Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Advertisements

Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Design Considerations LHC hadron beams: E p =7 TeV E A =E e  Z/A Luminosity O (10 33 ) cm -2 s -1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug) Integrated e ± p.
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
MeRHIC Design V.Ptitsyn on behalf of MeRHIC Design team: M. Bai, J. Beebe-Wang, I. Ben-Zvi, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Burrill, R. Calaga, X. Chang, A. Fedotov,
LHeC Test Facility Meeting
Outline 1.ERL facility for gamma-ray production [A. Valloni] 2.ERL facility - Tracking Simulations [D. Pellegrini] 3.SC magnet quench tests [V. Chetvertkova]
Progress of SRF and ERL at Peking University Lu Xiangyang Institute of Heavy Ion Physics Peking University.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Issues.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
SiriusUVX LNLS – National Synchrotron Light Laboratory CNPEM – Brazilian Center for Research on Energy and Materials A R Rodrigues, M Lisboa, R Madacki.
2015 LHeC Coordination Group meeting 2 nd October 2015 Oliver Brüning, CERN1 ERL Demonstrator for LHeC: Critical issues -Choice of multi-turn ERL configuration.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
BERLinPro An ERL Demonstration facility at the HELMHOLTZ ZENTRUM BERLIN.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 Alex Bogacz EIC14 Workshop, Jefferson Lab, March 20,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Source, FLS2012 M. Shimada A), T. Miyajima A), N. Nakamura A), Y. Kobayashi A), K. Harada A), S. Sakanaka A), R. Hajima B)
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz Status and Plans for Linac and RLAs.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 LHeC Workshop, Chavennes-de-Bogis, June 26, 2015 LHeC.
The Beauty of an ERL for LHeC … and the interest to collaborate Erk Jensen, Ed. Ciapala (with lots of material provided by Rama Calaga, Joachim Tückmantel.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
Seesion1 summary Unwanted Beam Workshop (UBW 2012) Dark Current Issues for Energy Recovery Linacs.
WG2: Beam Dynamics, Optics and Instrumentation – Summary
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
PERLE - Current Accelerator Design
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Hosting Orsay Walid KAABI
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Joint Accelerator Research JGU & HZB
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
Re-circulating Linac Option
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Electron Source Configuration
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Optics ‘Scrapbook’ for ERL Test Facility
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Optics and Layout of Alex Bogacz Workshop, Orsay, Feb. 23, 2017.
– Overview Alex Bogacz JLAB, Aug. 14, 2017.
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
PERLE - Current Accelerator Design
Presentation transcript:

Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni

 Test facility for SCRF cavities and modules  Test facility for multi-pass multiple cavity ERL  Test facility for controlled SC magnet quench tests  Injector studies: DC gun or SRF gun  Study reliability issues, operational issues!  Could it be foreseen as the injector to LHeC ERL? TARGET PARAMETER*VALUE Injection Energy [MeV] 5 Final Beam Energy [MeV] 900 Normalized emittance γε x,y [μm] 50 Beam Current [mA]10 Bunch Spacing [ns]25 (50) Passes3 *in few stages Goals of a CERN ERL Test Facility

ERL Test Facility worldwide (1/2) Beam Energy35 MeV Beam Current10 mA Bunch charge77 pC RF frequency1300 MHz Passes1 ERL-TF IN IHEP, BEIJING Beam Energy50 MeV Beam Current100 mA Bunch charge77 pC RF frequency1300 MHz Passes1 BERLinPro, HZB Beam Energy12-26 MeV Bunch charge pC RF frequency1300 MHz Passes1 ALICE, Daresbury

ERL Test Facility worldwide (2/2) Beam Energy105 MeV Bunch charge0.77 pC RF frequency1300 MHz Passes2-3 MESA facility, Mainz Beam Energy20 MeV Bunch charge0.5-5 nC Bunch current300 mA RF frequency704 MHz Passes1 Brookhaven ERL Beam Energy MeV Beam Current10mA (100mA) Bunch charge7.7pC- 77pC RF frequency1300 MHz Passes1- 2 cERL, KEK

 Test facility for SCRF cavities and modules  Test facility for multi-pass multiple cavity ERL  Test facility for controlled SC magnet quench tests  Injector studies: DC gun or SRF gun  Study reliability issues, operational issues!  Could it be foreseen as the injector to LHeC ERL? TARGET PARAMETER*VALUE Injection Energy [MeV] 5 Final Beam Energy [MeV] 900 Normalized emittance γε x,y [μm] 50 Beam Current [mA]10 Bunch Spacing [ns]25 (50) Passes3 *in few stages Goals of a CERN ERL Test Facility

Outline 1. STAGES OF BUILDING DESIGN - LAYOUTS - BASELINE PARAMETERS 2. ARC OPTICS ARCHITECTURE 3. TEST FACILITY FOR SC MAGNET TESTS

Planning for each stage STEP 1 SC RF cavities, modules and e - source tests - Injection at 5 MeV - 1 turn - 75 MeV/linac - Final energy 150 MeV ARCENERGY ARC 180 MeV ARC 2155 MeV *4 SRF 5-cell cavities at 802 MHz LINAC 1* LINAC 2*

Planning for each stage STEP 2 Test the machine in Energy Recovery Mode - Injection at 5 MeV - 3 turns - 75 MeV/linac - Final energy 450 MeV ARCENERGY ARC 180 MeV ARC 2155 MeV ARC 3230 MeV ARC 4305 MeV ARC 5380 MeV ARC 6455 MeV Recirculation realized with vertically stacked recirculation passes

Planning for each stage STEP 3 Additional SC RF modules test Full energy test in Energy Recovery Mode - Injection at 5 MeV - 3 turns MeV/linac - Final energy 900 MeV ARCENERGY ARC 1150 MeV ARC 2300 MeV ARC 3450 MeV ARC 4600 MeV ARC 5750 MeV ARC 6900 MeV

Outline 1. STAGES OF BUILDING DESIGN - LAYOUTS - BASELINE PARAMETERS 2. ARC OPTICS ARCHITECTURE FOR STEP 3 3. TEST FACILITY FOR SC MAGNET TESTS

Layout ARC 1 – 155 MeV ARC 3 – 455 MeV ARC 5 – 755 MeV

Linac 1 Multi-Pass Optics 5 MeV 155 MeV 305 MeV 455 MeV 605 MeV 755 MeV 905 MeV A. Valloni, A. Bogacz

Linac 2 Multi-Pass Optics 905 MeV 755 MeV 605 MeV 455 MeV 305 MeV 155 MeV 5 MeV A. Valloni, A. Bogacz

Arc 1 optics 155 MeV 4×45° sector bends 2-step vert. Spreader 2-step vert. Combiner Arc dipoles : Ldip = 71.8 cm B = 5.67 kGauss ρ = cm 30° bends (1 rec. + 3 sec.) 30° bends (1 rec. + 3 sec.) A. Valloni, A. Bogacz β x β y D x D y 155 MeV

Arc 3 optics 155 MeV Arc dipoles : Ldip = cm B = 6.58 kGauss ρ = cm 9.8° bends (1 rec. + 3 sec.) 9.8° bends (1 rec. + 3 sec.) 455 MeV A. Valloni, A. Bogacz β x β y D x D y 8×22.5° sector bends2-step vert. Spreader 2-step vert. Combiner 455 MeV

Arc 5 optics 8×22.5° sector bendsVertical chicane Arc dipoles : Ldip = cm B = kGauss ρ = cm Vertical chicane A. Valloni, A. Bogacz 755 MeV

Arc 1,3,5 layout m m cm 92.6 cm 6 cm  Synchronous acceleration Isochronous arcs  Achromatic arc  FMC optics Total Arc length for Arc 1,2, m 94 x λrf For 6 arcs: 84 DIPOLES 114 QUADRUPOLES

Footprint Total length for Arc 1,2, m 94 x λrf (last cavity linac1 to first cavity linac 2) Total length for Arc 2, m 101 x λrf (last cavity linac1 to first cavity linac 2) Total length for Arc m x λrf (last cavity linac 1 to first cavity linac 2) ARCSLINAC Total length ~ 13 m CHICANE INJ/EXTR Length ~ 1.75 m TOTAL DIMENSIONS 42 m x 13.7 m

Arc optics OPTION 2 SAME OPTICS LAYOUT FOR ALL THE ARCS 900/750/600/450/300/150 MeV Arc dipoles : 8  bends Ldip = cm ρ = cm 1GeV750MeV600MeV450MeV300MeV150MeV B FIELD 1.30 T0.97 T0.78 T0.58 T0.39 T0.19 T Arc quadrupoles Lquads = 30 cm Q1Q2Q3Q4 Kq[m -2 ] DIPOLES ON TOP OF EACH OTHER * Attilio Milanese

Incoherent Synchrotron radiation in return arcs ARCE [MeV]  E [keV]  E/E [%]  Beam Energy loss  Beam Energy Spread

Next steps  Complete Step 2 and Step 1 configuration and optics layout Available space Step 2 Step 1

Linac 1 - Step 2 5 MeV 85 MeV 155 MeV 235 MeV 305 MeV 380 MeV 455 MeV DRIFT

Outline 1. STAGES OF BUILDING DESIGN - LAYOUTS - BASELINE PARAMETERS 2. ARC OPTICS ARCHITECTURE 3. TEST FACILITY FOR SC MAGNET TESTS

Controlled quench tests of SC magnets WE ARE INVESTIGATING THE POSSIBILITY OF USING THE TEST FACILITY FOR SC MAGNET TESTS Requirements in terms of:  Beam energy, intensity and pulse length (energy deposition)  Space for the magnets installation (possible tests of cable samples and full cryo magnets)  Cryo requirements  Vacuum requirements  Powering needs

Study beam induced quenches (quench thresholds, quenchino thresholds) at different time scales for:  SC cables and cable stacks in an adjustable external magnetic field  Short sample magnets  Full length LHC type SC magnets D. Wollmann Quench limits of LHC dipole as expected from QP3 simulations for different pulse durations Courtesy A. Verweij Controlled quench tests of SC magnets

Beam parameters to generate a given amount of energy deposition CALCULATIONS AND FLUKA SIMULATIONS Beam parameters Z, cm R,cm 1 GeV 150 MeV Energy deposition, GeV/cm 3 /e - Beam Results are given for half of bulky target because of symmetry Binning: 1 mm 3 bins V. Chetvertkova, D. Wollmann Cylinder of copper Radius = 50cm Length = 100cm Copper target (no magnetic field)

Beam parameters to generate a given amount of energy deposition CALCULATIONS AND FLUKA SIMULATIONS Beam parameters Beam Results are given for half of bulky target because of symmetry Binning: 1 mm 3 bins V. Chetvertkova, D. Wollmann Cylinder of copper Radius = 50cm Length = 100cm Copper target (no magnetic field) Peak at z = 0.6 cm, r=0 Peak value = GeV/cm^3 Energy deposition, GeV/cm 3 /e - Peak at z = 2.1 cm, r=0 Peak value = GeV/cm^3 150 MeV 1 GeV Z, cm

Energy Deposition, GeV/cm 3 /e - Depth of max dE/dx Max energy deposition Depth of max dE/dx Beam parameters to generate a given amount of energy deposition

# electrons needed to quench the magnet Quench threshold Maximum value for the energy deposition 1 GeV = x mJ MB quench limit 450 GeV is 140mJ/cm 3 in 10ms: ~2.2 x 10 9 e 1GeV necessary MB quench limit 7 TeV is 16 mJ/cm 3 in 10ms: ~2.6 x 10 8 e 1GeV necessary Number of particles Beam parameters to generate a given amount of energy deposition MB quench 3.5 TeV Energy Deposition, GeV/cm 3 /e -

Summary  The concept of the ERLTF is designed to allow for a staged construction with verifiable and useful stages for an ultimate beam energy in the order of 1 GeV.  Design complementary to & synergetic with other proposals  A Design Study of the ERL-TF has started (a sketch of the optics configuration is provided and other options are under investigation) in collaboration with other institutes (as JLAB)  First analysis of having controlled quench tests of next generation superconducting magnets has been carried out. Beam parameters seem to match the requirements….further investigation is required!  Completion of Conceptual design study of an ERL-TF at CERN by the end of 2014 Thank you for your attention