Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Booster Cogging Robert Zwaska Fermilab (University of Texas at Austin) Accelerator Physics & Technology Seminar Dec. 8, 2005.
Advertisements

Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
REPHASING TESTS DURING THE TWO BEAM IMPEDANCE MD P. Baudrenghien, J. Noirjean, T. Mastoridis 10/26/2012LSWG meeting 1 Oct 7 th,18:00 – Oct 8 th, 04:00.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Digital Filter Mode Switch Closed Orbit Mode Fast Abort Buffer Slow Abort Buffer Profile Frame Buffer Display Frame Buffer - Switch activated every 2ms.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Key Specifications for Tevatron BPM Hardware Architecture Choices Jim Steimel.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
1 Electron Cloud Measurements at the Fermilab Main Injector Bob Zwaska Fermilab ECloud07 Workshop April 9, 2007.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
1 NuMI BEAM POSITION MONITOR via MAIN INJECTOR, and RECYCLER Brajesh Choudhary, 06.Mar.2003 MINOS Collaboration Meeting University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Antiproton Source Capabilities and Issues Keith Gollwitzer & Valeri Lebedev Accelerator Division Fermilab 1.
Getting Beam to NuMI (It’s a worry!) Peter Kasper.
1 FermiLab Recycler Ring BPM Upgrade Based on Digital Receiver Technology R. Webber, J. Crisp, P. Prieto, D. Voy, C. Breigel, C. McClure, M. Mengel, S.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
SNuMI (>1MW) SNuMI 1 Motivations for SNuMI The neutrino experimental program for the next decade –NOνA (long baseline νμ→νe search) –MINERνA (Main Injector.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the hardware components of the upgraded Main Injector BPM system. The figure shows 2 signal channels which produce one position.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Proton Study Meeting 4/19/05 Eric Prebys 1 Proton Plan Stage I Eric Prebys.
F 1 MW Proton Beam for Neutrinos Dave McGinnis AAC Meeting May 10, 2006.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Diagnostics in the Fermilab Proton Source (Linac + Booster) Eric Prebys FNAL Beams Division.
Booster Cogging Bob Zwaska University of Texas at Austin Bill Pellico FNAL.
The Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Front-End Software Luciano Piccoli, Stephen Foulkes, Margaret Votava and Charles Briegel Fermi National Accelerator.
S. Pordes - to part of CD 09/10/031 Introduction to some Beams Division jargon in some order…see how far we get:
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Beam Line BPM Filter Module Nathan Eddy May 31, 2005.
MI primer for NuMI users  Getting beam  TLG modules  Timelines  Beam intensity  NuMI kickers  Extraction bumps and last turn positions  Batch positions.
Fermilab February 17, 2003Recycler BPM Front-end1 Duane C. Voy
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
MI 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MAIN INJECTOR & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs INCLUDING THE NuMI BEAM LINE Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
IPM EM Simulations 9 th DITANET Topical Workshop on Non-Invasive Beam Size Measurement for High Brightness Proton and Heavy Ion Accelerators April.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Simultaneous Position Measurements of Protons and Anti-Protons in the Tevatron R. K. Kutschke †, J. Steimel, R.Webber, S. Wolbers, Fermilab*, Batavia,
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Proton Source Improvement Workshop Cogging W. Pellico Dec 6&
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
Status of the Accelerator Complex Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Accelerator Division Fermilab 2009 Fermilab Users’ Meeting.
Bunch Numbering P. Baudrenghien AB/RF for the LHC/RF team.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
F Possible Proton Capabilities at Fermilab Dave McGinnis April 16, 2007.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Overview of Project X ICD and RD&D Plans David Neuffer material from Paul Derwent & Sergei Nagaitsev (AAC Meeting, February 3, 2009)
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Ioanis Kourbanis 01/23/13 RR AIP 1. Requirements Provide proton beam with the proper time structure from the Recycler to the muon campus for the g-2/mu2e.
Low-Emittance Tuning at CesrTA Jim Shanks Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2.
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation
Presentation transcript:

Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The beam energy can vary between 8.9 GeV to 150 GeV. The time structure of the beam can be:  53 MHz  Protons. From 1 bunch up to a full batch of 84 bunches in successive 53 MHz buckets (19ns apart). The 95% bunch length varies between 1 ns, at transition and at 120 GeV after bunch rotation for anti-proton stacking, to 10 ns for single coalesced bunches. Up to 6 batches, each one of 84 bunches, can be loaded in the MI for anti-proton production and in support of NuMI.  Anti-protons. Anti-protons are currently accelerated using 53 MHz RF cavities from 8.9 GeV to 150 GeV. With the implementation of the 2.5 MHz acceleration scheme up to 27 GeV, anti-protons would be accelerated in 53 MHz bunches from 27 GeV to 150 GeV. Four consecutive groups of antiprotons, spaced by 396 ns, of typically 5 (up to 9) 53 MHz bunches, are present in MI.

Beam time structures 2  2.5 MHz - Protons or anti-protons  Anti-protons transfers from the Accumulator and transfers to or from the Recycler Ring instead happen in four 2.5 MHz bunches in successive 2.5 MHz RF buckets (396 ns spacing). 95% bunch lengths range from 100 to 200 ns at 8GeV. With the implementation of 2.5 MHz anti-proton acceleration, bunch lengths will shrink down to 40 ns at 27 GeV

Protons for anti-proton stacking and fixed-target Protons for Tevatron tune-up Proton transfers for collider operation

Anti-proton transfers from Accumulator/Recycler Ring Anti-proton transfers to the Tevatron

Measurements Specifications 1  The upgraded BPM system will provide a position measurement of the beam present in the machine for each one of the operating modes described above. In particular the system should be capable of measuring beam positions with 6 batches loaded in the MI, however spaced.  The upgraded BPM system will also provide a beam intensity measurement from the magnitude of the sum of the plate signals for each BPM. This measurement will provide a “relative” intensity measurement between different BPMs. BPM-to-BPM scaling capability should be incorporated in the system to equalize the response of the different BPMs.  It is understood that during particular RF manipulations of the beam, like slip- stacking and coalescing, with no steady defined RF structure, the BPM system might not report sensible data.

Measurements Specifications 2  The system will operate in both narrow and high bandwidth mode.  Narrow bandwidth will be used for measurements that do not need single turn resolution and represent a single ensemble position measurement of the beam present in the machine averaged over many turns (100 turns or more).  High bandwidth is needed for measurements that require single turn resolution.  The system will need to be switched between narrow and high bandwidth operations in a given cycle with a minimum interruption in data acquisition (less than ~ 10 ms).

Measurements Specifications 3  For 2.5 MHz anti-proton transfers the system will provide a single ensemble position measurement of the beam present in the machine. No bunch-by-bunch position measurement is required in this case.  For 53 MHz multi-batch operation the system should be able to provide, if requested, a batch-by-batch measurement. The batch-by-batch measurements are only possible in high bandwidth mode and will measure one batch at a time.  The system must be able to provide first injection turn and last extraction turn for each portion of beam injected or extracted from the machine. It has to be able to cope with multiple beam injection/extraction regions and with opposite circulating directions of protons and anti-protons in the machine.  If there are multiple injections in the same cycle, the system must provide the capability to measure the first turn for each portion of beam injected in the machine. Successive injections from the Booster happen at a maximum rate of 15 Hz.  If there are multiple single turn extractions in the same cycle, the system must provide the capability to measure the extraction turn of at least one portion of beam extracted from the machine.

Measurement Definitions  Measurement range. This is defined as the range of positions, relative to the BPM center, over which the BPM measurement must be valid and meet the accuracy requirements.  Absolute position accuracy. This determines how well the position of the beam is measured with respect to the survey center-line. This is limited by a number of factors including alignment, calibration, cable attenuation and noise  Relative position accuracy. This determines how well the displacement of the beam is measured over the measurement range. This requirement does not include offset errors, but does set limits on the scale errors, non-linearities and random errors  Position resolution. This is a requirement on the smallest change in beam position that the BPM can reliably measure.  Position linearity. This is a requirement on the linearity of the BPM response to orbit changes over the measurement range. The linearity is defined as the difference between the measured BPM position and the slope of the BPM response at the center of the BPM.  Long-term position stability. This is a requirement on the BPM system ability to give the same position value for the same beam position and intensity over time.  Relative intensity accuracy. This is a requirement on the relative intensity measurements between BPMs. It is understood that during the acceleration cycle there will be, for a given BPM, apparent variations of beam intensity due to changes in bunch widths.

Measurement Types  Flash Frame: A single turn orbit measurement, performed in high bandwidth mode, associated with injection or extraction of beam.  Turn-by-turn: A measurement of the orbit on every turn ( MHz RF buckets) for a specified number of turns, performed in high bandwidth mode.  Averaged orbit: An average of a specified number of turn-by-turn measurements.  Display Frame: A narrow bandwidth measurement triggered by the display frame TCLK ($7B). This measurement occurs once per cycle.  Profile frame: A narrow bandwidth measurement triggered by the profile frame TCLK ($7A). This measurement can occur up to 128 times per cycle.  Fast time plot (FTP): a narrow bandwidth measurement taken at least at 500 Hz. FTP measurements for all channels in parallel must be supported.

Acquisition Specifications  Each Main Injector cycle is uniquely identified by a machine state. This state information is transmitted on the MDAT system and is valid at the TCLK reset for the main ramp. Each state must have a unique set of readout specifications that is re- configurable by the end-user.  Injections and extractions for the Main Injector are identified by Beam Sync clock events. The BPM system must be able to collect data based on these events as defined in the state acquisition specification.  The BPM system will be directed (via the acquisition specifications) to take turn- by-turn measurements for particle injection and extraction, triggered by the relevant Beam Sync Clock event. The system must support 512 turns for each measurement. The specific turn with actual injection or extraction must occur in the corresponding dataset and the BPM system must identify the data for the first or last turn in the set.  The BPMs must provide the capability for turn-by-turn measurement at a user specified time with 2048 turns.  When in high bandwidth mode, it would be desirable, for debugging purposes, if the system would be able to respond to a self-trigger, based on beam over threshold, instead of using hard timing controls.