Informations and comments on ECE-TRANS-WP.29-GRB-2016-02e 1 Louis-Ferdinand PARDO (France) Transmitted by the expert from France Informal document GRB-63-16.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conducted Immunity IEC
Advertisements

Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments Evaluation of multiple carriers deployed in a channel block evaluation criteria section.
Paolo Gemma, Senior Expert, Huawei
BS EN ISO Cleanrooms & associated controlled environments- Part 3: Metrology and test methods DIS.
Informal document No.GRB-47-4 (47th GRB, February 2008 Agenda item 3 (a) CLEPA presentations supporting justifications of informal documents GRB-47-2.
RF Circuit Design Chris Fuller /7/2012.
Comments on GRE/2012/27 (Lighting & Signalling WG) Headlamp Initial Aiming October 2012 Informal document No. GRE (68th GRE, October 2012,
Validation, Verification, Qualification : Which is right and does it really matter?
Conquest Innovations, LLC MAX4 Acoustic Performance Summary of Conquest Innovations’ MAX4 Acoustical Performance Evaluation by The ARL Penn State Acoustic.
Organised in co-operation with Serbian Chamber of Commerce Technical characteristic of package and metric bottles for prepacked products Workshop on requirements.
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
EMS Auditing Definitions
STATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF MEASURING INSTRUNMENTS
BA , 1 Principles of Acoustic Measurements Exercises: Basic Concepts of Sound Measuring Sound Measuring Sound in Practice Basic Frequency Analysis.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
Classification of Instruments :
R3.6.4 Improved Hearing Assessment in Noisy Environments – Parts 1 & 2 Project Leader: Michael Fisher Principal Researcher (Part 1): the late Ben Rudzyn.
THE SOCIETY OF MOTOR MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS LIMITEDPAGE 1 Poland: comments on OICA comments on GRE/2012/27 Headlamp Initial Aiming and leveling tolerances.
Microphone Measurements, Standards, and Specifications Eargle, Ch. 7.
Proposed revision of ITU-R Recommendation providing EESS (active) Performance and Interference Criteria May 13, 2015 Committee On Radio Frequencies Thomas.
Proposal for Draft Amendment to Regulation No. 117
Part 1: Basic Principle of Measurements
LECTURER PROF.Dr. DEMIR BAYKA AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING LABORATORY I.
Element 1 Factors affecting quality and reliability of electronic products 1.1Factors affecting quality are identified, their causes described, and methods.
Reproduction interdite © ALMA EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM Reproduction forbidden Design, Manufacture, Transport and Integration in Chile of ALMA Antennas Page.
Capacitive transducer. We know that : C=kЄ° (A/d) Where : K=dielectric constant Є° =8.854 *10^-12 D=distance between the plates A=the area over lapping.
ISO MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be.
VALIDATIONS: TOWARDS RELAIBLE QUALITY OUTCOMES DR. SHIVPRAKASH MANAGING DIRECTOR SYNCHRON RESEARCH SERVICES PVT. LTD., INDIA.
Defining Design Goals and Design Requirements © 2013 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Engineering Design and Development.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
Development of Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions for Periodical Technical Inspections of Wheeled Vehicles and the Reciprocal Recognition.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS Assessment on the Minimum Sound Level of the Horn 60 th GRB Working Party on Noise September.
Committed to Connecting the World March 2011 Geneva, March 2011 Presentation of the Recommendation ITU-T K 100: Presentation of the Recommendation.
Doc.: IEEE /084r0 Submission March 2000 David Skellern, RadiataSlide 1 Comments by P WLAN WG on P WPAN High Rate Study Group PAR 7.
Image Enhancement Objective: better visualization of remotely sensed images visual interpretation remains to be the most powerful image interpretation.
Concerning regarding the future development of ECE R28 1 Informal document GRB (63 rd GRB, February 2016, agenda item 2) Transmitted by the.
ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS
Doc.: t Submission September 2007 Anthony Maida, 3eTI, Inc.Slide 1 Recommendations for Comments on COAT Section Date: Authors:
Resolving Common Problems with Developing Louver Catalogs.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
IEEE NPEC SC2 Equipment Qualification Electromagnetic Compatibility Compliance Type Test-Design Considerations- Installation and Mitigation Standard/Guidance.
Equipment for Measuring Hearing and Calibration
Abstract A highway traffic noise prediction model has been developed for environmental assessment in South Korea. The model is based on an outdoor sound.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS Measurement of Radiation Pattern Gain
Comments on GRE/2012/27(Lighting & Signalling WG)
64th GRB EU Regulation on AVAS requirements
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Two Vacuums Shopvac Bosch Dept. of Mech. Engineering 1
Informal document No. 9 (50th GRE, 7-11 April 2003, agenda item 3.2.)
Analysis of the Polish proposal. GRE2016/18
IEEE SC-2 International Standard Review
Indoor pass by noise France Presented by Louis-Ferdinand PARDO
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
KMVSS on the Reverse safety devices
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Submitted by the experts of OICA
EU Tyre Industry comments on document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2019/6
Summary of ISO TC43/SC1 WG42 November 2018, Matsue, Japan
Summary of ISO TC43/SC1 WG42 November 2018, Matsue, Japan
Resolving Common Problems with Developing Louver Catalogs
Task-force on reverse warning signal CURRENT STATUS in United nations C-WGN 16th – Wuhan – December 11, 2018.
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Comments on tyre choosing of UN Regulation No
ISO Technical Measurement Development
Presentation transcript:

Informations and comments on ECE-TRANS-WP.29-GRB e 1 Louis-Ferdinand PARDO (France) Transmitted by the expert from France Informal document GRB (63rd GRB, February 2016, agenda item 2)

The test facility in anechoic and hemi-anechoic chamber shall meet the requirements of ISO 26101:2012 with the following qualification criteria and measurement requirements appropriate to this test method. For qualifying the acoustic space, the following evaluation shall be conducted: - Sound source location shall be placed in position of the audible warning device to be tested; - Sound source shall provide a broadband input for measurement; - Evaluation shall be conducted in one ‐ third ‐ octave bands; - Microphone locations for evaluation shall be on a line from the source location to position of the microphone used for measurement. This is commonly referred to as the microphone transverse; - A minimum of 10 points shall be used for evaluation on the microphone transverse line; - The one ‐ third ‐ octave bands used to establish hemi ‐ anechoic qualification shall be defined to cover the spectral range of interest. The test facility shall have a cut-off frequency, as defined in ISO 26101:2012, lower than the lowest frequency of interest. The lowest frequency of interest is the frequency below which there is no signal content relevant to the measurement of sound emission for the audible warning device. For the purpose of this Regulation the lowest frequency of interest is 200 Hz. Part I – Anechoic environment (§6,2) 2 Why a reference to ISO with some additional criteria ?

A brief information on ISO Part I – Anechoic environment (§6.2)

A brief information on ISO Part I – Anechoic environment (§6.2) 4

Part I – Anechoic environment (§6,2) A brief information on ISO ISO is equivalent to Annex A from ISO Project ISO 3745/A1 : Replace Annex A by reference to ISO 26101:2012 Annex A from ISO is dedicated to room qualification for sound power level (source on floor, …) For other application ISO permit to define specifics requirements :

Part I – Anechoic environment (§6.2) These specific requirements are : Space to be deemed anechoïc : Annex A : No specification – It can be the full room Test sound source location : Annex A : centre of room, on the floor) Microphone transverses : Annex A : 5 transverse path – Usually from center to corner of the room Qualification bandwith : Typical of the spectral characteristic of the type of sources that will be measured Generation of sound Discrete-frequency noise or random Spatial resolution of measurement : Annex A : One-tenth waveleght 1 kHz

The sound pressure level and other measurements shall be made according to the conditions specified in paragraph 6.2. of this Regulation.  6.2 refers to anechoic environment only. Reference on open space are only on in a note : The site may take the form, for instance, of an open space of 50 meters radius, the central part of which must be practically horizontal over a radius of at least 20 meters, the surface being of concrete, asphalt or a similar material, which must not be covered with powdery snow, tall weeds, or loose soil or cinders.  Test could be done in open space or in semi-anechoic chamber Part II (§14.3.2) 7

Definition of open space in ISO : Within a radius of 50 m around the centre of the track,, the space shall be free of large reflecting objects such as fences, rocks, bridge or building. Question : What is a large reflecting objects ? Part II (§14.3.2)

Definition of open space in Regulation ECE117, ECE41, ECE63 : The test site shall be such that the conditions of a free sound field between the sound source and the microphone are attained to within 1dB(A). These conditions shall be deemed to be met if there is no large sound reflecting object such as fences, rocks, bridges or building within 50 m of the centre of the measuring section. Question : What is a free sound field attained to within 1dB(A) ? Part II (§14.3.2)

For semi-anechoic, ISO is applicable  Question : Is it applicable also to open space ? Part II (§14.3.2) 10

The device to be tested and the microphone shall be placed at the same height. This height shall 1.20 ± 0.05 m.  In an anechoic environment, only the distance between the device and microphone is important if : minimum distance to the absorber (λ/4) is respected, it corresponds to a microphone transverse. Part I –

Part I – Which floor to be considered ? 1,2 m

Both example should be valid : Part I – m> λ/4 2 m > λ/4

IEC : IEC and IEC IEC Specifications IEC Pattern evaluation tests IEC Periodic tests IEC :2013- Specifications IEC Pattern evaluation tests IEC Periodic tests IEC – Sound level meter 14

Brief information on IEC Performance specifications : Frequency weightings, Level linearity, Self- generated noise, Time weightings F and S, Toneburst response, Response to repeated tonebursts, Overload indication, Peak C sound level Adjustments to indicated levels, Directional response, Under-range indication, Reset, Thresholds, Display, Analogue or digital output, Timing facilities, Radio frequency emissions and disturbances to a public power supply, Crosstalk, Power supply Environmental, electrostatic, and radio frequency criteria : Static pressure, Air temperature, Humidity, Electrostatic discharge, AC power frequency and radio frequency fields IEC – Sound level meter 15 IEC IEC

Example on Level linearity : Frequency Level IEC – Sound level meter 16

Question : Why IEC ? The procedures defined in IEC were intended to “… assure the user that the performance of a sound level meter conforms to the requirements of IEC :2002 for a limited set of key tests …” No environmental tests, electrostatic tests, radio frequency tests, … IEC – Sound level meter 17

Question : Difference between IEC /2006 and IEC ? First information : New techniques for assessing compliance with the allowable tolerance of the measurement data provided Reduction of the allowable tolerance and increase of maximum expanded uncertainties Additional tests : Long term stability of the SLM (25 to 35 min) at 1 kHz Stability of the SLM when measuring high noise levels at 1 kHz It seems that there is potential for some instruments to fail a given test when assessed in accordance with 2013 version compared to 2002/2006 version.  It has to checked more precisely to conclude. IEC – Sound level meter 18

Question : Why using IEC instead of IEC for compliance ? It is economically impossible to verify the whole IEC standard requirements one each item of an computerized data acquisition systems model. Until now, it seems that no IEC conformity has been given to computerized data acquisition systems on the market and the users cannot prove the instrumentation conformity required by the test code. Additional Proposal : When no general statement or conclusion can be made about conformance of the sound level meter model to the full specifications of IEC , the apparatus used for measuring the sound pressure level shall be a sound level meter or equivalent measurement system meeting the requirements of Class 1 instruments as described in IEC IEC – Sound level meter 19