LAIPLA Spring Meeting Las Vegas, June 8, 2013 Jonathan Kagan Irell & Manella LLP 1800 Avenue of the Stars Los Angeles, CA 90067.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS: WHAT IS IMPLIED AND WHAT IS NOT? RICHARD J. GILBORN, Q.C., April 30, 2004.
Advertisements

Cases Involving Standard Essential Patents: U.S. & Asia Toshiko Takenaka, Ph.D. Director, CASRIP University of Washington School of Law.
NICOLAS PETIT, UNIVERSITY OF LIEGE (ULG) & MIGUEL RATO, SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 11TH CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW JUDGES (AECLJ)
Alternatives to IP Litigation July 13, 2012 Dan R. Gresham.
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013Standards for Shared ICT Update on Activities of the TIA Standards and IPR Policy Committee (SIPC) and the IPR Standing Committee.
What You Need to Know About Biosimilars: Products, Recent Deals, IP Issues and Licensing August 2, 2012 Madison C. Jellins 1.
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
Geneva, October 9, 2012 Latest legal developments within ETSI Maïssa Bahsoun ETSI Legal Advisor Document No: GSC16bis-IPR-03 Source: ETSI Contact: Maïssa.
Session 2: Patent Law Principles National Judicial Academy of India Judicial Training Bhopal, India ~ January 24-25, 2015 Judge James L. Robart United.
Seeking, and enforcing, an injunction by a patent-holder as an antitrust abuse ? The emerging picture in the EU Alison Jones University of Toronto Patent.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) Terms Daphne C. Lainson Smart & Biggar AIPLA Annual.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Standard setting and abuse of dominant position (Article 82 EC Treaty) Douglas Lahnborg.
ROYALTY AMOUNT in FRAND: IP High-Court Grand Panel Decision Pre-Meeting AIPLA-Annual Washington, D.C. Oct , 2014 Hirokazu Honda Attorney-at-Law Abe,
RAND in the Courts: Legal Theories for RAND and an Update on Strategies and Approaches Being Used by Eric Lamison.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Andrew Thomases: Consequences of RAND Violations | 1 Consequences of RAND Violations Andrew Thomases.
Chapter 40 Franchises and Special Forms of Business
Dr. Thomas W. Reimann IP Practice in Japan AIPLA Midwinter Meeting Las Vegas, January 2012 Latest Patent Development in the European Union.
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association FRAND – Standard Essential Patents Licensed for Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory.
Geneva, October 9, 2012 GSC-16bis Meeting: Recent US IP Developments Earl Nied, Chair, ANSI Intellectual Property Rights Policy Committee Document No:
Anti-trust Practice in China concerning SEP and FRAND China Patent Agent (H.K.) Ltd.
©2013 Duane Morris LLP. All Rights Reserved. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris – Firm and.
© 2013 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP. All rights reserved. Throughout this presentation, “Cleary Gottlieb” and the “firm” refer to Cleary Gottlieb.
Hypothetical Company A owns a patent that is essential to a wireless standard. Company A has made a commitment to a standard-setting organization to license.
1 SECTION 337 INVESTIGATIONS Managing Intellectual Property IP In China April 30, 2013 New York, New York.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
Efforts by two leading standards-setting organizations to clarify the effect of a F/RAND licensing commitment in connection with Standard-Essential Patents.
1 Bonvillian v. Dep't of Insurance, 906 So.2d 596 (La.App. Cir ) What is the underlying dispute? Insurance Commission refused to renew a bail bond.
Exclusionary Conduct in the Context of Standard Setting William E. Cohen Deputy General Counsel for Policy Studies U.S. Federal Trade Commission Views.
1 AIPPI Forum 2011 Hyderabad, India, 15 October AIPPI Forum 2011 Hyderabad, India, 15 October 2011 Standardisation and Software Protection Strategies.
ABA China Inside and Out September , Beijing The interface between competition law and intellectual property Nicholas Banasevic, DG Competition,
Pierre Régibeau Moscow 2015 IP and Competition Law at the European Commission: The Role of Economics …in 8 Minutes Pierre Régibeau, Vice-President Charles.
1 Monica Barone Senior Legal Counsel January 27, 2015 Disputes and Developments in SEP Licensing: The Past, Present, and Future of F/RAND.
Patents and Autonomous Vehicles
Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change (Anderson & Tushman, 1990) Olga Jemeljanova Joona Kanerva.
Session 30: FRAND Licensing Disputes NJA Advanced Course on Commercial Matters Bhopal, India January 23, 2016 Richard Tan, Chartered Arbitrator, Singapore.
Recent Japanese Cases Regarding Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing Declaration AIPLA-IPHC Meeting April 11, 2013 Shinji ODA Judge, Intellectual.
1 Bonvillian v. Dep't of Insurance, 906 So.2d 596 (La.App. Cir ) What is the underlying dispute? Insurance Commission refused to renew a bail bond.
Patent Remedies in Global Perspective Thomas F. Cotter Briggs and Morgan Professor of Law University of Minnesota Law School February.
Standards, Patents and FRAND Licensing Jean-Nicolas Delage Christian Harmsen Demetrios Anaipakos Matthew Vella.
Legal Status Task Force Report CWS/4/8, CWS/4 BIS/5 Geneva, Switzerland March 2016 Young-Woo YUN Head, Standards Section.
Sangmin Song, Director, Anti-Monopoly Div., KFTC MRFTA & IP Rights 1.
Ongoing Royalties in Patent Litigation The Evolving Case Law on Damages for Post-Verdict Infringement: Procedural Issues Nicole D. Galli February 15, 2011.
Latonia Gordon Microsoft NJTIP 10 th Anniversary Symposium Chicago, March 7-8, 2013 The views expressed herein are solely those of the author; they should.
Stephen S. Korniczky Anti-Suit Injunctions – Leveling the Playing Field When Seeking a FRAND License to Standard-Essential.
표준특허 라이선스와 분쟁 현황 ETRI 지식재산활용실 최민서 특허청 컴퓨터시스템심사과 세미나.
Thoughts About SEPs and Non-SEPs Hint: It’s Not About Mushrooms
Update on SDO IPR Policy Debates
ITC and Trademark Infringement Cases
Legal Issues Concerning Small Businesses
ITC Section 337 Investigations: An Alternative Battleground
IP Licensing and Competition Policy: Guidelines and the Cases in Japan
SEPs and FRAND Mike Lee, Google Lisa Nguyen, Latham & Watkins
IEEE ComsocSCV Meeting
Role of IP in facilitating the transfer of technology
Is it Time for a Global FRAND Rate-Setting Tribunal?
Voluntary Codes and Standards
TORTS RELATING TO INCORPOREAL PROPERTIES
ETSI GSC IPR 20 April 2015 Presented by Christian Loyau GSC_IPR(15)01_010 © ETSI All rights reserved -GSC_IPR(15)01_010 
Legal English and the Common Law AY 2017/2018
IPR in FP7 Bart Janse DG Research A.2.
MSFT/MMI SEP Milestones
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
Giles S. Rich Inn of Court September 26, 2018
Huawei – broader context and implications
eBay v. MercExchange: Model or Monster?
“The View From the Corner of U.S. Competition Law and Patents”
The role of injunctions in FRAND proceedings – a UK perspective
Update on IP and Antitrust
Ronald A. Antush, Nokia Laurie M. Charrington, Intel
© Healthcare Inspirations. All rights reserved
Presentation transcript:

LAIPLA Spring Meeting Las Vegas, June 8, 2013 Jonathan Kagan Irell & Manella LLP 1800 Avenue of the Stars Los Angeles, CA 90067

Background Standard-setting organizations (“SSOs”) establish standards to ensure interoperability. Owners of standard-essential patents (“SEPs”) agree to license patented technology on FRAND terms in exchange for having their technology incorporated into the standard.

Key FRAND Questions (1) – Is Injunctive Relief Available? (2) – When Is FRAND Calculated? (3) – What Is a FRAND Rate?

Injunctive Relief for SEPs Should injunctive relief be available for SEPs? Availability of exclusion orders in the ITC for SEPs

Key Recent Developments Apple v. Motorola – Denial of injunctive relief on SEPs by Judge Posner Realtek v. LSI – granting injunction prohibiting LSI from enforcing any ITC exclusion order on SEPs ITC Final Determination in Inv. 794 – granting limited exclusion order on SEPs - June 4, 2013 First time Commission has granted exclusion order on an SEP (ALJs have previously held exclusion order is available remedy for SEPs) One Commissioner dissented on public interest grounds

When Is FRAND Calculated? Before Breach Microsoft v. Motorola After Breach Realtek v. LSI Corp.

How to Calculate FRAND (per Judge Robart) Start with Georgia-Pacific Factors Modify for FRAND Microsoft Corp., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60233, at *54-65.