“Successes, Challenges and Technical Assistance: A Dialog with State Teams” Lisa Stooksberry – AACTE David Paradise – CTQ Kathleen Paliokas –CTQ Michele.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report to the KSD Board June 9, Provide Kent School District the necessary guidance and assistance to create an equitable, academically enriching,
Advertisements

Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.
Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Campus Improvement Plans
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
September 20, 2004CTQ National Forum Rhode Island’s Journey Toward Aligning the State Teacher Licensing System: An Example of One State’s Reform.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Integration of State Planning and Reporting Functions Using Indistar® Indistar® Summit March 24-25, 2014 Office of School Improvement Virginia Department.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
A Model for Developing AT Competencies for Education Professionals Brian W. Wojcik George R. Peterson-Karlan H Phillips Parette SEAT Center, Illinois State.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
The Maryland Co-teaching Framework
+ Distance Learning PD History and Development Model: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
ASSESSING CANDIDATE PERFORMANCE William Sharpton Richard Hall University of New Orleans Project Directors’ Meeting July 2007.
Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.
SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Teaming with Kansas: An Early Childhood Personnel Development Partnership Kansas Technical Assistance System Network ( TASN) Quarterly Meeting February.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
Iowa’s Statewide Approach to Performance Evaluation & Compensation Judy Jeffrey, Director.
Designing and Delivering Preparation in Response to Local Need: Challenges in Preparing and Retaining HQ Special Education Personnel presented by: Phoebe.
Center for Improving Teacher Quality (CTQ) Funded through the Office of Special Education Programs, U. S. Department of Education.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the United States Departments of Education, Health.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Developing personal and team effectiveness using IT
Center for Improving Teacher Quality (CTQ) Ensuring that Special Education Students are Served by Highly Qualified Teachers Funded by the Office of Special.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.
We are a North Carolina public education institution in Davidson County. With the support of the community and our staff we provide access to opportunities.
What do we know and what have we learned about CLD transition planning? Where do we go from here?
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Virtual K-12 Special Education: Policy and Practice Recommendations March 18, 2010 Paula Burdette, Ph.D. Director Project NASDSE Alexandria, Virginia.
Office of Service Quality
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Mission Possible: Improving Academic and Behavioral Results for Children with Disabilities through Sustained Research Based Professional Development Deborah.
Champaign Unit 4 Parent Advocacy Committee Update Cheryl Camacho & Tony Howard April 22, 2013.
Strategies for Collaboration CHAPTER 5. Consultation and Collaboration: Models and Skills What are the six problem-solving stages of the collaborative.
Systems-level Alignment Issues Challenges and Strategies to Recruiting, Preparing and Retaining HQ Special Education Personnel presented by The contents.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Teaching Students with Mild and Moderate Disabilities: Research-Based Practices Second Edition © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
David M. Murray, Ph.D. Associate Director for Prevention Director, Office of Disease Prevention Multilevel Intervention Research Methodology September.
C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Introduction and Background
Ohio Deans Compact Overview CEEDAR Webinar June 21, 2018
Capacity Building for HMIS Leads
Using data for instructional decision-making
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

“Successes, Challenges and Technical Assistance: A Dialog with State Teams” Lisa Stooksberry – AACTE David Paradise – CTQ Kathleen Paliokas –CTQ Michele Cheyne – Univ of Pittsburgh

Question #1 1. What has your state team accomplished so far in drafting and implementing your state action plan? 1. What has your state team accomplished so far in drafting and implementing your state action plan?

Accomplishments Work with standards Work with standards –Developing –Reviewing –Adapting –Adopting –Disseminating –Understanding –Implementing

Accomplishments Stakeholders Stakeholders –Identifying –Gathering data from –Engaging –Building relationships with

Accomplishments Resources Resources –Locate funding sources –Align current state initiatives with CTQ work

Accomplishments System System –Teacher preparation of general educators –Recruitment and retention –Induction programs

Question #2 2. What challenges or obstacles are you facing or expect to face as you draft and implement your plan? 2. What challenges or obstacles are you facing or expect to face as you draft and implement your plan?

Challenges and Obstacles Buy in Buy in –Need for change –Of the new standards –From stakeholders Resources Resources –Funding –Staffing –TIME

Challenges and Obstacles Increasing shortage of teachers Increasing shortage of teachers Changes in leadership Changes in leadership Resistance to new program models Resistance to new program models Resistance to change Resistance to change

Question #3 3. What technical assistance would help you move forward in your work?

Technical Assistance Continued ongoing contact with CTQ staff liaison Continued ongoing contact with CTQ staff liaison –Liaison to serve as facilitator Continue with annual face-to-face meetings Continue with annual face-to-face meetings –Hold regional forum –Hear what other states are doing Funding Funding Information on grant writing and identifying resources Information on grant writing and identifying resources

Technical Assistance Information on implementation of organizational change Information on implementation of organizational change –Overcome political obstacles –Motivate team members and stakeholders –How to communicate with stakeholders

Technical Assistance Expert consultation/information on a variety of topics Expert consultation/information on a variety of topics –Low incidence disabilities »Technology to support personnel prep efforts –Teacher Preparation »Dual and blended programs »Examples of program approval standards »Assessment for general education teachers regarding special education knowledge and skills »Collaborative models for special ed delivery »Models for linking candidate performance to increased student achievement

Technical Assistance Expert consultation/information on a variety of topics (continued) Expert consultation/information on a variety of topics (continued) –Professional development on collaboration –Information management capabilities –Developing monitoring systems –Research-based teaching strategies NCLB/IDEA updates NCLB/IDEA updates Examples of targeted successes Examples of targeted successes

Technical Assistance Teleconferencing Teleconferencing

Question #4 4. Describe any successes you have had that you think would be helpful for other states to hear about.

State Successes Worth Sharing Alignment of pre-service standards with K-12 student standards, national standards, etc Alignment of pre-service standards with K-12 student standards, national standards, etc Grants to help support state work, teacher licensure, and innovative teacher preparation programs Grants to help support state work, teacher licensure, and innovative teacher preparation programs Development of induction/mentoring models Development of induction/mentoring models Development of assessment tools for pre-service teachers Development of assessment tools for pre-service teachers Working collaboratively with stakeholders Working collaboratively with stakeholders

CTQ Website