NIH CHANGES TO POLICIES, INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS Presented by the Office of Sponsored Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Sponsored Programs VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY The Office of Sponsored Programs has upgraded COEUS to accommodate the new Grants.gov C-Forms About.
Advertisements

Using MyNCBI for Training Grants Stephanie Scott Communications and Outreach Director Sponsored Projects Administration (SPA) Dina Matsoukas Head of Reference.
Preparing and Submitting Reports Della Brown White, Ph.D. Program Officer, Office of Health Equity Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health.
November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
Changes to the NIH Biosketch December, Notice Number: NOT-OD Key Dates Release Date: November 26, 2014 NOT-OD …NIH and AHRQ will require.
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
Use and Care of Vertebrate Animals: What Researchers Need to Know Brian Greene IACUC Chair and Associate Professor of Biology Missouri State University.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
R ESEARCH P ROTECTIONS R EVIEW & F UNDING Nancy Stalnaker, Director & Donna Silver, Assistant Director UVM Research Protections Office 6/3/2013UVM Research.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) The IACUC provides internal oversight of animal: - husbandry - facilities - use in teaching & research.
The Use of Animals in Research Is a Privilege We Wish to Retain Animal Welfare Versus Animal Rights How are Animal Welfare Concerns Reported?
NIH Implementation and Guidance Syracuse University Office of Sponsored Programs Stuart Taub.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
1 Sex/Gender and Minority Inclusion in NIH Clinical Research What Investigators Need to Know! Presenter: Miriam F. Kelty, PhD, National Institute on Aging,
We have reviewed this material in accordance with U.S. Copyright Law and have tried to maximize your ability to use, share, and adapt it. The citation.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
NIH UPDATE Reference: NOT-OD Error correction window REDUCED from 5 to 2 business days Proposal “on time” if ALL of the following are met Registrations.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Animals in Research: Navigating the Animal Protocol Approval Process Summer Seminar Series Susan Warren IACUC Chair.
FEDERAL UPDATE Jeff Warner Senior Contract and Grant Officer Alisia Ford Contract and Grant Officer Spring QRAM - Tuesday, March 12, 2013.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
JEFF WARNER CONTRACT AND GRANT OFFICER FEDERAL UPDATE.
1 Judy Hewitt, PhD On Detail to Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health May 18, 2015 Center for Scientific Review Advisory Council.
J.P. Hornak, , 2004 Research Practices http://
Clinical Research Training Center Office of Training Grants RPPR: Training Grant Focus Training Grant Administrators Working Group July 8, 2015.
Dhanonjoy C. Saha, Director December 1 & 2, 2015.
An Equal Opportunity University SRAS & Surgery “Meet and Greet” November 17, 2015.
GCO INFORMATION SESSION: YOU ASK, WE ANSWER NIH R01 A PPLICATION B ASICS P RESENTED BY : M ICHELLE H UMPHREYS G RANTS A NALYST II G RANTS AND C ONTRACTS.
Rigor & Reproducibility: Back to Basics
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
Using the NCBI SciENcv application to generate NIH Biosketches in new format Hermanie Pierre-Noel and Silvia Pulido, Ph.D University of Central Florida.
Research Protections Office University of Vermont Change to Procedures for Committee Review of Resubmissions of Grant Applications.
Quarterly Grant Managers Meeting 06/17/15. Agenda Data Security Policy: Information Technology Security Office Update Richard Biever and Cara Bonnett.
Upcoming NIH Proposal Preparation Changes NOT-OD (Summary of All Changes) NOT-OD
1 The NIH Public Access Requirement [short presentation] June 2013.
Dhanonjoy C. Saha, DVM, PhD Director, Office of Grant Support (OGS) December 16 and 17, 2015.
Introduction to NSF’s new PAPPG Tammy Custer Kim Holloway Office of Sponsored Programs.
RCC Update ORS Quarterly Meeting April 28, 2016 Julie Cole, Director Research Costing Compliance.
Roundtable November 12, 2015 Auditorium C, DHMC.  The continuing Resolution is good until December 11, 2015….stay tuned.  Non-competing awards are issued.
COBRE Post Award Management Christy Leake Grants Administration Branch National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH.
Office of Sponsored Projects Federal Updates/Reminders ROUNDTABLE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 CAMPUS.
Sponsored Programs Administration (SPA).  Coeus is now updated with the SF424 D-Forms for all NIH submissions due May 25, 2016 and after.  For proposals.
A CLOSER LOOK AT RECENT NIH APPLICATION CHANGES…. Revised May 5, 2016.
Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.
Rigor and Transparency in Research
SciENcv: NLM’s Fed-wide biosketch tool NIH Regional Meeting May 2016 Neil Thakur, PhD Office of Extramural Research Bart Trawick, PhD National Center for.
Office of Extramural Programs RIGOR AND REPRODUCIBILITY: BACK TO BASICS MAY 13, 2016 PATRICIA VALDEZ, Ph.D. NIH EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH INTEGRITY OFFICER.
NIH Update Maria Skinner, OSP Manager (NIH Lead) Laura Johnston, OSP Asst. Director January 7, /7/2016.
NOTICE OF POLICY CHANGES FOR NIH GRANTS
Rigor and reproducibility: back to basics
Upcoming NIH Proposal Preparation Changes
The NIH perspective on rigor and reproducibility
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Office of Sponsored Projects
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NIH GRANT PREPARATION WORKSHOP: A workshop for new investigators about putting together administrative portions of a grant and the NIH review panel. Tuesday,
Project Grant: Fall 2016 Competition
Being an effective consumer of preclinical research
Director of Training, Workforce Development and Diversity
implementing NEW NIH Human subjects guidance
Writing that First Research Grant
New NIH Human Subjects & Clinical Trials Information
AURA Meeting May 25, 2016.
K R Investigator Research Question
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Presentation transcript:

NIH CHANGES TO POLICIES, INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS Presented by the Office of Sponsored Programs

Phase 1 – For due dates on or after January 25, 2016 Phase 2 – For due dates on or after May 25, 2016 See: NOT-OD NIH CHANGES

Applies to FORMS-C application forms Required for due dates on or after January 25, 2016 Implements the following policy changes: – Rigor and Transparency – Vertebrate Animals – Definition of Child – Research Training PHASE 1:

Revisions to application guide instructions for preparing your research strategy attachment Use of a new "Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources" attachment Additional rigor and transparency questions reviewers will be asked to consider when reviewing applications Rigor and Transparency See: NOT-OD and NOT-OD

1) the scientific premise forming the basis of the proposed research 2) rigorous experimental design for robust and unbiased results 3) consideration of relevant biological variables 4) authentication of key biological and/or chemical resources Rigor and Transparency – 4 main focus areas

Briefly describe methods to ensure the identity and validity of key biological and/or chemical resources used in the proposed studies. Key biological and/or chemical resources may or may not be generated with NIH funds and: 1) may differ from laboratory to laboratory or over time 2) may have qualities and/or qualifications that could influence the research data 3) are integral to the proposed research Can include: Cell lines, specialty chemicals, antibodies, other biologics Doesn’t include: Standard laboratory reagents, buffers, common chemicals Reviewers will be asked to assess this information Information in this section must focus only on authentication and/or validation of key resources to be used in the study Authentication of key biological and/or chemical resources

SIGNIFICANCE – Describe the scientific premise for the proposed project, including consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of published research or preliminary data crucial to the support of your application APPROACH – Describe the experimental design and methods proposed and how they will achieve robust and unbiased results – Explain how relevant biological variables, such as sex, are factored into research designs and analyses for studies in vertebrate animals and humans. For example, strong justification from the scientific literature, preliminary data, or other relevant considerations, must be provided for applications proposing to study only one sex Rigor and Transparency - Research Strategy Updates There are some activity code exceptions to this policy, and some grants that will be subject to this policy only with the implementation of Phase II

Research Performance Progress Reports (RPPR) submitted January 25, 2016 or later will be expected to emphasize rigorous approaches taken to ensure robust and unbiased results. Rigor should be addressed in the RPPR for any grant that funds research or training in research; grants that support other activities do not need to address rigor. This includes non-competing continuation reports (Type 5) for grants reviewed and awarded before implementation of the policy. Rigor and Transparency- RPPR

Vertebrate Animals section should include: Description of the procedures Justifications of the species in relation to the proposed work Minimization of Pain and Distress Euthanasia (If consistent with AVMA guidelines, only need to state as such, otherwise need entire justification) Summary of Changes: A description of vet care no longer required No justification of number of animals required Full description of euthanasia method required only if not consistent with AVMA guidelines For all applications EXCEPT F series and T series grants implemented during Phase I Vertebrate Animals Does not apply to AHRQ applications! See: NOT-OD

For proposals submitted for due dates on or after January 25, 2016, the age of a child will be defined as individuals under 18 years old instead of under 21 years old Applicants for NIH funding will still be expected to justify the age range of the proposed participants in their clinical research, with particular attention paid to addressing the inclusion (or exclusion) of children (or subsets of children) Definition of Child Does not apply to AHRQ applications! See: NOT-OD

"Recruitment and Retention Plan to Enhance Diversity" - applicants will be asked to focus on recruitment "Human Subjects" - applicants must describe how the institution will ensure that trainees only participate in exempt human subjects research or non-exempt human subjects research that has IRB approval; no longer necessary to provide a list of potential grants trainees may work on and associated IRB information "Vertebrate Animals" - applicants must describe how the institution will ensure that trainees only participate in vertebrate animal research that has IACUC approval; no longer necessary to provide a list of potential grants trainees may work on and associated IACUC information "Progress Report" - requirement to report on publications that arose from work conducted by the trainee while supported by the training grant will be moved to the Just-in-Time process Research Training

PHASE 1 QUESTIONS?

Applies to FORMS-D application forms Required for due dates on or after May 25, 2016 Implements the following changes: Rigor and Transparency Vertebrate Animals Inclusion Forms Data Safety Monitoring Plans Research Training Appendix Policy New PHS Assignment Request Form New Font Guidelines Biosketch Clarifications PHASE 2:

Extending Phase 1 changes to include institutional training and individual fellowship applications. Adding a new "Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources" attachment to the following forms in FORMS-D application packages: – PHS 398 Research Plan – PHS 398 Career Development Supplemental Form – PHS Fellowship Supplemental Form New “Plan for the Instruction in Methods for Enhancing Reproducibility” attachment will be added to the PHS 398 Research Training Program Plan form in FORMS-D application packages. Rigor and Transparency

Extending Phase 1 changes to include institutional training and individual fellowship applications. See NOT-OD NOT-OD Adding new questions regarding euthanasia to the following forms in FORMS-D application packages to replace the euthanasia criteria in the vertebrate animals section: – PHS 398 Research Plan – PHS Fellowship Supplemental Form Note: These changes do not apply to AHRQ applications. Vertebrate Animals

Adding an optional PHS Inclusion Enrollment Report form to FORMS-D application packages. The new form, with additional study descriptors, will replace the optional Planned Enrollment Report and Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment Report forms found in FORMS-C application packages. Provide more details about these changes prior to release of the updated forms. Inclusion Forms

Adding a new “Data Safety Monitoring Plan” to the following forms in FORMS-D application packages: – PHS 398 Research Plan – PHS 398 Career Development Supplemental Form – PHS Fellowship Supplemental Form – PHS 398 Research Training Program Plan This new attachment must be included with all applications involving clinical trials. Although the requirement of a data and safety monitoring plan for clinical trials is not new, the use of a separate attachment to collect this information will emphasize its importance and facilitate systematic enforcement of its presence. Data Safety Monitoring Plans

Changing the research training data table format. Changes include: – Reducing the number of tables from 12 to 8 – Minimizing the reporting of individual-level information – Extending the tracking of trainee outcomes from 10 to 15 years NIH’s xTRACT system to help applicants prepare the new tables became available as of October 16, See NOT-OD NOT-OD Research Training

Reevaluating the current appendix policy. A notice describing specific appendix policy changes will be issued by spring Appendix Policy

Adding an optional PHS Assignment Request Form to FORMS-D application packages to provide a consistent way to collect application referral information, including: – Awarding component (NIH institute) assignment preference – Study Section preference – List of potential reviewers in conflict, and why – List of scientific expertise needed to review the application See NOT-OD NOT-OD New PHS Assignment Request Form

Providing additional flexibility regarding the fonts allowed in PDF attachments included in grant applications. Although NIH will continue to recommend specific fonts, they will also allow other fonts (both serif and non-serif) as long as they comply with specific type density and line spacing guidelines. See NOT-OD NOT-OD New Font Guidelines

Clarifying biosketch instructions. Clarifications include: – Indicating that a URL for a publication list is optional and, if provided, must be to a government website (.gov) like My Bibliography – Allowing publications (peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed) and research products to be cited in both the personal statement and the contributions to science sections – Explicitly stating that graphics, figures and tables are not allowed Biosketch Clarifications

Questions? PHASE 2

NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD NOT-OD Resources

Tammy Custer, tjb3, Kim Holloway, jkh44, Linda Griswold, lag13, Brenda Truesdail, bmt2, Chris Ashdown, Federal Team Lead, cma20, THANK YOU! Contact your Grant and Contract Officer