1 Asteroid Sample Return AEM 4332 FDR 5/7/2008 Becky Wacker Carla Bodensteiner Ashley Chipman John Edquist Paul Krueger Jessica Lattimer Nick Meinhardt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Professional Development Spring, 2002
Advertisements

Shooting for the Moon Bernard Brown Ashley Richter Will Bullins.
Miniature Modular Rack Launcher Combo Senior Design Group 3 Casey Brown Cyril John Keith Kirkpatrick Bryan Rickards.
Understanding the Systems Engineering Process
1 Air Launch System Project Proposal February 11, 2008 Dan Poniatowski (Team Lead) Matt Campbell Dan Cipera Pierre Dumas Boris Kaganovich Jason LaDoucer.
Asteroid Sample Return Progress as of 3/12/2008. GN&C Sensor Data.
Attitude Determination and Control
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Presentation Draft Slides Description: Some draft slides and ideas 3/26/09 Kris Ezra Attitude 1.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
Rotational Kinematics
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
The Basics of Physics.
17 January 2006Astronomy Chapter 2 Orbits and Gravity What causes one object to orbit another? What is the shape of a planetary orbit? What general.
Chapter 8 Rotational Equilibrium and Rotational Dynamics.
 The word "rocket" can mean different things. Most people think of a tall, thin, round vehicle. They think of a rocket that launches into space. "Rocket"
AE 1350 Lecture #14 Introduction to Astronautics.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
Traveling Into Space Chapter 19 section 5.
Asteroid Sample Return AEM 4332 Final Design Review 5/7/2008 Becky Wacker Carla Bodensteiner Ashley Chipman John Edquist Paul Krueger Jessica Lattimer.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
Team Force Field Leslie Chapman Scott Cornman Adam Johnson Richard Margulieux Brandon Phipps.
Physics 1210/1310 Mechanics& Thermodynamics Thermodynamics Lecture R1-7 Rotational Motion.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
Oh, Thank Heaven for 7-Eleven: Fueling Up in Space with In-Situ Resource Utilization ASTE-527 Final Presentation Riley Garrett.
Chapter 9 Linear Momentum and Collisions. Conservation Laws in Nature: Why do objects move at constant velocity if no force acts on them? What keeps a.
Thermal Control.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Slide Concepts March 26, 2009 [Cory Alban] [Mission Ops] [Locomotion] 1.
Spacecraft Trajectories You Can Get There from Here! John F Santarius Lecture 9 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology 533 / Astronomy 533 / EMA 601 University.
1 Weekly Summary Asteroid Sample Return Spring Semester March 5, 2008 Ashley Chipman.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Support structure for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
AP Physics C Chapter 4
1 Arizona State University Senior Design ASU/JPL Flight System Group Members: Robert Hoffman, Dusty Terrill, Adam Nikolic, Josh Ruggiero.
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
The center of gravity of an object is the point at which its weight can be considered to be located.
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory JPL Flight Team Adam Nikolic Josh Ruggiero Bob Hoffman Dusty Terrill.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Comparison [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
PTAR Presentation Jonathan DeLaRosa, Jessica Nelson, Ivan Morin, JJ Rodenburg, & Tim Stelly Team Cronus.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Characteristics of remote sensing satellites. Satellites generally vary in their architecture Usually remote sensing satellites are having two plateforms.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Lander Volume and Mass 10kg, 100g, Arbitrary March 12, 2009 Lunar Descent Phase Group [Ryan Nelson] [STRC] 1.
Non-Inertial Reference Frames Unit 4 section 6.6 and 6.7.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
Satellite Safety and Circularizing Orbits: A Study in Simplifying Models Anthony Ko.
Today: (Ch. 8)  Rotational Motion.
Eric Weber (1/14)1 Configuration and Structural Design Eric Weber Tasks –Preliminary hardware research –Preliminary transmission research –Materials Research.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Technical Resource Allocations
CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM
Do now A baseball player holds a bat loosely and bunts a ball. Express your understanding of momentum conservation by filling in the tables below.
Space Exploration SPACE.
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Lunar Descent Trajectory
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Chapter 5 Momentum.
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
Rocketry Trajectory Basics
Presentation transcript:

1 Asteroid Sample Return AEM 4332 FDR 5/7/2008 Becky Wacker Carla Bodensteiner Ashley Chipman John Edquist Paul Krueger Jessica Lattimer Nick Meinhardt Derek Steffes Sam Zarovy

Mission Goal Acquire a 1 m deep, 100 g core sample of the asteroid

Mission Objectives 1.Leave orbit about the asteroid and position for landing. 2.Land on the asteroid with drill and return vehicle intact. 3.Attach the spacecraft to the asteroid that withstands a 10 N reaction force and a 0.1 N/m torque from the drill for 24 hours. Structures | Propulsion | GN&C | Telecommunications | Becky 3

4 Requirements Spacecraft must weigh no more than 750kg including: – 50kg payload package (drill and stereo cameras) – 200kg return vehicle The spacecraft must land and support drilling operations for 24 hours Landing must not exceed 15 g’s Spacecraft must support drilling operations: – 10 N reaction force – 0.1 N/m torque

5 Expectations Explain the results of all system and hardware trade studies including rationale for final selections Provide spacecraft layout drawing(s) Demonstrate compliance with all requirements Provide high-level block diagram of the spacecraft subsystems Define system and hardware requirements sufficiently to allow future subsystem architecture definition and hardware trade studies Demonstrate that the landing loads do not exceed requirements and can be supported by the structural/mechanical configuration

Assumptions Orbiter will supply pictures of asteroid to give targeted landing area Asteroid is only gravitational pull in area Orbiter can place lander in preferred initial placement Major Tasks 1 and 2 are most important Key asteroid physical properties a. Rotation period is 5.0 hours b. Semimajor axis: 1.5 AU c. Radius: 10 km (assume spherical shape) d. Mass is 1x10 16 kg e. Surface rock distribution is gaussian with 0.25% probability of a 0.5 m rock in a 5 m 2 area. f. Surface gravity: m/s 2 6

7 Major Tasks 1) Perform a trade study of approach, landing and anchoring options which considers: a. Control system architecture b. Structural impact loads c. Anchoring mechanism d. Propulsion system options 2) Develop a spacecraft layout including a. Mechanical/structural configuration b. GN&C sensor locations and field-of-view (FOV) clearances c. Location and orientations of reaction control system thrusters d. Telecommunication component locations including antenna FOV clearances

Major Tasks Cont. 3) Identify major hardware components of each spacecraft subsystem a. Guidance, Navigation, and Control b. Command and Data Handling c. Electrical Power d. Telecommunications e. Propulsion f. Structures and mechanisms g. Thermal control system 4) Define the key system and hardware requirements 5) Determine landing loads and associated structure/absorber sizing 8

9 Team Organization

Layout

Attachment Method

Initial Trade Study IdeaHow worksProsCons Spikes on ImpactDrive stakes in when land from legs Don’t need separate propulsion system (less weight) Highest probability for success Leaves nothing behind HarpoonShoot something out and reel ourselves in Compensation torques Probably use more fuel Way more mechanisms involved Possibly get tangled to roll back up. Thrusters Propulsion Only Use thrusters to hold in place Extra fuel Torque when drilling Need momentum wheel, “spikey feet” Cork ScrewScrews into ground like a cork screw into a cork Not a high resulting force Complicated mechanisms and possibility of stirring soil instead of screwing in Spikes Post-ImpactTwo arms with small explosion that would rotate and come back while nailing into the ground Would work…kinda Able to retry Even more complicated than harpoon

Initial Trade Study Cont. ThrustersHarpoonSpikes on ImpactSpikes Post- Impact Corkscrew WeightBad GoodOkayBad Mechanical Complexity GoodBadGoodOkayBad Fuel Consumption BadGood OkayGood Power Requirements GoodBadGood Bad DependabilityGoodBadOkayGoodBad Applied LoadsGood BadOkayGood ReusabilityGoodBad Okay

Attachment Method Use Mechanical fastening system based on Hilti Gun model DX E72. Assume built weight for guns to be same as hilti gun (2kg ea.). Use F=m(v/t) to determine force from anchor deployment. t is assumed to be 0.01 s Determine required Thrust and Fuel based on Force. Deploy two anchors simultaneously at 45° to reduce thruster requirements. Assume 30s to deploy all 4 anchors Use Anchor based on future research.

Attachment Method.22 caliber powder actuated fastening tool Drives up to 2.8” nails into concrete or steel 2 kg each 15 Structures | Propulsion | GN&C | Telecommunications | Becky

Reaction Force Ballistics information found at: Used: Remington.22 Short CB Cap Bullet Weight = 1.87 g Velocity = m/s Force from Attachment = (213.36/.01)*(1.87/1000)=39.898N per anchor

Spike deployment requires a 21 N force from the 4 thrusters pointing in the +Z direction using a safety factor of 1.5 Attachment Method Cont. Spacecraft +28N -28N +28N Gun #1 Gun #2 17 Structures | Propulsion | GN&C | Telecommunications | Becky

Thrust and Fuel Requirements Using Moments = 0 and forces = 0, 21N force required from all 4 thrusters pointing in the positive Z direction. X direction forces cancel each other out, resulting in 56 N force. 56/4=14*1.5(safety factor)=21N/per thruster (Need Fuel Req. From Nick)

Further Work Required Make gun space worthy -solid rocket propellant instead of gun powder -space worthy construction material Test force required to insert nails -soil testing experiments Determine spike specifications -force experiments