1 Coverage Density as a Dominant Property of Large-Scale Sensor Networks Osher Yadgar & Sarit Kraus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
高度情報化社会を支えるネットワーキング技術 (大阪大学 工学部説明会資料)
Advertisements

Presented by: Richard Wood. Goals and strategies Methods Performance evaluation Performance improvements Remaining Challenges.
Continuous Estimation in WLAN Positioning By Tilen Ma Clarence Fung.
Modeling Maze Navigation Consider the case of a stationary robot and a mobile robot moving towards a goal in a maze. We can model the utility of sharing.
Bidding Protocols for Deploying Mobile Sensors Reporter: Po-Chung Shih Computer Science and Information Engineering Department Fu-Jen Catholic University.
Agent-based sensor-mission assignment for tasks sharing assets Thao Le Timothy J Norman WambertoVasconcelos
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 12 Methods of parametric estimation.
A Distributed Indoor Navigation System Leaving the Trails Thomas Wießflecker Terena Networking Conference 2009.
Coverage Estimation in Heterogeneous Visual Sensor Networks Mahmut Karakaya and Hairong Qi Advanced Imaging & Collaborative Information Processing Laboratory.
Generated Waypoint Efficiency: The efficiency considered here is defined as follows: As can be seen from the graph, for the obstruction radius values (200,
1.2.2 Geographical Targeting of Poverty Alleviation Programs 1 MEASUREMENT AND POVERTY MAPPING UPA Package 1, Module 2.
KAIST Adaptive Triangular Deployment Algorithm for Unattended Mobile Sensor Networks Suho Yang (September 4, 2008) Ming Ma, Yuanyuan Yang IEEE Transactions.
Module F: Simulation. Introduction What: Simulation Where: To duplicate the features, appearance, and characteristics of a real system Why: To estimate.
The Cat and The Mouse -- The Case of Mobile Sensors and Targets David K. Y. Yau Lab for Advanced Network Systems Dept of Computer Science Purdue University.
1 Prediction-based Strategies for Energy Saving in Object Tracking Sensor Networks Yingqi Xu, Wang-Chien Lee Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International.
Decentralised Coordination of Mobile Sensors using the Max-Sum Algorithm School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton {rs06r2,
Mobility Improves Coverage of Sensor Networks Benyuan Liu*, Peter Brass, Olivier Dousse, Philippe Nain, Don Towsley * Department of Computer Science University.
Presenter : Shih-Tung Huang Tsung-Cheng Lin Kuan-Fu Kuo 2015/6/15 EICE team Model-Level Debugging of Embedded Real-Time Systems Wolfgang Haberl, Markus.
2015/6/161 Traffic Flow Theory 2. Traffic Stream Characteristics.
Wireless Distributed Sensor Challenge Problem: Demo of Physical Modelling Approach Bart Selman, Carla Gomes, Scott Kirkpatrick, Ramon Bejar, Bhaskar Krishnamachari,
Location Systems for Ubiquitous Computing Jeffrey Hightower and Gaetano Borriello.
Statistical Background
Jana van Greunen - 228a1 Analysis of Localization Algorithms for Sensor Networks Jana van Greunen.
Applications of agent technology in communications: a review S. S. Manvi &P. Venkataram Presented by Du-Shiau Tsai Computer Communications, Volume 27,
Impact of Different Mobility Models on Connectivity Probability of a Wireless Ad Hoc Network Tatiana K. Madsen, Frank H.P. Fitzek, Ramjee Prasad [tatiana.
Exposure In Wireless Ad-Hoc Sensor Networks S. Megerian, F. Koushanfar, G. Qu, G. Veltri, M. Potkonjak ACM SIG MOBILE 2001 (Mobicom) Journal version: S.
THE SECOND LIFE OF A SENSOR: INTEGRATING REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE IN VIRTUAL WORLDS USING MOBILE PHONES Sherrin George & Reena Rajan.
Speed and Direction Prediction- based localization for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks Imane BENKHELIFA and Samira MOUSSAOUI Computer Science Department.
Decentralised Coordination of Mobile Sensors School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Ruben Stranders,
Extracting Places and Activities from GPS Traces Using Hierarchical Conditional Random Fields Yong-Joong Kim Dept. of Computer Science Yonsei.
Abstract Introduction Results and Discussions James Kasson  (Dr. Bruce W.N. Lo)  Information Systems  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire In a world.
Sensor Positioning in Wireless Ad-hoc Sensor Networks Using Multidimensional Scaling Xiang Ji and Hongyuan Zha Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,
Demo. Overview Overall the project has two main goals: 1) Develop a method to use sensor data to determine behavior probability. 2) Use the behavior probability.
University of Ottawa - Bio 4118 – Applied Biostatistics © Antoine Morin and Scott Findlay 08/10/ :23 PM 1 Some basic statistical concepts, statistics.
Tracking with Unreliable Node Sequences Ziguo Zhong, Ting Zhu, Dan Wang and Tian He Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Infocom 2009.
DARPA TMR Program Collaborative Mobile Robots for High-Risk Urban Missions Third Quarterly IPR Meeting May 11, 1999 P. I.s: Leonidas J. Guibas and Jean-Claude.
A Hybrid Method for achieving High Accuracy and Efficiency in Object Tracking using Passive RFID Lei Yang 1, Jiannong Cao 1, Weiping Zhu 1, and Shaojie.
1 A Bidding Protocol for Deploying Mobile Sensors GuilingWang, Guohong Cao, and Tom LaPorta Department of Computer Science & Engineering The Pennsylvania.
DISCERN: Cooperative Whitespace Scanning in Practical Environments Tarun Bansal, Bo Chen and Prasun Sinha Ohio State Univeristy.
Secure Sensor Data/Information Management and Mining Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas October 2005.
for statistics based on multiple sources
1 Collaborative Processing in Sensor Networks Lecture 5 - Visual Coverage Hairong Qi, Associate Professor Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University.
1 Distributed and Optimal Motion Planning for Multiple Mobile Robots Yi Guo and Lynne Parker Center for Engineering Science Advanced Research Computer.
1 Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)5/15/2012 Advanced Radio Frequency Mapping (RadioMap) Dr. John Chapin.
Mobile Agent Migration Problem Yingyue Xu. Energy efficiency requirement of sensor networks Mobile agent computing paradigm Data fusion, distributed processing.
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
Probabilistic Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors : Nadeem Ahmed, Salil S. Kanhere, Sanjay Jha Presenter : Hyeon, Seung-Il.
A Passive Approach to Sensor Network Localization Rahul Biswas and Sebastian Thrun International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2004 Presented.
D. M. J. Tax and R. P. W. Duin. Presented by Mihajlo Grbovic Support Vector Data Description.
APL: Autonomous Passive Localization for Wireless Sensors Deployed in Road Networks IEEE INFOCOM 2008, Phoenix, AZ, USA Jaehoon Jeong, Shuo Guo, Tian He.
Chapter 2 Statistical Background. 2.3 Random Variables and Probability Distributions A variable X is said to be a random variable (rv) if for every real.
Distributed Algorithms for Multi-Robot Observation of Multiple Moving Targets Lynne E. Parker Autonomous Robots, 2002 Yousuf Ahmad Distributed Information.
Decentralized Energy- Conserving and Coverage- Preserving Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks
Behavior-based Multirobot Architectures. Why Behavior Based Control for Multi-Robot Teams? Multi-Robot control naturally grew out of single robot control.
Time-Space Trust in Networks Shunan Ma, Jingsha He and Yuqiang Zhang 1 College of Computer Science and Technology 2 School of Software Engineering.
Shibo He 、 Jiming Chen 、 Xu Li 、, Xuemin (Sherman) Shen and Youxian Sun State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Zhejiang University, China.
An Energy-Efficient Geographic Routing with Location Errors in Wireless Sensor Networks Julien Champ and Clement Saad I-SPAN 2008, Sydney (The international.
Path Planning Based on Ant Colony Algorithm and Distributed Local Navigation for Multi-Robot Systems International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.
Strong Barrier Coverage of Wireless Sensor Networks Benyuan Liu, Olivier Dousse, Jie Wang and Anwar Saipulla University of Massachusetts Lowell and Deutsche.
Efficient Placement and Dispatch of Sensors in a Wireless Sensor Network You-Chiun Wang, Chun-Chi Hu, and Yu-Chee Tseng IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.
Zijian Wang, Eyuphan Bulut, and Boleslaw K. Szymanski Center for Pervasive Computing and Networking and Department of Computer Science Rensselaer Polytechnic.
A Coverage-Preserving and Hole Tolerant Based Scheme for the Irregular Sensing Range in WSNs Azzedine Boukerche, Xin Fei PARADISE Research Lab Univeristy.
ParkNet: Drive-by Sensing of Road-Side Parking Statistics Irfan Ullah Department of Information and Communication Engineering Myongji university, Yongin,
Fundamentals of Fault-Tolerant Distributed Computing In Asynchronous Environments Paper by Felix C. Gartner Graeme Coakley COEN 317 November 23, 2003.
Mingze Zhang, Mun Choon Chan and A. L. Ananda School of Computing
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Automatic Picking of First Arrivals
Mobile Agents.
Substation Automation IT Needs
Distributed Systems and Algorithms
Presentation transcript:

1 Coverage Density as a Dominant Property of Large-Scale Sensor Networks Osher Yadgar & Sarit Kraus

2 Growing needs of Large-scale Sensor Networks i.Measure the hardness of a given large-scale sensor network problem, ii.Compare a given system to other large-scale sensor networks in order to extract a suitable solution, iii.Predict the performance of the solution, and iv.Derive the value of each system property from the desired performance of the solution, the problem constraints, and the user's preferences.

3 Large-scale Agent Systems ? i.Thousands of agents ? (Ogston 03, Turner & Jennings 00, …) ii.Hundreds of agents ? (Ortiz 04, Scerri 04, …) iii.Dozens of agents ? (Bult 04, …) iv.Sensor coverage ? (Gage 92, Batalin 02, …) Coverage Density: What is the context ? What is the problem space ? Tradeoffs: time, money, accuracy, survivorability, etc.

4 Coverage Density intuition  Coverage Density defines the time needed to cover the problem space.  There may be an overlap of agent coverage such that, for example, a value of 100% Coverage Density does not reflect coverage of all the controlled area.  Given a limited budget, the system designer should consider whether to use many cheap sensors or a small number of expensive sensors.

5 i.Let A be a set of n agents such that whereas ii.Let be the area covered by the sensor of agent at a given time t. The agent may detect objects in this area at time t. iii.Let agent coverage be the average area covered by the sensor of agent such that. iv.Let total coverage be the average area covered by the sensors of all the agents such that. v.Let Z be the size of the controlled area. vi.Coverage Density is the total coverage divided by the size of the controlled area such that. Definition of the Coverage Density

6 Using the Coverage Density  Environment: a large number of real-time tasks/objects and a large number of mobile agents in a given geographical area.  Main issues: Resource management in a large scale environment. How the agents should be distributed over the area? How agents should process local information, derived from possibly noisy sensors, to provide a partial solution? How partial solutions should be integrated into global solution?

7 ANTS (Autonomous Negotiating Teams) related challenge  Environment: Targets and Doppler sensors.  Goal: Form an information map of targets in a controlled area as a function of time.  Large scale environment  Mobility

8 Challenges  Large scale environment;  Mobile sensor Dopplers;  Real time response;  No clock synchronization;  No close cooperation between the sensors;  Limit the information exchange;  Fault tolerant;

9 Doppler sensors’ properties  A radar is based on the Doppler effect with a wide beam of 120 degrees.  Provides information only about an arc that the detected target may be located on and the velocity towards the sensor (radial velocity)  A single Doppler measurement cannot be used to establish the exact velocity  Intersection method

10

11 Organizational Structure  Hierarchic structure of groups based on geographical areas; the base level consists of the sensor Dopplers.  Each level controls the level below it. It processes the information obtained from the level below it forms an estimation of the information map of its zone reports to it group leader.

12  Entities Sampler agent Group Leader agent  Data Structures Capsule InfoMap  Goal Generate a map of targets as a function of time. Hierarchy Example

13 Hierarchy of Group Leaders Level 4: 1 Zone Group Leader Level 3: 4 Zone Group Leaders Level 2: 16 Zone Group Leaders Level 1: 64 Sampler Group Leaders

14 Simulation environment  150 computers X 4 months = 50 years of CPU  Z= 400,000,000 square meters.  There are 5,000 Sampling and 85 Group Leader agents.  Each Doppler sensor has initial random location and velocity that is up to 50 kilometers per hour.  Range of interaction: 50 meters.  Sensing time: 10 seconds.  Moving time: 5 seconds. 

15 Simulation environment  At any given time, there are 1,000 targets in the area. Each target had an initial random location on the border and an initial random velocity, with a speed limit of 50 kilometers per hour (13.9 meters per second).  Targets leave the area when reaching the boundaries of the zone. Each target that leaves the area causes a new target to appear at a new location on the border.  A target stays a random time period in the area.  For 7 simulated days total of 13,635 targets.

16

17

18 Conclusions  Coverage Density defines the time needed to cover an area equal to the size of the controlled zone.  We have shown that there is a strong correlation between the Coverage Density of a system and its behavior.  We introduced a way to achieve the same system results with different preferences.  As a result, a system designer may find it easier to achieve a certain level of system performance under given specific constraints, such as budget limits.