SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
ATF2 Interaction Point Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Status T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Komamiya ( Univ. of Tokyo ), T. Suehara, Y.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Lecture 24 Physics 2102 Jonathan Dowling EM waves Geometrical optics.
How to explore a system? Photons Electrons Atoms Electrons Photons Atoms.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
Ch 25 1 Chapter 25 Optical Instruments © 2006, B.J. Lieb Some figures electronically reproduced by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle.
BSRT Optics Design BI Days 24 th November 2011 Aurélie Rabiller BE-BI-PM.
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
Matching and Synchrotron Light Diagnostics F.Roncarolo, E.Bravin, S.Burger, A.Goldblatt, G.Trad.
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
1 Proposal for a Multi-Optical Transition Radiation System in ATF2 A. Faus-Golfe, D. McCormick IFIC – SLAC 11 June th TB/SGC Meeting.
IPBSM status and plan ATF project meeting M.Oroku.
The aerogel radiator: optical characterization and performances L.L. Pappalardo INFN - University of Ferrara 1 CLAS12 RICH Review – JLab - September 5-6.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
1. Two long straight wires carry identical currents in opposite directions, as shown. At the point labeled A, is the direction of the magnetic field left,
1 Light Chapters 36 – 39 2 Wave or Particle? Newton -- particles. In the early 19 th century, Young, Fresnel, and others -- wave. In 1860 Maxwell --
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
SPS Synchrotron Light Monitor -BSR- Status G. TRAD E. Bravin, A. Goldblatt, F. Roncarolo.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Assessing Single Crystal Diamond Quality
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
1.Stable radiation source 2.Wavelength selector 3.Transparent sample holder: cells/curvettes made of suitable material (Table 7- 2) 4.Radiation detector.
Coherent Diffraction Radiation experiment Konstantin Lekomtsev, Grahame Blair, Gary Boorman, Pavel Karataev, Maximilian Micheler John Adams Institute at.
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
PROBLEM 1 Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
New emittance monitor beamline
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Calculation of the Coded Aperture zero-beam-size image (the “image”). The CA fitting procedure: The image is parameterized as a Sum-Of-Gaussians.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Unit 2 Magnets for circular accelerators: the interaction regions Ezio Todesco European Organization for.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Low Emittance Rings 2014 Workshop INFN-LNF, 18. September 2014 Low Emittance Studies at 3 GeV at PETRA III Joachim Keil DESY.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques. Contents 1.Optics (1): Stops, Pupils, Field Optics and Cameras 2.Basic Electromagnetics –Math –Maxwell's equations.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
ODR Diagnostics for Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen APC.
G. Trad on the behalf of the BSRT team Emittance meeting 04/11/2015.
News from the interaction region study Bernhard Holzer, Anton Bogomyagkov, Bastian Harer, Rogelio Tomas Garcia, Roman Martin, Luis Eduardo Medina Presented.
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
NEW DESIGN OF THE TESLA INTERACTION REGION WITH l* = 5 m
RICH simulation for CLAS12
High resolution profile measurements
Status of Equatorial CXRS System Development
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung, J.M. Vouillot Introduction Conclusion LEP 1 Layout LEP 2 Layout Results Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 Synchrotron Light Monitors

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors Introduction: The Telescope Layout Layout of the Synchrotron Radiation Telescopes in LEP. Four Synchrotron Radiation telescopes are installed in LEP around IP8, two for each particle type, one located at the exit of the experimental straight section where the Dispersion is very small, the other in the arc where the Dispersion is large.

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors Introduction: The LEP 1 era. With a beam energy limited to 45 GeV we manage to control our telescopes with a relatively standard layout.

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors Introduction: The Challenging Problems of LEP 2 But above 80 GeV, side lobes and asymmetric defocusing started to appear, pointing to the expected cylindrical deformation of the Be mirror due to the power deposition of the SR. To solve this problem, a special set-up had to be made: LEP 2 The Adaptive Optics

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors The Basic Layout LEP 1 Layout: The Basic Layout The Imaging Devices - Light Extraction Mirror: a 10 mm thick, 23x23 mm2 Be mirror. - Spherical Imaging Mirror: with a focal length of 4 m. - X - Y Steering Mirror: to align precisely the light with the bench. The Acquiring Devices - A Camera: a normal CCD. - A Linear Density Filter: to match the light intensity to the detector sensitivity. - Chromatic & Special Filters: to control wavelength and polarisation components.

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors LEP 1 Layout: The Major Difficulty The major difficulty was the precise selection of the light source due to the large bending radius of LEP (3100 m) and its distance from the telescope (21 m). A slit has been implemented to control precisely the centre of the light origin and the longitudinal acceptance. By moving the slit, the whole acceptance defined by the extraction mirror can be explored. Telescope Horizontal Phase Space with Beam Trajectories, Extraction Mirror and Slit acceptance bands. (The axes are the horizontal machine axis x and the trajectory angle 

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors LEP 1 Layout: The Applied Correction The correction applied to the measured size is:   REAL-H/V =   MEAS-H/V -   LA -   D-H/V Where w = the slit size and  XX represents broadening introduced by:  LA = k LA w - the longitudinal acceptance.  DH = k DH /w - diffraction due to the slit uniform window limitation  DV = k DV 2/3 - SR diffraction This correction currently represented around 10 % of the measured sigma in the horizontal plane and 35 % in the vertical. The telescopes have been optimised during the LEP 1 runs to provide the beam emittances with best precision (±0.1 nm in the vertical plane).

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors LEP 1 Layout: The Tuning Application The Beuv Scan Tool  LA = k LA w  DH = k DH /w k DV = 3.9± 0.1 k DH = 1.6± 0.2 k LA = 40 ± 10 Ability to measure vertical emittances smaller than 1nm to ±0.1nm

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors The LEP 2 Layout: The Final Layout Layout of the Synchrotron Radiation Telescopes in LEP. [LEP 2 Devices in Red] The Imaging Devices Light Extraction Mirror Deformable Mirror Slit Spherical Imaging Mirror The Acquiring Devices Mobile Camera Density Filter Additional Polarisation Filter Filters

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors LEP 2 Layout: The Polarisation Filter When LEP energy exceeded 80 GeV, side lobes appeared on the beam image explained by the combination of the remaining vertical polarisation component of the SR and the cylindrical deformation of the Be Mirror due to the power deposition of the SR. A dichroic sheet polariser having an extinction ratio of 1/4000 has been added to the original metallic polarisation filters in order to attenuate further these lobes. LEP 2

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors LEP 2 Layout: The Mobile Camera Above 80 GeV, the beam image is also no longer focussed in the same location in H and V, due to this cylindrical deformation of the extraction mirror. Slit position scans clearly demonstrate this effect and a mobile camera has been introduced to be able to optimise the telescopes either for H or V measurements. Result of a Mobile Camera Scan done at 94.5 GeV with 2.4 mA showing the beam image focussed at different location in the horizontal and vertical planes.

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors LEP 2 Layout: The Mobile Camera Other Results of Mobile Camera Scans E = 94.5 GeV- I = 1.2 mA E = 94.5 GeV - I = 1.8 mA

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors LEP 2 Layout: The Deformable Mirror In order to focus both planes simultaneously and anticipate the LEP beam energy and current increase (towards 100 GeV with currents above 3 mA per beam), an cylindrically deformable mirror has been implemented to compensate the main deformation of the Be mirror. This outsourced model allows a cylindrical deformation from flat to a radius of curvature of 350 m allowing to correct up to 3 mA at 94.5 GeV. A home made mirror has been installed this year and should allow us to correct up to 2.8 mA at 100 GeV (with a minimum radius of 270 m).

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors LEP 2 Layout: The Deformable Mirror A series of measurements were made at different energies and it has been estimated that the radius follows a law of the type: R= I b -1.7 E b -3 Curvature radius of the Be mirror as a function of beam current measured at 94.5 GeV with the radius R in [m], the beam intensity I b in [mA], and the beam energy E b in [GeV]

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors Results In 1998, the LEP2 layout has been implemented in the electron telescopes and: The Be mirror deformation law has been refined. A software server has been developed to monitor every minute the beam energy and current and deform accordingly the mirror. The polariser has been fine tuned to maximise the vertical polarisation attenuation. The slit position has been adjusted to target the SR origin inside the corresponding bending magnet. The slit width has been adjusted to 1 mm for a longitudinal acceptance of ± 40 cm.

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors Results Under these conditions, both telescopes gave the same emittance, within the errors on the beta values. The importance of the deformable mirrors is very well demonstrated below, where the same beam is imaged with and without deforming the mirror and filtering the vertical polarisation.

SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors Conclusion For the 1999 run, all telescopes have been put in the LEP 2 configuration and a campaign to re-measure the correction coefficients will be undertaken.. It should be then possible to reach a 2.8 mA beam current at 100 GeV before having to move the camera which gives a correction capability of an additional 1 mA, close to the LEP limit.