1 IMPACT: Benchmarking Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN Space-Charge Collaboration Meeting, May 20-21, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Advertisements

Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
Helmholtz International Center for Oliver Boine-Frankenheim GSI mbH and TU Darmstadt/TEMF FAIR accelerator theory (FAIR-AT) division Helmholtz International.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
SIMULATION PROGRESS AND PLANS AT ROSTOCK/DESY Aleksandar Markovic ECL2, CERN, March 1, 2007 Gisela Pöplau.
Magnetic Compression of High Brightness Beams: Survey of Experimental Results Scott G. Anderson ICFA Sardinia July 2002.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
1 IMPACT-Z and IMPACT-T: Code Improvements and Applications Ji Qiang Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration.
SciDAC Accelerator Simulation project: FNAL Booster modeling, status and plans Robert D. Ryne, P. Spentzouris.
PTC ½ day – Experience in PS2 and SPS H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou.
1 Tracking code development for FFAGs S. Machida ASTeC/RAL 21 October, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Oliver Boine-FrankenheimSIS100-4: High current beam dynamics studies SIS 100 ‘high current’ design challenges o Beam loss in SIS 100 needs to be carefully.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
1 BeamBeam3D: Code Improvements and Applications Ji Qiang Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Beam-Beam Simulations for RHIC and LHC J. Qiang, LBNL Mini-Workshop on Beam-Beam Compensation July 2-4, 2007, SLAC, Menlo Park, California.
IRPSS: A Green’s Function Approach to Modeling Photoinjectors Mark Hess Indiana University Cyclotron Facility & Physics Department *Supported by NSF and.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Status of Space-Charge Simulations with MADX Valery KAPIN ITEP & MEPhI, Moscow GSI, 19-Feb-2009
Advanced Modeling of a Next Generation Light Source Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Oct. 3, 2013.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 MaryLie/IMPACT: Status and Future Plans Robert D. Ryne Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration.
Recent Upgrades to BBSIM Code V. H. Ranjbar † † Tech-X Corporation We have made several improvements to BBSIM, a parallel beam dynamics simulation code.
 Advanced Accelerator Simulation Panagiotis Spentzouris Fermilab Computing Division (member of the SciDAC AST project)
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
M.E. Biagini, M. Boscolo, T. Demma (INFN-LNF) A. Chao, M.T.F. Pivi (SLAC). Status of Multi-particle simulation of INFN.
IMPACT-T - A 3D Parallel Beam Dynamics Code for Modeling High Brightness Beams in Photo-Injectors Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Work performed.
Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS S. Persichelli.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang US LARP CM12 Collaboration Meeting Napa Valley, April 8-10, 2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
FNAL 8 GeV SC linac / HINS Beam Dynamics Jean-Paul Carneiro FNAL Accelerator Physics Center Peter N. Ostroumov, Brahim Mustapha ANL March 13 th, 2009.
Collimator wakefields - G.Kurevlev Manchester 1 Collimator wake-fields Wake fields in collimators General information Types of wake potentials.
Simplified Modeling of Space Charge Losses in Booster at Injection Alexander Valishev June 17, 2015.
Simulation of resonances and beam loss for the J-PARC Main Ring Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) Etienne Forest (KEK) for the ICFA HB08 Workshop ICFA HB08.
DEVELOPMENT OF A STEADY STATE SIMULATION CODE FOR KLYSTRONS
PTC-ORBIT code for CERN machines (PSB, PS, SPS) Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) Etienne Forest (KEK) Group meeting, CERN June 1, 2011 current status …
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Sabrina Appel | PBBP11 March GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Tracking simulations.
1 Limits of Beam-Beam Interactions Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Joint EIC2006 & Hot QCD Workshop, BNL, July
Benchmark and Study of PSR Longitudinal Beam Dynamics Sarah M. Cousineau, Jeffrey A. Holmes, Slava Danilov MAP Workshop March 18, 2004.
Space Charge with PyHEADTAIL and PyPIC on the GPU Stefan Hegglin and Adrian Oeftiger Space Charge Working Group meeting –
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL ORBIT J. A. HolmesORNL FNAL: September 11, 2001.
Six-dimensional weak-strong simulations of head-on compensation in RHIC Y. Luo, W. Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA ICFA Mini-workshop on Beam-Beam.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Principle of Wire Compensation Theory and Simulations Simulations and Experiments The Tevatron operates with 36 proton bunches and 36 anti-proton bunches.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Will Stem Resonant Excitation of Envelope Modes as an Emittance Diagnostic in High-Intensity Circular Accelerators.
1 Strong-Strong Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 3 rd JLEIC Collaboration Meeting March 31 st, Jlab 2016.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Parametric Resonance Ionization Cooling of Muons
402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Sabrina Appel, GSI, Beam physics Space charge workshop 2013, CERN
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
SC Overview 2013 White & Rouge The Codes in Comparison The Noise Issue
Candidato: Nicolò Biancacci
IMPACT Simulation of the Montague Resonance at PS
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
Alejandro Castilla CASA/CAS-ODU
Beam-beam Studies, Tool Development and Tests
Presentation transcript:

1 IMPACT: Benchmarking Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN Space-Charge Collaboration Meeting, May 20-21, 2014

2 IMPACT-Z: parallel PIC code (z-code) IMPACT-T: parallel PIC code (t-code) Envelope code, pre- and post-processors,… Key Features —Detailed RF accelerating and focusing model, beam line elements of Linacs and Rings —Multiple 3D Poisson solvers Variety of boundary conditions: transverse round/rectangular, longitudinal open/periodic, … 3D shifted-integrated Green Function —Multi-charge states, multi-bunches —Machine error studies and steering —Wakefields —CSR/ISR —Gas ionization IMPACT has been used by researchers at more than 30 institutes and universities IMPACT Code Suite: Integrated Map and Particle ACcelerator Tracking

3 Particle-In-Cell Simulation with Split-Operator Method Advance positions & momenta a half step using H ext Advance momenta using H space charge  Field solution on grid  Charge deposition on grid  Field interpolation at particle positions Setup and solve Poisson equation for space-charge fields. Initialize particles (optional) diagnostics Advance positions & momenta a half step using H ext Rapidly varying s-dependence of external fields is decoupled from slowly varying space charge fields Leads to very efficient particle advance: –Do not take tiny steps to push millions - billions of particles –Do take tiny steps to compute maps; then push particles w/ maps

4 IMPACT-Z for Space-Charge Study in Ring ( fully 6D symplectic tracking) Drift – exact solution Combined function bend – direct symplectic integrator Quadrupole – direct symplectic integrator RF cavity – thin lens kick Nonlinear Multipoles – thin lens kick Space-charge forces– lumped thin lens kick

5 An Example: Symlectic Tracking through a Combined Function Bend Exact solution for H 1 Transfer map for one step: Ref: E. Forest, Beam Dynamics: A New Attitude and Framework, 1998.

6 Transverse irregular pipe FFT based Green function method: Standard Green function: low aspect ratio beam Shifted Green function: separated particle and field domain Integrated Green function: large aspect ratio beam Non-uniform grid Green function: 2D radial non-uniform beam Spectral-finite difference method: Multigrid spectral-finite difference method: Fully open boundary conditions Partially open boundary Transverse regular pipe with longitudinal open Transverse irregular pipe Different Boundary/Beam Conditions Need Different Efficient Numerical Algorithms O(Nlog(N)) or O(N) J. Qiang, S. Paret, “Poisson solvers for self-consistent multiparticle simulations,” ICFA Mini-Workshop on Beam-Beam Effects in Hadron Colliders, March 18-22, 2013.

7 Green Function Solution of Poisson’s Equation (I) (open boundary conditions) ; r = (x, y,z) Direct summation of the convolution scales as N 2 !!!! N – total number of grid points FFT based Hockney’s Algorithm /zero padding:- scales as (2N)log(2N) - Ref: Hockney and Easwood, Computer Simulation using Particles, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, This is NOT a spectral solver!

8 Comparison between the IG and SG for a beam with aspect ratio of 30 Integrated Green’s function is needed for modeling large aspect ratio beams! integrated Green functionstandard Green function R. D. Ryne, ICFA Beam DynamicsMini Workshop on Space Charge Simulation, Trinity College, Oxford, 2003 J. Qiang, S. Lidia, R. D. Ryne, and C. Limborg-Deprey, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, vol 9, (2006). (O(N log N)) With integrated Green’s function Integrated Green Function Method (II) (large aspect ratio beam with open b oundary conditions)

9 3D Poisson Solver with Transverse Rectangular Pipe (I) (Spectral-Finite Difference Method) J. Qiang, and R. Ryne, Comput. Phys. Comm. 138, p. 18 (2001). Numerical Solutions vs. Analytical Solutions z (m)

10 3D Poisson Solver with Transverse Rectangular Pipe (II) (Spectral-Green Function Method and 3D Spectral Method) Green function method: - efficiently handle long bunch spectral method: -reduce numerical noise with filtering in frequency domain J. Qiang, in progress (2014). Hermite polynomial H n :

11 R. Ryne, arXiv :1111, 4971, D Poisson Solver with Transverse Rectangular Pipe (III) (Green Function Method) Pro: computational domain needs to contain only the beam itself. Con: more numerical operations for Green function evaluation.

12 SIS-18 Benchmark

13 Benchmark Step 1: Single Particle Phase Space Qx = 4.338, Qy = 3.2 IMPACT All three codes show very close phase space topology.

14 Parameters for step 9: - Qx = , Qy = RF cavity voltage: 152 V - RF frequency: MHz - X aperture : 40 cm - Y aperture: 30 cm

15 For a given particle phase space coordinate: where M is the one-turn transfer matrixafter one turn through the ring after one turn: For an envelope matched beam: where N is the normal form matrixLet: For the given emittances in the phase space coordinate, one can find the corresponding emittances in the normal coordinates to generate a matched beam distribution. Define a second order moments matrix of the distribution: Generate Initial Matched Beam Distribution (Normal Form Transformation)

16 Evolution of RMS Beam Sizes with the Initial Matched Distribution (no space-charge)

17 Numerical Test of Convergence: Evolution of RMS Beam Emittances (1) (with space-charge) XY Z

18 Numerical Test of Convergence: Evolution of RMS Beam Emittances (II) (with space-charge) Transverse Longitudinal

19 Evolution of RMS Beam Emittances: Different Beam Intensity XY Z

20 Evolution of RMS Bunch Length: Different Beam Intensity

21 Physical parameters: RF frequency = 3.5 MHz RF voltage = 27 kV Ek = 1.4 GeV Emit_x = 7.5 mm-mrad Emit_y = 2.5 mm-mrad Rms bunch length = 45 ns Rms dp/p = 1.7 x Horizontal tune: 6.15 – Vertical tune: 6.21 Synchrotron period: 1.5 ms Half Aperture = 7cm x 3.5cm I = 1.0x An Application Example: PS Montague Resonace Refs: B. W. Montague, CERN-Report No , CERN, E. Metral et al., Proc. of EPAC 2004, p I. Hofmann et al., Proc. of EPAC 2004, p

22 Evolution of Transverse RMS Emittances: Different Tunes Simulation measurements (6.15,6.21) (6.20,6.21)

23 Thank You for Your Attention!