1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEM PURPOSE Model phenomena from observed or theoretical stances
Advertisements

Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
IAG Sub-Commission 1.3c Regional Reference Frames for North America 1 Regional Reference Frames for North America Current Status & Future Plans of Regional.
3. Geocentre and scale Comparison of weekly and daily IGS reference frames: the first year Peter J Clarke, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences,
R. Ferland and Jan Kouba Geodetic Survey Div. NRCan Canada IGS ITRF Realization and Transformations.
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
OLG LAC Reprocessing EPN 2006 G. Stangl 1, C. Aichhorn 2, S. Krauss 2 (1) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ (2) Space Research Institute,
DFG-Research Unit “Earth rotation and Global Dynamic processes” Poznan, 13 – 17 October 2008 N. Panafidina, M. Rothacher, D. Thaller Comparison and Combination.
Excess phase computation S. Casotto, A. Nardo, P. Zoccarato, M. Bardella CISAS, University of Padova.
ILRS Workshop, Poznan, Poland, October Status of ITRF Development and SLR Contribution Zuheir Altamimi Xavier Collilieux David Coulot IGN France.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_GLOB Hana Spicakova.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2014 Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Zuheir Altamimi, Xavier Collilieux 26th IUGG General Assembly, Prague, 28 June.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 ITRF2005 residuals and co-location tie issues Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Some features of ITRF2005 residuals ITRF2005 vs IGS05.
Jim Ray & Jake Griffiths NOAA/National Geodetic Survey STATUS OF IGS ORBIT MODELING & AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT Earth radiation pressure (albedo) accelerations.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
2013 AGU Fall Meeting – 9 December 2013 – San Francisco, CA – Poster #G13B-0933 Status of IGS Core Products J. Griffiths NOAA,
RFWG report ______________________ IGS 39th Governing Board Meeting San Francisco, 3 December
REPORT ON THE SIRGAS-CON COMBINED SOLUTION WEEK Sonia Costa, Alberto Luis da Silva Coordenação de Geodésia - CGED Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia.
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
Future IGS & inter-technique SINEX combinations: Issues and challenges D. Lavallée (aka Peter Clarke), R. Ferland, D. Thaller, T. Herring, R. Biancale.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
1/17 REFAG Symposium 6 October 2010 – Marne-la-Vallée, France Recent Results from the IGS Terrestrial Frame Combinations __________________________________________________________________________________________________.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Testing intraplate deformation in the North American plate interior E. Calais (Purdue Univ.), C. DeMets (U. Wisc.), J.M. Nocquet (Oxford and IGN) ● Is.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.
1 NAREF Analysis & ITRF2004 Densification Mike Craymer, Joe Henton Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 3rd SNARF Workshop Santa Ana Pueblo,
Recommendation 1 The IGS shall develop a standard protocol for exchanging information about IGS stations. The associated machine-readable database should.
Geocenter motion estimates from the IGS Analysis Center solutions P. Rebischung, X. Collilieux, Z. Altamimi IGN/LAREG & GRGS 1 EGU General Assembly, Vienna,
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
CEGRN 2015 Campaign A. Caporali (1), J. Zurutuza (1), O. Khoda (2), G. Stangl (3), M. Becker (4), M. Bertocco (1), L. Gerhatova (5), M. Mojzes (5), M.
1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.
IGS Workshop 2008, June 2-6, Miami Beach First activities of the IGS Antenna Working Group — Comparison of ground- and space-based satellite antenna maps.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
International Workshop on Laser Ranging, October 2008, Poznań (Poland) Quality assessment of the ILRS EOP „Daily” Product G. Bianco Agenzia Spaziale.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Current Status of the IGS Reprocessing Peter Steigenberger Technische Universität München Gerd.
Do Annual Geopotential Variations Affect IGS Products ? J. Ray NOAA/NGS with major help from S. Bettadpur, J. Ries U. Texas/CSR T.-S. Bae Sejong U. X.
Global VLBI Solution IGG05R01 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), Vienna, Austria 2 German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI), Munich, Germany.
TOWARDS THE TIME-VARIABLE GRAVITY FIELD FROM CHAMP M. Weigelt, A. Jäggi, L. Prange, W. Keller, N. Sneeuw TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.
A Velocity Field for Romania and Bulgaria Cornelia Aichhorn, Sandro Krauss (1) Günter Stangl (2) (1) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences.
Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ÖAW) / Institut für Weltraumforschung (IWF), 8042 Graz, Austria, Contact:
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008 Combination of the Analysis Centers Reprocessed “SINEX” Solutions Rémi Ferland Geodetic Survey Division.
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Menlo Park GPS data processing and archiving J.L. Svarc, J.R. Murray, Fred Pollitz, Scott Haefner,
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
IERS Directing Board Meeting No.39, BIPM Paris, September 23, 2004 IERS2005: Plan “Integrated Earth orientation parameters, Radio sources, and Site coordinates.
Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined
Impact of the Antenna Model Change on IGS Products
GLOBK Velocity Solutions
Analysis Center + Reference Frame Working Group
NRCan Velocity Fields & Comparisons to Some Plate Motion Estimates
Reference Frame Working Group
IVS contribution to the ITRF2014
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
Proposal for long station names in SINEX format Paul Rebischung Unified Analysis Workshop, Paris, July 2017 Good morning. So I’m going to.
Reference Frame Working Group Report
CNES-CLS Dynamical modelling of GPS orbits
Combination of reprocessed orbit, clock and ERP products
Presentation transcript:

1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND PROSPECTS

2/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco Tasks of the RF Coordinator Operational tasks: –Weekly combination of the AC SINEX (Stations coordinates, ERP, apparent geocenter) –Accumulation of the weekly combined solutions (Stations coordinates and velocities) –Detection of stations discontinuities Occasional tasks: –Provide official IGS submissions to the ITRF –Issue official IGS RF realizations –Provide satellite antenna offsets –Combine and accumulate AC reprocessed solutions operational automation to be done

3/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco Weekly combination: NRCAN strategy Preprocessing of AC solutions: –Unconstraining –Augmentation with explicit geocenter parameters –Alignment to IGS05 –Detection and removal of outliers Iterative combinations: (weighted stacking of normal equations) –AC variance factors = (WRMS of the “AC vs. cumulative” comparison)² –No transformation parameters estimated –No detection of outliers –Until: convergence of the variance factors

4/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco Weekly combination: IGN strategy Preprocessing of AC solutions: –Unconstraining –Detection and removal of outliers Iterative combinations: –AC variance factors: degree of freedom estimator –“AC ↔ combined” transformation parameters estimated –Detection of outliers –Until: No outliers + 1 iteration Last combination: –Augmentation of the AC solutions with explicit geocenter parameters –Transformation parameters fixed –The combined solution is finally rescaled and aligned to IGS05.

5/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco AC variance factors NRCAN: : residuals of the “AC ↔ cumulative” comp. : number of common stations : normal matrix of AC solution IGN: : redundancy factor : AC residuals from the combination : number of observations from this AC : design matrix for this AC : combined covariance matrix Example: VF comparison for week 1558 AC NRCAN √VF IGN √VF x2.941 ( * ) Ratio COD EMR ESA GFZ JPL MIT NGS SIO (*) The IGN combined solution is finally rescaled. For week 1558, SF = (2.941) ²

6/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco Transformation parameters NRCAN: –No transformation parameters are estimated since all AC solutions are aligned to IGS05. (⇒ They are supposed to be in the same frame.) –But the set of reference stations is different for each AC… IGN: –Each AC solution is in its own frame. –Alignment to IGS05 is made at the level of the combined solution.

7/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco IGN vs. NRCAN: Stations coordinates Agreement at: – mm in N, E –~ 1 mm in Up Accidents: –Week 1505: YKRO –Week 1514: CONT –Week 1519: STR1 –Week 1531: SAMP –Week 1552: BAKO –Week 1555: KATZ

8/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco IGN vs. NRCAN: Helmert parameters All below 1 mm And there is an explanation! Sets of reference stations are not the same because of: –Solution numbers –Outliers Green lines: T IGN / IGS05-NRCAN -T NRCAN / IGS05-IGN

9/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco IGN vs. NRCAN: ERP dXPO (µas) dYPO (µas) dXPOR (µas/d) dYPOR (µas/d) dLOD (µs) Mean Abs.max Std Differences are globally below the level of uncertainty XPOR, YPOR: SIO estimates are included in IGN solutions XPOR, YPOR, LOD: part of the differences can be explained by the different AC weightings

10/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco IGN vs. NRCAN: Geocenter dXGC (mm) dYGC (mm) dZGC (mm) Mean Abs.max Std Differences sometimes higher than the level of uncertainty (1.5 mm, 1.3 mm, 3.0 mm) GFZ geocenter is included in the IGN solutions. Influence of AC weightings

11/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco Metadata NRCAN: –From igs.snx for IGS stations –From AC solutions for other stations IGN: –Sites logs are gathered from several sources. (IGS, EPN, CORS, UNAVCO…) –Metadata are extracted from the sites logs. –Week 1558: Sites logs were available for 396 stations over 408.

12/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco Cumulative solution NRCAN strategy was reproduced: –Addition of a loosely constrained weekly solution to a loosely constrained cumulative solution (No transformation parameters are estimated.) –Rejection of stations without domes or with poor velocity estimates –Addition of internal constraints Start point is IGS09P45_all.snx. (cumulative solution for week 1557)

13/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco IGN09P46.snx vs. IGS09P46.snx TX (mm) TY (mm) TZ (mm) SCL (ppb) RX (mas) RY (mas) RZ (mas) dTX / dt (mm/y) dTY / dt (mm/y) dTZ / dt (mm/y) dSCL / dt (ppb/y) dRX / dt (mas/y) dRY / dt (mas/y) dRZ / dt (mas/y) Helmert parameters: WRMS : Differences are all (far) below the uncertainties. N (mm) E (mm) U (mm) VN (mm/y) VE (mm/y) VU (mm/y)

14/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco Discontinuities Currently, there is no discontinuity catalogue compatible with the IGS cumulative solution. (ALL.snx was modified according to the repro1 results.) This catalogue was built from ALL.snx and older versions. A SOLUTION/DISCONTINUITY block will be included in each IGN cumulative solution.

15/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco Plans January 2010: Test of orbits/clocks combination using IGN products February 2010: IGN becomes the operational RF coordinator. Early 2010: –IGS08 (subset of ITRF2008?) –Backsolve repro1 to derive satellite offsets consistent with IGS08 –IGN combination of repro1? Later: –Replacement of the operational cumulative solution by a solution based on repro1 (NRCAN? or IGN?) –Website devoted to IGS RF

16/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION

17/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco IGN vs. NRCAN: AC geocenters

18/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco IGN vs. NRCAN: AC geocenters STD

19/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco IGS05

20/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco Reference stations left on week 1558