1 Fertility Intentions in France and Russia Laurence Charton Marc Bloch University Strasbourg - France Sergey Surkov IIPS Moscow - Russia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Childbearing Intentions and Attitudes Towards Children among Childless Sexual-Minority and Heterosexual Men and Women. Nola du Toit Department of Sociology.
Advertisements

Groupe GEPP OFCE - 28/6/ 2007 Does the division of domestic labour differ after a marital separation ? Anne Solaz INED.
Living Single: The Effects of Domestic Capital Investments On Men’s Domestic Labor Participation Richard N Pitt, Jr. Vanderbilt University Department of.
Dagmar Kutsar and Kairi Kasearu University of Tartu, Estonia ISCI 3rd International Conference, York July, 2011.
1 Why Marriage Matters: Marriage, Lone Parenthood, Cohabitation, & Child Well-being in the West W. Bradford Wilcox Department of Sociology University of.
Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes and intentions in the BHPS. Ernestina Coast.
Latino fathers’ childbearing intentions: The view from mother-proxy vs. father self-reports Lina Guzman, Jennifer Manlove, & Kerry Franzetta.
What is the Impact of Parental Divorce on the Life Course Outcomes of Children in Canada? Valerie Martin*, Melinda Mills** and Céline Le Bourdais* * Centre.
Occupational Gender Segregation and Discrimination in Western Europe EPUNet 2006, Barcelona, Spain 8 May 2006 Yekaterina Chzhen Centre for Research in.
Depression, Partnership Quality and Partnership Breakdown An analysis of the Millennium Cohort Study Anna Garriga Kathleen Kiernan University of York.
SOSC 200Y Gender and Society Lecture 17: Conflicting roles - working mother.
FENICs Female Employment and Family Formation in National Institutional Contexts Women’s Entry into Motherhood in France, Sweden, East and West Germany,
FENICs Female Employment and Family Formation in National Institutional Contexts Changing Family Formation: The Diffusion of Cohabitation Among Young Women.
The family in Norwegian society Anne Skevik Grødem, NOVA – Norwegian Social Research.
Currently cohabiting: Relationship attitudes and intentions Dr Ernestina Coast.
Measuring gender relations with GGS data Maria Eugenia COSIO ZAVALA Pascal SEBILLE CERPOS Centre de Recherche Populations et sociétés University of Paris.
DOES STEP-PARENTING INFLUENCE MENTAL HEALTH? Paul Boyle, Peteke Feijten, Zhiqiang Feng, Elspeth Graham, Vernon Gayle.
Religiosity and Demographic Events A Comparative Study of European Countries Caroline Berghammer, Dimiter Philipov VIENNA INSTITUTE OF DEMOGRAPHY (VID)
Chapter Twelve. Section One A. The family is the most universal social institution B. Definition varies from culture to culture.
Vlada Stankūnienė Aušra Maslauskaitė Marė Baublytė Demographic Research Center, ISR Lithuania Lithuania International conference “Changing Family: Demographic.
9 Families and Children Laura MacIntyre.
Integrating a Gender Perspective into Statistics Selected topic: Poverty Statistics S. Nunhuck Statistics Mauritius.
STATE OF ART IN GREEK FAMILY
Marital Status and Transitions Gerontology 410 Jan 2008.
The Family and Household Transition
Time-invarying Covariates of Successive Births in Pakistan Ali Muhammad Ph.D. Candidate Department of Sociology University of Western Ontario London, Ontario.
Young Expert‘s Workshop. Berlin: Hertie School of Governance.
Family Types Child Development.
STRUCTURING PROBABILISTIC DATA BY GALOIS LATTICES PAULA BRITO FAC. ECONOMIA, UNIV. PORTO, PORTUGAL GERALDINE POLAILLON SUPELEC, FRANCE.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Being Single Preview.
Definition The Family is a small group consisting ordinarily of father, mother, one or more children and sometimes near or distant relatives. The word.
Department of Demography 2014 Applied Demography Conference Marriage Selectivity and Stepfamily Formation: Do Single Mothers Settle? Gabriela Sánchez-Soto.
Changing Demographic Trends & Families in the U.S. Lecture 2 Family Sociology.
SOC101Y Introduction to Sociology Professor Robert Brym Lecture #14 Families 27 Jan 2010.
+ Marriage Introduction to Family Studies FCST 200.
Emigration in the Perspective of the Search for a First Job in Bulgaria Rumiana Stoilova – Institute of the Studies of Societies and Knowledge at BAS.
5 Gender Laura MacIntyre.
Adele Menniti and Maura Misiti CNR Irpps - Institute for Population Research and Social Policies Fertility Preferences and Intentions : Some Results from.
Women of Aruba Presentatie aan de vrouwenvleugel van de politieke partij ‘RED’ 16 februari 2005.
Male Method Choice in Bangladesh: Does It Matter Who Makes The Decision? Mohammad Amirul Islam Sabu S. Padmadas Peter W.F. Smith Division of Social Statistics.
POSTPONEMENT OF FIRST CHILD – NEW REALITY FOR RUSSIA Sergei V. Zakharov Institute of Demography State University ‘Higher School of Economics’ Research.
Changing Demographic Trends & Families in the U.S. Lecture 2 Introduction to Family Studies.
Chapter 12 Family. Chapter Outline  Marriage and Family: Basic Institutions of Society  The U.S. Family Over the Life Course  Roles and Relationships.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 14: Divorce and Remarriage.
Family Forms…. Millions of Kids Children living in blended families, including either a step-parent or step-sibling. Children living with both natural.
Housework sharing among dual-earner French Couples : gender inequality remains Sophie Ponthieux, Amandine Schreiber INSEE, France.
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November , 2007 Relative employment positions of partners and gender relations in Russia and France Ariane Pailhé (INED) Oxana.
Social-economic Differentials of the Dying Risk of the oldest- old Chinese Liu, Guiping Max-Planck-Institute for Demographic Research.
Grand Challenge Seminar Reproduction. Births by Mother’s Age
Woman At Work More than half of all married woman work, giving greater independence to women. Not a blame, but possible reason for increasing number of.
Differentials in desires and realisation: 1st, 2nd and 3rd child Marion Burkimsher.
The American Family 50 years of change. Change… The American family has undergone tremendous change in the last 50 years. Some argue that family life.
Millions of Kids Children living in blended families, including either a step-parent or step- sibling. Children living with both natural parents and full.
International Conference ADDRESSING QUALITY OF WORK IN EUROPE Sofia, Bulgaria October 2012 “Satisfaction with working conditions and work organisation.
___________________________ Characteristics of rural- urban elderly living in poverty ELDERLY IN MALAYSIA SAIDATULAKMAL MOHD, Ph.D. This study benefits.
European Socio-Economic Classification: A Validation Exercise Figen Deviren Office for National Statistics.
Educational Fertility Di ff erentials by Occupational Status and Industry: Integrated Public Use Micro-Sample (IPUMS) census data from four European countries.
Workshop on World Programme for the Census of Agriculture 2020 Amman, Jordan May 2016 Theme 8: Demographic and social characteristics Technical Session.
The American Family 50 years of change.
Family and household structure Part 2
Family Forms….
Childfree? Or happy family?.
Chapter 10: Parenthood and Fertility
Gender Traits & Differences
Here comes the bride…..and a family!
How binding is parenthood
Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes and intentions in the BHPS. Ernestina Coast.
Marriage and the Family
The family in Norwegian society
TROUBLED MARRIAGES AND DIVORCE
Presentation transcript:

1 Fertility Intentions in France and Russia Laurence Charton Marc Bloch University Strasbourg - France Sergey Surkov IIPS Moscow - Russia

2 Introduction In 2005, the Total Fertility Rate was 1.91 in France and 1.29 in Russia.

3 G1: Total fertility Rate, France-Russia,

4 Introduction Effective control of Fertility The desire for children is the main catalyst of the process of procreation

5 Introduction Analysis of the gap between France and Russia in the level of fertility by studying the intentions of fertility and “favorable” conditions for the birth of a first and a second child.

6 Data and Methods 1 st STEP

7 Data and Methods 2 nd STEP

8 Data and Methods 3 rd STEP

9 G2: First rank cumulated fertility rate by sex and age groups, France and Russia

10 G3: Second rank cumulated fertility rate by sex and age groups, France and Russia

11 Parental conjugal status at 1st birth and conception according to parental status at 1st birth CountryGender Age groups Conjugal status Parental conjugal status at conception 1 at 1st birthfor child born inside marriage for child born outside marriage Mar- riage Without mar- riage Mar- riage Out- side union Cohabit ation Inside Union Outside union France Men Women Russia Men Women

12 Parental conjugal status at 1st birth and conception according to parental status at 1st birth CountryGender Age groups Conjugal status Parental conjugal status at conception 1 at 1st birthfor child born inside marriage for child born outside marriage Mar- riage Without mar- riage Mar- riage Out- side union Cohabit ation Inside Union Outside union France Men Women Russia Men Women First Child born inside marriage FranceRussia Men Women

13 Parental conjugal status at 1st birth and conception according to parental status at 1st birth CountryGender Age groups Conjugal status Parental conjugal status at conception 1 at 1st birthfor child born inside marriage for child born outside marriage Mar- riage Without mar- riage Mar- riage Out- side union Cohabit ation Inside Union Outside union France Men Women Russia Men Women First Child born inside marriage, conceived outside marriage FranceRussia Men Women

14 Parental conjugal status at 1st birth and conception according to parental status at 1st birth CountryGender Age groups Conjugal status Parental conjugal status at conception 1 at 1st birthfor child born inside marriage for child born outside marriage Mar- riage Without mar- riage Mar- riage Out- side union Cohabit ation Inside Union Outside union France Men Women Russia Men Women First Child born outside marriage inside cohabitation FranceRussia Men Women

15 Parental conjugal status at 2nd birth and conception according to parental status at 2nd birth CountryGender Age groups Conjugal status Parental conjugal status at conception 1 at 2 nd birthfor child born inside marriage for child born outside marriage Mar- riage Without marrige Mar- riage Out- Side Union Coha- bitation Inside Union Outside union France Men ,147,9 Women ,179,9 Russia Men Women

16 Parental conjugal status at 2nd birth and conception according to parental status at 2nd birth CountryGender Age groups Conjugal status Parental conjugal status at conception 1 at 2 nd birthfor child born inside marriagefor child born outside marriage Mar- riage Without marrige Mar- riage Out- Side Union Coha- bitation Inside Union Outside union France Men ,147,9 Women ,179,9 Russia Men Women nd Child born inside marriage FranceRussia Men Women

17 Parental conjugal status at 2nd birth and conception according to parental status at 2nd birth Countr yGender Age groups Conjugal status Parental conjugal status at conception 1 at 2 nd birthfor child born inside marriage for child born outside marriage Mar- riage Without marrige Mar- riage Out- Side Union Coha- bitation Inside Union Outside union France Men ,147,9 Wome n ,179,9 Russia Men Wome n nd child born inside marriage, conceived outside marriage FranceRussia Men Women

18 Parental conjugal status at 2nd birth and conception according to parental status at 2nd birth CountryGender Age groups Conjugal status Parental conjugal status at conception 1 at 2 nd birthfor child born inside marriage for child born outside marriage Mar- riage Without marrige Mar- riage Out- Side Union Coha- bitation Inside Union Outside union France Men ,147,9 Women ,179,9 Russia Men Women nd child born outside marriage inside cohabitation FranceRussia Men (88.9) (60.9) (74.1) ,1(57.1) Women (85.0) (71.4) (59.0) ,1(43.9)

19 Fertility intentions for childless people by gender and age groups CountryGenderAge groups Fertility intentions Unadjusted Number definitely yes 1 definitely not 2 Rather yes, rather not or do not know France Males Females Russia Males Females Age groups Definitely yes, males FranceRussia Age groups Definitely yes, females FranceRussia Age groups Rather yes, rather not or do not know, females FranceRussia

20 Fertility intentions for people having only one biological child by gender and age groups CountryGenderAge groups Fertility intentions Unadjusted Number definitely yesdefinitely not Rather yes, rather not or do not know France Males Females Russia Males Females Age groups Definitely yes, males FranceRussia Age groups Definitely yes, females FranceRussia

21 Fertility intentions for people having only two biological children by gender and age groups CountryGenderAge groups Fertility intentions Unadjusted Number definitely yesdefinitely not Rather yes, rather not or do not know France Males Females Russia Males Females Age groups Definitely yes, males FranceRussia Age groups Definitely yes, females FranceRussia Age groups Rather yes, rather not or do not know, females FranceRussia

22 Independent variables for logistic regression of positive fertility intentions Gender Age groups Parental divorce, size of siblings, nationality of respondent, and religion observance Occupation status of respondent and occupation status of father and mother (ISCO-88) Level of education, and intentions to resume studies Partnership/marriage Conception of Family Life Gender of the first child and age of respondent at the moment of the first birth

23 Gender and age groups Factors ChildlessOne biological child Relative risk FranceRussiaFranceRussia Gender Menreference Women1,39*1.62*** ** Age groups ,50*** * 25-29reference ,51*1.310,46** *1,19***0.25*** ,57*0.27***0,05***0.12*** ,21***0.15***0,02***0.02*** Significance: * 5 (per 100), ** 1 (per 100) and *** 1 (per 1000)

24 Parental divorce, size of siblings, nationality of respondent, and religion observance Factors ChildlessOne biological child Relative risk FranceRussiaFranceRussia Parental divorce yes noreference Size of siblings or morereference Nationality French / Russianreference Others ** Religious Observance Regular1,85* Irregularreference Non praticing (agnostic) **

25 Occupation status of respondent Factors ChildlessOne biological child Relative risk FranceRussiaFranceRussia Legislators, seniorofficials and managers Professionals Technicians and associate professionals reference Clerks * ** Service workers and shop and market sales workers ,27*0.75 Skill agricultural and fishery workers Craft and related workers * Plant and machine operators and assemblers * Elementary occupations *** None or unknow **

26 Level of education and intentions to resume studies Factors ChildlessOne biological child Relative risk FranceRussiaFranceRussia Level of Education Primary Secondaryreference Tertiary Studies in progress yes *** noreference Intention to resume studies yes1,06*** ** noreference

27 Partnership/marriage Factors ChildlessOne biological child Relative risk FranceRussiaFranceRussia Conjugal status alonereference in couple (partnership)3,38*** ** others Marital status singlereference- - married2,74*** others Number of unions 0reference 11,70**2.25** ,12**2.05* * 3 or more ** Intention to change its marital situation yes *** *** noreference do not know

28 Conception of Family Life Factors ChildlessOne biological child Relative risk FranceRussiaFranceRussia To grow happy, child needs a father and a mother at home agree or rather agreereference neither agree, nor disagree disagree or rather disagree To make happy, a woman must have children agree or rather agreereference neither agree, nor disagree disagree or rather disagree * To make happy, a man must have children agree or rather agreereference neither agree, nor disagree ** disagree or rather disagree0,48* A woman can have a child alone if she does not wish a stable relation with a man agree or rather agreereference neither agree, nor disagree disagree or rather disagree

29 Gender of the first child and age of respondent at the moment of the first birth Factors ChildlessOne biological child Relative risk FranceRussiaFranceRussia Age at the first child less than ,23*** – 29 years-- 0,44** – 34 years-- reference 35 or more Gender of the first child Boy-- reference Girl

30 Semi-parametric (Cox) model for first and second birth Gender Age groups Parental divorce, size of siblings, nationality of respondent, and religion observance Occupation status of respondent’s father and mother (ISCO-88) Level of education, and intentions to resume studies Conjugal events Gender of the first child and conjugal status at first birth

31 Gender and age groups Significance: * 5 (per 100), ** 1 (per 100) and *** 1 (per 1000) Factors Relative risk 1st birth FranceRussiaFranceRussia Gender Menreference Women1,46***1,17***1,50***1,13*** Age groups ,23***0,67***2,52***0,29*** 25-29reference ,16***1,36***0,872,25*** ,46***1,38***0,872,86*** ,45***1,40***0,883,19*** ,35***1,40***0,903,45***

32 Parental divorce, size of siblings, nationality of respondent, and religion observance Factors Relative risk 1st birth FranceRussiaFranceRussia Parental divorce yes1,15**1,33***1,082,38*** noreference Size of siblings 10,79**0,940,71***0,72*** 20,92*0,980,81***0,76*** 3 or morereference Religious Observance Regular1,15**0,951,050,95 Irregularreference Non praticing (agnostic)1,141,001,030,95 Nationality French / Russianreference Others0,91,010,76**1,07

33 Occupation status of respondent’s father Factors Relative risk 1st birth FranceRussiaFranceRussia Legislators, seniorofficials and managers0,961,010,961,04 Professionals0,931,001,010,95 Technicians and associate professionalsreference Clerks1,061,030,981,07 Service workers and shop and market sales workers1,111,071,101,05 Skill agricultural and fishery workers1,101,041,271,07 Craft and related workers1,161,041,24*1,00 Plant and machine operators and assemblers1,18*1,051,29**1,04 Elementary occupations1,19*0,991,231,03 None or unknow1,24**0,951,190,84

34 Occupation status of respondent’s mother Factors Relative risk 1st birth FranceRussiaFranceRussia Legislators, seniorofficials and managers1,140,911,271,08 Professionals0,930,970,870,96 Technicians and associate professionalsreference Clerks0,991,021,081,11 Service workers and shop and market sales workers1,211,041,33*1,13 Skill agricultural and fishery workers1,121,081,151,22 Craft and related workers1,171,031,221,05 Plant and machine operators and assemblers1,32*0,991,331,05 Elementary occupations1,33**1,041,181,10 None or unknow1,121,041,211,18

35 Studies and employment Factors Relative risk 1st birth FranceRussiaFranceRussia Studies in progress yes1,050,74***0,80* noreference With already worked yesreference no2,21***1,012,56***1,20***

36 Two possible conjugal events Factors Relative risk 1st birth FranceRussiaFranceRussia Two possible conjugal events never in couple0,25***0,28***0,53***0,26*** in cohabitation outside marriagereference married1,48***1,62***1,101,31*** cohabitation then marriage0,931,64***1,071,34*** in couple then to separate0,001,38***0,43***0,88***

37 Gender of the first child and conjugal status at first birth Factors Relative risk 1st birth FranceRussiaFranceRussia Gender of first child boy--0,961,13** girl--reference Conjugal status at first birth without union--1,61***2,21*** cohabitation--reference marriage - - 1,242,00***

38 Conclusions In France fertility intentions are generally higher than in Russia Factors which have influence on fertility intentions of childless people and fertility intentions of respondents with one biological child are different The most crucial factors for positive fertility intentions in both countries are conjugal status and number of unions, other factors are vary in France and Russia The most serious factors linked to probability of the first and second birth in both countries are age groups as well as conjugal events