H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 1 The In-Kind Process at ESS Håkan Danared Lund, 15 October 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIARA: Status WP4 C. Omet, GSI 1.Update on WP members 2.Tasks 3.Meetings 4.Schedule 5.Status 14/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting1.
Advertisements

International Energy Agency Hydrogen Implementing Agreement Proposed Task on Hydrogen Safety.
Introduction 1 Proposal for the structure of FAIR GmbH construction phase 2 Relationship between FAIR GmbH and GSI mbH construction phase Contract Site.
Helmholtz Centre for Ion Research D. Krämer, 2nd Lab Directors Meeting, Protvino, January 15-16, 2008 Design and Engineering Issues; Standardization and.
H. Danared | Sw/Fr Coordination Committee | Page 1 Swedish/French Coordination Committee Håkan Danared Saclay, 13 January 2015.
ESS Update and Meeting Goals
European Spallation Source A World-Leading Centre for Materials Research and Life Science with Neutrons HEPTech Workshop 7 May 2013 James H. Yeck CEO ESS.
The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.
In-Kind Contribution Management Update Allen Weeks March 20, Lund.
Australia Middle East NGO Cooperation Agreement Phase Three (AMENCA 3): Palestinian Farmers Connecting to Markets program Competitive Aid Grant Process.
September Elements of success behind CASA-1000.
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under.
Response to ESS Accelerator Technical Advisory Committee April 2014 Recommendations 5 November 2014 Dave McGinnis.
F. Azaiez (IPN-Orsay) The European Collaboration for Stable Ion Beams – ECOS Pushing the limits with high intensity stable beams A typical bottom up initiative.
International Accelerator Facility for Beams of Ions and Antiprotons at Darmstadt CBM Collaboration meeting Status Interim MoU J. Eschke, GSI.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Report on TTonT By: Jan Rozema. Contents Historical overview Status (at PFAC-02) Terms of Reference How to go onward.
Project preparation workshop “Bringing a transnational project to life” Project idea “Challenges and chances from Climate Change for regional and local.
News from ESS Cristina Oyón, Mats Lindroos, Steve Peggs November 2009.
Accelerator/WP High Beta Structures Alan Wheelhouse HIGH-BETA CAVITY DELIVERY April 21, 2015.
Accelerator Project TB Meeting September 2015 Mats Lindroos Head of Accelerator September 23, 2015.
Accelerator/ Medium Beta Cavities Paolo Michelato INFN Milano - LASA April 21, 2015.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
Accelerator/program Mats Lindroos Head of accelerator April 21, 2015.
ACCSYS Risk Management J. G. Weisend II Deputy Head of Accelerator Projects January 14, 2016.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
Proposal for ESS DTL Roadmap. Divide Into Four Phases 1.Conceptual Design Phase (In progress) 2.Technical Design Phase 3.Prototyping Phase 4.Construction.
General overview of WU : Cryogenic Distribution for Elliptical Linac Jarosław Fydrych Cryodistribution Project Engineer Preliminary Design Review,
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
CDR for the ESS Linac Magnets for LWUs (pulsed quadrupoles and DC correctors) Closeout May 4, 2016 J.G. Weisend II, Chairman CDR.
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
European Spallation Source Overview and Status Technical Advisory Committee 1-2 April 2015 James H. Yeck ESS CEO & Director General
H. Danared | TB12, 5 Mar 2015 | Page 1 Håkan Danared Mats Lindroos Lund, 5 March 2015 Status of In-Kind Contributions to Accelerator.
European Spallation Source Science Advisory Committee February 5-6, 2014 Jim Yeck CEO & Director General.
Welcome Mats Lindroos Head of the ESS Accelerator Division EPG 5/12/2011.
Christine Darve ESS deputy WP leader Pierre BOSLAND, CEA Saclay External WP5 leader With special Acknowledgment to Nuno Elias (ESS) and Gilles Olivier.
Delivery of FAIR In-kind items (feedback from India) Subhasis Chattopadhyay VECC-Kolkata & BI-Kolkata.
BrightnESS is funded by the European Union's Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, under grant agreement Building a Research.
H. Danared | Collaboration Board | Page 1 Status of In-Kind Contributions Håkan Danared Legnaro, 1 December 2014.
In-Kind Strategy Integrated Control Systems Garry Trahern Head of ICS Division TAC 9, 3 rd April, 2014, ESS, Lund.
H. Danared | Collaboration Board, March 2014 | Page 1 Status of In-Kind Contributions to Accelerator Håkan Danared Kastrup, 14 April 2014.
ACCSYS Design Reviews J. G. Weisend II Deputy Head of Accelerator Projects.
Scope of PCP Phase 1: Solution Design of Q4 First-of-a-kind prototype QUACO Bid Conference, CERN, 07 th July 2016 Arnaud Foussat, CERN TE MSC-LMF Helene.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL PLAN ESS Quality Assurance and Control workshop (30June) V. HENNION.
WP High Beta Cavities Delivery
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
ESS cavity procurement via in-kind contributions
LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge
recent activities our company Jean Claude Le Scornet - Tomas JUNQUERA
European Spallation Source
Olivier Napoly, coordinator CEA/Irfu
4th BrightnESS Best Practice Workshop VAT exposure related to ESS Installations in Sweden Carlo J. Bocchetta.
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
The European Spallation Source
The European Spallation Source
September 2015 – September 2017 Contractual obligations fulfilled & project on schedule and budget GA approval for both years 1st periodic report ‘approved’
Daresbury ESS In-Kind Contributions
THE STATE OF BEAM DIAGNOSTICS
Work Package 3 „Cooperation“
European Spallation Source ERIC Procurement
Elettra – Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A.
CNRS contribution to ESS – 01/02/17
IKCA CEA Technical ANNEXES Follow up 18th DECEMBER 2015.
RF introduction Anders Sunesson RF group leader
AMICI WP5 INDUSTRIALIZATION
Status & Schedule for ESS TS2
Charge and Agenda of the 18th TAC meeting
General Overview of WP 12 ESS Vacuum System
IKC in operations and potentials for co-creation
Presentation transcript:

H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 1 The In-Kind Process at ESS Håkan Danared Lund, 15 October 2014

H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 2 In-kind Contributions An in-kind contribution is by definition a non-cash contribution by a member country to ESS It can be in the form of: Technical components for the facility (also personnel needed to perform the testing, installation and/or integration) R&D work (also personnel needed to perform the work) Personnel made available for specific tasks during the construction phase Other products and services relevant for the completion of the facility ESS being a “green-field organization at a green-field site”, it would not be possible to build the ESS accelerator in-house. Instead we must rely on our collaboration partners to design, build and deliver most of the components.

H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 3 Target station 154 M€ Accelerator 522 M€ NSS/Instruments 350 M€ In-kind Cash Total construction cost: billion € From G. Nemeth ESS In-kind Contributions Potential

H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 4 Suitable in-kind contributions are defined by ESS Programme Plan Values laid down in the cost-book Each IKC is subject to a written contract between ESS and delivering partner Each contract to follow a fixed structure The delivering party is wholly responsible for the contribution (technical, financial, commercial perspective) In-Kind Review Committee to evaluate and recommend all IKC contract proposals ESS Council to approve all in-kind contracts Based on final approval Member Country gets accredited the value of the contract From G. Nemeth General Principles

H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 5 1 Agreement (General Terms and Conditions) Signed only once with each partner 1 Agreement (General Terms and Conditions) Signed only once with each partner 1. Agreement (General Terms and Conditions) 2. Framework for handling in-kind contributions 1. Agreement (General Terms and Conditions) 2. Framework for handling in-kind contributions STC approved STC approved 1 Agreement (General Terms and Conditions) Added separately for each WP/WU 1 Agreement (General Terms and Conditions) Added separately for each WP/WU 3. Schedule (Technical Annex) IKRC reviewed IKRC reviewed IKC Agreement with 3 sections Contract Structure From G. Nemeth

H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 6 Cost, Scope, Schedule ESS Cost Book ACCSYS Requirements Level 1 ACCSYS High Level Master Schedule Deliverables within a technical appendix defined, as usual, by cost, scope and schedule

H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 7 In-Kind Potential for Accelerator WBS items can bedivided into four catogories: Planned IKC: Partners have been identified and technical and/or contractual discussions are taking place Planned cash contributions: Partner have been identified as for true IKC, but they are in countries that provide cash to ESS, such as host states. Potential IKC: Items that could be IKC but where no partner is identified. These are mainly large commercial items where financial risk is larger than academic interest. Not IKC: Items not suitable for IKC. A major task during the coming year is to convert ”planned” (and if possible ”potential”) contributions into ”agreed”. Not IKC, 22% Planned IKC, 47% Potential IKC, 29% Cash ”IKC”, 2%

H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 8 Collaboration Partners Discussions going on with 22 organizations. Out of these, 16 could deliver in-kind contributions, while 6 are from the host countries of from countries proposing cash contributions. CEA CNRS Cockcroft Inst Daresbury Lab Elettra ESS-Bilbao Huddersfield Univ IFJ PAN Cash in-kind Aarhus Univ DESY GSI/FAIR Lund Univ PSI Uppsala Univ INFN Catania INFN Legnaro INFN Milan NCBJ RAL Tallinn UT Warsaw UT Wroclaw UT True in-kind Discussions relating to cryomodules: CEA: Elliptical cavities, cryomodules CNRS: Spoke cavities, cryomodules Daresbury Lab: Elliptical cavity procurement and tests DESY: Nb testing (?) IFJ PAN: Installations INFN Milan: Elliptical cavities prototyping, production follow-up (?) Uppsala Univ: Spoke testing