Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/2011 1 G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
SOCRAT: a SOftware for Clas12 Reconstruction And Tracking 04/25/10 S. Procureur (CEA-Saclay)
TIME-05 Workshop, 3-7 October 2005, Zurich 1 Probabilistic Data Association Filter for the fast tracking in ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker Dmitry Emeliyanov,
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
31 March 2004 Geneva University MICE TPG Reconstruction Cluster finding Space point reconstruction Track recognition Track fit GENEVA UNIVERSITY GENEVA.
March 6th, 2006CALICE meeting, UCL1 Position and angular resolution studies with ECAL TB prototype Introduction Linear fit method Results with 1, 2, 3,
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
VELO Testbeam 2006 Tracking and Triggering Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO Testbeam and Software Review 09/05/2005 List of tasks 1)L0 trigger.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
The LiC Detector Toy M. Valentan, M. Regler, R. Frühwirth Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna InputSimulation ReconstructionOutput.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
18 February 2009DCH Analysis1 MEG DCH Analysis MEG Review Meeting 18 February 2009 W. Molzon For the DCH Analysis Working Group.
HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.
Measurement of through-going particle momentum by means of Multiple Scattering with the T600 TPC Talk given by Antonio Jesús Melgarejo (Universidad de.
1 Track reconstruction and physics analysis in LHCb Outline Introduction to the LHCb experiment Track reconstruction → finding and fitting Physics analysis.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
26 Jan, MEG Software Status Framework for MEG MC, Unification of LargePrototype/beam test, Schedule and DC reconstruction MEG Software Group.
Spasimir Balev /CERN/ mrad 3 LKr simulation: – very slow, so only events with interesting topology are fully simulated: –  + with.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
X5 analysis: the problem! The muon spectrum is overwhelmed by the gamma radiation background. Tmax is not visible. Possibile solution to recover the muon.
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
V.Patera – KLOE GM – Otranto – 10 June 2002 K  reconstruction status K + K - retracking features New vs Old : resolution New vs Old : efficiencies Conclusion.
1 PID & FPD Software Gilvan Alves (Lafex/CBPF) Q4Q4 D S Q2Q2 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 S A 1Q A1SA1S A 2Q A 2S P 1Q P 2S P 1S P 2Q p p Z(m) A D1 Detector Roman.
Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.
21 Jun 2010Paul Dauncey1 First look at FNAL tracking chamber alignment Paul Dauncey, with lots of help from Daniel and Angela.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
18 december 2002, NIKHEF Jamboree Tracking and Physics Studies, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking and Physics Studies in LHCb Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF Jaarvergadering.
V0 analytical selection Marian Ivanov, Alexander Kalweit.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
“Vertexig and tracking ” Entirely based on works and results by: S. Rossegger, R. Shahoyan, A. Mastroserio, C. Terrevoli Outline: Comparison Fast simulation.
Studying the efficiency and the space resolution of resistive strips MicroMegas Marco Villa – CERN MAMMA meeting Tuesday, 13 th December 2011 CERN, Geneva.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Detector alignment Stefania and Bepo Martellotti 20/12/10.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
NA62 Collaboration Meeting – Anacapri 1 September 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Pattern recognition with the triplet method Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa MEG Meeting, Hakata October /10/20131 Fabrizio Cei.
By: Daniel Coelho Matthew Szydagis Robert Svoboda Improving Electron / Gamma Separation LBNE Software Fermilab, ILFebruary 1, 2013.
M.C. Studies of CDC Axial/Stereo Layer Configuration David Lawrence, JLab Sept. 19, /19/08 1 CDC Tracking MC Studies -- D. Lawrence, JLab.
LDC behavior at θ ≤ 20° ALCPG '07, Fermilab, Oct M. Regler, M. Valentan presented by W. Mitaroff LDC behavior of ∆(1/p t ) at polar angle θ.
Time-zero evaluation using TOF, T0 and vertex detectors
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
Update on Trigger simulation
Dmitry Emeliyanov, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
LKr inefficiency measurement
DCH missing turn analysis
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Tracking Pattern Recognition
DESY drift chambers efficiency and track reconstruction
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
road – Hough transform- c2
Presentation transcript:

Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency

Introduction Spectrometer Layout (MC) Reconstruction L-R ambiguity resolution Pattern Recognition algorithm Straw tubes performances vs 1 track reconstruction Full set-up Minimal set-up (2012) Conclusions 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency

Full Spectrometer Simulation Layout: 4 Chambers 4 Views / Chamber (UVXY) 4 Single tube planes / View Geometry from TD Chamber and tube positions from Beatch file 11/06/2010. Physical/instrumental effect:  rays, effective radius, uniform inefficiency, gaussian smearing of R measurement,  hadronic interactions,  decays. Reconstruction algorithm built using       events. Analysis performed using a sample of  events Generated between and m 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency

Spectrometer Reconstruction Requiremets: High resolution (against backgrounds constrained by kinematics) also in case of multi-track events High efficiency (signal acceptance and rejection of multi-track background π + π + π -, K e4 ) also in case of multi-track events As much as possible independent from the sources of inefficiency of the straws (effective radius, smooth inefficiency…) 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency Why multi-track environment ?  (t) straw ≈ 7 ns  t ≈ 3  (t) ≈ 20 ns Rate per chamber ≈ 10 MHz Prob(> 1 hit/view) ≈ 0.18 ≈ Prob(> 1 track)

L – R ambiguity resolution 4 hit fired: not allowed by geometry. 3 hits fired: 1 tube hit close to the wire, the other 2 tubes are hit close to the edges. LR solution always possible. 2 hits fired: both tubes are hit in the central part. LR solution always possible. 1 hit fired: only close to the beam hole and in case of straw tube inefficiency. LR solution never possible. Steps: Look for contiguous tubes fired. Sum or subtract the measured R in one tube to the position of the tube according to the pattern of contiguous tubes. 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency

Hits and Clusters Definitions Hit: one straw tube fired. Measured infos: 1-D coordinate of the impact point of the track on the tube (or the position of the tube if the LR ambiguity is not solved). Time (Not used in the present work). Cluster: group of Hits in one view used to solve their LR ambiguity. Types: 1-Hit, 2-Hits, 3-Hits according to the impact point of the track on the view planes. Measured infos (extracted by linear interpolation of the hits forming the cluster): 1-D coordinate of the impact point of the track extrapolated at an average Z Slope of the track. 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency Each cluster is defined by a coordinate AND by a slope (track slope)

Single hit reconstruction 07/02/2011 G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency 7 Effective radius 5 mm No  rays pileup No smooth inefficiency No R smearing  hadronic interactions  decays Effective radius 4.7 mm  rays pileup allowed 3% smooth inefficiency R smearing (  m)  hadronic interactions  decays Ideal configurationReal configuration

Single hit reconstruction (cont’d) 07/02/2011 G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency  m17  m Ideal configurationReal configuration

1 hit clusters regions 07/02/2011 G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency 9 Ideal configurationReal configuration more

Pattern recognition algorithm Kalman filter approach starting to the last chamber and adding the clusters down to the first chamber: Initialization step profits from the a-priori knowledge of the track slope. Complications: at least 2 views needed for the initialization of the X-Y angle of the track. The number of the views fired in one chamber depends on the track impact point on the chambers. Momentum initialization possible at the level of the second chamber only. Step 0: all the possible cluster combinations in chambers 4 are considered. And each combination is propagated back in chamber 3 down to a view with at least 1 cluster. Step 1: A cluster in this view is chosen according to the difference between the measured position and the position expected on the basis of the estimated track parameters, divided by the corresponding errors. Step 2: a “good” cluster is added, the track parameters recomputed, some model of MS added to the correlation matrix of the track parameters and track propagated back again (step 1). Process ends when no more views with clusters are found 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency INIT FILTER Identification of the clusters in the different views and chambers belonging to the same track

Pattern recognition algorithm Further complications (short examples): One track with a cluster in only 1 view in chamber 4. A not parallael view in chamber 3 needed for a suitable initialization. No clusters in chamber 4. Clusters in chamber 3 used for initialization. One track with clusters in chamber 4 and another track without chamber 4… No cluster in chamber 2, or 1 cluster in chamber 2 in Y direction. A cluster in chamber 1 is needed to initialize the track momentum. … Output: sets of combinations. Track candidates chosen among the combinations on the basis of a suitable  2. Added features: track candidates are indetified also in case of clusters in 3 chambers only (the case of any chamber missing is addressed). Algorithm tuned using       events. 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency

1-track event results Results presented as a function of the effective radius Real Configuration 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency Clusters per track vs effective radius hit per clusters per track vs effective radius

1-track event results 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency 1 hit cluster 3 hits cluster 2 hits cluster Real configuration

Spectrometer efficiency (1-track) 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency 3 Chambers 4 Chambers Total: 95% Effect from  hadronic interactions and  decay included

Efficiency vs P (1-track) 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency Effective radius between 5.0 and 4.5 mm: no visible effect vs track momentum Geometrical acceptance (beam hole)

Minimal Spectrometer Layout (2012) Layout: 4 Chambers 2 Views / Chamber : Chamber 12 XY, Chamber 34 UV 4 Single tube planes / View Geometry from TD Chamber and tube positions from Beatch file 11/06/2010. Analysis performed using a sample of  events Generated between and m 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency

Minimal Spectrometer Layout Results studied as a function of the effective radius Real Configuration 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency Clusters per track vs effective radius (hit per clusters ) per track vs effective radius

Minimal Spectrometer Layout 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency 3 Chambers 4 Chambers Total: 75% Efficiency vs Effective Radius

Minimal Spectrometer Layout 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency Efficiency vs P

Conclusions 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency Time to build a “realistic” reconstruction of the Spectrometer L-R resolution algorithm developed: Independent from the geometry of the planes Provide position and first track slope estimation Pattern recognition algorithm started: Use of a Kalman Filter technique Most part of possible cases addressed and solved. Works in multi-track environments (some refinement still needed)

Conclusions (cont’d) 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer Efficiency Straw performances vs 1 track events: Reconstruction efficiency almost not dependent on the effective radius Reconstruction quality does depend on the effective radius Spectrometer efficiency (including geometry,  interactions,  decays, 3% smooth efficiency of the straws, 4.7 mm effective radius): 95% (90% for tracks with 4 chambers) full set-up (16 views) 75% (70% for tracks with 4 chambers) minimal set-up (8 views). Reconstruction quality to be addressed. A further step in the reconstruction needed to reach the highest level of resolution (next talk.)