Sucker Control Trials The Regional Sucker Control Trials are conducted under the auspices of the Regional Growth Regulator Committee of the Tobacco Worker’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple Comparisons in Factorial Experiments
Advertisements

Topping. Question 1 Why do plants have leaves? As a store for seed production.
Experiments with both nested and “crossed” or factorial factors
2007 Sucker Control Trials Regional Growth Regulator Trials MH-Free Sucker Control Trials MH-Free Nozzle Study.
Calibration using the Test Strip Method (Long Hand) Cecil Tharp Pesticide Education Program Montana State University Extension.
Calibration 2014 Wisconsin Pesticide Applicator Training Program University of Wisconsin Extension 1 of 40.
Insecticidal Control of Caterpillar Pests of Cole Crops Alton N. Sparks, Jr. and David G. Riley, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia INTRODUCTION Cole.
Sprayer calibration Maury Craig, IR-4 Program Coordinator Extension Plant Sciences Dept. New Mexico State University.
MH Free Tobacco Trials were conducted in Jessamine County to study the mechanical application of sucker control chemicals that do not contain Maleic Hydrazide.
1 Variable Selection for Tailoring Treatment S.A. Murphy, L. Gunter & J. Zhu May 29, 2008.
MSU Extension Chapter 6 Equipment & Calibration. MSU Extension Equipment Selection n Depends on… –target –type of application –pest to be controlled –pesticide.
INTRODUCTION Organic acreage, to meet the feed and food industry demand is increasing. Between 1997 and 2003, certified organic acres grew by 10% per year.
MSU Extension Pesticide Education Turfgrass Pest Management (Category 3A) Application Calculations and Calibration Chapter 5.
Equipment Methods The Basic Function of a Sprayer: Distribution & Metering Apply a dilute amount of herbicide (Rate) in a determined volume of water.
Evaluation of Combinations of Bispyribac-Sodium or Amicarbazone with Trinexapac-Ethyl or Paclobutrazol for Annual Bluegrass Control On Creeping Bentgrass.
Insect Control Field Days Sponsored by the Kansas Fruit Growers Association.
Evaluation of the Effects of Plastic Mulches - Red, Black, Olive and Control, on the Growth and Yield of Tomato A. A. James, J. A. Sawtelle, and R. W.
Selecting Nozzles while Calibrating Your Field Sprayer Cecil Tharp Pesticide Education Program Montana State University Extension.
Calibrating Homeowner Equipment
Calibration. Calibration Challenge #1 A label may call for 1 pint of pesticide to be applied over an entire acre (1 pint per acre). An acre is 43,560.
Calibration and Calculations Made Easy for Turfgrass Applicators Fred Fishel, UF/IFAS Dept. of Agronomy S. Priest, UF/IFAS.
S.G. Wilson, A.S. Culpepper, and A.C. York University of Georgia and N. C. State University MANAGING LARGE MORNINGGLORY IN ROUNDUP – READY COTTON WITH.
Comparative Performance of BARBREN and LONREN David B. Weaver Professor Department of Agronomy and Soils Auburn University AL Dallas, TX, April 4,
Conducting Experimental Trials Gary Palmer. Scientific Method  Formulation of Hypothesis  Planning an experiment to objectively test the hypothesis.
Burley Tobacco Update Dr. Bob Pearce Extension Tobacco Specialist 2014 ANR Agent Update Winchester, Kentucky October 14, 2014.
BELT 4 SC (FLUBENDIAMIDE): A NEW INSECTICIDE FOR CONTROL OF HELIOTHINES IN CONVENTIONAL COTTON – 2006 Jarrod T. Hardke 1, Gus M. Lorenz 1, B.R. Leonard.
SPRAY EQUIPMENT Basic Components and Operations. Purposes  Used to apply agricultural chemicals  Spray pressures range from near 0 to over 300 pounds.
EVALUATION OF MH FREE CHEMICALS FOR SUCKER CONTROL Gary Palmer, Bob Pearce & Andy Bailey University of Kentucky.
Use of Salt to Control Annual Bluegrass in Seashore Paspalum. Lewayne White, Paul Raymer, and Patrick E. McCullough Introduction  Annual bluegrass (Poa.
Conducting Harvest-Aid Research in Corn E.P. Prostko and A.S. Culpepper Dept. Crop & Soil Science University of Georgia WSSA 2004.
U NDERSTANDING S PRAY D EPOSITION AND M INIMIZING D RIFT Dan Heider University of Wisconsin - IPM.
Growing Burley Tobacco in a Post Buyout Environment Dr. Gary Palmer University of Kentucky.
Funded by an annual grant from the Northwest Center For Small Fruit Research Acknowledgments Biology and Control of Blueberry.
Herbicides Trials The Fayette Co. herbicide trial was severely affected by weather, but weed control trends are evident in the weed pressure rating. Command.
Sucker Control in Burley Tobacco with and without MH.
Herbicide Trials 2002 Only one herbicide trail was conducted. Conditions were dry with heavy weed pressure which can be seen by the dramatic effect of.
Calibrating Your Field Sprayer
Fertilizer Trials Two fertilizer trials were conducted in One in Clinton Co. and one in Brown Co., Ohio. Sources of nitrogen were compared. The effects.
15 July 2009 INFLUENCE OF PHC SEED AND FOLIAR TREATMENTS ON IRISH POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD Summary of Rhizoctonia Data, Holland Ag Services, Washington.
Objectives To evaluate the effects of two simulated drift rates of 2,4-D on non-tolerant cotton at various stages of development. 1 Chandler P. Rowe, 1.
CCLONES - ADEPT ( Comparing Clonal Lines On Experimental Sites) Forest Biology Research Cooperative University of Florida.
Plant Growth Regulator Programs in Arizona Cotton Erin L. Taylor and Patrick A. Clay University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.
Designing Experiments. Four Basic Types of Studies.
Cecil Tharp MSU Pesticide Education Program Pesticide Education Specialist Department of Animal and Range Montana State University.
Final Project Everybody still registered for the grade who did not have their own project will receive an with file names to be used for their project.
Spray Equipment Calibration. Calibration Used to determine sprayer output in units of volume per acreUsed to determine sprayer output in units of volume.
Work Sheet Calibration is included at the end of this presentation.
Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting
TWO WAY ANOVA WITHOUT REPLICATION
Clarke Alder, Crop Consultant, The Amalgamated Sugar Company
Unraveling the Mysteries
EVALUATION OF PLANT GROWTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS ON LOW DESERT COTTON
D.A. Komm (1), R. Ehsani (2), P. Ravenna (3)
Stephen E. Hart and Patrick E. McCullough
Manuel Campos and Don Henne
Michael W. Melichar, Anita L. Alexander, Daniel L
and No-Tillage under Various Crop Rotations.
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Precision Farming Profitability
Extension Plant Pathologist University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Sensors and Fertility Management
School-Wide Achievement Mathematics
MH Free Tobacco Production of MH free burley tobacco is difficult and labor intensive. To achieve control hand labor is needed to run products like fatty.
Grade one First term Second term Learning unit Learning unit
Chuck Ingels, UCCE Sacramento County
Untreated Weed-Free Check
R.M. Merchant*, E.P. Prostko, P.M. Eure, and T.M. Webster
PEANUT RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE SIMULATED OFF-TARGET
To calculate the number of combinations for n distinguishable items:
The Effects of Defoliation Timing and Ethephon Rate on Harvest Date, Lint Yield, and Fiber Quality of Cotton Guy Collins, Keith Edmisten, James Lanier,
Presentation transcript:

Sucker Control Trials The Regional Sucker Control Trials are conducted under the auspices of the Regional Growth Regulator Committee of the Tobacco Worker’s Conference. Treatments proposed by the committee were treatments 1-7. Treatment 8 was added for this study only. A sprayer malfunction on treatment 2 produced results that were not characteristic of the past performance of this treatment. Treatments 3 (MH at 1.5 gal/a), 4 (Royal MH-30 at 1.5 gal/a + Flupro at 0.5 gal/a), & 5 (Royal MH-30 at 1.5 gal/a + Butralin at 0.5 gal/a) were all excellent treatments. Both the Off-shoot T followed by Off-shoot T + Butralin at 0.5 gal/a & Off-shoot T followed by Off-shoot T + Butralin at 1 gal/a were acceptable, but not as clean as treatments 3-5. Butralin at 1 gal/a by itself was as good as when Off-shoot T was added. All Treatments were made with a West Texas Lee high clearance sprayer using a three nozzle arrangement in a TG-3 – TG-5 – TG-3 configuration and an application volume of 60 gal/a. Applicator speed was 2.4 mph at 30 psi. Plots were 55 ft by 2 rows (42” rows) in a randomized complete block design with four replications.

Regional Sucker Control Treatments* 1 st Treatment (Elongated Bud)2 nd Treatment (At topping – 10-25% bloom) 1Untreated Check 2Royal MH-30 (2 gal/a) 3Royal MH-30 (1.5 gal/a) 4Royal MH-30 (1.5 gal/a + Flupro 0.5 gal/a) 5Royal MH-30 (1.5 gal/a + Butralin 0.5 gal/a) 6Off-shoot T (3%)Off-shoot T (4%) + Butralin (0.5 gal/a) 7Butralin (1 gal/a) 8Off-shoot T (3%)Off-shoot T (4%) +Butralin (1 gal/a) * 60 gal/a at 2.4 mph and 30 psi using a West Texas Lee high clearance sprayer Treatments were scheduled for 5 days apart but were applied 7 days apart due to weather

Comparison of Sucker Control Treatments at Two Weeks after Application UK Spindletop Farm (MH= Royal MH-30, F=Flupro, B=Butralin,) in (gal) O=Off-Shoot-T in (%), UTC=untreated check, fb=followed by at 7 days. *=Sprayer malfunctioned

The Effects of Sucker Treatment on Sucker Number per Plant UK Spindletop Farm (MH= Royal MH-30, F=Flupro, B=Butralin,) in (gal) O=Off-Shoot-T in (%), UTC=untreated check fb=followed by at 7 days. *=Sprayer malfunctioned

The Effects of Sucker Treatment on Sucker Weight UK Spindletop Farm (MH= Royal MH-30, F=Flupro, B=Butralin,) in (gal) O=Off-Shoot-T in (%), UTC=untreated check, fb=followed by at 7 days. *=Sprayer malfunctioned

MH Free Trials Treatments with MH produced 100% control. However, results from Off-shoot T at 4% followed by a tank mix of Off- shoot T + Butralin at 1 gal/a followed by Butralin at 1 gal/a were close to those containing MH. The results from this treatment (5) were not statistically better than treatments 2, 4, 6, & 7. A 3% concentration of Off-shoot T applied before topping did not perform as well as a 4% concentration. All Treatments were made with a West Texas Lee high clearance sprayer using a three nozzle arrangement in a TG-3 – TG-5 – TG-3 configuration and an application volume of 60 gal/a. Applicator speed was 2.4 mph at 30 psi. Plots were 30 ft by 2 rows (42” rows) in a randomized complete block design with four replications.

MH Free Trails Treatments 1 st Treatment (Elongated Bud) 2 nd Treatment At topping ( 10-25% bloom) 3 rd Treatment 5 days post top 1Off-Shoot T 3%Off-Shoot T 4%Butralin 1 2Off-Shoot T 4% Butralin 1 3Off-Shoot T 4%Butralin 1 4Off-Shoot T 4%Off-Shoot T 4%+Butralin 1 5Off-Shoot T 4%Off-Shoot T 4%+Butralin 1Butralin 1 6Off-Shoot T 4%Flupro 1Butralin 1 7Off-Shoot T 4%ButralinButralin 1 8Off-Shoot T 4%Royal MH 1.5 9Off-Shoot T 4%Butralin 0.5+Royal MH1.5 10Untreated Check * 60 gal/a at 2.4 mph and 30 psi using a West Texas Lee high clearance sprayer Treatments were applied 5 days apart

MH Free Trials Comparison of Sucker Control Treatments UK Coldstream Farm (MH= Royal MH-30, F=Flupro, B=Butralin,) in (gal) O=Off-Shoot-T in (%), UTC=untreated check (-) followed by at 5 days.

MH Free Trials The Effects of Sucker Treatment on Sucker Number per Plant UK Coldstream Farm (MH= Royal MH-30, F=Flupro, B=Butralin,) in (gal) UTC=untreated check O=Off-Shoot-T in (%), (-) followed by at 5 days

MH Free Trials The Effects of Sucker Treatment on Sucker Weight UK Coldstream Farm (MH= Royal MH-30, F=Flupro, B=Butralin,) in (gal) O=Off-Shoot-T in (%), UTC=untreated check, (-) followed by at 5 days.

MH-Free Nozzle Study Application technique changed a MH-Free sucker control program from unsuccessful to successful. Nozzle size was studied as part of the overall application technique trial. While a rundown method is known to work successfully, mechanical application has proven difficult to achieve acceptable results. All treatments were applied with a CO 2 backpack with an over-the –shoulder two row boom. Plots were 40 ft by 2 rows (42” rows) in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Treatments consisted of 4% Off-shoot T at elongated bud followed by a combination of Off-shoot T at 4 % plus Butralin at 1 gal /a.

Effects of Nozzle Size on Sucker Control Nozzles ArrangementPSIMPHGal 1TG-3 - TG-5 - TG TG-3 - TG-5 - TG TG-5 - TG-5 - TG TG-5 - TG-6 - TG

Effects of Nozzle Size on Sucker Control All Nozzles were TG full cone nozzles

Effects of Nozzle Size on Sucker per Plant All Nozzles were TG full cone nozzles