Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 EUROPEAN REGULATORS’ VIEWS ON REGULATING SMART DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS Authors - Gareth Evans (Ofgem), Riccardo Vailati(AEEG), Karstein Brekke(NVE), Werner Friedl(E-Control), Hugo Schotman(Energiekamer NMa), Matthias Steiner(E-Control), Math Bollen(EI), Tahir Kapetanovic(E-Control), Ferruccio Villa(AEEG) Presented by Gareth Evans, Head of Profession - Engineering, Ofgem
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Consultation objectives Role of the Regulator Regulatory priorities Conclusions and recommendations Further work Gareth Evans – GB – Session 6 – Paper ID 0978 Presentation – Key Issues
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Collect the views of all stakeholders to assist regulators in understanding how smart grids can benefit network users Explore ways in which smart grids deployment, where cost effective, can be encouraged Gareth Evans – GB – Session 6 – Paper ID 0978 Consultation objectives ERGEG “Position Paper on Smart Grids” published 10 June 2010
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Technology neutral Smart grids are a means to an end not an end in themselves Better value for customers, including indirect benefits Key facilitator, identifying and removing barriers – finding solutions that balance all stakeholders’ positions Gareth Evans – GB – Session 6 – Paper ID 0978 Role of the Regulator
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June Focus on the performance of network companies in terms of the outputs delivered; 2. Encourage innovation while protecting consumers’ interests; and 3. Encourage co-operation amongst stakeholders, with special care to standardisation and to identify possible barriers to smart grid deployment. Gareth Evans – GB – Session 6 – Paper ID 0978 Regulatory priorities Three main priorities identified
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Conclusions from the Position Paper* Significant challenge Better understanding of smart grids needed Clarity of stakeholder roles/responsibilities Significant number of stakeholders want a step change in activity Attention to encouragement of innovation Focus on regulation of outputs/performance Development of cost/benefit analysis vital Stakeholders co-operate to address barriers * Summarised text
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Recommendations* (1) R-1: Ensure regulatory stability and reasonable rate of return for grid investments R-2: Consider decoupling between grid operators’ profits and volumes of electricity they deliver R-3: Pursue regulation of outputs as a mechanism to ensure value for money paid by network users R-4: Promote improved awareness of consumers about their electricity use and market opportunities and an improved engagement of network operators with their network users R-5: Encourage deployment of smart grid solutions, where they are cost- efficient and find ways of incentivising innovative network solutions where beneficial * Summarised text
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Recommendations* (2) R-6: Evaluate costs and benefits of demonstration projects and to take decisions/provide advice based on societal cost-benefit assessment R-7: Ensure public dissemination of results/lessons learned from demonstration projects (co-)financed by grid tariffs or from public funds R-8: Participate in ‘smart grids’ discussions and cooperation activities among stakeholders and especially to achieve interoperability of smart grid devices and systems R-9: Clarify the difference between regulated grid activities and market opportunities for new services under a competitive regime R-10: NRAs to continue to exchange expertise at European level, in order to learn as soon as possible from best regulatory practices. * Summarised text
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Work is currently underway to collect more detailed views and information from Regulators relating to smart grids A report summarising this process is planned to be published later this year. Gareth Evans – GB – Session 6 – Paper ID 0978 Further work
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Gareth Evans – GB – Session 6 – Paper ID 0978 Thank you for your attention