Abraham Gallas for the LHCb Silicon Tracker Group 7 th International Hiroshima Symposium on Development and Application of Semiconductor Tracking Devices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
Advertisements

Marco Bregant Vertex05 - Nikko, November 2005 Dipartimento di Fisica Universit à di Trieste & Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) - Trieste ALICE.
1 Status of the CMS Pixel project Lorenzo Uplegger RD07 Florence 28 June 2007.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
PHENIX Vertex Tracker Atsushi Taketani for PHENIX collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Over view of Vertex detector 2.Physics.
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
1.ATLAS and ID 2.SCT 3.Commissioning 4.Integration 5.Latest Runs 6.Conclusions Commissioning the ATLAS Silicon Microstrip Tracker IPRD08 - Siena Jose E.
Introduction Silicon Tracker project: design production Tracking strategy and performance Design and performance of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Kim Vervink.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
SSD Operations Manual March 2014 SSD: 4 th layer of vertex detector Heavy Flavor Tracker Silicon Strip Detector – Operations Manual PXL Inserted from this.
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
Jon S Kapustinsky 11/17/2010 Jon S Kapustinsky FVTX Commissioning Plan 1.71 Jon S Kapustinsky 1.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Running Experience – Markus Keil – University of Geneva on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Vertex 2009 Putten, Netherlands,
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
CM26 March 2010Slide 1 EMR Status o Intro o Construction o Magnetic shielding o Electronics o Prototype Cosmics test o Schedule Jean-Sebastien Graulich,
Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
Leo Greiner TC_Int1 Sensor and Readout Status of the PIXEL Detector.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Super-Belle Vertexing Talk at Super B Factory Workshop Jan T. Tsuboyama (KEK) Super B factory Vertex group Please visit
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Test of Single Crystal Diamond Pixel Detector at Fermilab MTEST Simon Kwan Fermilab April 28, 2010.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
9/17/2008TWEPP 2008, R. Stringer - UC Riverside 1 CMS Tracker Services: present status and potential for upgrade Robert Stringer University of California,
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
Pixel Atsushi Taketani RIKEN RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Overview of Pixel subsystem 2.Test beam 3.Each Components 4.Schedule 5.Summary.
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
ST Occupancies (revisited) M. Needham EPFL. Introduction Occupancies matter Date rates/sizes In particular was data size on links from Tell1 to farm estimated.
Javier Castillo3rd LHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 15/06/ Status of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Alignment Strategies & Results from Cosmic run Javier.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
0 Characterization studies of the detector modules for the CBM Silicon Tracking System J.Heuser 1, V.Kyva 2, H.Malygina 2,3, I.Panasenko 2 V.Pugatch 2,
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Simulated vertex precision
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
LHCb Velo: commissioning, performance and High flux tests.
UNIZH and EPFL at LHCb.
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
The LHCb vertex detector
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Setup for testing LHCb Inner Tracker Modules
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

Abraham Gallas for the LHCb Silicon Tracker Group 7 th International Hiroshima Symposium on Development and Application of Semiconductor Tracking Devices First Operational Experience from the LHCb Silicon Tracker The LHCb Silicon Tracker Installation and Commissioning Operation with particles Summary

2 The LHCb Silicon Tracker Tracker Turicensis Inner Tracker LHCb: single-arm forward spectrometer Silicon Sensors: p-n silicon strip sensors (HPK) 1-4 sensors bonded together  up to 37 cm long strips Radiation Dose: IT : 5 x MeV n/cm 2 eqv after 10 years TT: 8 x MeV n/cm 2 eqv after 10 years  5°C  12 m 2  272k RO channels

IT Layout 3 3 Stations with 4 Boxes (Top, Bottom, A side, C side) Each box has 4 layers (0°, +5°, -5°, 0°) Top/Bottom boxes 1 sensor ladders Side boxes 2 sensor ladders 320, 410  m thicknesses 198  m pitch, w/p = 0.25 Sensor size: 110 x 78 mm IT Box IT Module T B AC

TT Layout 4 4 Layers (0°, +5°, -5°, 0°) 128 half-modules with 7 sensors 500  m thickness 183  m pitch, w/p = 0.25 Sensor size: 96.4 x 94.4 mm Tracker Turicensis beam TT Half Module

Silicon Tracker ECS 5 ST Experiment Control System: Expert system based on a hierarchical FSM paradigm Allows distributed and multi-platform control Controls and/or monitors: HV, LV power supplies and regulators DAQ electronics Cooling Environmental parameters (T,H,...) Corrective actions triggered automatically by warnings Devices to be configured:  7.5k Devices permanently monitored:  6.6k Implemented using PVSS II SCADA and the SMI++ toolkit Trending and archiving capabilities

Detector Installation 6 Tracker TuricensisInner Tracker 3 stations 4 boxes/station

Commissioning Lessons 7 Oscillations in the LV power supplies: Filter out with capacitors Failing voltage regulators: we did not test with all different load scenarios  replaced (  30 out of 1992) Optical fibre/laser diode problems: measure optical power  bad alignment between the diode and the optical fiber due to overheating of diodes during soldering process  diodes below threshold replaced:  IT: 30 out of 1008  TT: 95 out of 1152 Internal swaps in optical fiber bundle, bad connections, ….

8 Commissioning Bond Problems Despite extensive module testing/temp cycling during module construction and QA: On 9 out of 280 TT-hybrids bond wires on front-end chip (Beetle) input broke at the heels 7 hybrids exchanged during the shutdown Detected via noise pattern inspection Affects innermost of four bond rows  One module with broken bonds has been extensively tested  2 hybrids examined with SEM  So far the damage could not be reprodu- ced in lab (i.e. temp variations etc...)  The majority of the broken bonds appeared  2 month after the instal- lation of the modules was finished  This year only 1 hybrid started to show the problem  Under further investigation

Commissioning Status 9 TT-Station: broken bond wires 1 broken Beetle port (32 chs)  % working channels!! IT 2 IT 1 IT 3 AC B T IT-Stations: slightly noisier Beetle ports not working  99.3 % working channels!!

ST commissioning with particles 10 Cosmic events are very rare due to the projective geometry of LHCb “TED” events LHC beam injected in the transfer line and stopped in a beam dump 350 meters behind the LHCb detector, in 2008 & 2009 very high particle density:  4000 clusters in the IT (  20x more than B meson event) detectors fully illuminated with particles. muons,  10 GeV/c (MC) Magnet off Internal fine time alignment Spatial alignment Study performance of the detector

ST commissioning with particles 11 LHC synchronization tests (TED runs) were performed in Aug-Sep 2008 and Jun TED runs: The LHCb detector was in nominal position LHCb data taking was  6 hours 5.3k tracks reconstructed in the Inner Tracker Time and spatial alignment was performed 2009 TED runs: The LHCb detector was in an open position: the Inner Tracker was opened by  50 cm Most of the electronics related faults during 2008 run had been fixed Data taking for LHCb was  72 hours  50k low intensity) tracks reconstructed in the Inner Tracker

TED events: IT time alignment 12 MPV ~ 27 ADC counts  S/N ~ 15 Cable lengths for different parts of the detector differ Different stations have different time of flight of particles  Need to adjust timing delays of individual detector elements  Timing delay scans (charge measurement vs clock delay) Scanning sampling point Short IT Ladders

TED events: TT time alignment 13 Need to adjust the timing delays of the four quadrants of the TT stations.  Timing delay scans (charge measurement vs clock delay) MPV ~ 25 ADC counts  S/N ~ 11 Scanning sampling point

TED events Large CM Low gain ?? MPV: 14.2 MPVs: IT C side Landau fits per ladder with the optimal timing: S/N ratio 14÷15 in most cases Few outliers due to large CM / low gain,… Long IT Ladders IT1IT2IT3

IT: Spatial alignment 15 “TED events”: occupancy too high for standard track finding. Survey  Pre-Alignment  Alignment Estimate of x position of the IT2 station boxes Simple pre-alignment tracking Draw a line with hit in 1 st layer of IT1 and 4 th layer of IT3 Line should point towards TED Confirm track with another hit in IT1 or IT3 Residuals in IT2 Survey Box photogrammetry (~ 1-2 mm) Layer survey ( ~ 50 μm) Only x layer surveyed Ladder survey (precision: ~ 50 μm) Only x ladders surveyed

Alignment : Use TED runs with lowest occupancy Standalone IT reconstruction pointing towards TED Alignment of: 1.Boxes in X, Y translation and Z rotations 2.Layers in X translation and Z rotation 3.Ladders in X translation Strategy: Evolving  2 /dof of reconstructed IT tracks for track selection with iteration Ladders were aligned to  20  m precision with 2008 TED data. Will improve in 2009 TED IT: Spatial alignment 16 (*) NIM A600: , 2009 (*)

IT: Spatial alignment validation 17 Procedure Alignment done using TED runs with the lowest occupancy Use different event sample to estimate the layer/ladder bias Fit gaussians to residual distributions of all 12 layers and plot the mean (layer bias) Before alignment x layersstereo layers After alignment x layersstereo layers top bottom Boxes side boxes Dominated by MS for a 10 GeV/c μ

TT: Spatial alignment 18 “TED” events No standalone TT track reconstruction, TT has only 4 layers (X,U,V,X) Track candidates from the VELO extrapolated to the TT: Search for hits in the TT (min 3 hits in 4 layers) VELO acceptance very limited -> small region of TT illuminated by VELO tracks around beam pipe -> no individual module alignmen Survey  Align full station in x and y rotation Extrapolate VELO Track candidates  Residuals in TT (TT a/U) Survey: Full station (500 μm) Module support (50 μm) Sensor metrology assembly (10 μm) Overlap of silicon detectors for the tracks coming from TED

TT: Spatial alignment 19 Residuals of TT hits to extrapolated VELO tracks Only alignment of full station Mean: mm Width: mm Mean: mm Width: mm Mean: mm Width: mm NominalSurveyAligned

Summary 20 The LHCb Silicon Tracker is a silicon strip detector for the high density particle region near the LHC beam pipe and in front of the bending magnet Installation in the LHCb cavern of the detectors and ancillary systems has been completed by summer 2008 Commissioning in LHCb revealed several minor design weaknesses that have been fixed in the meantime Initial time alignment, and first studies of spatial alignment have been done with particles during the TED runs. At the moment > 99% of the detector is fully operational Internal and global alignment of the ST ongoing. IT aligned to 20  m Ready for next data taking with particles this winter.

21 Back-up slides

Read-out Electronics 22 3 (4) Beetle readout chips IT(TT) rad hard 0.25 μm CMOS 40MHz, 128 channels multiplexed onto 4 ports  36 cycles to read 1 event  1.1 MHz readout Pipelined 160 bunch crossing near detector  15krad in 10 yrs near detector < 1 Mrad in 10yrs Safe environment counting house

23 Broken bonds SEM studies Investigation with a Scanning Electron Microscope of 2 hybrids with broken bonds: K124, M175. In general: Affects always and only the innermost of the four bond rows between the readout chip (Beetle) and the pitch-adapter. For most hybrids, almost all broken bonds are broken on the pitch-adaptor side, but for at least one hybrid almost all broken bonds are broken on the Beetle side. Out of the two hybrids we put under the SEM, on one we see cracks on almost all not-broken bonds, but on the other one we do not see any cracks on the not-broken bonds.

24 Broken bonds SEM studies Broken bond Crack