Planning sample T Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL. What we’re doing… We are putting together a wish list for: – Signal MC samples to be generated when there are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monday 30th June – Friday 11th July
Advertisements

Communicate Coordinate Collaborate Hawaii Strategy Institute 2011.
L2 chains for single-beam menu Muon full reconstruction T2Calo starting from MBTS Ricardo Gonçalo, Denis Damazio.
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
H->bb Weekly Meeting Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) HSG5 H->bb weekly meeting, 11 October 2011.
Trigger validation Ricardo Goncalo, RHUL Physics Validation - 14 September 2007.
Skeleton outline for the physics case document M. Shochet December 15, 2005.
Prototyping. Horizontal Prototyping Description of Horizontal Prototyping A Horizontal, or User Interface, Prototype is a model of the outer shell of.
FTK Studies: H  hh  bbbb FTK Physics Case Meeting 11/03/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.
Feb 26, 2004 Mike Hildreth – DØ Collaboration Meeting Run IIb Trigger Simulation Report Mike Hildreth & Ela Barberis for the Run IIb Trigger Simulation.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
ATLAS Analysis Model. Introduction On Feb 11, 2008 the Analysis Model Forum published a report (D. Costanzo, I. Hinchliffe, S. Menke, ATL- GEN-INT )
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Update FTK Meeting 07/13/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Keyboard shortcuts in the 2007 Office system Introducing the Ribbon Based on extensive research into how people use Microsoft Office and how they wish.
OpenEMR: Accounting and Receivables Based on OpenEMR 4.1 Laboratory Informatics Institute January 2014.
MATHEMATICS Data – Types and Sources. Lesson Objectives The aim of this powerpoint is to help you… to recognise the different types of data to appreciate.
Planning Process The Planning Process is a decision-making tool that supports the organization’s overall philosophy about youth-centered leadership and.
Trigger Software Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) TAPM Open Meeting – Mar. 1, 2007 Outline: Status of infrastructure Schedule.
Log Files. eValid Log Files eValid validates your WebSite by recognizing and recording both successful and unsuccessful events. Detailed records are stored.
KNOWLEDGE FOR LIFE START Your Commissioning Editor (CE) helps you put together your book proposal. Your proposal is externally reviewed… (1) … and you.
News from the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo - 18 February 2009 Higgs WG Meeting during ATLAS Week.
Trigger validation for Event size TrigDecision Jets Electrons Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL Physics Validation Meeting – 9 October 2007.
Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) Higgs WG meeting – 28 th August, 2007 Outline: Introduction & release plans Progress in menus for cm -2 s -1 Workshop on trigger.
Plans for Trigger Software Validation During Running Trigger Data Quality Assurance Workshop May 6, 2008 Ricardo Gonçalo, David Strom.
11/13/07 J. MooneCenter for Professional Development1 Office 2007 Changes At First Glance.
Version How to Use Packet Tracer MarinaMD.
Preparation for the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs WG Meeting during ATLAS Week - 4 Dec.08.
LVL2 ID ESD/AOD classes Status and plans. PESA L2 ID Algorithms Review - RAL 25 July Ricardo Goncalo ESD/AOD More and more interest from physics.
DPDs and Trigger Plans for Derived Physics Data Follow up and trigger specific issues Ricardo Gonçalo and Fabrizio Salvatore RHUL.
Organisation of the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs WG Meeting - 22 Jan.09.
CSC350: Learning Management Systems COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (Virtual Campus)
Trigger Validation TAPM Open meeting 2 October 2007 Ricardo Goncalo.
H->bb Weekly Meeting Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) HSG5 H->bb Weekly Meeting, 29 March 2011.
AOD/ESD plans Status and plans focusing on LVL2 e/  and some items for discussion On behalf of: J.Baines, P.Casado, G.Comune, A.DiMattia, S.George, R.Goncalo,
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
Integration of the ATLAS Tag Database with Data Management and Analysis Components Caitriana Nicholson University of Glasgow 3 rd September 2007 CHEP,
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 24/01/2013.
Trigger Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) on behalf of trigger community Physics Validation Meeting – Feb. 13, 2007.
Proposal requesting money from Senate (Event Name) **Proposal must be submitted by the 1 st of every month prior to event to **
The PESAsim analysis framework What it is How it works What it can do How to get it and use it Mark Sutton Tania McMahon Ricardo Gonçalo.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
H ➝ bb Note Meeting Malachi Schram, McGill Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL H->bb 7TeV meeting, 5/11/2011.
Performance DPDs and trigger commissioning Preparing input to DPD task force.
28/01/101 Zvv bkg, how to get an estimate with first data ? R. Brunelière Time schedule is tight. Goal : get an estimate by may/june if we get data from.
H->bb Weekly Meeting Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) HSG5 H->bb Weekly Meeting, 22 February 2011.
Trigger Input to First-Year Analysis Model Working Group And some soul searching… Trigger Open Meeting – 29 July 2009.
The Worldwide LHC Computing Grid Introduction & Housekeeping Collaboration Workshop, Jan 2007.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Points from DPD task force First meeting last Tuesday (29 th July) – Need to have concrete proposal in 1 month – Still some confusion and nothing very.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
Uploading Grades on Edline. Open your grade books. Make sure you have saved the gradebooks if you have done any work on them.
In today’s lesson we will be looking at: what we mean by the software development lifecycle the phases in the lifecycle We will focus particularly on testing:
Introduction 08/11/2007 Higgs WG – Trigger meeting Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
SADE ANITA Monte Carlo(SAM) Test Results Amir Javaid University of Delaware.
Workplace Organization (WPO) and Visual Controls (VC)
Skimming in Zztop Ricardo – SLT meeting.
Latest News & Other Issues
Objectives State the reasons for the complexity involved in the development of software Define the following terms Objects Classes Messages Methods Explain.
Basic Factoring Review
Fold How important was this?
Creating and Sharing Google Docs
Check List Tool Kit A description of your check box can be placed here
An ABC Book by.
An ABC Book by.
An ABC Book by.
Why now? New requirement for all RACs in the next Request for Applications (RFA) Improve communications among all participants Increased need to identify.
Microsoft Outlook (Disabling desktop notifications)
Presentation transcript:

Planning sample T Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL

What we’re doing… We are putting together a wish list for: – Signal MC samples to be generated when there are significant menu changes to test – List of triggers to generate these samples that would be useful (mainly for physics signal selection) at 1x10 33 cm -2 s -1 Boundary conditions would be: – Entire requests =< 1M events and =< 100 different samples

What we’re NOT doing… Deciding ourselves here and now what, if anything, what will be produced, how, when etc – The lists we produce will be passed to trigger management who will decide – Maintaining this sample represents a gain but also a burden on trigger and on production resources – Benefits and costs must be well understood, this is only the beginning of the discussion Replacing the need for physics groups to set up the structures to study the effect of higher thresholds etc on D3PDs, AODs etc

Ideally… Ideally we’ll arrive at a sensible set of signal samples that would: – Make sure physics groups can give quick feedback to the menu coordination on new menus – … after a previous discussion on what the menu should be – Guarantees that last checks can be done on realistic signal samples Should be another tool in the box, which improves the ATLAS capability to react quickly to changing luminosity etc and increase our physics output