H2 TMS Y QPD Sled - As Built - Bram Slagmolen, Keita Kawabe, Matt Evans LIGO-T1100476.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Hild, Andreas Freise University of Birmingham Roland Schilling, Jerome Degallaix AEI Hannover January 2008, Virgo week, Pisa Advanced Virgo: Wedges.
Advertisements

19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Fig. 4-1, p Fig. 4-2, p. 109 Fig. 4-3, p. 110.
HAM6: Summary of Beam Parameters L. Barsotti Jun 12, 2013.
Chapter 2 Propagation of Laser Beams
Cavity length alignement 1.Two alignement mirrors -> symmetric beam image 2.PZT sweeping with an amplitude = several FSR 3.Shift two plane mirrors (in.
An Optical Setup for Crackle Noise Detection Carell Hamil Mentor: Gabriele Vajente 1.
P.464. Table 13-1, p.465 Fig. 13-1, p.466 Fig. 13-2, p.467.
P449. p450 Figure 15-1 p451 Figure 15-2 p453 Figure 15-2a p453.
Fig. 11-1, p p. 360 Fig. 11-2, p. 361 Fig. 11-3, p. 361.
Philippe Hering October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe.
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
Table 6-1, p Fig. 6-1, p. 162 p. 163 Fig. 6-2, p. 164.
Senior Design II Film Thickness Measurement Julian Peters Joe Fitzmyer Brad Demers Coordinator: Dr. Wayne Walter Advisor: Dr. Dale Ewbank Sponsor: Dr.
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
Higher order TEM modes: Why and How? Andreas Freise European Gravitational Observatory 17. March 2004.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
Higher order laser modes in gravitational wave detectors
Status of IPBSM Improvement N. Terunuma, KEK 2012/July/13 ATF2 Weekly Meeting.
Prepared using support of U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 by the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California.
September 28, 2007LGS for SAM – PDR – Optics1 LGS for SAM Optical Alignment R.Tighe, A.Tokovinin. LGS for SAM Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
Tutorial: Calculation of Image Rotation for a Scanning Optical System Sergio Guevara OPTI 521 – Distance Learning College of Optical Science University.
Controlling a 3D Vehicle with Simulink Jeff Bender ME
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
IP-BSM Improvement Work N. Terunuma 2012/6/26 ATF2 Project Meeting.
European Gravitational Observatory12/12/2005 WG1 Hannover 1 Mode Matching of the Fabry-Perrot cavities Julien Marque.
Modern Optics Lab Lab 6 Part 2: Interference Experiments  Observe interference by plane-parallel plates: Measure the thickness of the plates based on.
The lens, diffraction and photon game
04. November 2004 A. Freise A. Freise, M. Loupias Collaboration Meeting November 04, 2004 Alignment Status.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
G D LSC Changes in Preparation of High Power Operations Commissioning Meeting, May 5, 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg, Matt Evans.
G Z AJW for Marcus Benna, Cambridge Wavefront Sensing for Advanced LIGO Model of wavefront sensing in a dual- recycled interferometer Consequences.
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105 & ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 8: Gaussian Beams Prof. Charles A.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
LSC August G Z Gingin High Optical Power Test Facility (AIGO) 1 High Optical Power Test Facility - Status First lock, auto-alignment and.
Intermediate  configurations at the IP for commissioning and optimization Sha BAI IHEP/LAL Philip BAMBADE LAL.
Laser Notcher Demonstration Experiment Dave Johnson, Todd Johnson, Matt Gardner. Rick Tesarek, Vic Sacrpine.
Law of Reflection and Mirrors How Light can be Redirected.
Plan in summer shutdown Magnet -SF1FF -Swap of QEA magnet - Multipole field of Final Doublet IP-BSM improvement.
L1 TMSY Telescope focal tuning results Adam Mullavey, Chris Guido 31 Oct 2013 LIGO-G
M. Mantovani, ILIAS Meeting 7 April 2005 Hannover Linear Alignment System for the VIRGO Interferometer M. Mantovani, A. Freise, J. Marque, G. Vajente.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
1 Development schedule of Static IFO Simulation (SIS) Basic building blocks »Framework »mirror, cavity or propagator, detector FP cavity »Simple locking,
Plane Reflection – Learning Outcomes  Demonstrate the laws of reflection.  Discuss images formed in plane mirrors.  Differentiate between real and virtual.
FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Andreas Freise European Gravitational Observatory 17. March 2004.
Chapter 1. Ray Optics.
40m Optical Systems & Sensing DRD, G R 1 40m Optical Systems and Sensing Design Requirements Document & Conceptual Design Michael Smith 10/18/01.
Local control sensors for iKAGRA payloads and perspective (Optical lever) Kazuhiro Agatsuma 2013/Dec./5 ELiTES meeting at Tokyo1.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Simplified ray-tracing diagram for a biaxial monostatic lidar. (a) General view.
Lab 2 Alignment.
Main Interferometer Subsystem
TMSY Telescope focal tuning results
Laser Safety Laser Beam Containment Effects from beam exposure
nicolas smith-lefebvre MIT GWDAW 2011
The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Progress on 1.8m Telescope with 127-element Adaptive Optics at IOE
How to align lightlever optics
Modeling of Advanced LIGO with Melody
Robert Pushor, Catherine LeCocq, Brian Fuss, Georg Gassner
PSL optical layout changes for eLigo
Alignment Investigations towards Advanced Virgo
Injector Drive Laser Technical Status
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Fig. 2 Images of the optical field at transmitter and receiver.
Presentation transcript:

H2 TMS Y QPD Sled - As Built - Bram Slagmolen, Keita Kawabe, Matt Evans LIGO-T

QPD Sled Telescopes The TMS/ISC Breadboard has two QPD sleds, one for IR and one for Green. Each sled, has a small Gouy phase beam reducing telescope to steer the beam onto the QPDs. The Gouy phase between the two QPDs needs to be close to 90 degrees (for a diagonal sensing matrix in the near- and far field).

Mode-Matching Approach The sleds are assembled, and the telescope optics (2” lens and a 1” lens) are placed as illustrated in figures 8 and 10 in document T T The nominal location for L1 and L2 as listed in the tables 8 and 9 are used. For mode-matching measurements, the IR and GRN Laser Diode sources as per T are used.T The Coherence ModeMaster is used to measure the waist location and size behind the telescope. The location of L2 is adjusted to match the measured waist location and size as close as possible according to T

Mode-Matching Validation Once the telescopes are aligned, a matlab model (alm) is used to validate the location of the QPDs with respect to the measured waist locations. This is done by adjusting the model (changing the distance between L1 and L2) such that the waist location is similar to the measured results (using the LD sources as input to the telescope). With these telescope settings and ‘injected’ the IFO arm cavity beam parameters (e.g. out of the TMS Telescope), adjust the location of the QPDs so the difference in Gouy Phase is nominal 90 degrees.

IR QPD Sled /w LD Source Waist location target: 0.80m (as per T , table 8, fig 7) Laser Diode Source modematching = IRxpath.components list Measured Parameters: (* = adjusted z(m) parameter) label z (m) type parameters L1 0 lens focalLength: * L lens focalLength: QPD flat mirror none: Y-waist flat mirror none: QPD flat mirror none: Adjusted the L2 location in the model until the output waist coincided with the measured waist location (Y-waist).

IR QPD Sled /w IFO Beam (as-built) IFO Arm Beam Parameters modematching = IRxpath.components list Modeled Parameters: (* = adjusted z(m) parameter) label z (m) type parameters L1 0 lens focalLength: L lens focalLength: *QPD flat mirror none: Y-waist flat mirror none: *QPD flat mirror none: Gouy Phase-x (QPD1): Gouy Phase-y (QPD1): Gouy Phase-x (QPD2): Gouy Phase-y (QPD2): Using the model to locate the QPDs.

GRN QPD Sled /w LD Source Waist location target: 0.619m (as per T , table 9, fig 9) Laser Diode Source modematching = GRNxpath.components list Measured Parameters: (* = adjusted z(m) parameter) label z (m) type parameters L1 0 lens focalLength: QPD flat mirror none: * L lens focalLength: Y-waist flat mirror none: L lens focalLength: QPD flat mirror none: Adjusted the L2 location in the model until the output waist coincided with the measured waist location (Y-waist).

GRN QPD Sled /w IFO Beam (as-built) IFO Arm Beam Parameters modematching = GRNxpath.components list Modeled Parameters: (* = adjusted z(m) parameter) label z (m) type parameters L1 0 lens focalLength: *QPD flat mirror none: L lens focalLength: Y-waist flat mirror none: *L lens focalLength: *QPD flat mirror none: Gouy Phase-x (QPD1): Gouy Phase-y (QPD1): Gouy Phase-x (QPD2): Gouy Phase-y (QPD2): Using the model to locate the QPDs.