SEPT 20, 2006 T. Brown, M. Cole, P. Fogarty, P. Goranson, K. Freudenberg, D. Williamson NCSX STAGE 2 COIL TO COIL ASSY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assembly Manual Mike Fortney 04/09/2004 CricketSat Receiver.
Advertisements

C2 to C5 fit up review-R41 Review of MC Type C to C assembly clearances with C2 to C5 shell surface interface details 12/19/06 Rev 4.
NCSX Mod Coil C1 features requiring rework at PPPL.
© the Design and Technology Association Health and Safety Training Standards in Design and Technology S8HS PLANER/THICKNESSER MACHINE Specialist Extension.
Optical Manufacturing Solutions 1 Probe Assembly.
Mechanical Engineering Design Review BL ARPES Endstation Derek Yegian, Jonathan Denlinger, Keith Franck 4/18/2008.
Lucas Air Mass Meter Stripdown sequence and technical information.
Machining Two introductory projects 1.Support post for mirror mount 2.Vertical micro-rail mount.
Deviations from fiducial locations are unacceptable in areas despite high accuracy at alignment points.
1 MC Assembly via Test Cell Crane FPA Stage 3 Peer Review August 12, 2005 T. Brown.
J. H. ChrzanowskiNSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review1 NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review Fabrication and Assembly April 10, 2003 By: James H. Chrzanowski.
Couplings Nizwa College of Technology.
Integration of Cavities and Coupling Coil Modules Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting March 28 – April 1, 2004.
Assembly Manual Mike Fortney 04/02/2006 CricketSat Receiver.
Jigs and Fixtures.
Pat Willoughby MIT/ABB Monday, September 11, 2000 X Z Y First Attempt - 30 to 60 minutes Following Attempts - 20 minutes Possibility for Wrist Damage Possibility.
LHQ Coil Fabrication Experience and Plan Miao Yu 04/08/2013.
MC Type-B fit up review1 Review of MC Type B assembly clearances reviewing A-to-B and B-to-C interfaces 3/1/07 Summary: Wing interfaces look okay between.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined (including.
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Joint Design Mike Viola PPPL July 1 st, 2003.
Types of Threaded Fasteners.  Used to hold parts together  Clearance holes in parts  Nut on other end  Can also be used with a threaded hole.
Weld Study Continued Filet weld on both sides Deflection (top flange removed) Stress Intensity (top flange removed)
MARS 2 Design Review-Optomechanical Review 07 Nov 2002 GLW1 MARS 2 Mechanical Design Review.
1 Dimensional Control for the National Compact Stellarator Experiment R. Ellis, A. Brooks, T. Brown, W. Reiersen, S. Raftopoulos, B. Stratton Presented.
Ultra-Compact Electrical Machines for Wind Energy DE-FOA : Demo Machine C. L. Goodzeit and M. J. Ball May 1, 2014 Part 1: Design and Construction.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) – Stage 3 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined.
FNAL QXF Curing Mold Miao Yu, FNAL 05/07/2013. FNAL Short Curing Press 2 2 meter long Capacity (pump psi) Max. force/cylinder kN (ton) Spacing cm(inch)
1 MCHP-1 clamp and MC port opening metrology review ProE model: stb-mchp-1_vvsa1_pppl_best_fit.asm stb-fpa_mech_left_side.asm, Rep: mchp-1_clamp_metrol_pts.
1 WBS 1 Design Analysis Status NCSX Analysis Meeting Dec 3, 2003.
Modular Coil Assembly Bolted Joint PDR 2/22/07. Objectives The review objectives include... Define the location of additional inboard bolts Finalize the.
Fred Nobrega, Nikolai Andreev 21 September, 2015.
Twisted Racetrack Manufacturing & Metrology. Winding/metrology prototype chronology Various keystoning tests – Completed. –Established keystone effect.
Barrel Calorimeter Support Mechanism Two designs are proposed for review –Design1. Individual module (Segment) of the Barrel Calorimeter is placed inside.
ZDC Remote Handling Tool Structure and Force Analysis P. Debbins University of Iowa December 10, 2009.
Shear Problem Defined There are no bolts on the inboard side of the coil structure to account for shear forces. Bottom Line: friction alone will not prevent.
NCSX A. Brooks, P. Fogarty, G. Lovett, D. Williamson June 3, 2005 Modular Coil Type-C Final Design Review – Part II.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Thermal Insulation Final Design Review July 31, 2006 WBS12 NCSX.
Metrology Milestones Metrology Task Force –Vacuum vessel manufacture - P. Goranson –Mod. Coil Form manufacture - D. Williamson –Mod. Coil winding- S. Raftopoulos.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 17, 2007 T. Brown.
Summary of first round of testing of shim concept for modular coil assembly
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Procurement 1 February 3, 2006 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Coil Procurement.
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL HEATING/COOLING PL Goranson Preliminary Results February 17, 2006 MDL Testing of Coolant Tracing NCSX.
1 Field Period Assembly Office of Science Project Review Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ November 2, 2005 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
Shear Test Assembly update
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Field Period Assembly Mike Viola NCSX Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX Project Review April 8-10, 2008.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Machine Assembly E. D. Perry.
1 Assembly Tooling PU Workshop on NCSX Cost & Schedule Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Mar 1-4, 2007 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
09/07/07Shutdown’07 Week 5 F.G. Garcia1 MTA beam line installation Weekly Report September 07, 2007 Period covered: August 31 st to September 7 th (Week.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Final Design Review November 17, 2005 Man Access Port /Lateral Supports NCSX.
Field Period Assembly Wayne Reiersen SC Project Review PPPL May 2006.
1 FPA Stage 2 Peer Review May 12, 2006 T. Brown. 2 FPA Stage 2 Status Summary of Stage 2 activities Review current design status Review schedule details.
NCSX Friction Coating Peer Review March 16, 2007 NCSX.
1 Modular Coil Assembly Fixture (MCAF) Information Meeting February 23, 2005.
1 FPA Stage 2 MC Flange Assembly Issues and Design Proposals June 20, 2006 T. Brown.
1 MC B3 Inspection MTM data: dated 12/22/06 1/6/07 Pro/E model: b3_mtm_data_check.asm T. Brown / D. Williamson.
1 MC B1 Inspection MTM data: FIDUCIALS.IGS DATA.IGS 9/26/06 Pro/E model: b1_mtm_data_check.asm.
MAP Assembly Investigation A project summary for discussion during 4/11/2014 meeting.
ENM208 INTRODUCTION to MACHINING ANADOLU UNİVERSITY Industrial Engineering Department.
Rapid Change Technology The following is a presentation to aid Technicians in the replacement of the Rapid Change Technology Block.
LHQ Coil Design and Features Miao Yu Fermilab May 09, 2012.
QXF magnet integration Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013.
LHQ Coil Fabrication Experience and Plan Miao Yu 04/08/2013.
Radiation Shutter Re-Purposing Roy Preece STFC RAL 18 th December 2014.
Clutch Fundamentals.
SHMS Downstream Beamline Large SHMS/HMS Angles (Config-1)
Additional Upstream Coil Shielding
Panel Riveting Dept. Adjustable Part Holding Fixture
Presentation transcript:

SEPT 20, 2006 T. Brown, M. Cole, P. Fogarty, P. Goranson, K. Freudenberg, D. Williamson NCSX STAGE 2 COIL TO COIL ASSY

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy2 AGENDA 3 POINT POSITIONING SUPPORT – Mike Cole BOLT REAMING – Paul Goranson SHEAR PLATE – Kevin Freudenberg WING SUPPORTS – Dave Williamson

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy3 3 Point Positioning Support Requirements Position Winding Center within a TP of.020 inch. Maintain electrical isolation between coils.

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy4 Type-A Type-B on A Stand repositioned to receive Type-C Type-C added along with supports MCHP Assembly Sequence where flanges and spherical seats must come together…accurately.

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy5 3 Point Positioning Support

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy6 Shim geometry is formed from MC developed surfaces rather from individual curves. Separate curves would be better. The flange interface involves the need to accurately mate spherical seats and inclined flange surfaces that are separated by shim material. Can shims be accurately machined and located? Can glass epoxy be used to take up misalignment? Mold release on flange surface

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy7 Thin layer of glass epoxy insulation. How thin, 15 – 30 mil ? Individually machined SS wedges. Can uncured glass epoxy (placed or pumped in) be used to take out the shim alignment imperfections? Will it meet the flange load capacity? Where tapped holes do not exist on flanges can spring pins be used to hold metal shim in place? Will we be cutting and machining individual SS shim pieces?

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy8 Sphere Flat “V” Proposed new alignment method. 1.5” Ø Switch from aligning three spheres to aligning a sphere, flat and “V”.

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy9 An alignment hole is need in the flat and “V” spherical seats to locate an alignment sphere, used for locating the mating sphere.

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy10 PROBLEM: How do you align the spherical seats when the shim surfaces are making contact at the same time?

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy11 Initial Alignment Position Fixed Adjustable Position for Final Shim Compression Uses spring loaded seats! Keyed interface prevents rotation. Option 1 We’ve added a pop up system to aid alignment.

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy12 Three or four captured precision compression springs provides an additional 3/8” extension above flange shims to aid alignment. Alternate approach for establishing a spring loaded interface Keyed interface prevents rotation. Option 2

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy13 How does the A-to-A interface set-up effect the flange assembly? Left side Right side The left side is rotated over the VV and placed ¾” from its final position and supported from the roller system below. The right side is rotated to within ¾” of its final position and held by the crane. The left side is then moved to its final position via rollers and the right side mates with the spherical seats via the crane system.

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy14 With no shims in place the MC position is verified with metrology measurements. Left side Right side

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy15 13”gap Left side fixed at -0.75” to alignment plane Right side backed to Step 32 Once metrology is verified the right side is backed off 13” via crane and secured from below. The flange shim system is installed and then the device is reassembled and metrology rechecked. This sounds okay, will it work? Backing off 13” involves an inclined moment with little rotation.

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy16 3 Point Positioning Support Issues Selection of 3 point support mechanism Ball and Socket only vs Flat, “V”, & Socket Variations include Spring loaded vs static. Determining Shim thickness & size One piece vs more than one piece

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy17 Extra slides follow

20 September 2006Stage 2 Coil to Coil Assy18 Early coil design with spherical seat machined into flange of winding form