DM Elective Transfer Scenarios 29 January 2009. 2 Principles  Incoming Shipper or Read Provider responsible for obtaining read at Start of GFD – i.e.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Advertisements

Third Energy Package for Change of Supplier 2009/73/EC.
Project Nexus (AMR) Workgroup – 7 th July 2010 Response to Transporter action.
12/10/20141 Project Nexus Workgroup Settlement Issues 15 th May 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic) Allocations Overview 4 th December 2012.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
Data Logger/ Daily Meter Reading Processes. New Daily Metered Site  DM Service Provider receives a request from Gas Shipper for installation of daily.
Implementation of Non Effective Days Nexus Workgroup – March
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
UK Link Industry Engagement Forum
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
CSEP Transportation Charges 11 th August Background Action NEX0604 from 18 th June PN UNC requested Xoserve to provide a presentation on how Supply.
Version /08/2008 The AQ calculation and validation process Compiled and delivered from the xoserve AQ Team for Review Group 209 Susan Prosser & Steve.
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 19 – Meter Reading.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
UCB SA-NV SAP TEAM EURO Information Session 17th November
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
CSEPs NDM Reconciliation. Assuming opening read of zero.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
1 Performance Assurance Workgroup January 2014 A proposal by Xoserve for a Performance Assurance methodology.
PN UNC Workgroup iGT Services 7 th February 2012.
AQ Tolerance Proposal Mod 209 – August Page 2Theme Date Department AQ Tolerances  Provide a view of appropriate tolerances for AQ validation 
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
1 MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime UK Link Implementation Summary & Overview of Solution Options 9 th.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Apr 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  These slides describe the business rules for the treatment.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement – Interim Report findings 17 th September 2012.
ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous Workstream discussion ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous.
Version PNUNC AQ Principles Workgroup Mod 0209 – Rolling AQ Presenter: Steve Nunnington 23 rd March 2010.
Version /08/2008 The AQ calculation and validation process Compiled and delivered from the xoserve AQ Team for Review Group 209 Susan Prosser & Steve.
Datalogger / DMV Modification Proposals - Summary Simon Trivella – 26 th August 2010 Distribution Workstream - Elexon U P D A T E.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
CONFIDENTIAL - Mod Initial Business Rules © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime 28 May 2009 Code User Pays Services.
Project Nexus UNC Workstream Consolidation of High-Level Principles Fiona Cottam 19 May 2010.
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
Project Nexus Workgroup (Settlement)
Weekly Progress Update 3rd Aug 2018
DM Elective Transfer Scenarios 26 February 2009
Distribution Workstream UNC Modification 0224 Draft UKLink Implementation Summary Responses 26th February 2009.
Weekly Progress Update 13 July 2018
RAASP – Solution Options Scenario Comparison
Weekly Progress Update 15 June 2018
Weekly Progress Update 11 May 2018
Changes implemented February/ March 2019
Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup
SPA Processes for DM Sites
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
Nexus Workgroup Winter Consumption and the influence on Winter Annual Ratio (WAR) Bands 8th January 2014.
Joint Theft Reporting Review (from meeting 1st March 2019)
Project Nexus Workgroup
Gas Customer Forum Project Nexus xoserve update (as of 19th July 2010) 26th July 2010 Final.
AQ BTU Form – Process & Timeline 29th September 2009
DN Interruption Phase II
Project Nexus Workgroup
Development Work Group 0209 Straw Man Update
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime Distribution Workstream Update Following Completion of Analysis 23rd.
UNC Modification 0634 (Urgent) – Post Implementation Assessment
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 14 – Meter Reading
Nexus Workgroup Read Validation Scenarios
Weekly Progress Update 09 Feb 2018
Meter Read Rejections ..
Meter Reads.
Project Nexus Workgroup
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Annual Quantity (AQ) 45.
Presentation transcript:

DM Elective Transfer Scenarios 29 January 2009

2 Principles  Incoming Shipper or Read Provider responsible for obtaining read at Start of GFD – i.e. 01/01/09  Where Outgoing Shipper or Read Provider provides reading this will be rejected, regardless of whether Incoming Shipper or Read Provider provides reading  If Actual Reading not provided by Incoming Shipper or Read Provider, Reading Calculated by:  D-7  AQ/365  NDM Estimate Read Process  File to notify Shippers of ‘Transfer’ Readings will be relevant to read service

3 Further Principles  If Outgoing Shipper disagrees with ‘Transfer’ Reading (whether Actual or Estimate), a Consumption Adjustment is required  Incoming Shipper will be required to raise  As per Shipper Agreed Reads process where a CA is received around transfer the CA is assumed to be agreed with Shipper A

4 Discussion Points: Asset Exchanges IDC Changes

5 Discussion Points: Datalogger to AMR kit Exchanges DMSP / IDC Switch

6 Discussion Points: AMR to Datalogger kit Exchanges IDC / DMSP Switch

7 Discussion Points – Read Not Provided: No DM history for D-7, or AQ/365 Previous NDM Readings may be aged Discussion Points – General: Assumes NDM-DM Readings follow on

8 Discussion Points – Transfer Reads (D): DM / NDM Readings may not be in sequence Opening Reading may not get loaded until D+10 Likely to require Manual Intervention Discussion Points – Transfer Reads (>D): DM / NDM Readings may not be in sequence Inferred large consumption for GFD 31/12 Ratchet Functionality? Opening Reading may not get loaded until D+10 Likely to require Manual Intervention

9 Discussion Points – Transfer Reads (<D): DM / NDM Readings may not be in sequence Inferred negative consumption for GFD 31/12 Opening Reading may not get loaded until D+10 Likely to require Manual Intervention

10 Views  Confirm approach  Ensure consistency with Business Rules  Finalise analysis