing Activities Countdown to MMA: New & Unfinished Business Maria A. Friedman, DBA Senior Advisor Office of eHealth Standards and Services.
CMS Proposals for Quality Reporting Programs Under the 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule PQRS, EHR Incentive Program, Physician Compare,
1 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2007 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) Module One.
Temporary Certification Program: Overview Educational Session August 18, 2010 Carol Bean, PhD Director, Certification Division Office of the National Coordinator.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Medicare Part D Overview of Options, Creditable Coverage, Required Notices, COB and Health Care Reform.
Clinical Operations Workgroup.  Core Measure  Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)  Meaningful Use Stage 1:  Core:
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Facilitators: Kit Cairns, WIITTS Karen Navarro, University of WI Hospital & Clinics Claudia Yoakum-Watson, WEA Trust and CCRS Overview of 5010 and ICD-10:
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Career Education Computers in the Medical Office Chapter 2: Information Technology.
Copay Structure Principles in Practice Copyright © – Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)Slide 1.
1 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2008 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) September 18, 2008 National Provider Call.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
J14 NHIC, Corp CAC Meeting The Price of Non-Engagement: When Pay for Performance Programs Develop Penalties Andy Finnegan Health Insurance Specialist Division.
National e-Prescribing Conference Sponsored by CMS and Industry Partners - October 6 & 7, 2008 Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Florida Center.
The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices
Restrictions on Referrals v Federal law prohibits referrals among providers that have tainted financial relationships v Any arrangement that confers an.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
E-Prescribing Profits, Pitfalls, and Perils. Agenda Medicare’s E-Prescribing Program Frequently-Asked Questions About Medicare’s E-Prescribing Possible.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 7: Meeting the PBHCI Grant.
Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Florida Center for Health Information and Policy Analysis Florida Public Health Association - Medical Director’s.
PCS (PCP Rate Parity) Option 2 Audit Overview, Results and Next Steps December 2014.
MIPPA Update. MIPPA Incentives Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA)
Medicare E-prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program: Getting the 2011 Incentive and Avoiding the 2012 Reduction Mary Patton Wheatley Senior Specialist Health.
Page 0 10/19/201510/19/2015 Meaningful Use of Health IT: Laboratory Data Capturing and Reporting Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA CDC, PHITPO.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
ePrescribing Functional Requirements
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Electronic Prescribing Through SureScripts
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 14 What is Health Information Management and Technology?
HIPAA History March 3, HIPAA Ruling Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act Passed by Congress.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
Meaningful Use and E-Prescribing Workflow Douglas S. Bell, MD, PhD Associate Professor, Dept. of Medicine, UCLA Research Scientist, RAND Corporation.
Technology, Information Systems and Reporting in Pharmacy Benefit Management Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Updated: February.
Understanding Policy Regulations and Reimbursement Practices Impacting Telehealth Programs Rena Brewer, RN, MA CEO, Global Partnership for Telehealth Lloyd.
Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) Requirements for Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) Simone Dennis, RHC Payment Policy Corinne Axelrod, RHC Payment.
Technology in the Pharmacy
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
E-Prescriptions Krishi. E-Prescriptions Overview One major contributor to PAEs is patient medication errors, and the implementation of e-prescription.
HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,
1 The information contained in this presentation is based on proposed and working documents. Health Information Exchange Interoperability Minnesota Department.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #4 – ePrescribing (eRx) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 12, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Praxis EMR Training Seminar
Telepractice Delivery of Services in OASAS Programs.
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Health Information Exchange Interoperability
How to receive your incentive dollars quickly
Presentation transcript:

Procurement Sensitive Medicare’s 2009 ePrescribing Program Daniel Green, MD, FACOG Medical Officer, Quality Measurement Health Assessment Group Office of Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Baltimore, MD

Procurement Sensitive Overview Review MIPPA provisions relevant to new ePrescribing incentive. Review ePrescribing measure in 2008 PQRI Review implementation schedule for 2009 PQRI and ePrescribing incentive.

Procurement Sensitive MIPPA Legislation – PQRI The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA), passed in July 2008, contains several new authorities and requirements for quality reporting and PQRI for 2009 and beyond. Section 132 contains the new electronic prescribing incentive provisions.

Procurement Sensitive MIPPA Legislation – Successful Electronic Prescriber, Section 132 The MIPPA provides for a 2% incentive payment to eligible professionals who successfully prescribe (as defined by the statute) their patient’s medications electronically beginning in The legislation specifically refers to applicable electronic prescribing quality measures (i.e., ePrescribing measure #125).

Procurement Sensitive MIPPA Legislation – Successful Electronic Prescriber, Section 132 (cont) ePrescribing measure will be removed from PQRI for 2009 and added to the ePrescribing incentive program. The Secretary has the authority to update the specifications of the electronic prescribing measure in the future.

Procurement Sensitive 2008 PQRI – ePrescribing Measure Electronic Prescribing Structural Measure (measure #125) qualifies as one of three required measures in PQRI to earn an incentive payment. Requirement for 2008 PQRI is to report the measure on 80% or more of eligible patients. No separate incentive for successful ePrescribing in 2008 PQRI.

Procurement Sensitive Electronic Prescribing Measure in 2008 PQRI If you have not adopted an electronic prescribing system that meets the specifications of the measure, you cannot report on this measure. The measure is intended to be reported for EVERY patient visit in the denominator.

Procurement Sensitive Qualified Electronic Prescribing Systems – Measure #125 The measure assesses an eligible professional’s use of electronic prescribing using a qualified system. As a qualified system, the program must be able to perform the following tasks: –Generate a medication list incorporating electronic data received from pharmacies or PBMs (if available) –Select medications –Transmit prescriptions electronically and conduct safety alerts

Procurement Sensitive Qualified Electronic Prescribing Systems – Measure #125 (cont) –Conduct safety alerts Automated prompts that offer information on the drug being prescribed Potential inappropriate dose or route of administration of the drug, drug-drug interactions Allergy concerns Warnings and cautions –Provide information on lower cost alternatives (if any). (Tiered formulary information, if available, would satisfy this requirement for 2009) –Provide information on formulary or tiered formulary medications, patient eligibility and authorization requirements received electronically from the patient’s drug plan (if available).

Procurement Sensitive Additional eRx System Requirements The System must employ the current Part D standards for the functionalities they provide

Procurement Sensitive Part D Standards The standards refer to the version of messaging that the ePrescribing program uses to send the information over the prescription network. It is similar to an update of a particular software product (i.e. Word ’97 vs. Word 2003).

Procurement Sensitive How ePrescribing Works An eligible professional decides to order a prescription for a patient. The prescription is entered into an ePrescribing program and is transmitted to the desired pharmacy. Communication also occurs between the pharmacy benefit manager and the physician.

Procurement Sensitive ePrescribing Communication Professional PharmacyPBM

Procurement Sensitive SureScripts-RxHub Network where the prescription communication or messaging travels between the 3 entities involved in ePrescribing (i.e., the professional, pharmacy and PBM). Approximately 90% of US prescriptions use the SureScripts-RxHub network. ePrescribing vendors using the SureScripts- RxHub network must be certified by SureScripts-RxHub.

Procurement Sensitive Determining if your System is Part D Compliant Vendors listed on the SureScripts website, connected.aspx?ptype=physician, meet the 2009 Part D standards for the functions they provide.

Procurement Sensitive Qualified ePrescribing Systems for 2009 –If an ePrescribing system is not on the SureScripts network, a potential customer should look at the Part D standards on the CMS website and check with the product’s vendor. –You must HAVE and USE a “qualified” ePrescribing system. –If purchasing a system, have the vendor demonstrate each functionality described in the measure

Procurement Sensitive Earning 2% Through ePrescribing Patient must have an encounter with one of these CPT or G-codes: 90801, 90802, 90804, 90805, 90806, 90807, 90808, 90809, 92002, 92004, 92012, 92014, 96150, 96151, 96152, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99211, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, 99241, 99242, 99243, 99244, 99245, 99381, 99382, 99383, 99384, 99385, 99386, 99387, 99391, 99392, 99393, 99394, 99395, 99396, 99397, G0101, G0108, G0109

Procurement Sensitive Earning 2% Through ePrescribing Report on all eligible patients to ensure success. 3 G-codes can be used in this measure: –G8443 –G8445 –G8446

Procurement Sensitive ePrescribing G-codes G8443 All prescriptions created during the encounter were generated using a qualified e-Prescribing system. OR G8445 No prescriptions were generated during the encounter. Provider does have access to a qualified e-Prescribing system. OR G8446 Provider does have access to a qualified ePrescribing system. Some or all prescriptions generated during the encounter were printed or phoned in as required by state or federal law or regulations, patient request or pharmacy system being unable to receive electronic transmission; OR because they were for narcotics or other controlled substances.

Procurement Sensitive Measure #125 for 2009 ePrescribing The Secretary may change the measure specifications until December 31, 2008

Procurement Sensitive Additional Information CMS has an ePrescribing section page on the PQRI website at This section will contain information on: –The MIPPA legislation –A fact sheet describing the MIPPA ePrescribing incentive provisions –Part D standards –“ePrescribing Made Simple” –Other documents/instructions

Procurement Sensitive CCHIT CCHIT currently certifies EHRs which contain ePrescribing modules. –2008 CCHIT certified systems meet the functionality requirements of the measure Some of the eRx modules may be available for purchase separately.

Procurement Sensitive CCHIT (cont) Some products are designated “partners” of 2008 CCHIT certified EHRs. –These “partners” would meet the functionality requirements CCHIT expects to review stand-alone systems for certification starting in mid-2009.

Procurement Sensitive Reporting of the ePrescribing Measure as Described Under the MIPPA Statute Successful reporting is defined as reporting the measure on at least 50% of eligible patients. –Limitation: CPT codes that make up the denominator of the eRx measure MUST account for at least 10% of the provider’s total allowed charges for Medicare Part B covered services during the reporting period.

Procurement Sensitive Incentives for Successful ePrescribing Under MIPPA A 2% payment incentive for successful use of ePrescribing is available for 2009 & In 2011 and 2012 the payment incentive drops to 1% of covered Medicare Part B charges. In 2013 the incentive drops to 0.5% of the covered Medicare Part B charges.

Procurement Sensitive Future Penalties for Not Electronically Prescribing Eligible professionals who are not successfully using electronic prescribing by 2012 will be penalized 1% of their covered Medicare Part B charges. –This means that these providers will be paid at 99% for their covered Medicare Part B fee schedule services.

Procurement Sensitive Future Penalties for Not Electronically Prescribing (cont) Fee reduction is prospective, providers will have to electronically prescribe by a date to be determined to be sure their fees are not reduced in This date will not be before Hardship exemption.

Procurement Sensitive Future Penalties for Not Electronically Prescribing (cont) In 2013 – 1.5% deducted from their covered Medicare Part B services. –Professionals will be paid at 98.5% of the physician fee schedule for covered services. In 2014 and beyond penalty will increase to 2%. –Professionals will receive 98% of the physician fee schedule for the covered services they provide.

Procurement Sensitive Part D Information The Secretary has the authority to change the requirements for successful ePrescribing in the future. The MIPPA legislation allows for future use of Part D data (i.e., a specific number of electronically written prescriptions) in lieu of claims-based reporting by eligible professionals.

Procurement Sensitive Implementation Schedule for 2009 PQRI and ePrescribing Incentive 2009 PQRI –2009 PFS Rule – posted July 1, 2008; comment period for proposed rule ended 8/29/08. –MIPPA provisions – enacted July 15, Electronic Prescribing Incentive –Details of the program were Published in the Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule section of the Federal Register in November, 2008

Procurement Sensitive Additional PQRI Resources For more information on PQRI and ePrescribing, please visit our website at: Thank you!