1 Understanding IDEA and MOE The basics of maintenance of effort.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented By WVDE Federal Programs Staff July 15, 2009 Title III Monitoring and Fiscal Updates.
Advertisements

1 Understanding IDEA and MOE under the ARRA The basics of maintenance of effort 4/09.
IDEA-B LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) FY 2014 and Beyond Texas Education Agency (TEA) Division of Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting November 2013.
Daniel Bush, DPI School Financial Services WASBO Fall Conference October 4, 2013.
Fund 80 – Community Service Fund Jerry Landmark, Assistant Director School Financial Services Team.
1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference Consolidating Funds S choolwide P rograms Sandy Brown &
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
Budget Hearing and Annual Meeting Monday, August 20,
IDEA Proportionate Share and Equitable Services: Serving Parentally Placed Private School Students with Disabilities OSE/ISD Directors Leadership Meeting.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education
IDEA-B and NCLB LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Texas Education Agency (TEA)
CCDF Presentation September 9, CCDF: CCDF Budget Development The CCDF award is based on the federal fiscal year beginning October 1 st and ending.
Maintenance of Effort for Special Education April 11, /11/14Office of Special Education1.
SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANT Denise Dusek Federal Funding Specialist December 7, 2011.
Federal Fiscal Compliance 101 Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
Special Education State and Federal Funding. Federal Funding In 1975, Congress promised to pay 40 percent of the cost of special education as part of.
FY 14 Special Education Funding Issues Illinois ASBO Annual Conference May 16, 2013 Illinois State Board of Education Funding and Disbursement Services.
Special Education Funding Education Service Center, Region 20 Sherry Marsh 1.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability, and Supplement/Supplant PAFPC April 2011.
A State Department Perspective.  Headed by an elected State Superintendent ◦ No state board of education  425 School Districts  12 Cooperative Educational.
Budget Montrose Area Public Budget Presentation June 3, 2002 Lewis Plauny.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Maintenance of Effort Danna Sanders Phone:
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Georgia Department of Education Special Education.
Shrewsbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2013 Initial Financial Projection.
1 Maintenance of Effort Chart of Accounts and State School Fund Processes October 1, 2009.
 Two aspects to IDEA MOE: 1. Eligibility Process  Determines eligibility to receive IDEA-B funds  Compares upcoming year’s Budget to prior year Expenditures*
1 Understanding IDEA and MOE The basics of maintenance of effort.
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SPED Finance-Grants and Data LEA Academy SPED Finance 1.
Virginia Department for the Aging Area Plan Financial Section Training FY2006.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE). MOE REQUIREMENT Federal law requires that each local education agency (LEA) receiving federal funds pursuant.
Title I ARRA School Level Reporting Project Office of Educational Management Services New York State Education Department Questar BOCES March 2, :30.
Maintenance of Effort Office of Special Education Fall Forum 1.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) for Special Education April 7, 2015 April 2015Office of Special Education1.
Explain Changes in Net Position © Dale R. Geiger
Federal Grant Training. I. Title I-A Fiscal Requirements  To ensure Title I-A funds are in addition to regular services normally provided, three fiscal.
1 Connecticut State Department of Education American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA): Bureau of Special Education Teleconference May 21, 2009.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 FAA Hot Topics Reauthorization, Continuing Resolutions and Environmental Issues Federal Aviation Administration Presented.
Maintenance of Effort Federal Cross-Cutting & Special Education MoE Daniel Lunghofer Supervisor, School District/ESD Accounting.
Consolidated Fiscal (OCFO) Requirements: Special Education and Federal Programs Components Spring Fiscal WorkshopsSpring Fiscal Workshops.
DIVISION OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. EXCESS COSTS Excess Cost Requirement –Prevents usage of Part B funds to pay for all costs directly attributable to the.
Local Education Agency (LEA) Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Requirements under IDEA.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services United States Department of Education Program Review and Best Practices: Who, What, When, Where,
COORDINATED EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES CEIS 1.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 IDEA Recovery Funds for Services to Children and Youths with Disabilities.
ESS G RANT M ANAGEMENT IDEA Charter School Expansion Act (CSEA), Basic Entitlement and supplemental grants New Charter Operator Training 2015.
Grant Applications Shanna Graham-Garrett
Special Education Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Michael Brooks Division of School Finance Special Education.
IDEA Grants Application: Maintenance of Effort. 2 What is Maintenance of Effort? IDEA regulation (34 CFR § ) which directs districts, for each grant.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education
School-wide Consolidation: LEA Panel
VASBO Winter Conference February 17, 2017 Tracie L. Coleman
Congress Considers Major Medicaid Changes
Every Student Succeeds Act
Introduction to LEA MOE Tool
Budgeting Basics And Fiscal Principles
IDEA-B LEA MOE Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting
LEA Maintenance of Effort and Excess Cost Calculation
( Annual Financial Report) Updated
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
IDEA Maintenance of Effort
VASBO Spring Conference May 19, 2016 Tracie L. Coleman
SPECIAL EDUCATION FINANCE UPDATES
Maintenance of Effort Compliance
SPECIAL EDUCATION FINANCE UPDATES
Presentation transcript:

1 Understanding IDEA and MOE The basics of maintenance of effort

2 Maintenance of Effort MOE requirements have been around for awhile Feds allow certain flexibility School Districts should keep track of this from year to year. Forms to calculate are also available in conference documents and at: Administrative Advisory SPED at:

3 For the purposes of this presentation The presentation focuses on how the district shows that it is maintaining its state and local fiscal effort in the area of special education. IDEA considers that districts are meeting “non- supplanting” requirements if state and local effort is maintained. Therefore, this presentation focuses on maintenance of effort and does not use the terminology “non- supplanting” --- although it is covered.

4 Examples of State and Local Funds Local Funds Funds appropriated by your local community for the district’s use. Includes c. 70 funds as they go through your community first. State Funds Funds coming directly from the state to the district. Includes circuit breaker reimbursements Grants funded by the state and administered by DESE.

5 We’ll pretend this district STARTS in 2014 How much did the district spend on special education in FY2014? $100,000 in state funds $50,000 in local funds $75,000 in federal funds TOTAL = $225,000 Simple Maintenance of Effort = total spending from state and local funds =$150,000 Let’s call this sMOE.

6 MOE can be demonstrated in the aggregate or per/student with disabilities 150 students w/disabilities (SWD) in FY2014 So sMOE (simple maintenance of effort)/SWD is either 150/$150,000 or $1,000/SWD.

7 Simple Maintenance of Effort (sMOE) FY 2015 For FY2015, the district must spend at least as much on special education from state and local funds Either in the aggregate ($150K) …Or per/student w/disabilities (#students x $1,000). Let’s say there are 100 students with IEPs in FY2015. (NOTE: a decrease of 50 students)

8 Simple Maintenance of Effort (sMOE) FY 2015 For FY2015, the district must spend either a total of $150K in state and local funds in the area of special education OR $100K (100 students x $1,000) in state and local funds on a per/student with disability basis. (fiscally prudent choice)

9 Which would you choose? Using Per/Student? Student #s decreased from 2014 to 2015 Decreased student #s means MOE will be less using per/student In this case CHOOSE PER/STUDENT method. Using the Aggregate? If student #s increase from one year to the next, the Aggregate method will be less. In this case, student #s decreased – so this is not the MOE method to choose.

10 How do the federal funds fit in? IDEA 2004 allows some of the federal funds to “supplant” state and local funds. Why? Because the Congress had promised to pay 40% of the costs of special education and it realizes it has not yet met that promise. So? So, 50% of NEW Federal Dollars can be treated as state and local funds until the federal money catches up to the promised level!

11 How can federal money be treated as state and local money? NEW federal money only 50% of new money only To explain, we need to go back to spending in FY2014.

12 How much did the district spend on special education in FY2014? $100,000 in state funds $50,000 in local funds $75,000 in federal funds TOTAL = $225,000 Simple Maintenance of Effort = total spending from state and local funds =$150,000

13 How much federal money does the district get in FY2015? The district gets $90,000 in federal special education money. More than 2014 So, new money = ($90,000-$75,000) or $15,000 Remember we can use 50% of new money. 50% of $15,000 = $7,500

14 Therefore, in FY2015, $7,500 of federal money can be used to “supplant” state and local money in meeting the MOE requirement. The sMOE requirement was $150,000 for FY2014, but since our student numbers decreased, we are aiming for $100,000 in state and local monies for FY2015. Even that looks hard with our state belt tightening, so we look to the offset of $7,500 to see if we can make it even easier on ourselves. $100,000-$7,500 = $92, that is the amount of the MOE that must be funded with state and local money. The remaining $7,500 can be funded with the offset federal money. We can call that combination of state, local, and offset federal money the final Maintenance of Effort, or fMOE that we want to budget for FY2015.

15 If the SWD numbers increase, then it will be fiscally prudent for the district to demonstrate fMOE in the aggregate (as it will be the lower amount) If the SWD numbers decrease, however, the fMOE calculated per student will be less than the aggregate fMOE, and the district should choose this method to demonstrate fMOE. Demonstrate fMOE either in the aggregate or per/ student with a disability (SWD)

16 Can the district spend more than it is required under the fMOE? Yes, our fictional district could actually spend $200,000 in state and local money (regardless of federal offset) in FY2015, HOWEVER, if it did, then the sMOE required amount would be higher for FY2016, as the district would be required to maintain its effort. If possible, it is the better fiscal choice to spend more federal money instead (if you have it).

17 Interesting info on the federal offset The federal offset is CUMULATIVE. If the offset is used, it can only be used once. The advisory calculated the cumulative offset for every district from FY97 up to FY2007. From that point forward, we expected districts to maintain the calculation locally. Suppose the offset cumulatively was $62,000 for our fictional district heading into The district could have used all of the offset to reduce the state and local burden from $100K to $38K (100-62=38). The sMOE going into 2016 would then be 38K, and the cumulative offset would be ZERO. In essence, starting fresh again with 2016.

18 final Maintenance of Effort (fMOE) (more) fMOE can be demonstrated by the district by spending either in the Aggregate (the whole pie) Or per/student with an IEP (#students x an equal amount). There is no individual student entitlement implied by these calculations. fMOE is about the “state and local” spending planned for special education.

19 Find out your district’s accumulated federal offset The ESE has calculated it for you up to FY2007: Check the full ESE advisory because there are other exceptions that this Powerpoint does not address. Calculate your federal offsets each year, and add them to the accumulated offset or, if you use federal funds from this offset to meet your state and local MOE, then subtract from the cumulative amount.

20 Potential exceptions District Accountability Level 4 or You may not use any new federal offset funds for the year or years you have that accountability level. If you use 15% of the funds for instructional supports --- that will impact how much you can use of the federal offset funds. If you receive a written finding of non- compliance for disproportionality you will be required to spend funds for specific remediation.

21 Potential additional flexibility Allowable exceptions –Voluntary departure or disciplinary departure of staff –Termination of costly obligation –Termination of large expenditure Four actual ways to figure MOE –State and local aggregate –State and local per/pupil –Local aggregate –Local per/pupil The state cannot calculate this for districts.

22 Questions?