What are the key uncertainties? 1.The Common Causes and Remarkability of Recent Changes in the Arctic System 2.The Nature and Importance of Threshold Events,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Advertisements

Learning from the IPCC AR4: Possible implications for GCOS Stephan Bojinski GCOS Secretariat, WMO.
CliC (NEG) Climate and Cryosphere Recent, current and planned activities Aike Beckmann
N84 UNCLASSIFIED Rear Admiral Dave Titley, Ph.D. Oceanographer of the Navy / Director Task Force Climate Change October 15, 2009 This Presentation is Unclassified.
Climate Change: Science and Implications Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Seminar A DC Public Library Summer Reading Program Takoma Park.
General questions: are there barriers for cross-breeding in the oceans? Implications for evolutionary study (e.g., species stability), ecology (e.g., local.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Ecosystems (from IPCC WG-2, Chapters 4,9-16) Ecosystems Primary Source: IPCC WG-2 Chapter 4 - Ecosystems, their.
Introduction to Breakout Session 2.2 Essential Variables for GEO SBAs (Chair: Antonio Bombelli) Coordinator of the GEO Task CL-02 “Global Carbon Observations.
Uncertainty and Climate Change Dealing with uncertainty in climate change impacts Daniel J. Vimont Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Department Center for.
1 Key vulnerabilities to climate change Some ecosystems are highly vulnerable: Coral reefs, marine shell organisms Tundra, boreal forests, mountain and.
The Ocean’s Role in Climate Change. Responding to the Kyoto Protocol Climate Change Action Fund (CCAF) Initiatives Reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Reduce.
Moving to Horizontal Connections: Design Concept 2 Impacts: 1. What are the critical interactions among resources (and resource management) that will.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
CLIMAG LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE CHALLENGES A CLIMATE SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE By Hartmut Grassl Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg, Germany.
HSRP Spring Meeting May 4, 2011 David M. Kennedy.
Effects of Climate Change on Marine Ecosystems David Mountain US CLIVAR Science Symposium 14 July 2008.
US CLIVAR Themes. Guided by a set of questions that will be addressed/assessed as a concluding theme action by US CLIVAR Concern a broad topical area.
The Scenarios Network for Alaska and Arctic Planning is a collaborative network of the University of Alaska, state, federal, and local agencies, NGOs,
NOAA Climate Service V. Ramaswamy and Chet Koblinski WCRP JSC-31 Antalya Turkey February 16, 2010.
Ecological processes in a changing climate: winners and losers Third US GLOBEC Pan Regional Workshop 20 February 2009 J. Runge, presenter.
Breakout 2 Nancy Glenn Laura Duncanson. 1. What are the gaps in our current knowledge of carbon-relevant Earth System processes? What are the linkages.
Charge to the Working Group How well do we understand the 2007 sea ice extent minimum? (through modelling and data analysis including retrospective analyses.
US Climate Change Science Program Incorporating the US Global Change Research Program and the Climate Change Research Initiative U.S. Climate Change Science.
Atmospheric Research Climate Hazards & Risk Assessment Roger N. Jones AIACC Kickoff Meeting Nairobi February
Wednesday Working Group Topics 1.Collaboratory Development: –Community issues, workshops, cross-disciplinary communications, development of cross-program.
Thinking in Terms of Social- Ecological Systems: Connecting climate change impacts to human communities Miranda H. Mockrin Rocky Mountain Research Station.
U.S. Climate Change Science Program: Strategic Planning to Implementation DOE Office of Science BERAC Meeting November 13, 2003 James R. Mahoney, Ph.D.
Identifying Grand Challenges in Climate Change Research: Guiding DOE’s Strategic Planning: Report on the DOE/BERAC workshop March Crystal City For.
Climate Variability and Change: Introduction to Course.
Modeling and Forecasting Climate Change, Biophysical Impacts, and Ecological and Economic Adaptations Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling.
Modern Climate Change Darryn Waugh OES Summer Course, July 2015.
Framework for adaptation control information system in the Rio de la Plata: the case of coastal fisheries Walter Norbis – AIACC LA 32.
USFWS’ Arctic Strategy: Managing Fish and Managing Fish and Wildlife Populations in a Changing Landscape SEARCH Science Steering Committee Meeting October.
Infrastructure Planning Presentations Summary Determine climate and weather extremes that are crucial in resource management and policy making Intense.
Geosciences - Observations (Bob Wilhelmson) The geosciences in NSF’s world consists of atmospheric science, ocean science, and earth science Many of the.
Integration Across Social and Natural Sciences: A Social Science Perspective Matt Berman EPSCoR All Hands Meeting May 2009.
Components of the Global Climate Change Process IPCC AR4.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
What is Global Environmental Change? Changes in the biogeophysical environment caused or strongly influenced by human activities Land cover & soils Atmospheric.
SEARCH Understanding Change Panel: Priority Needs and Implementation Status Matt Berman John Walsh Nov. 5, 2007 Charge to panel: Plan the data analysis,
An exploratory community-based research project **************************************** Shannon McNeeley Environmental and Societal Impacts Group National.
Science Advisory Board Public Session 1 1 Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Associate Director for Science Integration Climate Change Science Program Office CCSP Update.
ASCL Workshop— Boulder, CO Fundamental Concepts for Essential Principal: Atmospheric circulations transport matter, gases, particles, energy and momentum.
Chapter 6 1 U.S. Climate Change Science Workshop December 04, 2002 Climate Variability and Change Draft Strategic Plan.
How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.
5 June 2005 Strategic Plan 2001 Challenges identified for NCAR Intellectual Human resource development and education Application of science to societal.
Dr Mark Cresswell Scenarios of the Future 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
Arctic Research Office May, 2002 Update on SEARCH from the Agency Perspective.
Jim Hurrell Director Climate and Global Dynamics Division Climate and Ecosystem Community Planning Meeting November 2-3, 2005 Boulder,
Jamie Morison Polar Science Center University of Washington Seattle, Washington USA SEARCH Update ARCSS AHW Feb. 20, 2002.
Lessons from other vulnerability and adaptation assessments Ligia Noronha Senior fellow TERI Pre-sessional consultation on TAR Milan, 27 –28 November,
Arctic pollution from Fires
Ocean Response to Global Warming/Global Change William Curry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Environmental Defense May 12, 2005 Possible changes in.
Adaptive Integrated Framework (AIF): a new methodology for managing impacts of multiple stressors in coastal ecosystems A bit more on AIF, project components.
David M. Legler U.S. CLIVAR Office U.S. Climate Variability and Predictability Program usclivar.org CLIVAR Welcome Climate Diagnostics.
Results from the Downscaling Needs Assessment Survey April 2011 Sarah Trainor Courtesy of Tony Weyiouanna Sr. & Dave Atkinson.
Picture: Bill Chapman. From the 1998 ARCSS Science Plan, the first theme was identified as follows: 1. How will the Arctic climate change over the next.
OEAS 604: Final Exam Tuesday, 8 December 8:30 – 11:30 pm Room 3200, Research Innovation Building I Exam is cumulative Questions similar to quizzes with.
Breakout Group 6 Ocean and Atmosphere Group Terrestrial Group.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
MICHAEL A. ALEXANDER, ILEANA BLADE, MATTHEW NEWMAN, JOHN R. LANZANTE AND NGAR-CHEUNG LAU, JAMES D. SCOTT Mike Groenke (Atmospheric Sciences Major)
Climate Sensitivity Succession Regime Shifts Integration Current Proposal: The Dynamics of Change Next Proposal (due in < 4 years!!) Human Dimensions K-12.
Do we / why do we want to develop an ASM? Climate working group for WRF – workshop on model developments for climate studies with WRF (summary of.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Climate System Research Center, Geosciences Alan Condron Peter Winsor, Chris Hill and Dimitris Menemenlis Changes in the Arctic freshwater budget in response.
Adaptation to Climate Change Grete Kaare Hovelsrud PhD Research Director Center for International and Environmental Research – Oslo CICERO Joint Seminar.
Mitigation, Adaptation, and Costs of “Building Resiliency” Preparing Your Coast.
Craig Nicolson, UMass-Amherst
Second Arctic System Science All-Hands Meeting
Presentation transcript:

What are the key uncertainties? 1.The Common Causes and Remarkability of Recent Changes in the Arctic System 2.The Nature and Importance of Threshold Events, Extreme Events, and Abrupt Changes 3.Defining the Extreme States of the Arctic System 4.How to Produce Useful Scenarios of the Future 5.Sorting out the Interactions Between Global and Arctic Modes of Variability ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 1

how do we track these changes what unprecedented environmental changes are Arctic residents noticing that differ from the pattern of normal or natural variability that they have observed in the past what are the appropriate conceptual models how to link observations of change to their causes natural vs. anthropogenic how do we integrate across systems physics – HARC where and what to measure sensitivity and key variables mis-match between info we need and what models can predict 1. The Common Causes and Remarkability of Recent Changes in the Arctic System ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 2

What is the impact of this uncertainty on our understanding of the Arctic System? high (we see changes but not sure of which model to apply) 1. The Common Causes and Remarkability of Recent Changes in the Arctic System ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 3

What is our level of confidence in the above assessment? high 1. The Common Causes and Remarkability of Recent Changes in the Arctic System ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 4

What is our level of readiness to deal with this uncertainty? high in some areas and regions (Barents), but … don’t have a theoretical understanding of the atmosphere-ocean circulation; insufficient long-term ecosystem time-series (Toolik Lake only ~25 years) 1. The Common Causes and Remarkability of Recent Changes in the Arctic System ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 5

Should this focus area be addressed by a new or existing initiative, by one or a combination of existing ARCSS components, or by some other means? yes – existing: SEARCH, LTOs/LTERs 1. The Common Causes and Remarkability of Recent Changes in the Arctic System ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 6

how do we model these things (non-linear) impacts on society how do these things re-organize or synchronize ecosystems and society what are the ecosystem buffers rates and reversibility of change the frequency of extreme events what is an extreme event are we looking hard enough for extreme events limits of predictability relative importance how will Arctic communities adapt to unprecedented changes and are there thresholds of adaptation with respect to extreme variability, extreme states and events, extreme rates of change 2. The Nature and Importance of Threshold Events, Extreme Events, and Abrupt Changes ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 7

2. The Nature and Importance of Threshold Events, Extreme Events, and Abrupt Changes What is the impact of this uncertainty on our understanding of the Arctic System? high ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 8

2. The Nature and Importance of Threshold Events, Extreme Events, and Abrupt Changes What is our level of confidence in the above assessment? high for paleo record; high for some co-varying data (such as Larry’s fishery collapse report); high for some ecosystem models depending on scale; low for dynamic models; medium for societal models ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 9

2. The Nature and Importance of Threshold Events, Extreme Events, and Abrupt Changes What is our level of readiness to deal with this uncertainty? high for re-analysis of already existing co-varying data; medium for new cross-disciplinary efforts (mathematicians are ready) ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 10

2. The Nature and Importance of Threshold Events, Extreme Events, and Abrupt Changes Should this focus area be addressed by a new or existing initiative, by one or a combination of existing ARCSS components, or by some other means? good avenue for cross-directorate Announcement of Opportunities (mathematics, LTER, OPP, SBE, GEO) ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 11

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System Defining the Extreme States of the Arctic System how far can it go bumpers on separate quasi-steady states (ice-covered vs. ice free) how do you recognize an extreme state (vs. extreme event: persistence time- scale) how likely – frequency multiple quasi-steady states what can we learn from combining the paleo record and the models – what else happens with ice-free arctic other year examples: deep convection; ecosystem collapse (ecosystem shifts to lower trophic levels – return to Cambrian ocean); phase-lock of natural oscillation (AO); depopulation; species extinction; new CO 2 levels; oil impacts; permafrost degradation

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System Defining the Extreme States of the Arctic System What is the impact of this uncertainty on our understanding of the Arctic System? moderate to high, with high relevance (40% ice loss, or 10% + hiding)

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System Defining the Extreme States of the Arctic System What is our level of confidence in the above assessment? low

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System Defining the Extreme States of the Arctic System What is our level of readiness to deal with this uncertainty? high

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System Defining the Extreme States of the Arctic System Should this focus area be addressed by a new or existing initiative, by one or a combination of existing ARCSS components, or by some other means? PARCS, SEARCH

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System How to Produce Useful Scenarios of the Future sort out non-linear thresholds from organized change scenario choices – multiple possibilities pathways of change can include probabilities start with communities; what is the question; who is end user model assessment; what is necessary for GCM and regional models user-defined scenario generation; type of model depends on users confidence depends on having clear assumptions needs and information base what outputs of climate, oceanographic, and ecosystem models of change respond to community concerns

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 18 What is the impact of this uncertainty on our understanding of the Arctic System? NA: wrong question – scenario is application of information 4. How to Produce Useful Scenarios of the Future

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System How to Produce Useful Scenarios of the Future What is our level of confidence in the above assessment? NA: wrong question

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System How to Produce Useful Scenarios of the Future What is our level of readiness to deal with this uncertainty? NA

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System How to Produce Useful Scenarios of the Future Should this focus area be addressed by a new or existing initiative, by one or a combination of existing ARCSS components, or by some other means? HARC is already doing some of this We are dumb scientists, society! Tell us what you need!

ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System Sorting out the Interactions Between Global and Arctic Modes of Variability harmonize Arctic with global program – ASOF, CLIVAR polynyas – international program relative importance of internal vs. external modes of variability; interactions and relationships between the ENSO, PDO, AO, others ecological impacts: river basins southern limits, contaminants, animal migrations, circulation changes impact changes in the deep convection; salinity anomalies changes in private and government policies; new technology understanding the stratosphere – ozone hole CO 2 radiative trace gases what other local and global changes have taken place that affect the ability of Arctic residents to adapt to environmental change

5. Sorting out the Interactions Between Global and Arctic Modes of Variability ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 23 What is the impact of this uncertainty on our understanding of the Arctic System? very high – how open is the system

5. Sorting out the Interactions Between Global and Arctic Modes of Variability ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 24 What is our level of confidence in the above assessment? very high – need to tie in with larger communities

5. Sorting out the Interactions Between Global and Arctic Modes of Variability ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 25 What is our level of readiness to deal with this uncertainty? different states of readiness: - positive readiness: contaminant transport - negative readiness but improving: global climate modeling

5. Sorting out the Interactions Between Global and Arctic Modes of Variability ARCSS All Hands Workshop, February 2002 Breakout Group: Modes of Variability in the Arctic System 26 Should this focus area be addressed by a new or existing initiative, by one or a combination of existing ARCSS components, or by some other means? Evil axis of SEARCH, CLIVAR, and ASOF