Using Groundwater and Surface Water Models for the Marcus Hook Refinery CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Presented by Julie Kim April 29, 1999.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall Analysis (1)
Advertisements

1 Water discharge rate is monitored continually. 2 Sampling of stream and drainage water is made automatically or by grab sampling weekly while groundwater.
WEB-BASED LOAD DURATION CURVE Indrajeet Chaubey Purdue University Presented at the EPA Region 5 TMDL Practitioners.
Droughts in Ohio: Shall We be Worried? Tiao J. Chang Department of Civil Engineering Russ College of Engineering, Ohio University Athens, Ohio Prepared.
Basic Spreadsheet Functions Objective Functions are predefined formulas that perform calculations by using specific values, called arguments, in.
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Blue Lakes Stream Gauge Improvement and Lake Level Stabilization Project: Summary of Dye Tracer Testing City of Twin Falls September 12, 2011.
LDEQ’s RECAP Soil Protective of Groundwater - Soil GW Soil Saturation - Soil sat.
Hydrologic Statistics
HOOD RIVER TRIBUTARIES DRAFT AREA WEIGHTED SUITABILITY Presented by: Thomas Gast, Normandeau Associates Presented to: Hood River Water Planning Group Instream.
Towards a Stream Classification System for the Canadian Prairie Provinces CWRA-CGU National Conference, Banff, Alberta June 5-8, 2012 Greg MacCulloch and.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
RunoffRunoff Creating a spatially explicit runoff grid.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney River Basin Modeling.
Surface Water Hydrology Summarized in one equation V = velocity, fps or m/s A = channel cross-sectional area, sf or m 2.
Start Audio Lecture! FOR462: Watershed Science & Management 1 Streamflow Analysis Module 8.7.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Flood (and drought) prediction ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Mid-Range Streamflow Forecasts for River Management in the Puget Sound Region Richard Palmer Matthew Wiley Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Biological and Environmental Engineering Soil & Water Research Group Spatial Variability of Groundwater Soluble Phosphorous on an Alluvial Valley-Fill.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744
Long-Term Salinity Prediction with Uncertainty Analysis: Application for Colorado River Above Glenwood Springs, CO James Prairie Water Resources Division,
Flood Frequency Analysis
SWAT – Land Phase of the Hydrologic Cycle Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw.
Hydrologic Statistics
Great Basin Verification Task 2008 Increased Variability Review of 2008 April through July Period Forecast for 4 Selected Basins Determine what verification.
An Analysis of the Pollutant Loads and Hydrological Condition for Water Quality Improvement for the Weihe River For implementing water resources management.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
Flow Estimation in the Wood River Sub-Basin. Study Motivation To estimate an historical record at the mouth of the Wood River. –Enables comparison of.
WFM 5201: Data Management and Statistical Analysis © Dr. Akm Saiful IslamDr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 5201: Data Management and Statistical Analysis Akm Saiful.
CE 3354 ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY Lecture 6: Probability Estimation Modeling.
The flow or movement of water
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS.
Center for Science in the Earth System Annual Meeting June 8, 2005 Briefing: Hydrology and water resources.
Assessing the impacts of climate change on Atbara flows using bias-corrected GCM scenarios SIGMED and MEDFRIEND International Scientific Workshop Relations.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Stream flow estimation. Why try to estimate it? Gauges don’t exist on every stream Important for water quality modeling Permitting discharge sites Biological.
Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.
MPCA Groundwater Roles
Probability. Hydrologic data series 1.Complete series Use all of the data. DateDepth (cm) 4/28/ /20/ /30/ /11/ /5/ /22/050.3.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection June, 2005 HYDROPORT RETRIEVAL APPLICATION FOR ASSESSMENTS.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection March, 2005 PROTOTYPE FOR SPRING SYSTEM ASSESSMENTS.
Update on A National Water Census * Part of the Initiative U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Projections of Increasing Flood Frequency and Intensity Across the Western United States Objective, Data, and Methods: The goal of this study is to quantify.
Stochastic Processes and Transition Probabilities D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M6L5 Stochastic Optimization.
CE 3354 ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY Lecture 6: Probability Estimation Modeling.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Overview and Evaluation of the Current Hydrologic Data Network Scott Morlock USGS Indiana Water.
Hydrological Forecasting. Introduction: How to use knowledge to predict from existing data, what will happen in future?. This is a fundamental problem.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Reservoir Operating Criteria Proposed Modifications Lovell, Wyoming July 29, 2008 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Smith Mountain Lake Level Predictive Model Accuracy Improvement Water Management Committee May 14,
AQUASTAT FAO’s global information system on water and agriculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
Storm Water Management Plan Lawrence County, PA Katelyn Zollos CE 549.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology October 09, 2015.
Snowfall Runoff Forecasting in San Juan County, UT
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Flood Frequency Analysis
Hydrologic Conditions: Surface and Ground Water Resources September 2012 The DNR summarizes the climatic, surface and groundwater resources on a monthly.
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Hydrologic Conditions: Surface and Ground Water Resources July 2012
Droughts in Ohio: Shall We be Worried?
Flood Frequency Analysis
SWAT – Land Phase of the Hydrologic Cycle
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
Study Update Water Quality Modeling
State of Calibration for California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim) CWEMF 2019 Annual Meeting Folsom, CA Presenter:
Presentation transcript:

Using Groundwater and Surface Water Models for the Marcus Hook Refinery CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Presented by Julie Kim April 29, 1999

Study Area Marcus Hook Refinery, Pennsylvania Lube Area, southwestern part of the facility Marcus Hook Creek (MHC)

Objectives To incorporate results from GW model into SW model To calculate GW target level (C GW ) so concentrations in SW are not above applicable SWQS (C STD ) in MHC To compare SW model predictions for stream flow with actual stream gauging results from USGS

Data Sources Act 2 requirements for diffuse GW modeling and mixing calculations (PADEP) C STD : Water quality criteria for eight COCs (PADEP) Historical daily streamflows for PA (USGS)USGS GW, SW, and WW flows from A. Romanek’s GW and SW modelsGW, SW, and WW flows from A. Romanek’s GW and SW models Max concentrations of COCs from spatial analysisMax concentrations of COCs from spatial analysis

Methodology Simple mass balance according to Act 2 C GW = C STD * Q SW / 2q where C GW = target level GW concentration C STD = SWQ criteria Q SW = Q harmonic for carcinogens or 7 Q 10 for non carcinogens 2q = GW flow from both sides of MHC

Methodology No water data for MHC –Use 66-years of historical daily flow values for Chester Creek (CC) located in the same basin (Lower Delaware) –Estimate streamflows for MHC by using simple drainage area ratio Q MHC = Q CC * A MHC / A CC Calculate Q harmonic for carcinogens Harmonic mean flow = Total number of samples Sum of the reciprocal of flow

Methodology Use frequency analysis to calculate 7 Q 10 for non carcinogens –Calculate mean of flows of 7 consecutive days for all data –Calculate minimum flow during a 1-year period for all flows –Sort minimum flows in descending order and rank –Use Gringorten’s formula to calculate exceedance probability (b=0.44) –Calculate return period – 7 Q 10 corresponds to the minimum flow with a 10- year return period

Results

Results Benzene measured in the Lube Area was above the target GW concentration –Additional analyses should be conducted Measured peak concentrations of other COCs were below C GW –Likely that no further action is warranted Total Q harmonic = 8.76 cfs Total 7 Q 10 = 7.51 cfs –USGS-based flow is close to SW model’s regional flow of 7.7 cfs

Future Work Conduct additional analyses for COCs whose concentrations were above C GW –Fate and transport modeling using GW concentrations other than maximum concentrations –More sophisticated GW-SW interaction models