Effective Strategies for English Language Learners in Science Melinda Moya Edu 7201T Fall 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Advertisements

Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
Differentiated Instruction
APS Teacher Evaluation A SMART Process for Student and Teacher Growth.
- DOES IT AFFECT STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING AND OUTCOMES? DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Janice Congreaves EDU SPRING 2010.
Effective Strategies for English Language Learners in Science Melinda Moya Edu 7201T Fall 2011.
Instructional Plan and Presentation Bernard Q Mallada CUR/516 Dr
ESOL Science 2 at BHS Richard Meyer Suzy King. Rationale To prepare targeted students for further science courses – Provide background knowledge – Provide.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Major Outcomes of Science Instruction
CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN NEW YORK CITY CLASSROOMS CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN NEW YORK CITY CLASSROOMS Selecting Efficient Instructional Techniques for Culturally.
English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) for English Language Learners (ELLs) Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau of Teaching Learning and.
Effective Strategies for English Language Learners in Science Melinda Moya Spring 2012.
Differentiated Instruction for English Language Learners (ELLs) Christopher Bell, Hong Duong, Sheryl Hoilette EDUC 4800 Action Research Project Georgia.
WHAT IS MAP? AMES Lunch and Learn.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Qualities needed for science Teachers in the new decades Thembi Ndlalane Okayama University 22 November 2010.
ESOL Update 2014 Van Wert Elementary 2014/2015 School Year.
Creating Assessments with English Language Learners in Mind In this module we will examine: Who are English Language Learners (ELL) and how are they identified?
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
ESOL Hopkins Elementary Presenter: Yanira Alfonso, EDS ESOL Teacher Hopkins Elementary School.
Leveling the Playing Field With Technology A New Approach to Differentiated Instruction.
English Language Arts Program Update Cambrian School District.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Developing an Online Course: A Road Map for the Process English Language Arts 3-5: Vocabulary.
Literacy Achievement for Secondary Students Exemplary teaching behavior Domains of expertise Anne G Liguori.
National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers Including Artifacts.
Parent Academy Topic: Support for All Learners 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Chapter 8 Assessing Active Science Learning
1 An Introduction to the SIOP Model Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
What is Interact? Active learning projects that: use authentic situations engage students challenge students.
Science Pacing and Content Earth Space Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor 8/9-8/16/101.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
INACOL Standard D: CLEAR EXPECTATIONS PROMPT RESPONSES REGULAR FEEDBACK.
ELL-MESOL Explaining the difference between BICS and CALP.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Materials Color tiles 2 color counters Paper Problem on labels Table copies of SMP (actions and questions) Instructional Rounds Documentation.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
The Big Picture Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2nd edition
The Three-Tiered Model and SIOP: How do we meet the needs of struggling students? Adapted from Sheltered Content Instruction: Teaching English Learners.
Effective Language and Reading Interventions for English Language Learners.
Azra S. Haq Illinois State University.  What is the value of specific instructional elements to help English Language Learners achieve passing grades.
Eric M. Roubion EDLD 871. Online Teacher Professional Development Standard F.
Charlie Robinson Charlie
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Effective Strategies for English Language Learners in Science Melinda Moya Edu 7201T Fall 2011.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
English Language Learners (ELL): Back to School Night English Language Learners (ELL): Back to School Night Welcome and thank you for coming!!!
Databases and the ULM Library Locating Specific Journal Articles for Education and Curriculum and Instruction Classes.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Building RTI Capacity Through the Lens of a Coach Curriculum and Instruction Department.
Mathematical Literacy Roland O’Daniel, Jo Ann Mosier KCTM October 2007.
21 st century Teaching and Learning District Educator Deborah Harris EDU620: Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Instructor: Adriane Wheat.
TECHNOLOGY AWARENESS & INTEREST COMMUNITY EVENT SPONSORED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND COMMUNITY CENTER.
CCSS in the Classroom Melina Reeves EDU695: MAED Capstone Professor Shannon O'Day January 15, 2015.
Pedagogy As it relates to the field of linguistics.
Differentiation Presented by Redwood Teachers. Differentiation in a Nutshell Differentiated Instruction is multiple ways to structure a lesson so that.
Year 2. 1.Name 2.What you teach 3.Hope or Fear Who makes up this Curriculum Team?
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
A Systematic Review of Discourse’s Outcomes
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
By: Natalie Jenkins, Kelly Malinowski, Kacy Swinson, & Kam Millikan
Candidate in Master of Arts in English/TESOL
By: Natalie Jenkins, Kelly Malinowski, Kacy Swinson, & Kam Millikan
Presentation transcript:

Effective Strategies for English Language Learners in Science Melinda Moya Edu 7201T Fall 2011

Table of Contents Statement of the Problem ….Slide 3 Statement of the Problem ….Slide 3 Pros and Cons….Slide 4 Pros and Cons….Slide 4 Review of Related Literature ….Slide Review of Related Literature ….Slide Statement of the Hypothesis ….Slide 7 Statement of the Hypothesis ….Slide 7 References …. Slide 8- References …. Slide 8-

Statement of the Problem Today’s curriculum seeks to differentiate instruction for all learners. Differentiation for English Language Learners or ELL’s has proven to be a challenge for many teachers. The teacher is constantly faced with the question on how to develop language skills for ELL’s. The issue that has arisen through years of testing ELL’s is that on the surface it may seem that ELL’s are communicating with teachers and peers in the new language, but the struggles seem to be within the content or academic language that is needed to excel in today’s educational system. One major struggle for ELL’s is in the content area of Science. Within the fourth and Eighth grades students are expected to gain a passing score in the state exam. In the recent past this has been a major concern for individuals educating ELL’s since success in these exams are abysmal.

Pros and Cons Pros Effective language strategies include a revamping on assessment tools as well as inclusion of academic language in the content areas. Providing ELL’s with academic language skills will develop both the language and knowledge in the content. (Gibbons, B.A., 2003) Cons Since the No Child Left Behind Act teachers are left with testing students on the content knowledge and little time is left to develop language assessment as well as language based lesson plans. In addition no assessment has been developed on the testing of the content in the home language.

Review of Related Literature Science needs to be connect or be aware of the students socio-cultural aspect. Science needs to be connect or be aware of the students socio-cultural aspect. Proper assessments and testing modality needs to be constructed to evaluate the students knowledge in science. Proper assessments and testing modality needs to be constructed to evaluate the students knowledge in science. Implementation of technology for science needs to be in place. Such as blogging, wiki spaces, and podcasts. Implementation of technology for science needs to be in place. Such as blogging, wiki spaces, and podcasts.

Review of Related Literature Cont… Graphic organizers that incorporates language skills need to be in place. Effective strategies include graphic organizers with a focus on language development skills. In this way the academic language is being developed in succession with the content knowledge. Graphic organizers that incorporates language skills need to be in place. Effective strategies include graphic organizers with a focus on language development skills. In this way the academic language is being developed in succession with the content knowledge. Language skills should include tier 2 words such as Describe, explain, or discuss. Language skills should include tier 2 words such as Describe, explain, or discuss.

Research Hypothesis Research will be conducted with a group of xx 8 th grade ELL students in a school in Staten Island. Intervention will be done three times a week for a period of two months. Students will be able to increase academic language as well as knowledge in scientific inquiry. Research will be conducted with a group of xx 8 th grade ELL students in a school in Staten Island. Intervention will be done three times a week for a period of two months. Students will be able to increase academic language as well as knowledge in scientific inquiry.

References Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., Webb, A. (2010). Assessing Equity Beyond Knowledge- and Skills-Based Outcomes: A Comparative Ethnography of Two Fourth-Grade Reform-Based Science Classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Volume 48(5), Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., Webb, A. (2010). Assessing Equity Beyond Knowledge- and Skills-Based Outcomes: A Comparative Ethnography of Two Fourth-Grade Reform-Based Science Classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Volume 48(5), Colombo, M.W., Colombo, P.D., (2007). Blogging to Improve Instruction in Differentiated Science Classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan. Retrieved from the JSTOR database. Colombo, M.W., Colombo, P.D., (2007). Blogging to Improve Instruction in Differentiated Science Classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan. Retrieved from the JSTOR database. Gibbons, B.A., (2003). Supporting Elementary Science Education for English Learners: A Constructivist Evaluation Instrument. The Journal of Educational Research. Volume 96(6), Gibbons, B.A., (2003). Supporting Elementary Science Education for English Learners: A Constructivist Evaluation Instrument. The Journal of Educational Research. Volume 96(6), Janzen, J., (2004). Teaching English Language Learners in the Content Areas. Retrieved from ERIC database. Janzen, J., (2004). Teaching English Language Learners in the Content Areas. Retrieved from ERIC database.

Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., LeRoy, K., (2005). Science Inquiry and Student Diversity: Enhanced Abilities and Continuing Difficulties After an Instructional Intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Volume 43(7), Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., LeRoy, K., (2005). Science Inquiry and Student Diversity: Enhanced Abilities and Continuing Difficulties After an Instructional Intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Volume 43(7), Lee, O., Fradd, S.H., (1998). Science for All, Including Students From Non-English-Language Backgrounds. Review of Educational Research. Volume 27(4), Lee, O., Fradd, S.H., (1998). Science for All, Including Students From Non-English-Language Backgrounds. Review of Educational Research. Volume 27(4), Lee, O., (2005). Science Education with English Language Learners: Synthesis and Research Agenda. Review of Educational Research. Volume 75(4), Lee, O., (2005). Science Education with English Language Learners: Synthesis and Research Agenda. Review of Educational Research. Volume 75(4),

Murphy, A.F., (2009). Tracking the Progress of English Language Learners. Phi Delta Kappan. Retrieved from JSTOR database. Murphy, A.F., (2009). Tracking the Progress of English Language Learners. Phi Delta Kappan. Retrieved from JSTOR database. Niss, M. L. (2005). Preparing Teachers to Teach Science and Mathematics with Technology: Developing a Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education. Volume 21, Niss, M. L. (2005). Preparing Teachers to Teach Science and Mathematics with Technology: Developing a Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education. Volume 21, Pluta, W.J., Chinn, C. A., Duncan, R.G. (2010). Learners’ Epistemic Criteria for Good Scientific Models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Volume 48(5), Pluta, W.J., Chinn, C. A., Duncan, R.G. (2010). Learners’ Epistemic Criteria for Good Scientific Models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Volume 48(5),