Understanding Science 14. Skepticism © Colin Frayn, 2015 www.frayn.net.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Advertisements

The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
© Michael Lacewing Scepticism Michael Lacewing
UVU Physical Science 1000 UVU West NG106 Tu/Th 6-7:15.
Theory of knowledge Lesson 2
Chapter 13 – The Scientific Revolution
Meditations on First Philosophy
1 From metaphysics to logical positivism The metaphysician tells us that empirical truth-conditions [for metaphysical terms] cannot be specified; if he.
Understanding Science 6. Conspiracy Theories © Colin Frayn,
HOW CAN WE TELL SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE? Identify The Characteristics Of Science Make a list for yourself.
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 1 The problem of knowledge.
How Claims of Knowledge Are Justified Foundationalism: knowledge claims are based on indubitable foundations –I can doubt whether there is a world, whether.
SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION (def) page 545 Scientists challenged ALL accepted knowledge believed something ONLY if it could be tested and proven by experiments.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Results from Meditation 2
Modern Philosophers Rationalists –Descartes –Spinoza –Leibniz Empiricists –Locke –Berkeley –Hume Epistemology - the theory of knowledge (what and how we.
Knowledge, Skepticism, and Descartes. Knowing In normal life, we distinguish between knowing and just believing. “I think the keys are in my pocket.”
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
“The Problem of Knowledge” Chapter 1 – Theory of Knowledge.
Bellringer: The astronomer Carl Sagan said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” What did he mean by this? Do you agree?
Understanding Science 2. Bayes’ Theorem © Colin Frayn,
The answer really annoys me for 3 reasons: 1.I think the statement is arrogant. It doesn’t take into account any definitions of God but solely focuses.
 Do Now: If you had been in Galileo’s shoes, would you have recanted (taken back) what you knew to be true? Why or why not?
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
Psychology: A journey through perspectives. What is psychology?
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
Big Bang Evidence Redshift of galaxies Background radiation Primordial elements Spread of galaxies Moving away from each other as if from an explosion.
Understanding Science 1. Proof © Colin Frayn,
Can Science Reduce the Probability that God Exists? SCIENCE AND GOD.
Sources of Knowledge Dr. Syed Rifaat Hussain Professor and Chairman, DSS Department, QAU, Islamabad.
Science and Creationism 1. Overview © Colin Frayn,
The Problem of Knowledge 1 Pages 3-9. Table of Contents Quotes p. 3 Quotes Introduction p. 4 Introduction Common sense p. 4-7 Common sense Certainty p.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Can you trust your senses?. WHAT DO YOU KNOW? AN INTRODUCTION TO SCEPTICISM.
RESEARCH METHODS The Nature of Science. WHAT IS SCIENCE? You can’t study psychology without being aware of what science is (Dyer 2006) Learning Objectives.
© Colin Frayn, The Straw Man Setting up a weaker version of a theory, claiming (falsely) that this is the true theory, and then disproving.
Eliminative materialism
The Scientific Revolution. Early Scientists First Sciences that developed were: First Sciences that developed were: - mathematics - mathematics - astronomy.
Understanding Science
Understanding Science 11. Special Pleading © Colin Frayn,
The Scientific Revolution (circa 1600 – 1800). The Scientific revolution shook the foundations of intellectual and theological traditions that formed.
Understanding Science 3. The Scientific Method © Colin Frayn,
© Colin Frayn, What are we discussing? ‘Science’ is the process of discovering and testing knowledge through rigorous, evidence-based.
Certainty and ErrorCertainty and Error One thing Russell seems right about is that we don’t need certainty in order to know something. In fact, even Descartes.
Stars, starlight AND The Big Bang. OUTCOME QUESTION(S): S1-4-07: What is the evidence for the Big Bang Theory? Vocabulary & People Electromagnetic spectrumDoppler.
Understanding Science 4. Pseudoscience © Colin Frayn,
Understanding Science 5. The Burden of Proof © Colin Frayn,
Epistemology Trying to answer the question … How can I know for sure?
Academic Vocabulary Geocentric Heliocentric
Scientific Revolution Essential Question: What developments during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance contributed to the Scientific Revolution of the.
Science as a Way of Knowing. What is Science? The impact of science on the modern world is so pervasive that it is nearly impossible to fully appreciate.
Scientific Method. Science: Further Info Science cannot provide certain (100%) proof – just the ‘best’ working theories based on the evidence that we.
The Scientific Revolution
Scientific Revolution Bellwork:
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
World History Chapter 16 Exploration and Expansion
Scientific Revolution
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 Berkeley
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy b. March in La Haye France wrote Meditations in 1641 d. February
Stars, starlight AND The Big Bang.
Chapter 4 Summary.
The Scientific Revolution
Chapter 21 the Enlightenment and Revolutions
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Science 14. Skepticism © Colin Frayn,

Introduction “Scientific Skepticism is the application of best practices to knowledge acquisition” Don’t base your beliefs on emotions, but on facts 1.Truth is important 2.Human perception is often unreliable 3.Use all of our knowledge 4.Use the Scientific method for investigating empirical claims © Colin Frayn,

Historical Skepticism Ancient Greece, ~300BCE –There is no absolute knowledge –All proofs are founded on other proofs so cannot be relied on René Descartes ( ) –“I think therefore I am”! –The one thing that cannot be doubted is my own existence. The Matrix –Is our entire perception constructed and unreal? –How can we tell that we are not in a Matrix? We can’t! © Colin Frayn,

Scientific Skepticism Extending the Skeptic tradition 1.Our senses genuinely tell us something useful about the real world –We must assume this to make progress. –We can then learn how our senses deceive us. –The fact that we are making progress suggests that it’s a sensible assumption. 2.The laws of science are constant in time and space –Astronomy / cosmology – looking at things far away and a long time ago. –Can check that the laws of physics appear constant. E.g. spectra, supernova, Cosmic Microwave Background etc. –So far we have no reason to believe that this isn’t true. © Colin Frayn,

Skepticism, Gullibility and Cynicism Gullibility – Being easy manipulated, overly trusting and not employing sensible filters to knowledge you hear. Credulousness – Willing to believe claims with insufficient evidence Cynicism – Being pessimistic about human nature, not trusting, expecting the worst. Closed-mindedness – Being unwilling to entertain new ideas. Dogmatic – Stubborn, clinging to specific ideas often in the face of evidence. © Colin Frayn, Gullibility Cynicism Skepticism

Why Skepticism? Mental Twister –Incompatible beliefs –In conflict with reality –Causes anxiety and stress –Leads to cognitive dissonance You can’t avoid reality –It’s best to choose beliefs that are in agreement with the real world –This minimises stress and anxiety –Make optimum use of all opportunities –Choose beliefs that are supportive and accurate! © Colin Frayn,

The Main Lesson Nothing in Science is permanent –We choose the best explanation for now –That explanation may change later – that’s ok! Einstein’s Cosmological Constant –Like a pressure holding the Universe apart –Rejected when the Universe was shown to be expanding –Brought back in the late 1990s when measurements showed that the expansion was accelerating Magic shows –Magicians know exactly how to trick us –They’re not the only ones –Our brains take short cuts which can be exploited Sometimes by accident –Understanding those weaknesses makes better at avoiding these exploits Lack of skeptical thinking causes much pain and suffering © Colin Frayn,

Educating Newton Isaac Newton ( ) Possibly the greatest scientist ever What would he make of modern science? –Could you explain it to him? –How did Science come about? Free book available for download © Colin Frayn,

Review 1.Proof 2.Bayes’ Theorem 3.The Scientific Method 4.Pseudoscience 5.The Burden of Proof 6.Conspiracy Theories 7.Intuition 8.Logical Fallacies 9.Science and Scientists 10.The Supernatural 11.Special Pleading 12.The Galileo Gambit 13.Significance 14.Skepticism © Colin Frayn,

Summary Please spread the word about these lectures Please download and read my book Constructive feedback gratefully received Suggested continued learning: –Podcast : The Skeptics Guide to the Universe –Book : Demon Haunted World (Carl Sagan) Thank you very much for listening! © Colin Frayn,