Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Dielectrons from HADES to CBM Bratislava (SAS, PI), Catania (INFN - LNS), Cracow (Univ.), Darmstadt,(GSI), Dresden (FZR), Dubna (JINR), Frankfurt (Univ.),Giessen.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Xiaoyan LinQuark Matter 2006, Shanghai, Nov , Study B and D Contributions to Non- photonic Electrons via Azimuthal Correlations between Non-
Simulation activities in India: students working on various topics.. Partha(VECC), Hemen (GU) : Trigger, SIS100, physics simulation Bipasha (CU): dynamic.
RICH PylosR. Gernhäuser (TU-München) The HADES RICH High Acceptance Di-Electron Spectrometer The HADES Spectrometer Special requirements RICH setup.
‘2+1’ correlation – Tagging of Back to Back Jets GREESHMA K M IIT Bombay ALICE-India Meet 27 th & 28 th April
C B M Di-electron background studies and first results using compact RICH CBM Collaboration Meeting, 27 September 2007, Dresden Di-electron background.
Dielectron production in C+C collisions at 2AGeV with HADES Jochen Markert For the HADES Collaboration.
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO CNS workshop, Tokyo Univ. Identified Charged Single Particle Spectra at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX.
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
HADES coll. meeting, Oct. 31, 2007 Charged pion production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV results of data analysis from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 Jehad Mousa.
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for HADES at SIS100: MAMI and CERN test results Lead-glass modules Tests -  beam at MAMI energy resolution -  - /e - beam.
Some investigations on Shower in Aug11 DST Szymon Harabasz Version: 15 November 2015.
Victor Ryabov (PNPI) for the PHENIX Collaboration QM2005 Budapest Aug,06, First measurement of the  - meson production with PHENIX experiment at.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
Experimental data by HADES PID method As an example let`s take deuterons and protons with p = 750 MeV/c. Their PDFs are gaussians with mean at β = p/(
UC Davis June st Rosi Reed Low Energy Test Run Results Rosi Reed University of California at Davis.
1 Pion production in np collisions at 1.25AGeV A.Kurilkin, P.Kurilkin, V.Ladygin, A.Ierusalimov, T.Vasiliev, LHEP-JINR, Dubna, Russia For the HADES collaboration.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
Differential cross section in deuteron-proton elastic scattering at 1.25 GeV/u P.Kurilkin, A.Kurilkin, V.Ladygin, T.Vasiliev LHEP-JINR For the HADES collaboration.
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Compact RICH detector Claudia Höhne, GSI Darmstadt.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
28/8/2006NN2006, Rio de Janeiro August 28 - September 1, Dielectron production in C+C collisions with HADES Pavel Tlusty, NPI Rez for the Hades.
Estimate of META efficiency in NOV02 Aim: check of META efficiency implemented in digitizers in order to get proper efficiency correction of yields Needed:
A Highly Selective Dilepton Trigger System Based on Ring Recognition Alberica Toia II Physikalisches Institut Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Germany.
XLVII Int. Winter Meeting, Bormio, Jan , 2009 CHARGED PION PRODUCTION IN C+C AND Ar+KCl COLLISIONS MEASURED WITH HADES Pavel Tlustý, NPI Řež for.
Elliptic flow of D mesons Francesco Prino for the D2H physics analysis group PWG3, April 12 th 2010.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
07/05/20041 Pentaquark search at HERA-B A. Sbrizzi - NIKHEF Motivation Pentaquark:  + (1540)  pK 0 Conclusion.
Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
ITTF “Re-View” Session, August 11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ITTF Evaluation for Spectra.
QM2002 (July / / Nantes / France)Susumu SATO (JSPS) for the PHENIX collaboration page 1 Susumu SATO Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,
J.Pietraszko, HADES Coll. Meeting, GSI Nov ,  – electron multiplicity measured in HADES W. Koenig, Jerzy Pietraszko, T. Galatyuk, V. Pechenov,
HADRON 2009, FloridaAnar Rustamov, GSI Darmstadt, Germany 1 Inclusive meson production at 3.5 GeV pp collisions with the HADES spectrometer Anar Rustamov.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
Anisotropic flow of charged and strange particles in PbAu collisions at 158 AGeV measured in CERES experiment J. Milošević 1),2) 1)University of Belgrade.
Di-electron elliptic flow in
April12 DST calibration status
A Kalman Filter for HADES
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
Simulation results for the upgraded RICH detector in the HADES experiment. Semen Lebedev1,3, Jürgen Friese2, Claudia Höhne1, Tobias Kunz2, Jochen Markert4.
Status of the "direct" photon reconstruction
Measurement of p0 – induced single leptons in the HADES RICH
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Dilepton production with HADES
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
“Hard” & “Soft” Interactions in Proton + Proton 200GeV
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý, NPI Řež HADES Coll. Meeting XVI Dresden, April 5, 2006 summary of charged pi meson production in C+C

Experimental and analysis details November 2002 C+C 2AGeV  200*10 6 events: 56% LVL1 trigger + 44% LVL2 trigger only 2 sectors with 4 chambers + RK tracking used in the analysis 20 M events (gen4 dst’s) used for analysis (days , 1st level trigger events) UrQMD simulations - 47 M events (gen4) used for parameter production 20 M events (gen4) used for analysis August 2004 C+C 2AGeV  650*10 6 events: 50% LVL1 trigger + 50% LVL2 trigger 20 M events (gen1 dst’s) used for analysis (days , 1st level trigger events) UrQMD simulations - 47 M events (gen1) used for parameter production 20 M events (gen1) used for analysis

Principle: for each track a probability that it is of a particle type h is calculated, for all possible particle types Bayes theorem implemented cut on the resulted probability set to decide on PID Input: for each track (track candidate) with a given momentum we have a set of independent measured variables in HADES: velocity, energy loss, RICH response, MDC hit, SHOWER response Output: - a probability, that a given track corresponds to the particle type h - efficiency and purity for a selected cut Particle Identification Method

Runge-Kutta tracks matched to META inner mdc segment  2 > -1, RK  2 < 1000, SplineAccepted=1 tracks with TOFINO paddle multiplicity =1 for NOV02 only sectors No. 0 and 3 Track selection

Results of hadron ID - NOV02

Efficiency and purity - NOV02

Spectrometer acceptance acceptance calculated from SIM data as ratio N rectracks /N primary for p,  +,  - in theta vs momentum

Corrected particle yields

Corrected yields - NOV02 - sector No.0 Momentum distribution Theta distribution

Corrected yields - NOV02 - sector No.3 Momentum distribution Theta distribution

NOV02 gen4 - negative tracks vs theta differences between sectors SEC 0 SEC 3

Corrected yields - NOV02 - selected region Momentum distribution Theta distribution

NOV02 particle distributions in c.m. mom_cm > 200 MeV/c

NOV02 - pi distributions in theta_cm

NOV02 - pi distributions in mom_cm - UrQMD

NOV02 - pi distributions in mom_cm - EXP

no d in UrQMD0.24 ± 0.02d 1.05 ± 0.11 * ± 0.24p 0.96 ± ± 0.08 –– 0.96 ± ± 0,07 ++ ratio N exp / N sim simulationexperiment (± bias error) NOV02 particle yields per event (acceptance corrected)  p+d) exp /p sim

NOV02 particle yields per event UrQMD yields to   event (1st level trigger) 0.82  event (no bias) N  = 0.83 ± 0.08   TAPS N  = 0.77 ± 0.07   KAOS

Corrected yields - AUG04 - sec. no.1 Momentum distribution Theta distribution

AUG04 gen1 - negative tracks vs theta differences between sectors, gaps in SHOWER+TOFINO region SEC 0 SEC 3

Corrected yields - AUG04 - sec. no.1 Comparison of 2 analyses

no d in UrQMD0.42 ± 0.04d 0.90 ± 0.11 * ± 0.25p 0.89 ± ± 0.03 –– 0.88 ± ± 0.03 ++ ratio N exp / N sim simulationexperiment (± bias error) AUG04 particle yields per event (acceptance corrected)  p+d) exp /p sim

AUG04 particle yields per event UrQMD yields to   event (1st level trigger) 0.36  event (no bias)

Summary comparison of low vs high resolution data - theta distributions plotting of EXP/SIM ratio of yields versus momentum comparison of yields

NOV02 - KICK vs RK Theta distribution sec no.0 Theta distribution sec. no.3

AUG04 - KICK vs RK Theta distribution sec no.1

AUG04 - EXP/SIM ratio of yields vs momentum low efficiency for mips?

NOV02 particle yields per event UrQMD yields to   event (1st level trigger) 0.82  event (no bias) N  = 0.83 ± 0.08   TAPS N  = 0.77 ± 0.07   KAOS

AUG04 particle yields per event UrQMD yields to   event (1st level trigger) 0.36  event (no bias) most probably >10% yields lost due to low efficiency

NOV02 - META and track multiplicity 8% of  „empty events“ in EXP Mean multiplicity  in EXP greater than in SIM - different centrality or fake tracks in EXP ?

AUG04 - META and track multiplicity 10% of  „empty events“ in EXP Mean multiplicity  in EXP same as in SIM - same centrality ?

Summary and outlook hadron PID analysis (beta vs momentum) performed using kick and runge-kutta tracks for Nov02 and Aug04 experiment problem with track reconstruction efficiency for particles with low energy loss observed  meson and baryon yields extracted to be done: further efficiency corrections needed

NOV02 gen3 and gen4 QA tracks yields per sector, theta and phi distributions of negative tracks (test of PID) momentum determination - protons, pi- ??

NOV02 gen3 - negative tracks vs phi large differences between sectors, for spline 15% difference between 2 sectors, kick even worse  yields copy distribution of negative tracks should be the same in electron distributions???? SIM EXP

NOV01 - negative tracks vs phi sec0 not used for analysis much better than Nov02 gen3 EXP SIM

NOV02 gen4 - negative tracks vs phi much better than Nov02 gen3 SYS 0 SYS 1

NOV02 gen3 - negative tracks vs theta Sec0 - Inefficiency in theta<30 and theta ~ 65 EXP SEC0 SIM EXP SEC3

NOV01 - negative tracks vs theta much better than Nov02! EXP SIM

NOV02 gen4 - negative tracks vs theta differences between sectors SEC 0 SEC 3

NOV02 gen4 protons: mom_track vs mom_beta (p track - p  )  vs p track  p  = M p *  *  SYS 1 SYS 0 KICK SPLINE RK