Building in the Three R’s An Introduction to Rigor, Relevance, and Relationship Edited from a PLS presentation for Lenoir County Public Schools Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality teaching in context
Advertisements

What do you know about the Rigor/Relevance framework?
Rigor/Relevance: Integrated Instruction & Student Engagement Liholiho Group Data Coaches & STEM RTs.
The 3 R’s IGOR ELEVENCE ELATIONSHIPS.
The Rigor and Relevance Framework: A lesson
In Your Walkthroughs… Do You See Rigorous and Relevant Questions/Assignments? High School Learning Team Meeting October 26, 2005.
Rigor/Relevance/Relationships Working in Quadrant D.
Title I School Improvement Where have we been? Where are we going? Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director April 2009.
How to engage students through Rigor, Relevance & Relationships
RIGOR AND RELEVANCE.
Rigor/Relevance Framework Overview
Securing Academic Rigor for Secondary Students RELEVANCE, RIGOR & EUREKA! NAGC, November 2007 Dr. Cecelia Boswell ©Dr. Cecelia Boswell, ACES, Austin Creek.
1 Implementing the standards cannot simply mean informing teachers about what the designers of the standards intended or providing them with videos of.
University of Delaware Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs. Instructor-Centered Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George.
1 1*. 2 After studying and practicing with the Rigor & Relevance Framework tools, teachers will be able to write lesson plans and develop learning experiences.
Where the Rubber Hits the Road – Next Generation Assessments Susan Gendron, Senior Fellow International Center for Leadership in Education October 3, 2011.
RIGOR, RELEVANCE, RELATIONSHIPS, & RESULTS Presented By: Kim Powell and Kim Dye November 10 th, 2012.
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
Lynette Molstad Gorder, Ed.D. Dakota State University Madison, SD.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
By Weizmar Lozada. Content-based Instruction Use of content from other disciplines in language teaching. Build on students’ previous knowledge. Students.
Teaching for Rigor and Relevance Why, What, How? Dr. Kelly Gillespie SWPRSC.
1. Read a description of a science experiment and list the necessary materials to perform the experiment. 2. Locate and read a current article on stem.
What Our Students Need Most The 7 Fundamental Conditions of Learning.
Rigor in the Classroom DECEMBER 11, Standards: 3. INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES: The teacher promotes student learning by using research-based instructional.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
“In years to come, your students may forget what you taught them
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
Oklahoma Academic Standards: What Career Tech Educators Need to Know For the Road Ahead Kerri White, Ed.D. Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educator.
To Examine Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment.
Chapter 4: Planning Educational Outcomes Presented by: April Gannon & Lizzy Allen.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Project Based Learning Learning Through Discovery.
Engaging Students through Rigorous and Relevant Instruction.
Coaching Rigor in the Classroom: Text Complexity and Close Reading Diane Hubona March 15, 2013.
Writing Lessons for Rigorous and Relevant Instruction Jim Miles Achieving Academic Excellence for All Students.
RIGOR & RELEVANCE NEW TEACHER MEETING SEPTEMBER 21, 2009 NEW TEACHER MEETING SEPTEMBER 21, 2009.
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
Inquiry Learning and Social Studies College and Career Readiness Conferences Summer
Rigor and Relevance Training Alison Owens Agenda Introductions Introductions How do you learn best activity How do you learn best activity Review of.
International Center for Leadership in Education Common Core Rigor and Relevance.
Welcome to Rigor + Relevance+Web.20 =Results or Can you see your way to Quadrant D? BJ Bagwell, Ph.D Susan Milligan.
Considering the 21 st Century Learner Joe Ferrara Director of Science, FWISD.
Nurturing Active, Deep, and Engaging Learning for Students of Color Tony Lamair Burks II, Ed.D. Superintendent-in-Residence National Center for Urban School.
Interactive Multi-Media Projects & Problem-Based Learning Engaging Students in Their Learning.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
Teaching for Rigor and Relevance Why, What, How? Dr. Kelly Gillespie SWPRSC.
Is Your Lesson Rigorous and Relevant?  Exploring the Rigor and Relevant Framework  Exploring Questioning.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Project Based Learning at Island View School Originally presented at the School District 8 Principals’ Meeting, January 19, 2011 by John Sheehan, Erin.
Building a System-Wide Focus On Student Achievement Joe Shannon September 30, 2011.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Day Two Agenda  The Big Picture  CIR – Phase 2  CIR – Phase 3  Preparing for Coaching Visit  Wrap Up and Next Steps.
Rigor/Relevance For All Students Common CORE January, 2013
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Mary B. Austin Elementary Rigor, Relevance, Relationships
SEMS STEAM 2016.
Rigor and Relevance: A Must for 21st Century Learners
Rigor/Relevance Framework
Writing Learning Outcomes
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
EXPLICIT DIRECT INSTRUCTION
Skills for Learning, Life and Work
Presentation transcript:

Building in the Three R’s An Introduction to Rigor, Relevance, and Relationship Edited from a PLS presentation for Lenoir County Public Schools Presented by Tezella Cline, Professional Development Specialist September 23, 2010 Road Show for Frink Middle School

OVERVIEW… The purpose of this session is to begin a conversation about rigor, relevance, and relationships that will facilitate learning about ways to include these in the classroom experience for all students.

MAKE MEANING OF THIS… Use a Thinking Map to help you make meaning of and explain the statement above. Classrooms that successfully engage students in learning have many things in common. They set high academic standards and provide rigorous, meaningful instruction to support students so that all students can meet them. Their structure makes it possible to give students individual attention and seek to understand how students think and feel. The teachers take an interest in students' lives, drawing on their real-world experiences and current understandings to build new knowledge. Teachers also show students the connections between success in school and long-term career plans.

Why Rigor & Relevance? Many Iowa schools have adopted this model as a tool to improve instruction because it...  Engages all teachers in school-wide efforts,  Focuses on instruction,  Provides a common vocabulary with which to discuss teaching and learning.

Rigor, Relevance and Relationships (R3)A State Board of Education Initiative designed to address high school reform, R3, focused on three research-based characteristics of successful schools. Rigor is defined as exposing students to challenging class work with academic and social support. Relevance is defined as demonstrating how students will use their learning. Relationship is defined as building caring and supportive connections with students, parents, and communities.

Rigor 6. Evaluation 5. Synthesis 4. Analysis 3. Application 2. Comprehension 1. Knowledge/ Awareness Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering New Bloom’s Taxonomy

When is a Task Rigorous? think deeply about a problem analyze new situations interpret and synthesize knowledge bring ideas together in a new or creative way develop and justify their own criteria for evaluation are intellectually challenged Students…

Relevance Knowledge is less connected to realistic situations and has less apparent value beyond school Knowledge is clearly connected to realistic situations and has value beyond school Knowledge in one discipline Apply in one discipline Apply across disciplines Apply to real- world predictable situations Apply to real-world unpredictable situations

When is a Task Relevant? Value beyond school Addresses an actual problem of contemporary significance Builds on students’ real-life experiences Has students communicate knowledge beyond the classroom Students recognize the connection between classroom knowledge and situations outside the classroom

Adaptation D High Rigor – High Relevance B Low Rigor – High Relevance A Low Rigor – Low Relevance C High Rigor – Low Relevance

Quadrant A Represents simple recall & basic understanding of knowledge for its own sake. Students gather and store bits of knowledge and information. Students are primarily expected to remember or understand this acquired knowledge. Low Rigor – Low Relevance CD A B

Quadrant B Students use acquired knowledge to complete tasks with a connection outside school. Activities or tasks involve lifelike situations. Does not require higher order thinking. Low Rigor – High Relevance CD A B

Quadrant C Students are thinking deeply about a problem in the discipline. Represents more complex thinking but has less clear value outside of school. Students extend and refine their acquired knowledge to be able to use that knowledge automatically and routinely to analyze, solve problems and create unique solutions. High Rigor – Low Relevance C D AB

Quadrant D Students are thinking deeply and there is a connection to lifelike situations. Even when confronted with unknowns, students are able to use extensive knowledge and skills to create solutions and take action that further develops their skills & knowledge. High Rigor – High Relevance C D A B

Student-Teacher Engagement In the Rigor/Relevance Framework there are different degrees of student engagement. In the following slide there is a description of student engagement. Decide in which quadrant it would fit best.

Students are thinking deeply about teacher-directed questions. Which quadrant? 1. A 2. B 3. C 4. D CD A B

Teacher is doing the working and the thinking. Which quadrant? 1. A 2. B 3. C 4. D CD A B

Students are working on teacher- directed, real-life problems. Which quadrant? 1. A 2. B 3. C 4. D CD A B

RELEVANCE C Students are working and thinking. D Teacher is working & thinking. A B Rigor & Relevance: Student – Teacher Engagement RIGORRIGOR