Harmonisation activity: Proposal for Standard methods Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The European Eutrophication Activity and the UWWT and Nitrate Directives Ana Cristina Cardoso.
Advertisements

Intercalibration of assessment systems for the WFD: Aims, achievements and further challenges Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute.
Invertebrate Standards in Rivers Paul Logan. Existing CEN standards relating to the ecological assessment of freshwaters - TG1 - invertebrates Quality.
CEN TC 230 WG2 “Biological Methods” Work Programme October 2008.
Lake Windermere Roger Sweeting Freshwater Biological Association Windermere, UK Brussels: 31 st Jan – 1 st Feb 2006.
Indicators to communicate progress towards good status WG DIS, April 2015.
Resolution 147 (Vienna-2) WG 2 welcomes the proposal for future standardisation activities and collaboration between CEN, DG Environment and ECOSTAT and.
RIVER HYDROMORPHOLOGY
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 4-5 MARCH 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Progress Report Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso Joint Research Centre.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 7-8 July 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Status Report AC Cardoso and A Solimini Harmonisation Task Team: JRC.
ECOSTAT WG2A meeting 7-8 October 2004 Eutrophication Activity Status report Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso.
WG 2A ECOSTAT Meeting 4-5 March 2004 Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT summary Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
Invertebrate Standards and Lakes Paul Logan. Existing CEN standards relating to the ecological assessment of freshwaters - TG1 - invertebrates Quality.
CEN TC 230 WG2 “Biological Methods” Work Programme April 2010.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
Updating the intercalibration process guidance Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive Working Group A ECOSTAT Ecological Status 7th Meeting Stresa, Lago Maggiore, Italy
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
CEN TC 230 WG2 “Biological and Ecological Methods” Implications for Annex V ECOSTAT Oct 2012 Paul Logan.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Objectives & Agenda of the meeting March 2005
Strategic Coordination Group Eutrophication Guidance
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
USING ALIEN SPECIES DATA FOR THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
Task on harmonization WFD Annex V 1.3.6
WG 2.9 Best Practices in River Basin Planning
Harmonisation Activity Progress report
WG 2.5 Intercalibration.
Author: DG Environment Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Introduction & objectives Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The Institute.
Drafting group Mixing Zones
Draft Mandate and Proposed Approach for the Drafting Group on
Meeting of Water Directors Eutrophication Guidance
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
IC manual: what and why Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
Activities of WG A Ecological Status
Main blocks of discussion
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2009
Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005
WG 2.9 Best Practices in River Basin Planning
Harmonisation Ecostat 2014
Working Group A ECOSTAT progress report on Intercalibration Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 2013 – 2015 Tasks and Deliverables
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WG 2.9 Best Practices in River Basin Planning
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Guidelines to translate the intercalibration results into the national classification systems and to derive reference conditions Presented by Wouter.
Lake Intercalibration – IC Decision Annexes + what to do in future
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Activity on Eutrophication
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
Reporting template for milestone reports
EU Water Framework Directive
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Lake Windermere THE STANDARDISATION PROCESS IN CEN Roger Sweeting
EU Water Framework Directive
EU Water Framework Directive
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Presentation transcript:

Harmonisation activity: Proposal for Standard methods Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability

Mandate for ECOSTAT  Task 2 : Harmonisation/Standardization  Proposal with methods for amendment of Annex V of the Directive (2011)

Background: WFD Annex V Standards for monitoring of quality elements: Methods used for the monitoring shall conform to the international standards listed below …

List of Standard methods ?  Only Macroinvertebrate sampling   Outdated or will be outdated soon

List of Standard methods ?  Urgent need to revise the list !  Incomplete and outdated

How to revise the list ?  Technical adaptations – Art.20 ,,, section of Annex V may be adapted to scientific and technical progress in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 21

CEN: Information on methods Title, contents, scope ECOSTAT WG leads Initial proposal Consultation with BQE and GIG leads Interim proposal Consultation with ECOSTAT Final proposal

CEN: Information on methods Title, scope ECOSTAT WG leads Initial proposal Consultation with BQE and GIG leads Interim proposal Consultation with ECOSTAT Final proposal  December 2011  January 2011  March 2011  April 2011

 What information we need for choosing the standards ?  At this moment available: –Title –Contents –Scope

Guidance on the selection of sampling methods and devices for benthic macroinvertebrates in freshwaters  This document describes the selection of sampling devices and methods used to evaluate benthic macroinvertebrate populations in freshwaters (rivers, canals, lakes and reservoirs).  The devices and methods considered in this standard are suitable for sampling all major components of the benthic assemblage. They are not suitable for sampling meio-fauna.

Introduction 1Scope 2Normative references 3Terms and definitions 4Principle 5Survey objectives and sampling programmes 6Benthic macroinvertebrates sampling methods/devices 7 Bibliography Figure 1 — A rectangular handnet Figure 2 — Schematic diagram for a suber sampler frame Figure 3 — A schematic diagram of a box sampler Figure 4 — Cylinder sampler Figure 5 — Naturalist's dredge Figure 6 — Ekman-Birge Grab Figure 7 — Ponar grab Figure Van Veen Grab Figure 9 -- Polyp Sampler Figure 10 — Air lift sampler Figure Tube sampler Figure Tube sampler Figure 13-- Tube sampler Figure Jenkin surface-mud sampler Figure 15-- Colonisation Unit

Water quality – Guidance standard for surveying of aquatic macrophytes in running waters  Topic of guidance This guidance defines a method for surveying aquatic macrophytes in rivers for assessing ecological status of river reaches  Water category relevance Rivers, including side channels and oxbows  Type data collected Semi-quantitative data based on a descriptor scale with visual estimates of species composition and abundance suitable for classification and monitoring of environmental conditions

CEN: Information on methods Title, scope, contents ECOSTAT WG leads Initial proposal Consultation with BQE and GIG leads Interim proposal Consultation with ECOSTAT Final proposal  December 2011  January 2011  March 2011  April 2011