Challenges of Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Grouping Adam Gamoran UW-Madison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLICK It! to Learn By Sue Z. Beers. Sue Z. Beers, 2006 CLICK it! Connecting… Learning: Whats happening inside the students mind; how.
Advertisements

Panel 4 If Differentiated Instruction is the Best Way to Teach Science, Then Why Isnt Everyone Doing It?
Planning to Support Mixed Ability Teaching
The Ins, Outs of Co-Teaching – An Overview
PORTFOLIO.
Gifted Education at the Middle School Level Gifted support is a service, not a place!
Differentiated Instruction
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
ABNEY LEARNING COMMUNITY PROUD TITLE 1 SCHOOLS. What is Title 1? Title I is the federal program that provides funding to local school districts to improve.
Major Progress Program Philosophy behind the grouping.
Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality
Dr. Allen Webb Western Michigan University  Raise the academic level for all students.  Prepare students for the intellectual challenges of college.
Education and Society Educational Stratification, Part 1: Within Schools.
Inequality within Schools: Ability Grouping and Tracking Sociology September 5,2004.
Tracking and Inequality: Old Findings and New Directions Adam Gamoran University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
 Diversity in the Classroom The importance of developing learner centered curricula that engages students in a variety of culturally responsive, developmentally,
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
WHAT’s A STATE TO DO? TO BUILD SCHOOL/EDUCATION LEADERSHIP CAPACITY Betty Hale.
What is Differentiated Instruction? Comparing Classrooms adapted from: Tomlinson, Students and Learning Instruction Content and Assessment.
Objectives are statements of what we want students to learn as a result of the instruction we provide them. Objectives answer the question “What do we.
ASSESSMENT ACCOMMODATIONS How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities Ohio.
BY Keith A. Anderson.  District-wide Initiative  Link between Differentiated Instruction and Danielson  What is Differentiated Instruction?  Why Differentiate?
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Ten Conditions that Result in Students Making Greater Effort to Succeed Gene Bottoms.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
KEY CONCEPTS.  Teachers find it increasingly difficult to ignore the diversity of learners who populate their classrooms.
 Relationships  Classroom management  Teaching styles › Visual › Auditory › Kinesthetic.
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
GRADE LEVEL MEETINGS OCTOBER 13, 2011 GRADE 8. WHY ARE WE LOOKING AT ELA DATA?
Implementing the CCSS in Mathematics: Challenges and Strategies CCSSO National Assessment Conference June 2013 Elliott Asp, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
A Quick Quiz What is your DI IQ? Discuss with peers… What do you know about differentiation? What concerns or fears do you have regarding differentiation?
Addressing Heterogeneity Early in American History only the well-to-do (mostly males) were educated. Early in American History only the well-to-do (mostly.
Teaching and Learning Strategies Direct Learning Model.
OUR MOVEMENT: UNDERSTANDING THE BIG PICTURE. 2 OVERVIEW Theory of Change Programmatic Approach.
STUDENTS INTERACTIONS WITH ONE ANOTHER LOOKING IN CLASSROOMS GOOD & BROPHY, 2000 CHAPTER 7 LUZ CARIME BERSH, Ph. D. National-Louis University.
Heterogeneous Grouping and Gifted Students Karen Shoyket Karen Shoyket Education Fall 2008 Professor O’Connor-Petruso.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Curriculum Planning for Intellectual Challenge
ACHIEVEMENT GAP: James Houseworth Jennifer Wilson April 4, 2011 The Influence of Teachers.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
1 The Common Core State Standards Implications for Teacher Preparation The Importance and Impact of Effective Practice K-16 Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.
THE ART AND SCIENCE OF TEACHING BY ROBERT MARZANO PRESENTED BY: DEBBIE WINSKE.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Chapter 1 Integrating UBD and DI An Essential Partnership.
Michelle Wrona.  Understand: Teachers will understand that MAP scores can be used to design and implement differentiated activities.  KNOW: Teachers.
 In your school, what data have you been exposed to about students that enables you to make decisions about your instruction? Is it enough?  Why/why.
Differentiation What it is? and What it is not?. Outcomes Participants will be able to: Define differentiation Explain the advantages of differentiated.
1 Positive Behavior Support:. 2 Positive Behavior Support… Aims to build effective environments in which positive behavior is more effective than problem.
By: Amy Lingenfelter Senior English Language Fellow (and making the teacher’s life easier)
What is Differentiated Instruction? Differentiated instruction is the theory that allows teachers to face this challenge by taking diverse student factors.
Welcome Back to Day Two Q and A Professional Learning Communities SMART Goals Mission Statement for improving parent-school relations Book Study “ The.
EdHD 5016 Teaching a Class of Mixed Abilities: Differentiated Instruction Instructional Intervention Ideas Fall, 2012.
Instructional Strategies to Engage Urban Learners Insert Facilitator Names Here.
1 Superintendent’s “Everybody Teaches” Academy Overview and Implementation Plan.
Tracking in Secondary Schools For: Education, Ethics, and Social Change Presented by: Steve Frey, Andrew Pisanko, Doug Williams, and Sam Skramovsky.
Cluster Grouping Presentation to Rockingham County School Board September 9, 2008.
Tracking in Secondary Schools For: Education, Ethics, and Social Change Presented by: Steve Frey, Andrew Pisanko, Doug Williams, and Sam Skramovsky.
PRITZKER STATE OF THE SCHOOL 2016 Dr. Joenile S. Albert-Reese, Principal Ms. Barbara Abdullah-Smith, Assistant Principal.
The Basic Steps Towards Differentiating. Differentiating instruction is doing what is fair for students. It means creating multiple paths so that students.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
ABNEY LEARNING COMMUNITY
ABNEY LEARNING COMMUNITY
Chapter 7 The Organization of American Schools
Within-Class Grouping During Literacy Instruction: A Look at Equity
Designing Programs for Learners: Curriculum and Instruction
Differentiation from Planning to Practice
Differentiated Instruction
Understanding by Design (UbD) & Differentiated Instruction (DI)
Coherence: “The Quality of Being Logically Integrated”
Presentation transcript:

Challenges of Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Grouping Adam Gamoran UW-Madison

Why Do Schools Assign Students to Classes by “Ability”? Seems logical and efficient Students differ in their performance levels, so divide students to match instruction more closely to their needs A narrower range of student performance levels makes it easier to organize the curriculum So why is this problematic?

Problems of Ability Grouping Due to circumstances outside of school, separating students by academic performance may also separate them by race and social class Homogenous classes lack the diversity that may foster rich discussions

Problems of Ability Grouping Although ability grouping is intended to provide equally effective instruction to all students, that rarely occurs Teachers are also tracked Cycle of low expectations Low-level classes as caricatures Emphasis on procedures in low-level classes, discussion in high-level classes

Ability Grouping and Unequal Instruction LowMiddleHigh Discussion time (minutes/lesson) Envisionment (standardized) Revision of content (0-1) Homework (hours/week) Track Level Source: Applebee, Langer, Nystrand, & Gamoran, 2003.

Ability Grouping and Unequal Instruction LowMiddleHighMixed Discussion time (minutes/lesson) Envisionment (standardized) Revision of content (0-1) Homework (hours/week) Track Level Source: Applebee, Langer, Nystrand, & Gamoran, 2003.

Achievement Gaps between High and Low Tracks Source: Applebee, Langer, Nystrand, & Gamoran, 2003.

Problems of Ability Grouping Partly as a result of unequal classroom conditions, inequality between students assigned to high- and low-level classes widens over time

No effect on achievement productivity Increase in achievement inequality Supporters focus on productivity while critics emphasize inequality Consequences of Ability Grouping

Responses to the Problem Reduce the use of ability grouping Eliminate dead-end classes Avoid teacher tracking Maintain an academic curriculum with high expectations and meaningful incentives in all classes

Responses to the Problem Use mixed-ability grouping (heterogeneous classes) Help teachers prepare to teach mixed- ability classes “It’s too hard to do all of this.”

Responses to the Problem Use mixed-ability grouping (heterogeneous classes) Help teachers prepare to teach mixed- ability classes Avoid diluting the curriculum Case studies: Marble Canyon, Wallingford

Responses to the Problem Use mixed-ability grouping (heterogeneous classes) Help teachers prepare to teach mixed- ability classes Avoid diluting the curriculum Use differentiated assignments to challenge high-achieving students

Cibola High: A case of successful mixed-ability teaching Complex academic projects Varied expectations for different students Curriculum not bound by a rigid sequence Supporting conditions: Small classes Extra tutoring on Saturdays Selection of staff and students

Conclusions Eliminate dead-end courses. Where ability grouping is maintained, implement high standards for low- achieving students. Where ability grouping is eliminated, see that standards for high-achieving students are not lowered.

Conclusions Provide professional development for teachers to help them meet the needs of all students.