U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Mary Cheston, FAA and Frederic Copigneaux, EASA Date: June 7, 2006 “Global Aviation Safety Processes:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPANY MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Advertisements

AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
EASA and the EU Regulatory Framework
6 December 2006 Design Organisation Approval Workshop DUBLIN
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
MODULE B - PROCESS B1. ASME Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity Assessment:
Overview of Virginia Law: Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children Michelle Vucci May 25, 2010.
Presentation of the ECB Framework Regulation Organisational aspects
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
JAA 19th Annual FAA/JAA International Conference 1 TRANSITION FROM JAA to EASA Institutional changes in Europe Klaus KOPLIN JAA Chief Executive.
Certificates of Airworthiness
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop From national to EU rules - Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
Procedure under the Merger Regulation. Procedure – legal documents The Merger Regulation Art. 4 – notification of concentration Art. 7 – suspension of.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Telemedicine Credentialing and Privileging October 16, 2014.
MODEL IMPLEMENTING IDERA REGULATION SUMMARY POWERPOINT FIRST EDITION NOVEMBER 2014.
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 1 Introduction to EMAR May 2015.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
European Aviation Safety Agency
PROPOSALS THE REVIEW OF THE 1958 AGREEMENT AND THE INTRODUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL WHOLE VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL (IWVTA) IWVTA Informal Group WP th Session.
AVS Repair, Alteration and Fabrication Team (RAFT) Results
Single undertaking Article II “…2.The agreements and associated legal instruments included in Annexes 1, 2 and 3 (hereinafter referred to as "Multilateral.
Review of Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Nie Junjian Airworthiness Inspector COSCAP-NA.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
Overview of the Rotterdam Convention. Sub-regional Consultation for DNAs 2 Overview of the Rotterdam Convention Structure of the presentation Part 1 -Introduction.
Regulatory Reform Program Proposed Design Approval Rules CASR Parts 21 and 146 Ian Kearsley Manager Engineering Support Section This presentation is.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Dan Bachelder, FAA, and Wilfried Schulze, EASA Date: June 5, 2008 “Global Safety Management: Revolution.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
Moving Forward With the African Dialogue Cross-Border Principles By Mary Gurure Manager, Legal Services and Compliance COMESA Competition Commission Lilongwe,
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
“ Global Safety Management: Revolution or Evolution?” Operations and Licensing Part 2.
ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE GENERAL European Commission 1 PECAs David Eardley DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission Tel: 032 (2)
ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2
Contracts FP6. PRESENTATION OUTLINE è Legal Framework è Participation è Contract Structure è Collective Approach l signature and entry into force l collective.
International Trade Regulations: the Law of the WTO Professor Mohammad F. A. Nsour Class 3 1.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Frédéric Copigneaux, EASA and Mary Cheston, FAA Date: 7 June 2006 “Global Aviation Safety Processes:
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Bilateral Safety Agreements June 7, U.S. Perspective on Bilateral Safety Agreements: Where We’ve Been and Where.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
1 Commodity Agreements Sugar, Coffee, Cocoa, Coconut New York, May 2004 Lynne Moorhouse.
EU Regulation on type-approval of hydrogen vehicles HFCV GTR – 4th SGS meeting Tokyo, Japan, September 2008 Ferenc PEKÁR Automotive Industry Unit.
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
1 The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade Basic Concepts and Member Obligations.
ICAO COSCAP - SA May AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE How can aerodrome certification be achieved? Establish an appropriate regulatory system within.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
2005 Europe/US International Aviation Safety Conference, Cologne 7-9 June The Europe-US International Aviation Safety Conference 2005 ‘ Aviation Safety.
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
The Mediation Centre of Chamber of Notaries in Gdańsk
Claude Probst European Aviation Safety Agency
Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
AIRWORTHINESS OF AIRCRAFT
Setting Actuarial Standards
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
The Future of Delegation
Status of U.S.-EU Bilateral Agreement
Jill Michielssen European Commission, DG Environment
International Whole Vehicle Type Approval
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Mary Cheston, FAA and Frederic Copigneaux, EASA Date: June 7, 2006 “Global Aviation Safety Processes: Refining, Reinforcing, and Streamlining” Understanding the U.S.-EC Airworthiness Agreement U.S-EU Feedback Forum

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 2 June 7, Overview Status of Negotiations The Proposed Executive Agreement Annexes –Airworthiness and Environmental Certification Technical Implementation Procedures

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 3 June 7, Status of Negotiations After several rounds of informal discussions since October 2003 and five formal negotiations, the U.S. and EU negotiating teams have a draft proposal for the Executive Agreement. --Formal coordination with Member States is expected to begin after U.S./Commission negotiation next week (June 14-15, 2006).

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 4 June 7, The Executive Agreement is applicable to all EU Member States. –It applies to entities within the U.S. and the territory of the European Union. –The application of the Annexes is limited to specified Member States. New agreement will have similar structure to a BASA…... but will be presented together with Annexes to be ratified by the European Community (European Parliament and Council.) Status of Negotiations

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 5 June 7, Status of Negotiations Because the U.S. and EU regulatory systems are different in several key areas, a treaty level document is necessary in Europe in order to provide a derogation from Community law. –Involves formal ratification process in European Community. –Expected to take at least 6 months. Agreement would remain an Executive Agreement in U.S. structure (not treaty level).

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 6 June 7, Agreement Format Three-tier concept was proposed by EU and accepted by agreed by U.S. Tiers 1 & 2 will be ratified by the European Parliament and Council. These documents are binding on all Parties, including the National Aviation Authorities. Exec. Agreement Annexes Technical Implementation Procedures + FAA EASA Guidance Materials Safety Agreement between US/EU Annex 1: Airworthiness & Environmental Certification Annex 2: Maintenance

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 7 June 7, New items in draft Executive Agreement: –Regulatory cooperation –Formal oversight board mechanism –More detailed dispute resolution provisions The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 8 June 7, Contents: 19 Articles ARTICLE I: Definitions ARTICLE II: Purpose and Scope ARTICLE III:Executive Management ARTICLE IV:General Provisions ARTICLE V:Annexes ARTICLE VI: Regulatory Cooperation and Transparency ARTICLE VII: Cooperation in Quality Assurance and Standardization Inspection Activities ARTICLE VIII: Cooperation in Enforcement Activities ARTICLE IX: Exchange of Safety Data ARTICLE X:Applicable Requirements, Procedures, and Guidance Material The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 9 June 7, Contents (continued): ARTICLE XI:Protection of Proprietary Data and Requests for Information ARTICLE XII: Applicability ARTICLE XIII:Unimpeded Access ARTICLE XIV:Fees ARTICLE XV:Preservation of Regulatory Authority ARTICLE XVI:Other Agreements ARTICLE XVII:Consultations and Settlement of Disputes ARTICLE XVIII:Suspension of Acceptance of Findings ARTICLE XIX:Entry into Force, Amendments, and Termination The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 10 June 7, ARTICLE I: Key Definitions “Aviation Authority” -- a responsible government agency or entity of a European Union Member State that exercises legal oversight on behalf of the European Community over regulated entities and determines their compliance with applicable standards, regulations, and other requirements within the jurisdiction of the European Community. “Technical Agent”-- for the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); and for the European Community, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA. “Regulated entity” -- any natural or legal person whose civil aviation safety and environmental testing and approval activities are subject to the statutory and regulatory jurisdiction of one or both of the Parties. The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 11 June 7, ARTICLE II: Purpose and Scope The agreement currently covers reciprocal acceptance related to: Airworthiness certification Environmental certification Maintenance With the possibility of additional areas in the future. The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 12 June 7, ARTICLE III: Executive Management The agreement creates a Bilateral Oversight Board (BOB) U.S. represented by FAA EU represented by European Commission, assisted by EASA Major functions of the BOB: 1)Oversee functioning of the agreement 2)Dispute resolution 3)Amendment of the Annexes and adoption of new Annexes 4)“Early warning” of draft regulations or legislation 5)Discussion forum for safety issues The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 13 June 7, Responsibilities Agreement Annexes Technical Implementation Procedures EU Council +EP EC (BOB) EASA USA FAA (BOB) FAA

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 14 June 7, ARTICLE IV: General Provisions: Terms and conditions for the reciprocal acceptance of findings and approvals are defined in the Annexes. Recognize each other’s systems of delegation to designees or regulated entities existing as of the date of entry into force of the Agreement. –New delegation systems are subject to confidence building. Agreement, including its Annexes, are binding. The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 15 June 7, ARTICLE V: Annexes Defines the contents required to be in each Annex. ARTICLE VI: Regulatory Cooperation Develop and adopt procedures, based on US/EU joint guidelines. Procedures must include: “the opportunity for consultation and participation by one Party’s Technical Agent and industry experts with the other Party’s Technical Agent, whenever possible in the early stages of drafting civil aviation regulatory materials. “ The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 16 June 7, ARTICLE VII, VIII IX and X: Areas for Specific Cooperation –Participation in standardization and quality assurance inspections –Cooperation in enforcement proceedings –Timely exchange of safety data related to accidents and incidents –Notification of applicable guidance The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 17 June 7, ARTICLE XI: Protection of Proprietary Data Commits both Parties to protect intellectual property, confidential business data, proprietary data, etc. unless otherwise required by law (e.g. a court action). “Neither Party shall copy, release, or show information identified as restricted to anyone other than an employee of that Party without prior written consent of the person or entity possessing confidentiality interests in the restricted information.” European Community will ensure that Aviation Authorities similarly protect data. Also addresses how requests from the public for information will be handled. The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 18 June 7, ARTICLE XII Applicability -- the United States and the European Community. ARTICLE XIII Access -- commits both Parties to assist with access to facilities of regulated entities. ARTICLE XIV: Fees – reasonable and commensurate with services provided. The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 19 June 7, The Draft Executive Agreement ARTICLE XV: Preservation of Regulatory Authority The Parties reserve the right to take individual action as necessary within their respective systems. ARTICLE XVI: Other Agreements Take measures to terminate or amend other bilateral agreements with Member States. Continued validity of findings and approvals recognized under prior bilateral agreements until such approvals are amended or canceled.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 20 June 7, ARTICLE XVII: Consultations and Settlement of Disputes –Provisions for consultations by the Parties at any time. –Annexes will contain additional information on how the Technical Agents will consult. –Matters can be referred as necessary to the BOB. ARTICLE XVIII: Suspension of Acceptance of Findings –If consultations are not successful, Parties may suspend acceptance of findings with 30 days prior written notice. The Draft Executive Agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 21 June 7, Annexes In accordance with Article V, two annexes have also been negotiated. Annex 1: Airworthiness and Environmental Certification Annex 2: Maintenance These annexes will be submitted for ratification along with the Executive Agreement.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 22 June 7, Technical Implementation Procedures The Annexes also provide for details to be outlined in technical implementation procedures. Two sets of procedures are drafted: –Airworthiness and environmental certification –Maintenance

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 23 June 7, Next Steps/Open Issues Resolution of open items from FAA’s two assessments of EU regulatory system. –Closure of FAA’s findings may take until December Resolution of open items in the Maintenance Annex text and completion of Technical Implementation Procedures and Guidance Material for Maintenance. Agreed text of the agreement and its annexes will need to be translated into the other 19 official EU languages and ratified by the European Community.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 24 June 7, THE AIRWORTHINESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION ANNEX

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 25 June 7, Airworthiness Annex The airworthiness and environmental certification annex contains the specific rights and obligations related to acceptance of findings, approvals and documentation for: airworthiness and continued airworthiness of civil aeronautical products (aircraft, aircraft engines, propellers, and appliances including parts); and noise, fuel venting, and exhaust emissions.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 26 June 7, Airworthiness Annex – The Vision The negotiating team worked to identify: 1)Industry concerns, 2)Redundancy, 3)Areas where streamlining would be beneficial. The proposed annex creates a framework for greater reciprocal acceptance in the future.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 27 June 7, All other design approvals: PMA, repairs, alterations, etc. STC/Amended STCs, TSOs & Certain Major Changes/Repairs TC/Amended TCs VALIDATION Under the new agreement, validation would be limited to fewer items. Airworthiness Annex – The Vision

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 28 June 7, Airworthiness Annex Annex has 8 Articles Article 1:Scope Article 2:Joint Coordination Body Article 3: Implementation Article 4: Acceptance of Findings and Approvals Article 5: Communications Article 6: Technical Consultations Article 7: Technical Assistance Article 8: Notification of Investigation or Enforcement Action In the following slides, denotes a new feature of this agreement

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 29 June 7, Airworthiness Annex Drafted as high level binding text, with procedural details in the third level technical implementation procedures. 1.SCOPE: Reciprocal acceptance of findings of compliance, approvals, and documentation Technical assistance

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 30 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 2.Establishes a Certification Oversight Board as a Joint Coordination Body. Certification Oversight Board is accountable to the BOB Jointly led by FAA and EASA Meets regularly to ensure functioning of this Annex Reports unresolved issues to the BOB and ensures the implementation of decisions from the BOB

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 31 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 2.Functions of the Certification Oversight Board Approve and revise the technical implementation procedures Share information Resolve technical issues within its responsibilities; examine other issues Develop means for cooperation and exchange of info on certification, environmental standards, quality management & standardization Propose amendments of this Annex to the BOB

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 32 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.Implementation section contains 4 subsections: 3.1General 3.2Design Approvals 3.3Continued Airworthiness 3.4Production 3.5Export Airworthiness Certification These are the principles underlying all activities related to airworthiness and environmental certification between the U.S. and the European Community

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 33 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.1General Technical implementation procedures to address the differences between the two systems.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 34 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.2Design Approvals To benefit from reciprocal acceptance under this agreement: EU applicant applies to EASA; U.S. applicant applies to FAA.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 35 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.2Design Approvals (cont.) Validation process used for: 1)Design of aircraft,aircraft engines, propellers and appliances 2)Supplemental type certificates 3)Certain major changes to type designs 4)Acoustical and emission changes

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 36 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.2Design Approvals (cont.) New form of concurrent validation is introduced—joint certification process. Requires agreement from FAA, EASA and applicant Applies where components of a product are designed by an entity under the authority of the other Party and where compliance demonstration and findings can be made locally. Joint certification bases and means of compliance Common Issue Papers/CRIs Delegation and work sharing program

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 37 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.2Design Approvals (cont.) Comparable systems for approval of parts, repair design data and design changes. Accept parts, repair design data, design changes (including FAA alterations), without a separate VA (FAA/EASA) approval, once they are approved through the CA’s system. Some exceptions are outlined in the technical implementation procedures.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 38 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.2Design Approvals (cont.) Certifying statements are to be defined in the technical implementation procedures. EASA accepts U.S. procedures (Part 21) as an acceptable alternative to EU requirements for the organizational demonstration of capability (DOA).

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 39 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.3Continued Airworthiness EASA, FAA and Aviation Authority commitments: Address unsafe conditions and exchange information on failures, malfunctions and defects Exercise the applicable ICAO Annex 8 responsibilities for the life cycle of the product. Timely communicate changes to ownership or airworthiness status of certificates.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 40 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.4Production Production approvals required for products to be exported between the US and EU. Local production approval satisfactory—no separate FAA/EASA production approval needed. Defines which production approvals granted or extended outside the territory of the US and EU may be recognized.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 41 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.4Production Defines conditions for reliance on the surveillance system of the local authority. Surveillance assistance is requested Manufacturing facility holds a production approval of similar scope FAA, EASA or Aviation Authority, as applicable is willing to undertake assistance Details of assistance are documented

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 42 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.4Production Introduces conditions for the acceptance of each other’s authorized release certificates for parts (a local release) in lieu of FAA or EASA’s release document. Means EASA Form 1 will be recognized for U.S. parts manufactured in the EU, and vice versa. Privileges are granted to specific countries identified in attachment to the Annex.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 43 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.5Export Airworthiness Certification Defines acceptance of Certificates of Airworthiness and Authorized Release Certificates Covers new products, rebuilt engines, and used civil aircraft Mandates what is to be certified, (e.g. conforms to a design approved by the importing authority, is in a condition for safe operation, etc.) Requires specific certifying statements and records to be defined in the technical implementation procedures.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 44 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 3.5Export Airworthiness Certification Requires coordination of exceptions if requirements for issuing an airworthiness certification are not met. Allows for import of used aircraft only if a TC holder exists to support continued airworthiness. Exempts U.S. parts from the European Parts Approval (EPA) marking requirements.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 45 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 4. Acceptance of Findings and Approvals New section outlining the qualification requirements of FAA, EASA, and Aviation Authorities. Documented system Demonstrated knowledge of each other’s systems Appropriately qualified staff and training Internal quality audits and standardization inspections

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 46 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 4.Acceptance of Findings and Approvals FAA and EASA meet the qualification requirements for airworthiness certification. Confidence building process to be conducted for environmental certification. Aviation Authorities that meet the conditions are listed in Appendix 1. Provides for the addition of Aviation Authorities following a consultation process and action by the Bilateral Oversight Board.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 47 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 5.Communications English language 6.Technical Consultations Resolve issues through consultation. Process to be defined in technical implementation procedures Principle is to attempt to resolve at the lowest level

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 48 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 7.Technical Assistance Upon request and after mutual agreement, FAA, EASA and Aviation Authorities shall provide technical assistance to each other. Use its own regulatory system and procedures. Delegated organizations may conduct certain tasks. Assistance may be requested related to import of used aircraft and obtaining information from the original manufacturer.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 49 June 7, Airworthiness Annex 8.Notification of Investigation or Enforcement Action Prompt notification of investigation or enforcement action that may involve a product, regulated entity, or violation of this Annex. Cooperation in sharing information needed for the investigation or enforcement action.

Understanding the US-EC Airworthiness Agreement 50 June 7, Summary Executive Agreement is essentially complete. Both sides have worked intensively to draft text on airworthiness and environmental certification that progresses bilateral cooperation in new areas. Closing FAA assessment findings are key to timing of final signature.